Over the last few days I easily turned 1 BTC into 8.3 BTC using a similar strategy, but most of my bets were at 6% chance.

Start out betting low, if you lose 10 or 20 in a row, increase the bet a bunch and keep going. If you're still losing, increase the bet more and then win.

It worked for me, getting up to 9 BTC before it stopped working. I was down to 8.3 BTC before the site pissed me off so I withdrew what I had left there and quit.

It's a dumb strategy, of course, but it works until it doesn't.

I don't think there's a limit on the amount you can split, until you start hitting dogecoin-like amounts, in the billions.

There is a limit on transaction size however - no transaction can be bigger than 100,000 bytes, and so that limits the number of outputs you can create. The client will complain if you try to create too many.

When I try to create 10k outputs:


I see this in the terminal:


and this in the debug.log:


And when I try to create 3k outputs, this in the debug.log:


So somewhere around 2900 outputs seems to be the limit, although it will depend on the number of inputs, and whether the addresses are compressed or not.

They will stake separately, but may be recombined when you stake, depending on your config.

He's referring to the developers being open to the idea of changing the consensus rules to change the initial distribution.

The initial distribution was (is?) unique.

That isn't true. At least one of your players had an issue, and took the time to screenshot it and report it here. Why would you say that none of your players had an error?

I suspect that either you aren't logging the errors correctly, or you are lying to me.

Do you think that I made that screenshot up? How would I know your internal pathnames? Ask your developers if that screenshot is real or not. Ask them if it could be faked.

I put it to you that the reason I am the only one who reported that issue is because the rest of them either don't care enough, and just hit reload, or they do care but this kind of rude treatment has trained them not to bother reporting issues. I know I won't be bothering again.


What the fuck is that supposed to mean? How could me reporting a bug on your site have anything to do with an unrelated asshole leaving nonsensical negative trust on my forum account?


I'm not sure. From here it looks like you didn't like me trying to help and decided to try to attack me.


Rather than showing that error message to your users, you should log it internally. Then you wouldn't be relying on your customers to help you debug your casino platform, but could see the error messages for yourself. You also wouldn't then feel the need to attack them when they show your error messages to you. For fucks sake.


I've had no luck with tickets. Most of the stuff I've written in tickets hasn't received any kind of a response until I post about it in the forums. I found that reporting issues on the forum gets more attention. But I see you don't like that either, so I give up.

I enjoyed most of my time at betcoin, but this attitude from the support staff is intolerable. I'm out.

---

Alternatively:


How I received it:

I was logged in to betcoin.ag, probably looking at the wallet page, then clicked 'dice' at the very top of the page. All this while having a negative feedback on my bitcointalk profile. Not sure if that's relevant.

Where I received it:

I was running Chromium in Linux. Is that what you mean by "where"?

From the text of the error message it looks to me like there's a bug in your semaphore code. But your developers will be able to figure that out.

Hey, could you get your somewhat biased ass into the IRC channel to continue talking about it?

Ta.

I noticed that yesterday, and posted it in one of the other many betcoin threads.

If only there was a single venue for support issues where you didn't just get expediently ignored.

Thanks. I found a solution using MicroXP and VirtualBox.

I did eventually get it working using something called "MicroXP" in VirtualBox.

None of the browser bits work, like the bottom bit of the screenshot below, but the games seem to play alright.



I'm not sure why there are so many different OSS #13 events. I guess some of them are labelled wrong, but that's probably not the VM's fault.

I've tried using WINE. It loads up fine, and even lets me view the full list of tournaments. But as soon as I log in, a small window pops up with the title "Poker Client", its content never gets drawn, and everything from that point on is frozen:






I would do that if I had a copy of Windows, but I don't.

What do you see if you right-click in the flash-client? I'm interested in the version string.

I see this - note how once I click on the 'tournament' tab everything freezes, and the last game it shows (1K CAGE) is incomplete - the blue background stops part way across:

As usual, you have misunderstood. He is saying that he USES deadmansswitch.net, not that he OWNS it.

Another little niggle: when I click 'withdraw', it takes me to the wallet, the same as when I click 'wallet':



Then I have to click 'withdraw' again. Would be useful if the first withdraw button took me to the withdraw form.

Yeah, I got that exactly backwards, sorry. Either way, he's adding to the sell pressure which will tend to push the price down.


Yeah, I don't know.

I've had one person accuse me of using "inside information", and that it was unfair that I sold some CLAMs before publishing my findings. I'd counter that the information I found was on the public blockchain, and so wasn't "inside information" at all.

OK, thanks.

It would be good to have a single place where we could post our support issues rather than having everything spread out like this. Unfortunately I don't know of any such place.

Did you just mention your ticket system and "efficiency and expediency" in the same sentence? You're a funny man!

Another weird error I just got when trying to go to the dice game:



Those kind of details should be logged somewhere and not shown to the user. The user doesn't care. They just want to play dice.

Even if the digger never did anything other than selling into existing buy orders, the price would still drop. Selling into buy orders removes buy orders from the market without removing sell orders, leaving an imbalance. The price will adjust downwards as new sellers find less attractive buy orders remaining.

I did sell some CLAMs immediately before making my first post and didn't tell anyone else about it. I think it was around 5000 CLAMs that I sold. The price had already fallen from ~0.012 to ~0.0075 before I sold anything as I remember it, so it wasn't 3 or 4 in your list that started the price collapse.

I didn't quit - my 1 BTC deposit is now 8.03 BTC.


The <img> tag is still being included in the pages, making the browser fetch the invalid page.


So according to this:



the theoretical rake was 5.56 and my profit was 3.51, but according to my events list I only received 3.51 rakeback. That's 100% of my profit, not 100% of my rake. And where's the extra 10% that I should be getting for my "Bronze III" VIP level?


I had no other play on that day, or since. I have been avoiding poker until this is resolved, to keep the situation simple. I only played one session on the day in question, and have played no sessions since. The issue is that there were no status points awarded at the end of that day, as shown here:

Here's a strange one:

My affiliate banner ad on Just-Dice.com finally got a signup:



Apparently I earned 1.9 from his poker play and 1.9 from his dice play, for a total of 1.9!

How does that work?

When replying to this question, please use this thread and not the channel of which I am unaware.

Thanks.

I replied: