Latest posts of: LoyceV

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 [1069] 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 ... 1373 »

21361

Other / Meta / Re: Begging for merit?

on: October 29, 2018, 11:47:58 AM

Quote from: morvillz7z on October 29, 2018, 11:26:00 AM He did get 2 merits for the exact same thread but written in Russian a few days ago: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055784.msg47186759#msg47186759 I compared the first few sentences, and it's an exact copy from Google Translate. But as far as I can find, that's allowed, as it's not mentioned in the unofficial forum rules: Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 05:27:51 PM 27. Using automated translation tools to post translated content in Local boards is not allowed.

21362

Other / Meta / Re: [RELEASED] @mention notification bot - now with Telegram

on: October 29, 2018, 10:06:14 AM

Quote from: Piggy on October 28, 2018, 12:34:22 PM At the moment i'm looking for a pattern " @username/alias " or " username/alias " with space in the begin and in the end, i can change it easily to space or ", " (comma + space) in the end. That that mean a username followed by a "dot" or anything else than a comma gets ignored? Like when I ask this question @Piggy?

21363

Other / Meta / Re: Annual Comparison of User Registrations

on: October 29, 2018, 08:41:33 AM

I didn't expect 2018 to have more registrations than 2017, after the bull run ended. I expect spam/bump bots to be responsible for the largest increase, as spammers create thousands of accounts at a time. Quote from: cabalism13 on October 29, 2018, 05:10:42 AM Quote from: S_Therapist on October 29, 2018, 05:01:14 AM You can use table for organizing those data. It will look better. You can use the following code. Code: [table] [tr] [td]Hello[/td] [/tr] [/table] For learning more- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1727100 I did use that but it's kinda wrecked into spaces... You'll need to use columns with "\|" as separators (see example).

21364

Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented

on: October 29, 2018, 06:42:04 AM

Quote from: james3441 on October 29, 2018, 03:39:21 AM How would re-using funds that were supposed to be mixed not decrease privacy? Chipmixer explains fungibility in the FAQ. In short: Quote from: http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-adam3us-fungibility-privacy/ It's the idea that a one ten dollar note is the same as any other ten dollar note. Quote from: james3441 on October 29, 2018, 03:33:02 AM I can also split my coins that intend to mix "as chips" values and i will be still using the "input dirty" funds. You can make your own chip-sized transactions. And the more people do that, the more difficult it becomes to distinguish between chips.

21365

Economy / Service Announcements / Re: 📣📣📣 [ANN] 👉 BESTMIXER.IO 👈 THE FUTURE OF BITCOIN MIXING! TECHNOLOGY IS HERE

on: October 28, 2018, 10:22:58 PM

Quote from: bestmixer on October 25, 2018, 01:18:53 PM Thus, BestMixer.IO advertises its project for all active users in the bitcoin blockchain with a balance from $1500. At the moment, more than 75000 addresses are included in the daily sending list. Daily the cost of such advertising is approximately equal to 0.65 BTC or $4500. Is this the result of your advertising/spam/dust campaign? See How to isolate dust transactions? Recent spam/tracking dust transactions.: Quote from: JackRilley on October 28, 2018, 10:00:14 PM I have many addresses that have been attacked with this tracking dust. I use Tails OS with electrum. How can I mark or spend just these inputs? Is it possible with electrum? If not, is it possible to do on Tails OS with a different client? I prefer to use only a live OS in a secure environment, I do not take risks with my btc lightly. I see several severe drawbacks of your method. Although spamming the blockchain can probably get you new users and more revenue, it's quite unethical. Not only are you increasing the blockchain by making 75000 dust transactions, the receiving party will have to add much more bytes to his transaction to get rid of the dust inputs. The only real way to stop this are higher fees, which is undesirable for many users.

21366

Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to isolate dust transactions? Recent spam/tracking dust transactions.

on: October 28, 2018, 10:18:57 PM

Quote from: JackRilley on October 28, 2018, 10:00:14 PM I use Tails OS with electrum. How can I mark or spend just these inputs? If you enable the Coins tab, you can select (hold CTRL-key) all inputs you want to use. But: if you select dust transactions received on different addresses, you'll link them together compromising your privacy, which is the opposite of what you want. My personal preference is to always use coin control, and choose my own inputs. Quote Is it possible with electrum? If not, is it possible to do on Tails OS with a different client? Even if you could freeze certain inputs, you'd have to do this again each time you restart your LIVE OS. That's not a permanent solution. Is this what's causing the dust transactions? Quote from: bestmixer on October 25, 2018, 01:18:53 PM BestMixer would like to present you a new advertising technology invented by our mixer. In short, every day we send to bitcoin wallets of all active users a noticeable amount of 0.00000888 BTC, which is accompanied by a comment about BestMixer service. All details are below. ~snip~ If so, they may send you more dust after you make another (large) transaction, so consolidating the dust onto the real address won't help you. Otherwise you could take all dust and larger inputs that belong to the same address, and send the full amount at once to a new (or even the same) address to consolidate inputs that belong to the same address.

21367

Other / Meta / Re: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them)

on: October 28, 2018, 09:31:28 PM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 28, 2018, 09:14:51 PM It’s spilled over into Bitcoin Discussion now too which saddens me. Resurrecting Bitcoin Discussion would (in my opinion) be much more important than trying to rescue the altcoin board. But it's not infested by bump bots like the altcoin board, and that's why I made the 1 Merit suggestion there. I think Bitcoin Discussion needs a moderator with iron fist. Politics & Society is in a better state now than Bitcoin Discussion (thanks to Flying Hellfish).

21368

Other / Meta / Re: Full merit transaction history for any user - now with GRAPHS!

on: October 28, 2018, 09:24:00 PM

Updated until last Friday's Merit data dump. Quote from: JSRAW on October 23, 2018, 08:11:06 PM why not a permanent ban for those users who involved in the trading account or merits. Like trust, merit isn't moderated: Quote from: theymos on January 24, 2018, 11:00:11 PM While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with. Theymos also said not to worry too much about small merit abuse, in the end it doesn't matter much.

21369

Other / Meta / Re: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them)

on: October 28, 2018, 09:13:49 PM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on October 28, 2018, 08:40:34 PM The Altcoin board should be nuked, it’s an about cess pool full of shitty posters & bounty hunters aka shit posters. It literally hurts my eyes just reading the rubbish in there. Drastic measures I still have some hope the board can be saved, but that requires maybe 99% or more of the posts to disappear. If 1 Merit isn't enough to accomplish that, I wouldn't mind seeing it raised further. Make people earn the right to post about altcoins on Bitcointalk.

21370

Other / Meta / Re: Trust system abuse / DT2 member Vod is provably dishonestly rating people

on: October 28, 2018, 08:58:32 PM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on October 28, 2018, 08:29:00 PM Quote from: Anduck on October 28, 2018, 08:10:25 PM Auctioneer bidding on the auctioned item is perfectly fine around the world in various auctions. It's a form of concealed reserve price. I have never, never heard about auctions who allow a person auctioning an item to bid on it in order to set a concealed reserve price. Again, do you have examples of auction houses that allow that? I can imagine an auction house allows that if they take 10-15% commission. And if the seller bids 20 million on his own item, I can imagine they don't mind taking 2-3 million of his money as commission so that he can buy back his own item. That high commission makes it very unattractive to the seller to do. You say it's allowed under US law. Personally, I have nothing to do with their law, as I'm not in their country. Whether it's allowed or not, it strikes me as "weird" to bid on your own auction, and it's certainly not something I would expect to happen. And I'm not the only one. In your auction thread, you surprised wheelz1200, Lairew, acharias, Lincoln6Echo and minerjones. On the other hand, thread USER ANDUCK Bidding on own auction.. was opened 1.5 years after the auction, and based on User Vod abusing DT position (petty red-rating with provable lies as a reason) it really looks like a personal conflict between the two of you.

21371

Other / Meta / Re: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them)

on: October 28, 2018, 08:29:08 PM

Now that we have a 1 Merit requirement for Jr. Members, I suggest to extend this to anyone who wants to post on the Altcoin board. My original post including Veleor's suggestion to post it here: Quote from: Veleor on October 28, 2018, 07:17:34 AM Quote from: LoyceMobile on October 28, 2018, 06:11:30 AM I'd say require at least 1 Merit to post in the altcoin section. You can add this offer to the special list that it is not lost here. Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them) The main idea isn't to stop real users, and I do realize they'll be "collateral damage", but this may be the only way to stop paid bumping bots. Copper Members shouldn't be restricted either. This will give the spammers something to lose. Currently, a spammer can create 6000 accounts in a day, which is enough to bump many threads for a very long time (and earn a lot of money from it). Just 1 Merit (or 0.00208333BTC for Copper Membership) per account can still be abused, but not at this magnitude.

21372

Economy / Lending / Re: Looking for loan 0.0025 BTC

on: October 28, 2018, 10:15:28 AM

Quote from: shasan on October 28, 2018, 07:19:14 AM I think doge will not increase 8% by 1 day. So sell will be better than taking loan. Note: I am not a good trader. But if s/he thinks it may increase then s/he should take the loan. My assumption was/is that OP can't exchange the Doge because of fees to withdraw from an exchange. If that's the case, I can exchange it to Bitcoin, send OP his Bitcoin and leave my Bitcoin at Bittrex.

21373

Economy / Securities / Re: LoyceV's Legendary 10 Month 10 Person 10 Altcoin Investment Roller Coaster #2

on: October 28, 2018, 08:48:17 AM

The following table is based on the current highest bids on respectively Bittrex, Binance and Poloniex. Please let me know if I made a mistake.

Mon Oct 22 12:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00661265 BTC	\|	0.00651018 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00019990 BTC	\|	0.01169571 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000104 BTC	\|	0.01192413 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00007001 BTC	\|	0.01485850 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00030940 BTC	\|	0.01746980 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00255400 BTC	\|	0.00928726 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00015110 BTC	\|	0.01204723 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009481 BTC	\|	0.00792930 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000353 BTC	\|	0.00863465 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01622241 BTC	\|	0.01090507 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11126183 BTC	\|

Tue Oct 23 12:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00668775 BTC	\|	0.00658412 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00021234 BTC	\|	0.01242355 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000106 BTC	\|	0.01215344 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00006845 BTC	\|	0.01452742 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00031650 BTC	\|	0.01787069 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00255700 BTC	\|	0.00929817 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00014960 BTC	\|	0.01192763 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009120 BTC	\|	0.00762738 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000344 BTC	\|	0.00841450 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01673500 BTC	\|	0.01124964 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11207654 BTC	\|

Wed Oct 24 12:00:07 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00689940 BTC	\|	0.00679249 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00020678 BTC	\|	0.01209824 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000113 BTC	\|	0.01295603 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00007120 BTC	\|	0.01511106 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00031090 BTC	\|	0.01755449 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00256200 BTC	\|	0.00931635 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00015310 BTC	\|	0.01220669 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009102 BTC	\|	0.00761233 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000342 BTC	\|	0.00836558 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01662019 BTC	\|	0.01117246 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11318572 BTC	\|

Thu Oct 25 12:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00733008 BTC	\|	0.00721649 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00020516 BTC	\|	0.01200346 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000113 BTC	\|	0.01295603 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00007066 BTC	\|	0.01499645 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00030440 BTC	\|	0.01718748 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00255600 BTC	\|	0.00929453 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00015860 BTC	\|	0.01264520 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009151 BTC	\|	0.00765331 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000345 BTC	\|	0.00843897 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01633720 BTC	\|	0.01098223 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11337415 BTC	\|

Fri Oct 26 12:00:02 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00736561 BTC	\|	0.00725147 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00020609 BTC	\|	0.01205787 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000111 BTC	\|	0.01272672 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00007101 BTC	\|	0.01507073 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00031520 BTC	\|	0.01779728 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00250500 BTC	\|	0.00910908 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00017160 BTC	\|	0.01368170 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009219 BTC	\|	0.00771018 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000340 BTC	\|	0.00831666 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01637503 BTC	\|	0.01100766 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11472935 BTC	\|

Sat Oct 27 12:00:01 UTC 2018 (forum time)

\|	Altcoin	\|	Price	\|	Value	\|
\|	0.98450454 GBYTE	\|	0.00779002 BTC	\|	0.00766931 BTC	\|
\|	58.50783037 PIVX	\|	0.00020763 BTC	\|	0.01214798 BTC	\|
\|	11465.51724138 SC	\|	0.00000111 BTC	\|	0.01272672 BTC	\|
\|	212.23404255 XRP	\|	0.00007065 BTC	\|	0.01499433 BTC	\|
\|	56.46348000 NANO	\|	0.00032120 BTC	\|	0.01813606 BTC	\|
\|	3.63636000 NEO	\|	0.00251300 BTC	\|	0.00913817 BTC	\|
\|	79.73019000 WAN	\|	0.00016320 BTC	\|	0.01301196 BTC	\|
\|	83.63362106 NMC	\|	0.00009483 BTC	\|	0.00793097 BTC	\|
\|	2446.07843137 DGB	\|	0.00000345 BTC	\|	0.00843897 BTC	\|
\|	0.67222271 XMR	\|	0.01611947 BTC	\|	0.01083587 BTC	\|
\|	Total	\|		\|	0.11503034 BTC	\|

21374

Other / Meta / Re: Is it legal to have public alt accounts?

on: October 27, 2018, 06:54:29 PM

Quote from: KingZee on October 27, 2018, 06:48:03 PM I know but it would be nice if everyone agreed on the same stance about alt accounts. They're not always a bad thing. Especially in promoting businesses or splitting some PM load. I think most people more or less agree: -alt of a scammer is bad -alt abuse is bad -alt for another purpose is fine Quote P.S LoyceV : I see you're also the type that edits his messages mid-typing. Gave me a headache trying to quote you Lol, it's a challenge Real answer: I wanted to add a response to a new message, without creating another post by myself.

21375

Other / Meta / Re: Is it legal to have public alt accounts?

on: October 27, 2018, 06:39:17 PM

Quote from: KingZee on October 27, 2018, 06:14:45 PM Like, who do these people think owns all those "business" alts? It doesn't matter who's behind the account. This forum believes in privacy and freedom. Quote from: The Pharmacist on October 27, 2018, 06:21:20 PM Timelord2067 or other members might give the accounts a neutral trust simply stating the connection between the alts, but that shouldn't affect you adversely. Even better, to avoid any confusion or questions later on, you can tag them by yourself. Don't use positive trust for this, some users even use negative trust for alt-accounts they use on public computers. The main reason for getting red trust on alt accounts is to notify someone either one of them can't be trusted. See alia for example, who got red trust from theymos for being an alt of a known scammer. Quote from: iasenko on October 27, 2018, 06:29:58 PM For example Jet Cash have a few, LoyceV have also few alts Even better: Global Moderator hilariousandco and Administrator theymos have an alt too. Quote I don't have a need for alt but maybe one day I'll register one too. I started LoyceBot because I didn't trust the posting bot I used. Quote from: KingZee on October 27, 2018, 06:38:41 PM This is a pretty good example compilation of what I've casually seen happen from other users too. It seems to me that not everyone is on the same page as you on this matter. That's what happens with a decentralized trust system. The total trust is more or less an average of opinions from many users. Quote Nice, I guess that's one way to do it. Confirm yourself that an account is your alt before other people do it in red for you. When I created LoyceMobile I was afk. By the time I got back to my desk, I had a PM asking to confirm it's me. I asked Jet Cash the same when his alt claimed to be his alt. Leaving neutral trust back and forth solves this.

21376

Other / Meta / Re: [CLUB]The SpamBuster!4 Cases open,over 3000 accounts, Reviewed:5000+ [11.09]

on: October 27, 2018, 06:32:29 PM

Quote from: Coolcryptovator on October 27, 2018, 05:52:50 PM Could someone stop "good project" fucking Soldier ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052614.0 . I am tired by reporting them. Just today made more than 260 reply. Threads like these make me want to require at least 1 Merit to post on the Altcoin board! That would effectively cripple the bumping services. They'd still do it for a while with bought or hacked sMerit, but it would eventually end. I counted accounts posting in that thread: 1. 19: huapupay (BPIP unchecked) 2. 2: phuocbitcoin (BPIP unchecked) 3. 2: luongthap85 (BPIP unchecked) 4. 2: salek69 (BPIP unchecked) 5. 1: deppil90 (BPIP unchecked) 6. 1: 5thFear (BPIP unchecked) 7. 1: KarmaAnt (BPIP unchecked) 8. 1: dRAIH (BPIP unchecked) 9. 1: vinodkamat (BPIP unchecked) 10. 1: 4share (BPIP unchecked) 11. 1: Yanyan 111 (BPIP unchecked) ............. ............. ............. 521. 1: Feeliks (BPIP unchecked) 522. 1: wiserico (BPIP unchecked) 523. 1: rtvk1971 (BPIP unchecked) 524. 1: zz9w9z (BPIP unchecked) 525. 1: Waleed123 (BPIP unchecked) 526. 1: Floxyjay (BPIP unchecked) 527. 1: Vyacheslav41 (BPIP unchecked) One account posted 19 times, 3 accounts posted twice, and more than 500 different accounts bumped the thread once. Bump bots used to use 35 different accounts, now they use much more to avoid easy detection. I don't think there's a single post worth reading in that thread.

21377

Economy / Speculation / Re: guess the price before 12december BAKKT ([btc]GAME[btc])

on: October 27, 2018, 02:50:24 PM

Quote from: xhomerx10 on October 27, 2018, 04:47:47 AM My guess is that you need a hat! I clearly missed something here Quote from: JayJuanGee on October 25, 2018, 07:21:58 AM No meaning beyond following themes.. of getting pants taken from several members, and then another member asserting that he would eat his hat, which contributed to thereafter hat momentum leading to likely hat bubble, at some point. Roach hasn't requested a hat, YET. Do you have a link to where ~~this~~ that all started? I need one too! I've been looking for a personal avatar for a while now, but I'm not artistic enough to make one.

21378

Other / Meta / Re: Reporter Statistics

on: October 27, 2018, 10:38:07 AM

Quote from: morvillz7z on October 27, 2018, 10:22:42 AM It was probably last week, some dude showed a screenshot of their reports, the guy had more than 900k . Don't know if it was photoshopped Lol of course it's fake Did you not see the 101% accuracy? I'm at this: Code: You have reported 5061 posts with 99% accuracy (4755 good, 71 bad, 235 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. I need 245 more good reports so that I can bump Seeking reporter badge images and cry for my badge

21379

Other / Meta / Re: What's more important to judge whether or not I should be trusted?

on: October 27, 2018, 10:20:30 AM

Quote from: iluvbitcoins on October 27, 2018, 09:56:35 AM A friend of mine is using it currently. I can show it to a trusted individual in private. How many Merits did he earn per post? That's a reasonable indicator to judge if he's spamming or contributing. For comparison: you've received 0.0722 Merit per new post. Shouldn't this thread be moved to Reputation by now?

21380

Other / Meta / Re: Percentage of Merit received on old posts, deleted posts, and average per post

on: October 27, 2018, 10:18:33 AM

(this statistic was needed as a reference for another post of mine) User iluvbitcoins (full history) Received a total of 67 Merit up to last Friday. Received 3 Merit (4.47%) for 3 (0.08%) of 3745 posts created before the introduction of Merit (0.0008 Merit per old post). Received 62 Merit (92.53%) for 24 (2.79%) of 858 posts created after the introduction of Merit (0.0722 Merit per new post). Received 2 Merit (2.98%) for posts that are now deleted.

Pages: « 1 ... 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 [1069] 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 ... 1373 »