I bought one ticket, TXID: 693325d8ade7dd26c07e437cb2e9b22948643849555096c7de499824703a5a69 But none of the sending addresses were mine! So I need to generate a receipt. I click on the 'Details' of the transaction, and generate a receipt and pick which of my address I want to disclose. In this case, 1LbXzBCP6bMknX5W3A5Z5QUs4eU3adAEy4. Now: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Signed by Inputs.io on 20/07/13 06:47:13 The transaction 693325d8ade7dd26c07e437cb2e9b22948643849555096c7de499824703a5a69 was sent by the owner of the address 1LbXzBCP6bMknX5W3A5Z5QUs4eU3adAEy4. Messages signed from that address are representative of the actual sender of this transaction. This receipt was signed with one of the inputs of the transaction for verification. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1HvcmKFw8jkANjR7QkKQHLwNrQ1KAShJur IOjQb8PslKXjxu9Z4Raq7sYiwm7qBn4gyRpHWMkq5pBuciyYBM9co/1Xd9Q7/aHxGxLOXTIt+qKJlN243qkWlLE= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- You can verify this message on https://inputs.io/clearsign , brainwallet.org , Bitcoin-Qt, etc. This message was signed from one of the sending addresses, and tells you (Dabs) to send my winnings to 1LbXzBCP6bMknX5W3A5Z5QUs4eU3adAEy4.
|
|
|
Hi Dabs,
Inputs.io now works with your low hash lotto! It's slightly more complicated, and you probably should add some help text telling people to generate a payment receipt and post it here.
|
|
|
I sent some funds + transaction fee to my inputs.io a couple of hours ago and they have 13 confirmations on the blockchain but still shows in inputs.io as unconfirmed.
Should have confirmed. New feature: Payment receipts!This allows you to participate in things that require you to sign a message from one of your sending addresses. As inputs.io mixes your wallet for you automatically, none of the sending addresses of your transactions actually belong to you for privacy. However, this means that some things (like lottos that send back to your sending address, or group buys) cannot be used with Inputs.io ... until now! You're able to (retroactively) generate receipts for all your outgoing transactions to the Bitcoin network. We'll sign a message from one of the sending addresses of that transaction with one of your addresses. It looks like this: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Signed by Inputs.io on 20/07/13 06:38:48
The transaction 03f4e309a037e8c45e30eb01828f2f08be0ac26a4825eeaf0c2aac5bf535b186 was sent by the owner of the address 13LUGyXdAenEEMzKKP1Tr2a1ASSyKW9ixR. Messages signed from that address are representative of the actual sender of this transaction. This receipt was signed with one of the inputs of the transaction for verification.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1K6Tfakyn3mzkndYx5oTdoEA3RXqBK3puR IGOiOikZhGxoFLnWkFjPW6dsnyoN5IAbeavQnfhGHT4RvuHJbjLUJfIqjOv/th+MX4mj1VGSf381CkVO6br23C0= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- As you can see, this message was signed by 1K6Tfakyn3mzkndYx5oTdoEA3RXqBK3puR even through I don't own that address, but Inputs lets me sign this message as it has verified that this transaction did come from me. 13LUGyXdAenEEMzKKP1Tr2a1ASSyKW9ixR is my address.
|
|
|
* TradeFortress shuts mouth. You don't know a lot
|
|
|
You still think I'm Bradley?
|
|
|
FYI scotaloo, also found out the alt of MoneyPakTrader
|
|
|
Funny how scotaloo shows up It's obvious that ironcross360 was controlling krudkeeper.
|
|
|
Or hacked by scotaloo or hacked by the other phisher..
And scotaloo would have replied to himself in this boring script-kiddies war they had right here ? I don't see any point in that, maybe the 'other' phisher, then, guess I read too fast to be aware of him. BTCTalkAccounts are a group. Ironcross360 was the 14 year old who was controlling krudkeeper - he's involved, and has been trying (& failing) to give me pathetically wrong information. scotaloo, you forgot to tell ironcross to not troll
|
|
|
They're known for planting misinformation and doing the same thing twice, I'm pretty sure it is scotaloo trying to make us believe in the info that "krudkeeper" uncovered, and also had a suspicious PM exchange with BCB. Good thing I never PM'd him in the first place because of how suspicious his posts were.
It doesn't make much sense otherwise. This account was obviously not for scamming.
|
|
|
Hi, My account was hacked by this guy. I am the real Cayce Franklin. The guy said on other recent posts (scams) that his name is Mark. I have since changed my password. My apologies if this has caused you any trouble. I have never even been to Minneapolois or anywhere else in Minnesota.
All I am doing is running a website called rainingbitcoin.com . I don't want anyone's money or Bitcoin, I don't mine, use asics, build them, or want to start an ipo. (these were some of the idiot's posts using my account). I am also not 13. I am 33. Hope you find him. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you (Lord knows it has caused me a lot today)
Then you were hacked by someone in scotaloo's ennemies team. Which would mean they both play dirty. But have you been hacked, really ? Or hacked by scotaloo or hacked by the other phisher..
|
|
|
Have you entered anything into bitcoin - talk.org?
|
|
|
You can't edit posts in the auction section.
|
|
|
But how? I'll tell you all in the near future... Two possibilities: 1) You compromise the server and got the server seed 2) luck
|
|
|
If you have more than enough ASICMINER shares available to provide as collateral for the loan amount, contact me and we can work out the details (or just make an offer on CoinLenders). The interest rate depends on the amount, duration, and is determined on a case by case basis.
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198934.0If you buy an account for 0.05 BTC that has 100 or more posts then you can make at a minimum 0.02 BTC a month, so it would pay itself off in 3 months assuming TradeFortress is still around. Edit: Your account, Inedible, would fetch him 0.18 BTC a month for just changing your signature and registering Your second payout will only be your newer existing posts means you have to make at least 100 posts per month. hilarious. This has been changed but I'll change it back if people start abusing it with buying dead accounts.
|
|
|
Yes, your sig is fine!
|
|
|
Slightly tweaked (in a good way):
* We no longer distinct between "counted" posts. All of your posts count, even if it's not your first month. * Some tiers now have activity requirements * You'll need to reply to this thread again after 1 month to start another round of payouts.
|
|
|
I'll do it. Wouldn't mind upfront payment. Quote to confirm, please! 1HeroCCotNLtJzpEiWGrRkaFSFDBZkF1jG Your Inputs.io usename does not exist yet. If I don't receive a response in a few days, I'll send the non-double rate to the address you gave me.
|
|
|
Sorry for the delay! Here's the results:
A: email SHA256 hash d3e8c86ded8a84ea38f1a7d6648201f8c461512d0f817902190bb4019d175713 B: email SHA256 hash fa952cc869c875f8a11639736a0e21dfd826f6589ed6949ffaa3fae4d0d9ae8d C: email SHA256 hash b8e58e10ca79426590a1b3a2912b2a708000b8770f212d36abfc888143971624
0.01 BTC: A, B 0.02 BTC: B 0.04 BTC: B 0.05 BTC: C 0.06 BTC: B
The winner was hollowinfinity (B). Congrats!
|
|
|
LOL Goat, you should write a book.
|
|
|
|