|
My guess is that you either have a keylogger on your computer or you were MITM'd with a keylogger on the page. If you have had malware, it is probably still on your computer. Antivirus scans are not good enough.
What version of Java do you have?
|
|
|
|
It's kind of silly IMO that you allow people to send to addresses but don't allow payments to be sent via inputs-inputs with the API...
Just change address= to recipient= and do a simple regex and then decide the process of sending.
Thanks and enjoy!
Thanks! Address already supports email, Bitcoin addresses and usernames. |
|
|
|
This is going to end in tears.
Nice. |
|
|
|
I would recommend also coinlenders. Low return, but safe  I always thought coinleders was a Demo script..  It says that on thier website.... guys what is the deal here with coinlender? is it the real thing or just a demo? It is a real demo.  |
|
|
|
|
So do you dispute my allegations or not? We need to settle that before continuing onto the trust rating.
|
|
|
|
|
Please respond to my previous post first. Do you dispute my allegation you have botted? In addition, do you dispute that it was made clear to you in writing (email) that (I) you were banned from coinchat and (ii) bot activity must be done under an account with the substring bot?
We must proceed this way if you are interested in lawyering your way around instead of having a normal discussion. A common trick used is to switch the topic to something that would invoke responses from the other party once the subject matter on hand is uncomfortable to you. Unfortunately, I am not falling for it.
|
|
|
|
1) tradefortress gives out coins for chatting on his site
2) he thinks i didnt follow rules there
3) he says, 'hay, i wish i hadnt given you so much btc for chatting on my site'
4) he invents an amount and accuses me of taking it from him on the bitcointalk marketplace where i have never traded
This is fair?
1) A bot emitting messages to itself is not chatting. 2) The rules required bots to have the substring bot in it. This prevents it from getting rewards. Not knowing the rules is not an excuse. Keep in mind this forum has no defined rules. 3) Correct, as you have abused the service and defrauded coinchat. 4) From my read over the marketplace trust topic, it was named marketplace trust because it is visible in marketplace sections only, not that it was exclusively for deals conducted in the marketplace. If this is incorrect, some moderators have already violated the policy by leaving negative trust for activities not carried out in the marketplace. There's also quite a few trust ratings left for IRC / OTC trades. Regardless, you have defrauded coinchat 0.5 or so BTC which was the amount you withdrew. 1) I am a human, not a bot. 2) Again, I am a human, not a bot. 3) 'fraud' entails some relevant law (please cite one) 4) mods please weigh in on whether actions on coinchat have bearing on bitcointalk marketplace trust. Tf, please provide evidence that i entered into some currency trade agreement with you anywhere. Are you now disputing that you have used automated or scripted mechanisms of emitting messages on coinchat which were fraudulently eligible for rewards intended for productive chatter? We are not talking in the namespace of law. Pick up a dictionary and read up the definition of fraud. If you would like me to cite a relevant law, the CFAA forbids unauthorized access to protected interstate communications computers. Your first ban was an indication that you were no longer authorized to use the services provided by coinchat, however I am not interested in talking about legal matters or the CFAA. |
|
|
|
Done Thanks for this BTC address also in sig Well its actually been two months now I dont remember receiving anything Downloading the chain now Nothing yet. Whats the word on this? Sorry for missing you, sent you payment for 2 months (same thing as 1 month as it wasn't from Inputs) Thank you kindly Will keep it up Yay! another month I dont have access to my inputs.io so i changed my BTC addy in my sig Wow coming up on month 4 already. Just a reminder I never received anything for month 3 which would have been on 9/6/2013 Will make sure you get paid next batch. My apologies! |
|
|
|
You don't have to sign a ToS for it to be active. Using the service means that you agree with the ToS. Damn, how can someone be so ignorant as you?
You spammed with a bot to get BTC and now TF wants it back. Sounds legit and logical to me.
My 2 cents.
So your world works like this: a faucet gives you money for watching an ad. You take the money. A few months later the faucet owner finds you on bitcointalk and says: "hey I just found out that you weren't even watching the ad, you were making sandwhiches in the kitchen when the ad was playing. This is fraud and you owe me three times the amount of money that you got from my faucet." The faucet owner lowers your bitcointalk trust and calls you a spammer. This is fair and right? A better example would be using a python script to watch the ad 10000 times with a proxy list. You get banned, the owner emails and explains to you that you cannot use a not, and you do it again. You owe me half a Bitcoin, 1.5 BTC was an estimated amount (which is not that far off when looking at how much the average user owns). I have updated the risked amount to the correct sum. |
|
|
|
1) tradefortress gives out coins for chatting on his site
2) he thinks i didnt follow rules there
3) he says, 'hay, i wish i hadnt given you so much btc for chatting on my site'
4) he invents an amount and accuses me of taking it from him on the bitcointalk marketplace where i have never traded
This is fair?
1) A bot emitting messages to itself is not chatting. 2) The rules required bots to have the substring bot in it. This prevents it from getting rewards. Not knowing the rules is not an excuse. Keep in mind this forum has no defined rules. 3) Correct, as you have abused the service and defrauded coinchat. 4) From my read over the marketplace trust topic, it was named marketplace trust because it is visible in marketplace sections only, not that it was exclusively for deals conducted in the marketplace. If this is incorrect, some moderators have already violated the policy by leaving negative trust for activities not carried out in the marketplace. There's also quite a few trust ratings left for IRC / OTC trades. Regardless, you have defrauded coinchat 0.5 or so BTC which was the amount you withdrew. |
|
|
|
|
Actually you can run a service like this, managed cold storage.
|
|
|
|
|
Would be interesting to know if you're still in the green?
|
|
|
|
|
Their bitcoin backend is probably down.
|
|
|
|
You were using a bot to send automated messages on coinchat and reaping the rewards fraudulently.
I was using a script (that you helped me make) which was experimenting with reading wikipedia articles, I was trying to turn this into a question answering machine.
No you weren't, you were spamming irrelevant things in your own private room. Your excuse doesn't cut it. wait a damn minute s o youwere using a bought to make btc chatting and don't understand why you were banned? Cry maybe because thats completely uneffin fair. Roll Eyes lol 1) tradefortress runs a site that gives out bitcoins for chatting
2) he's upset that tspacepilot didn't chat according to his "rules"
I do give out free Bitcoins for chatting. A bot talking to itself is not chatting. You're not allowed to run bots unless your account has the substring bot in it - and before you get smartass-y, "bot" not "b0t". |
|
|
|
Just picking at points here, I agree with your sediment, but: PP doesn't let me send if it is not from my IP address PayPal does. I've accidentally used Paypal while using a VPN in a totally different country and made payments fine, without any additional hoops to jump through. The difference is that merchants take on the cost of chargebacks, whereas in Bitcoin the user takes the losses. |
|
|
|
quoting for posterity. remember how i signedup with "Nimda" at coinchat and you thought there was relation to "nimda" here? just because the odds are low doesn't eliminate the doubt. the user kosmo kramer here? i know a guy on a local sports message board that goes by the same name. my point is people see cool usernames and copy them other places. it happens.
Yeah, that does happen, however in that case there was a mistake which would be corrected as soon as it was explained. But nimda (reverse of admin) isn't as uncommon as tspacepilot. |
|
|
|
How else can a key logger gain access without having you download something? Maybe the porn is related to this. Prob a good idea to hold back on your urges.
You don't have to authorize downloading something to be infected.. |
|
|
|
yes he know he said that but how did you know to give him negative feedback when he hadn't said that when you gave it to him ?
until he posted this thread you had no way of knowing it was the same person
I think it's entirely reasonable that someone using the same uncommon username on two services can be assumed as the same user, especially given this: Welcome! I used to hang out a bit on coinchat as well. It was fun.
|
|
|
|
what I would like to know is how you linked those account names on coinchat to this username on bitcointalk
was it with his ip address ?
I know you have used an exploit in the past to access the forum admin panel ....
I *did* use coinchat a few months ago and I was banned by "admin". We exchanged some emails in which I asked him what I had done to be banned and I didn't ever get a detailed response. Here you go. @tspacepilot: I've updated my feedback to 0.503 BTC risked which is the amount you've withdrew from coinchat. I'm happy to remove my trust rating once you repay the coins you fraudulently withdrew. |
|
|
|
Hi tspacepilot aka wikib0t aka testycat aka newman aka manny on Coinchat, The best guess I have at what he was angry about is that I was experimenting with robots on his site using the api the he published (and I as I understood it) he encouraged us to use. I enjoyed coinchat and I learned a lot about node.js while I was experimenting there. I was sad to get kicked off because I had a lot of fun chatting there and gambling on the various robots. What I can't understand is how a site that gives money for chatting is going to cry 'fraud' when I took money for chatting. I mean, the site gave me money and I cashed it out using the site's system. How on earth is that fraudulent? Another thing I can't understand is how the 0.2 he asked me for (and I'm still not sure where he got that number) has now inflated to 1.5BTC. Excuse the language but bullshit. You were using a bot to send automated messages on coinchat and reaping the rewards fraudulently. You know that is against the rules. Nobody with any intelligence will think it is OK to run a bot to spam coinchat and get rewards. Bots are not allowed to earn rewards, bot accounts must have the name b0t in them and you've tried wikib0t. You've also said you "reviewed the rules" through email on Aug 30 and then tried wikib0t. I have zero interest in wasting time with spammers who try to lawyer their way out. If an ATM gives you money you shouldn't have got, legally you're in the wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
