No, not if Bitcoin becomes very popular. In the new client they are trying to develop a more organic way to determine the fee at a given moment to get a transaction through. Then it could even be lower than it is now.
What in your opinion is a dust payment in dollars? 1 dollar? 1 cent? 0.01 cent?
Can't argue with that, but miners decide. Do you think it should be handled different, then how?
Again, in dollars, what is poor and what is rich?
I think Bitcoin was not designed specially for the rich or the poor. It was designed to get rid of banks. In that way it saves in costs, most of the time people have to pay just for having an account. Also, it makes paying via the internet very easy because it is part of it.

But what's the use? This whole day it appeared he was trying to respond to as many topics as possible, while he just signed in on the forum yesterday. Suspicious...

I have bought the jalapeno last year. There have been a lot of things said about BFL, and I don't know if there all true. What I do know is that my jalapeno works perfectly connected to a Raspberry Pi. And that I had to wait for ages (about 8 months) before I had one. At the moment I have broke even and from here it's all profit.

It does appear you have some knowledge about the subject, and yet you don't. I bet if you reason with that knowledge that you have, then you know just as well as the rest of us do that your point of view isn't right.

Some answers:
- Micro transactions are allowed in Bitcoin, but only works when at least one decent miner accepts it.
- 'WE' are the miners, they don't accept dust payments. It would clog up the network.
- Satochi designed Bitcoin so it could accept micro transactions, but also chose to let the decision to do so to the miners.
- Mister Satochi is not the owner or boss of Bitcoin. He designed the first versions, now a whole bunch of developers are improving it.
- Not only the block headers have to be kept in memory, but all transactions ever made. With micro transaction used freely, the block chain would become very large very quickly. And because miners make Bitcoin work, and processing transactions cost time and energy, they can choose to ignore those. Probably because they 'only' get 25 BTC for it.
- Again, there is not one man in charge. It is closer to democracy.

It looks like you are demanding is should be free, and otherwise it's not fair. But every product or service cost money.
Just suck it up as it is, and go from there. And I would be happy to answer questions on the way.

A lot of new questions to be answered I reckon.

First one yes, second one no. Number of transactions has nothing to do with the hash rate.

Why are you literally citing me?

Often people say that Bitcoin is a revolution because no central banks exists and thus cannot controlled by the 1%. But when banks came into existence, that was not the case. There were arguably a lot of small banks. But it's inevitable that over years and generations take-overs and bankruptcies take place, limiting the amount of banks and making the ones left bigger.
That principle can be applied to many things, e.g. companies, rich people, nations, nature, and Bitcoin.
Sure, with the start of Bitcoin everyone could get in relatively easy. But people having the edge, get the most money in the end. Bitcoin is not going to solve that problem, that's only possible in some utopia society.

If the coin has a block time of 60 seconds, then you can mine 1440 blocks a day.

The nice thing about a SHA-256 hash is that you cannot predict it. If you hash a string and make another hash from that string but changing just one character, you get a completely different hash. They are not correlated, so you cannot use the outcome of one as an input for another to make an educated guess or something.

Not sure what you're trying to ask there.

Depends on your hashing speed.

For an existing business it's quite easy to include Bitcoin as a payment option. I think it's always good for a business to have as many payment options as possible. It's good for the business because possible more income, and because of "the early days" maybe your business is the first one to accept Bitcoin which could attract customers from competitors.
It's good for the customer, because of (arguable) advantages of Bitcoin compared to other payment options.
It's good for the Bitcoin community, the higher the market penetration the higher the popularity.

In the end it's not necessary to mine, design software, or create new feature to participate in the Bitcoin revolution. Just apply it into your business or everyday live to make it a success. Wide acceptance is the only way to make it viable.

Show how a wallet works, where to buy Bitcoins easily, and a place where they can spend it. Then tell them just to try it. If they like it, they dig into it.

Do you get any share with guiminer whatsoever. If not, then I guess it's indeed not visible on BTC Guild.

Don't belittle the Newbies forum. I like reading it, interesting questions and discussions pass by which make you think about Bitcoin in whole new ways.

The current block reward is 25BTC and the amount of fees is rather erratic. Take a look at blockexplorer.com. The first transaction of a block shows which part is reward and which part are fees. Going back 10 blocks it's approximately 0.05BTC per block. The change-over point is hard to predict, depends on the popularity of Bitcoin in the future. Pure speculation.

Here are some thoughts. It's kind of frustrating, isn't it?

Your question is a little bit vague.
Do you mean that every 60 seconds one block is generated with a reward of 50? The maximum of coins that ever can be in existence is 25 million? And what do you mean with a maximum of 400 per day?

How do you start the executable? If you do that by clicking the pictogram, it will start and if there is something wrong it closes immediately.
Instead open a cmd window, and start the executable from there. In that case it stays open if the program ends after an error.

The chance of getting the same address generated twice takes probably (citation needed) much more time than the age of the universe (with today's computers).