if there is an SMF mod already, would someone be so kind to implement it, please?
it's getting really annoying to navigate into each and every child-forum to mark read all posts that you don't want/need to see anyway.
|
|
|
might not have been what your looking for, but i wasn't slapping your idea, nor do i have a major ego and attitude.
i was just questioning one of your statements, nothing wrong with the idea itself, i would think about offering my processing power myself, if the price is right and actually thought a few times about renting other people's processing power (because i pay a shitload for energy), but unfortunately the price hasn't been right so far (at least not for me) on any of the available offers.
|
|
|
you end up paying a little more than what?
gribble says: The expected generation output, at 700000 Khps, given current difficulty of 434882.7217497 , is 1.61901089925 BTC per day..
you pay 700 = 1.46 btc per day (although you said HASH, whatever that means, i'm assuming you just meant Mhashes/s)
now let's do some math 1.46 / 1.619 = 90.179%
any proportional share based pool pays out more than 90%, even pay per share pools aren't worse than your offer.
so there's only one reason left to take your offer and that would be a paypal-payout and most of us hate paypal anyway (and we might even get more out, if exchange-rate goes up).
|
|
|
[5/27/11 10:59:09 PM] Connecting to: http://btcmine.com:8332/ nothing's screwed up, it's just that you're not finding blocks, but shares. DiabloMiner has no idea about what node it is connected to, in your case, the pool acts like a bitcoin-node at difficulty 1 and DiabloMiner acts accordingly, finding difficulty-1-blocks.
|
|
|
What's the diff on the namecoin chain right now?
1264.49395237 What for? For fancy "bit" on the end ?
i think you totally missed the point of namecoin. it's not to get a fancy "bit" on the end (btw, .bit is only the first used TLD, nothing stops us from using different/more TLDs), it's all about control. like bitcoin gives people control over their money, namecoin gives people control over their domain-names. no government, or central authority can shut down your domain for whatever reason.
|
|
|
Ich habe kein Problem damit, wenn man als Miner sagt, man will auch für seinen Aufwand entlohnt werden.
ich auchnich, die miner (also die worker) haben da nur garnichts von, die kriegen von der "aufwandsentschädigung" nichts ab. geht ja auch garnich darum, das jeder generierende knoten in jeden block den er produziert auch kostenlose transaktionen aufnehmen sollte, das verlangt niemand. völlig logisch und verständlich, das transaktionen, die gebühren enthalten, bevorzugt behandelt werden, es gibt aber keinen grund, ausschließlich transaktionen zu verarbeiten, die gebühren enthalten. auf eligius wird eher ein leerer block produziert, der garkeine transaktionen enthält (bis auf die generierten coins), als auchnur eine gebührenlose transaktion mit reinzupacken, selbst wenn noch genug platz da ist, das ergibt einfach keinen sinn. und je mehr miner ihre rechenleistung an eligius schicken, desto weniger freie transaktionen kann das netzwerk verarbeiten. ich frage die eligius miner gerne, ob sie selbst denn für ausnahmslos jede ihrer transaktionen auch ne gebühr zahlen, rate mal, was die meistgenannte antwort ist. eben länger dauern wirds auf eligius garantiert, sehr sehr viel länger. ich kann wirklich nur hoffen, das nicht noch mehr pool-ops auf sone dumme und (imo) völlig sinnfreie idee kommen, man stelle sich vor, Tycho, slush und Art entschließen sich ebenfalls dazu, dann ist auf der stelle schluss mit allen kostenlosen transaktionen, glücklicherweise sehen auch die keinerlei grund zu solchen aktionen, weils niemandem nützt und (in sachen neukundenwerbung/kundenzufriedenheit) nur dem netzwerk als ganzem schadet. macht was ihr wollt, aber seid euch der konsequenzen eurer taten bewusst.
|
|
|
and you all expect the difficulty to go down, just because some miners stop mining, i doubt that'll happen.
|
|
|
maybe.
currency rate will change, but that doesn't mean, it will go up the same way, difficulty does, it may do that, or even go higher faster then the difficulty (like it did before), but it doesnt have to, it's also possible that it'll go down and get un-profitable to some miners. actually i expect it to get un-profitable for most miners sooner or later, only those with cheap energy, or specialized hardware will survive in the long-term.
|
|
|
i talked to Jine earlier cuz i was confused about the Shares for current block vs Shares for current round (or round duration, which actually was duration on current block), that's why he replaced the obviously wrong values with placeholders.
guess all shares are stored anyway, so it'll only affect the stats-display, 'til he worked it out.
|
|
|
Es schränkt weder die Verfügbarkeit freier Transaktionen ein noch kostet es die Miner irgendwas.
es kostet die miner nichts, das ist soweit richtig, aber es schränkt sehrwohl die verfügbarkeit freier transaktionen ein und genau das sollten alle, die ihre rechenleistung auf diesen pool leiten bedenken, zumindest sollten sie das wissen, darum meine bitte, das doch auch zu sagen, wenn man schon dafür wirbt.
|
|
|
that one is nice. it's 7 different workers on 4 different machines and 3 different OSes and it's only your pool. overload extreme. however, maybe i'll check back later, but it's useless for me right now.
|
|
|
well, i really don't mind to "..see idle warnings/RPC errors from time to time..", but check this out. and that's only 4hours
|
|
|
something's wrong, i get a "warning: job finished, miner is idle", followed by "Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC" every minute or so, which is.....not so good. poclbm that is on ubuntu and a GUIminer on windows, phoenix doesnt tell me those warnings as often, but miners stop working randomly (every few hours) with a "work queue empty, miner is idle" (which is why i switched back to poclbm).
guess i'm currently losing a lot more than i'd pay in fees on other pools.
|
|
|
ach nee? is das n pool, von dem du da sprichst und auf den ich mich beziehe, oder nicht?
|
|
|
bitte, wenn ihr schon für eligius werbt, informiert doch die user auch über den gebühren-zwang.
wenn ich immer lese "Es gibt keine Besteuerung" wird mir schlecht, denn eligius ist (meines wissens) der einzige pool, der ausschließlich transaktionen verarbeitet, die gebühren enthalten.
wer also selbst ab und zu mal transaktionen verschickt, die keine gebühren enthalten (oder das in zukunft gerne machen möchte), sollte sich zumindest darüber im klaren sein, dass er selbst NICHTS dafür tut, solange er seine miner zu eligius verbindet.
|
|
|
* BitLex wonders if it'll ever come back what's up, idev?
|
|
|
Because some people don't trust encrypted code, and they want to be able to change things themselves.
maybe they want to know what things actually do. pool-users need to trust pool-admins. how could you trust someone, who doesn't even know what his scripts do?
|
|
|
what has all of this todo with mining?
there's no 6 000 000 000 Earth's citizens mining gold, that's just a few hundred.
bitcoin is not about mining coins, it's about transferring coins. you don't need to mine bitcoins to value bitcoins.
|
|
|
dishwara IS a murdering rapist, as long as he can't prove the opposite.
besides being a thief of course, we all know he is a thief, he confessed.
|
|
|
yeah, right, why prove anything if we can just blame whoever we want for whatever we want?
we don't need to prove anything, we got guns, let's just put some bullets in his head.
|
|
|
|