|
Test bot settings #1 (6 bots):
T-1000 is brutal: drown everyone it can, 100% of the time (0+ 100%; 0+ 100%; 0+ 100%; 10 7 3 9).
Android is lazy: running default settings (1,3+ 75%; 1 30%; 0 20%; 10 7 3 9).
R2-D2 only retaliates after 2 drowns in 3 moves (0+ 50%; 0+ 50%; 0% 5%; 10 7 4 11).
DeepBlue is supposed to be the smartest, but that failed (1+ 100%; 0+ 50%; 1+ 40%; 10 7 3 6).
Wall-E is sweet (0+ 40%; 0+ 30%; 0+ 80%; 10 7 3 30).
HAL9000 only drowns 50% of the users, but strikes back hard: drown him once, and he'll drown you 3 times (0+ 50%; 0% 50%; 0% 50%; 10 7 3 1).
|
|
|
|
Are there gonna be new global mods? If so, I have my alts(Welsh and LoyceV) up for that.  What did I do? Everybody knows I'm never anyone's alt  |
|
|
|
A month ago, I discovered Drownhim.com:Since Rollin.io (where I was a Mod for more than 2 years) closed, I haven't really used any other gambling sites. Drownhim is more of a multiplayer game than a gambling site, and that's what I like about it.
This thread is specifically made for testing Bot settings. Feel free to post your own settings, and/or try to beat mine. For testing, I use the room called "Bot training":Unibot
Drownhim offers manual playing, and several Bots. The most interesting one, and the reason I created this topic, is Unibot:I'll summarize the Unibot settings, the above example would be written as: (1,3+ 75%; 1 30%; 0 20%; 10 7 3 9).Bot testing
For testing bot strategies, Admin helped me to create 9 different accounts. "Normally", using more than one account is not allowed, just like in online poker. For testing Bot strategies, Admin made an exception for me.
These are the accounts:DeepBlue
T-1000
R2-D2
Wall-E
Android
HAL9000
System_370
Apple_II
PC_AT
Green: best result(s)
Red: worst result(s)
I'll change the settings from the worst performing bot, and try again.No spam
All my threads are now self-moderated to stop signature spam. I will remove all irrelevant posts. If you quote the entire OP, your entry will be deleted.Disclaimer
I'm not affiliated with the site, but I've been in contact with MrDrowner, and may run one or more campaigns for them in the future.
|
|
|
|
The problem here is even if the post is not deleted the thread still bumps back up which is still another point for their service. Correct. It stopped the accounts that post and delete the same post over and over again, using 30 accounts per thread. Now the generic useless sentences spam is still active. Your idea is pretty good but it does not remove other higher ranking accounts that can be included in their bumping service, who knows but they might have a lot of Member and above ranks at their disposal for this kinds of bumping service, they also have the option to improve their posts just to bump the thread. Thanks to the Merit system, they'll eventually run out of Member accounts, no matter how many accounts they have. Newbies and Jr. Members on the other hand can be created for free, thousands per day. |
|
|
|
thats not true. i sent backbytes between my devices /wallets and i could see if it was claimed or not. Of course you can see that, but that's also all you can see. The DAG only stores a hash that stops you from sending the same Blackbytes again. You may be interested in this: Byteball: Blackbytes FAQ. @ChainSmoker Think of Blackbytes as a post-it handed to you by the previous owner. The post-it says: "ChainSmoker is now the new owner". Together with handing you the post-it, the DAG registers that the previous owner is no longer the owner of these Blackbytes. The DAG does not register that you received the post-it. Now, if you lose this post-it, the previous owner can simply give you another post-it that says: "ChainSmoker is now the new owner". *If you want to give your Blackbytes to someone else, your post-it contains all the information you need to create a new valid post-it for the receiving user, and to register the change of ownership in the DAG. I think giving Tonych your address (and asking politely) is enough. Resending means sending the same transaction again, you'll receive the exact same Blackbytes again. The sending wallet can click "re-send private payloads" from the transaction history:  I really recommend to try the features Byteball has, create another wallet and send some money around. * Comment needed on this analogy: does it help explain how Blackbytes work? Very good analogy! |
|
|
|
now ethereum can Processing 1 million request per seconds. No it can't, it's hardcoded at 15 TPS. Any off-chain solution (like SegWit) is no longer the blockchain you're looking for, as it isn't stored. |
|
|
|
You can strike out the following numbers they are not part of the spam but just quoted and answerd the post. Done. It's much more work to excludes quotes, that's why I haven't done that yet. |
|
|
|
So I managed to install live Ubuntu on a DVD (eventually) What do you mean with "install"? All you need to do, is burn the ISO to the DVD. trouble is, I'm not entirely sure whether I can install bitcoin core directly on it (the dependencies won't write correctly will they)? I haven't tried. But it means you'll need to give the live OS access to write to your hard drive, which is possible, but goes against the idea of using a live OS. Anyway, I was wondering, before I go to the effort of installing Ubuntu, is there a faser operating system (also, I can use the same block database i already have on Windows that hasn't fully synced yet can't I)? My block database is a year and a half behind on its db.
I'm using Mint, but Ubuntu should be about the same. If you have enough RAM for file cache (12 GB works much faster than 4 GB), and if possible put your chainstate directory on a SSD, it'll be quite fast. Much faster than what I've read from Windows users. |
|
|
|
Phew, that is a lot. The last time I tried to help someone do this, it was only several hundred inputs. I kinda like challenges like that. "Just" 6600 means "just" 6600 clicks in Bitcoin Core to select them. I don't think it's worth scripting to use the CLI, you can finish this in an hour. Next thing to do would be claiming all forks, doing the same again. See if you can fill some fork blocks to the maximum size. As far as I know, Antpool rejects all transactions under 5 sat/byte, so their "accelerator" (if it even works) won't help you. But fees aren't that high, so you won't need an accelerator. If you're using a wallet like electrum and you're trying to send everything to one address, I can take your public key and try to fit those transactions in for you (to close to 100kb as possible). You'd have to sign those transactions afterwards after importing them into electrum. Good offer! |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is akamit of Bitcointalk.org and today is 10th July 2018.
akamit account is hacked and I am requesting DT members to provide negative rating and keep it until I recover my account.
Thank you!
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1AkAmitY8vNneHtJ6MBaPL29LgdCbrY2L4
HDJ0VFAnORrLzO3IZL32hB1Kid7eiD+HOP+HimZ1TyQVKliQmnUl7Rk3iIy1PePKXqWurIWhQeiwbVNwZfzXKCY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- unedited post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2349397.msg40927181#msg40927181The address can be verified now. Sorry I used a space in the msg when I posted that's why it was showing can't be verified. Now its fine. and unedited post archived. There's no need for red trust if the account has been locked already. Unless you want it as a warning to others, so I'll do it anyway. But I've seen someone who is not DT has provided negative rating. So wondering what will happen if any day I get my account back and that member went inactive.  In that case, the untrusted feedback with reference link will be there forever. So nothing happens. |
|
|
|
I'm going to make a ANN thread. You're a spammer, someone already archived your post history a week ago. I've just reported 9 of your posts. If you're going to make an ANN thread, you're going to have many people spam a lot more, and eventually get yourself banned. Get a good campaign manager if you're serious. |
|
|
|
i have 6660 input how can manage that ?? Let me guess: you've been hunting faucets for many years? You're going to want to read this: Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!So you're the guy who's going to make Bitcoin's blockchain 40 MB bigger Blocks are limited to 1 MB (ignoring SegWit), which means you'll make enough transactions to fill mempool for many hours. 40 MB transactions will cost you at least 0.4 Bitcoin in fees, at the minimum of 1 sat/byte. For that many inputs, I would use Bitcoin Core with coin control enabled (import the private keys). Then select which inputs to use for each transaction, and send it. I find this easier than using Electrum to select inputs. I'm pretty sure your transactions can't/shouldn't be bigger than 100 kb, so you're looking at 400 transactions to make. Out of curiousity: do you mind sharing which address(es) you used? Update: even if you use uncompressed inputs, 6600 inputs shouldn't be that big. With compressed inputs, it should be 10 MB. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
