my modem  |
|
|
|
Tick Tick Tick...
We are still here...
Just finishing up.. Little slower internet connection than what we expected..
 |
|
|
|
Just a tip from a cautious person: Have a Sandbox/VM ready  |
|
|
|
Overpriced.
Will dump to hell once hits major exch's.
But good returns for those who mined/got in, congrats.
Not mandatorily. For one of the rare times, you a really useful new technology. It can go higher I think. 0.025 is my target..  |
|
|
|
Polo has now disabled LBRY deposit and withdrawal...  It wasn't me  |
|
|
|
Someone is trying really hard to get the pool down, the frontend might go down intermittently - it will be back soon, shares are safe.
Might be a good idea to setup backup workers on the other available pool just in case
I think they might be fucking with the wrong pool operator. It seems to have stabilized, I hope it stays that way. It's wise to have back up pools set. |
|
|
|
Someone is trying really hard to get the pool down, the frontend might go down intermittently - it will be back soon, shares are safe.
Might be a good idea to setup backup workers on the other available pool just in case
Hi, Ocminer, I have these error msg from suprnova reject reason: unauthorized worker Try to reconnect, stop and start your miner to see if it authorizes correctly. |
|
|
|
|
Someone is trying really hard to get the pool down, the frontend might go down intermittently - it will be back soon, shares are safe.
Might be a good idea to setup backup workers on the other available pool just in case
|
|
|
|
Every single pool is down...
I don't see any problems ??! I do. My i7 was hit by frequent recv line failures and submitted no shares from 2:30 until I restarted the miner just now. Yet another connection was solid throughout. I've noticed this pattern before where some connections are flaky while others are stable. It happens with both xzc and xzc-low. I see what you mean, i'm on it What's happening? I don't see even a single share on my miner unlike a few hours ago when it can constantly find shares. Is this a difficulty problem or pool related? The larger the block height, the harder is it to find a share. Is your miner still sending shares ? Do you see "accepted" ? |
|
|
|
Every single pool is down...
I don't see any problems ??! I do. My i7 was hit by frequent recv line failures and submitted no shares from 2:30 until I restarted the miner just now. Yet another connection was solid throughout. I've noticed this pattern before where some connections are flaky while others are stable. It happens with both xzc and xzc-low. I see what you mean, i'm on it |
|
|
|
Official windows build of cpuminer is really needed, what if current one contains surprise like hidden fee rounds?
Also, anyone working on it to make it worj with getwork or getblocktemplate? Otherwise we will all stuck on a single pool. Currently it starts, receives job and halts for unknown reason.
? hidden fee rounds ?! It's compiled from this source, you can build it on your own: https://github.com/ocminer/cpuminer-xzcThere are 4 pools in the meanwhile, you can choose freely on which you'd like to mine.. |
|
|
|
Great Algo
Haha, I was just talking with someone about the ANN and I said "well, it's Qubit, there will be a suprnova pool" I'd prefer Nist5 as it's not mineable by the Baikal's but Qubit is nice too Are you going to put a pool at launch, oc?? And yes, Nist5 could be a nice option, and gives a combined con with Join for multipools. Salute Yes, maybe, depends on the algo, I was satisfied with Qubit but it seems it'll be changed again. |
|
|
|
my last 4 deposits are also stuck, from suprnova to poloniex... the price has a suspect and sustained rising mmmm  I doubt it has anything today with suprnova as you can find the transactions on the block explorer, ask Polo. |
|
|
|
Every single pool is down...
I don't see any problems ??! |
|
|
|
Great Algo
Haha, I was just talking with someone about the ANN and I said "well, it's Qubit, there will be a suprnova pool" I'd prefer Nist5 as it's not mineable by the Baikal's but Qubit is nice too |
|
|
|
I had some DDoS in Suprnova today, but it's all fixed since about 4 hours now
EDIT: Ah I just found a bug, fixed !
Thanks, however, I still get workers dropping off the list due to infrequent share submissions. I believe your rolling period is 3 minutes but sometimes there are no submissions for more than 3 minutes. Perhaps extend the averaging period to 5 minutes? Too much load on the server.. If your miners is not able to solve one share within 3 minutes it's not worth to mine with it IMHO However the shares are still counted just hashrate won't be displayed |
|
|
|
Been like this all day today  I had some DDoS in Suprnova today, but it's all fixed since about 4 hours now EDIT: Ah I just found a bug, fixed ! Nice. Finally all fixed. Thanks Yeah I had a timeout wrong, sorry, next time ping me directly if you see something like this and I'll look asap |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
