Chairman Allen West’s (GOP Texas) Response to SCOTUS Decision
“The Supreme Court, in tossing the Texas lawsuit that was joined by seventeen states and 106 US congressman, has decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law. Resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences. This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable. This decision will have far-reaching ramifications for the future of our constitutional republic. Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.”
That guy should read the constitution and stop listening to Trump. There's nothing unconstitutional about how the states ran their elections. What would be unconstitutional is the federal government (or another state) intervening in a states election the way they were asking. The case was nothing but political. Republicans are supposed to fight for State rights, not against them. |
|
|
|
So that's it, the only outstanding lawsuit is in Georgia where they allege thousands of voters who shouldn't have voted did vote and that won't be enough. Biden will be the next President, but there wasn't too much doubt in the first place.
Except for one major thing. This is the Kraken thread. The Texas lawsuit wasn't about winning. Rather, it was about making a show of attempting to win. Note that none of the things in the Texas lawsuit had anything to do directly with the Kraken. Also, the wording could have been written to show exactly what the voting methods of the other States had to do with Texas and the States that sided with her. But the attorneys who wrote up the Texas lawsuit, were too shrewd to write the lawsuit that way. After all, all they were doing is providing the legal and lawful method for Trump to activate the Kraken... by making sure every other method had been tried first. The Kraken? The 305th Military Intelligence Battalion? Such stuff doesn't have to do with courts. Rather, it has to do with emergency protection in war. And emergency protection in war is what the President does. The courts, in league with the States, are pushing the President into no other alternative than military action... the Kraken. And they are probably doing it intentionally, so that the Deep State really gets mopped up.  Pretty much nothing left to do but have a bigger tantrum than before and I guess violence if that's your thing. |
|
|
|
I think I'll be offline a couple days. I'm a bit tired of the oppressive atmosphere.
Wonder if he'll ever come back. btw, anybody know what happened to TECSHARE? (if it's public knowledge) |
|
|
|
Wow, that's the shortest news article I've ever seen... something is off. And I can't find any more information, weird. Oh, BTW, 17 isn't half of the states, that would be 25. But it really depends on what those 17 states are, which the story doesn't mention. I'm sure this is just a coincidence, but the Texas AG that filed the law suit was indicted in 2015 on felony fraud charges and has been dragging out the case ever since. It's a federal charge, so, all Trump would need to do is sign a piece of paper and all that would go away...but he would have to sign it before Biden takes office about 965 hours from now. I'm sure only people with TDS, like myself, will see the connection here. |
|
|
|
Have you guys not been keeping up with current events? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QTRO9MG6z8Rudy fell from grace. Hard. He's had cases thrown out not only because they don't make sense or for lack of evidence, but because the wrong forms were filled out, or they forgot to pay the fee. He forgets the judges name, contradicts himself and rambles incoherently. He has failed miserably in pretty much every way possible when it comes to being Trumps lawyer over the past month. Trump had no choice, though. No decent attorney would do what he wanted. Look at what happened to the last one that did. |
|
|
|
Steering back on topic - Was Melania probably a gold digger? Yes.
But it's also a bit ironic how disgusting the party of tolerance is towards Melania because women empowerment doesn't mean much if the woman is associated with a republican or is a republican.
How did the democrats treat her disgusting? I know she got some shit for the unironic ironic anti bullying campaign, the 'I don't care, do you?' jacket she wore to the border and the red Christmas trees, but I'd say overall she flew under the radar pretty much. Am I forgetting something? |
|
|
|
I could not resist that reply. But I'm pretty sure I know the answer to the riddle; was the school dumb or was I dumb?
It's not a matter of being "dumb" so much as valuing education. Maybe your school was dumb, but in that case you should have graduated easily. But did the Kraken have problems in high school? Did they laugh at him too? He should have graduated easily. Let it all out. Can't imagine how frustrated you must feel right now. |
|
|
|
They're trying to maintain the dominance of Trump on the GOP and that's the only thing they're trying to do here.
Also convince people to give Trump money (that they think will help him win a second term but actually goes to pay off his debt). |
|
|
|
My belief all along has been that this matter would go to SCOTUS, and thus the events in Georgia are only transient.
When I said earlier this was going to be six months of a shitshow, that's basically the process I was talking about. I wasn't happy about this then and I'm not now.
Granted, there are deadlines. But SCOTUS and Trump ganging up will mean Joe and Hoe are DONE.
Now the Kraken is awake.
Is this still your belief? |
|
|
|
Misleading headline. Here's what youtube said: we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come....As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context. |
|
|
|
god damn it! I really wanted Biden to win. Oh well. |
|
|
|
but I think the current Texas case to SCOTUS may be the one case that matters.
I think it will matter as much as the Kraken that Rudy released while he was sitting next to that drunk lady during the hearing. |
|
|
|
Because it's impossible. There is no signature on the ballots. Voters request absentee ballot => signature is verified and ballot is sent to voter => voter fills out ballot, signs envelope (does not sign ballot), drops in mail/drop box => signature is verified on envelope, ballot is sent to be counted (without envelope). After this last step, there's no way to match the envelope with the ballot it contained. But why do they do that? Because of the Georgia constitution, it has to be a 'secret ballot': "Elections by the people shall be by secret ballot and shall be conducted in accordance with procedures provided by law."Why is Trump asking for signature match when it's impossible? So that people will think they must be hiding something. "If they are not hiding anything, just do the damn verification" This is another example of why you should never make an assumption based on something Trump says. |
|
|
|
How much would it suck to be Dominion right now. They will probably never recover from all the misinformation all because of Trump and his weak minded sheep.  |
|
|
|
|
First time I have a shot at a yellow cap with 1 game left. 3-1 Brighton win would do it, and I think I can tie with a bunch of other possible scores other than 2-1.
|
|
|
|
From Wikipedia, let us clear up your delusions.
From Georgia's successful motion to dismiss, let us clear up your delusions.  |
|
|
|
I agree, everything you say, this thread says, and other socialist and propagandists say is not relevant.
How about the judges presiding over Trumps lawsuits? Is what they say relevant? “Contestants did not prove under any standard of proof that any illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, for any other improper or illegal reason, nor in an amount equal to or greater than 33,596, or otherwise in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,” Russell wrote in the order. “Reasonable doubt is one based on reason, not mere possibility.” <==Trump appointee "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here," <==Trump appointee  |
|
|
|
|
Mispelling Kraken in thread title is so
Sydney Powell.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
