Is there any way we can get an update to more accurately reflect the estimated reward time for minting? Hours go by and it changes by a minute or two.
Here is a screen shot of my wallet that shows minting (Mined). In my experience it is counted in Days (7-9 days) not hours. However please note this is based on my own experience. What you see "Expected Time to earn reward" is actually bugged currently. Or it actually means something else. I don't really know, but based on the description of the coin it says 8 hours to 30 days.  i agree, instead of 1, 4 or 9 hours when hover over staking or mining axes it should be static and state something like, "staking take 8hrs to 30days". when people see 2hrs, 5hrs or 2days till staking but when time come nothing happen then they will think there is bug or their staking is not working. |
|
|
|
I've just completed a test on the multi-path system
Receivers Address --->>>>> XXcJEFKxziaH8trY6DruHx9ap39rnDJbK7 - 0.03 XC's
I am going to put a password zip file online with the details
ATSECURE
it's only fair if you already upload detail somewhere with timestamp before anyone post their answer then release the detail next day. if you don't release the detail then chance the answer is correct but if no answer then chaplin can't find the way to track it. The file has been uploaded.. And after 24 hours I will release the location and by Sunday the password if nobody has submitted the address Wait, did you solve the challenge?
That's my account. I show people what is listaddressgroupings and change address. How does it relate. How to read block explorer. By the way, I am not interrested. you can't just say you no longer interested, people would view you as dishonest, scum, a coward or have no honor. you have tried to answered on every other little bit challenges. if you can't answer or can't no longer trace the transaction please say so. I am not interrested in Dev's challenge. Dev has refused to acknowledge the existence of hard link. So, I am not interrested. atcsecure will reveal the hard link / answer /detail as i quoted atcsecure above. if we don't get answer from you then you must of little coward bitch that you is. you still have honor if you answer now that you can't no longer trace the transaction. if you don't take the challenge then, yes, you little coward bitch. |
|
|
|
Wait, did you solve the challenge?
That's my account. I show people what is listaddressgroupings and change address. How does it relate. How to read block explorer. By the way, I am not interrested. you can't just say you no longer interested, people would view you as dishonest, scum, a coward or a person with no honor. you have tried to answered on every other little bit challenges. if you can't answer or can't no longer trace the transaction please say so. if you have your answer please post the address, just the address. i'm sure no one want to know your brag and craps. |
|
|
|
I've just completed a test on the multi-path system
Receivers Address --->>>>> XXcJEFKxziaH8trY6DruHx9ap39rnDJbK7 - 0.03 XC's
I am going to put a password zip file online with the details
ATSECURE
it's only fair if you already upload detail somewhere with timestamp before anyone post their answer then release the detail next day. if you don't release the detail then chance the answer is correct but if no answer then chaplin can't find the way to track it. |
|
|
|
Someone is trolling the Sales chart in Mintpal ahahahahhaha before huge walls now they are all gone ahaha
it's only 12 BTC, checkout the buy walls of more than 100 BTC |
|
|
|
Sell wall at 134k is gone. Might get interdasting today
that is me, i just put it there to slow it down. no need to rush. LOL I love when things get interdasting.  i was just kidding. i don't have that much coins. look like he/she took out the sell wall and dump it straight to buys. look like it's done now. i wised i could have 10,000 though. |
|
|
|
I really like the name XC
Like X men..... No - what does the X stand for there!?
X = unknown / xtraordinary
I think its a great name.
XC = Xceptionally Creative! I think XC is perfect. darkcoin? it sound like illegal and dark side. darkcoin(the name) is created for 1 purpose which is aim at silkroad2 users, illegal in every ways. none of legitimate business/corporation would want to link their business to darkcoin because it sound that their business is scam and illegal. just like darkcoin itself, scam. LOL dude please leave focus on XC no attacks on DRK again. alright haha |
|
|
|
Sell wall at 134k is gone. Might get interdasting today
that is me, i just put it there to slow it down. no need to rush. LOL |
|
|
|
I really like the name XC
Like X men..... No - what does the X stand for there!?
X = unknown / xtraordinary
I think its a great name.
XC = Xceptionally Creative! I think XC is perfect. darkcoin? it sound like illegal and dark side. darkcoin(the name) is created for 1 purpose which is aim at silkroad2 users, illegal in every ways. none of legitimate business/corporation would want to link their business to darkcoin because it sound that their business is scam and illegal. just like darkcoin itself, scam. LOL |
|
|
|
here is my question again, if you can't answer then you is really something.
I just want to know if the current XC mixer is taking a few(2+) blocks to complete it transaction or just one(1)?
what is the meaning of "just one(1)? " the current XC mixer is taking a few(2+) blocks to complete it transaction : yes yes, you answer my question. now i need to find this out or perhaps adc can confirm that mixer need a few(2+) blocks to complete it transaction. |
|
|
|
your answer, "just one(1) block more". is it a 1 + 1 or 1+more or just 1?
you still not answer my question. please read my question careful and try to answer? i did click the link but it talk about bitcoin. do bitcoin have or using mixer? we are talking about mixer here. please stay and focus with 1 subject.
ps. yes english is also not my first language, not even second or third but the fourth one.
You should ask me with block numbers. Then it will be easy. here is my question again, if you can't answer then you is really something. I just want to know if the current XC mixer is taking a few(2+) blocks to complete it transaction or just one(1)? |
|
|
|
so you saying mixer take a few blocks to complete it transaction and it can't be done within the 1 block period?
Take inputs, then send out at next block ? Can, why not. But, if the input block is orphaned ? You will know that after send out. No input, just send out = - balance. i didn't ask about input/output. I just want to know if the current XC mixer is taking a few blocks to complete it transaction or just one(1)? Depends on dev's patch. It's always changed. 2more, 6more, 11 more... just one(1) block more == xnode owner can lose coins. i didn't ask about input/output.
You should read this http://tech.eu/features/808/bitcoin-part-one/ your answer, "just one(1) block more". is it a 1 + 1 or 1+more or just 1? you still not answer my question. please read my question careful and try to answer? i did click the link but it talk about bitcoin. do bitcoin have or using mixer? we are talking about mixer here. please stay and focus with 1 subject. ps. yes english is also not my first language, not even second or third but the fourth one. |
|
|
|
Can you stop talking bullshit? you made a competition between XC and DRK, it's you who continue. You really think that price decreased because some people talk about DRK here? LMAO  Finally, there have more kids like you who talk about DRK, than DRK fanboys (do you realize that?) You are the one lowering the tone of this discussion. All I see in your post history is arguing with people in this topic and posting rubbish like this:
We know... because XC is a pump and dump coin with a stupid community.
I'm tired of all this scam. Bye.
From your post history I can read you got into DRK early and you are scared of XC's potential. No wonder you don't want XC compared to DRK because XC is a better version of DRK already. The nodes of XC can be ran in any wallet. When R2 comes out with encrypted real time messaging, multipath TOR-like anonymity and the marketing begins, I expect DRK to crumble and XC to rise like a phoenix.  Doesn't matter what his post history is, mine is not linked with DRK in any way, and yes i have some XC. I read the XC thread for information about XC. what is going on, what is the dev doing, what is the roadmap for the feauture, some communication between the dev's and the community how to help each other out, some fun, like the bet yesterday!!!! and so on. What i do not like to read is some stupid arguments about DRK how bad/good it is, i really don't care. So yes hashnine has a point, Why was DRK mentioned in the first place? If you want XC to go sky high, focus on XC. forum is great but this thread shouldn't be abandonned either i agree. i think people here(this thread) don't give crap about xcforum as most people here are involved more than 2 coins. |
|
|
|
so you saying mixer take a few blocks to complete it transaction and it can't be done within the 1 block period?
Take inputs, then send out at next block ? Can, why not. But, if the input block is orphaned ? You will know that after send out. No input, just send out = - balance. i didn't ask about input/output. I just want to know if the current XC mixer is taking a few blocks to complete it transaction or just one(1)? |
|
|
|
With XC you have to trust the mixer isn't logging the data and that the mixer won't steal your coins. Giving control of your coins to another entity is just asking for trouble.
Thansk I appreciate your (and others input here) So..with DRK the nodes merely witness the change of ownership and verify it? But with a mixer the coins pass into the mixer (rather than merely being witnessed) and then have to be "allowed" out the other end? Can you expand? 1.Where exactly is the "mixer"? 2.If the source is open, then would that mean coins could not be stolen? 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins? It's simple. You send coins to a address issued by mixer and mixer has private key of the address issued. so how mixer steal it? isn't the mixer program to mix/forward the coins? from what i understand you think mixer can just keep/steal the coin or perhaps forwards to different address? but how? Shutdown computer, lock wallet, diconnect network, power failure. Mixer program should/will mix/forward the coins. Owner of the mixer is problem.. Do you know that mixer takes input/coins and waits at least 2 ~ 3 more blocks confirmation before forwards the coins. 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins?
True, People steal coins. you sound like mixer could take minutes or even days to mix coins. i though this done instantly? it just pass through when wallet is on then pass it to blockchain? i used to think there is no time to even turn off computer during this instant mix. but hey perhaps mixers take minutes or even days like you though? Check my analysis. There are always 2 ~ 3 blocks difference. Why ? to prevent double spending. Can't be instantly. Mixer risks - balance situation. If a block is orphaned, sender spend the coins again. 2 ~ 3 difference of what and from what? send to mixer --> tx confirmed ( included in a block) + 1 : block no/heght ex) 100 another block generated = confirmed + 2 : 101 send out coins --> tx confirmed ( included in a block ) + 3 : 102 If a block is generated too fast, +1 more. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7270701#msg7270701how do you know if a block is generated too fast, +1 more? and is there way to fix this? Sometime It took 1 sec. http://drk.poolhash.org/x11coin.htmlhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx/transaction should be announced to network, it takes times. If tx is not included in a block, it will be in next block. Fix ? FIX POS.. so you saying mixer take a few blocks to complete it transaction and it can't be done within the 1 block period? |
|
|
|
With XC you have to trust the mixer isn't logging the data and that the mixer won't steal your coins. Giving control of your coins to another entity is just asking for trouble.
Thansk I appreciate your (and others input here) So..with DRK the nodes merely witness the change of ownership and verify it? But with a mixer the coins pass into the mixer (rather than merely being witnessed) and then have to be "allowed" out the other end? Can you expand? 1.Where exactly is the "mixer"? 2.If the source is open, then would that mean coins could not be stolen? 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins? It's simple. You send coins to a address issued by mixer and mixer has private key of the address issued. so how mixer steal it? isn't the mixer program to mix/forward the coins? from what i understand you think mixer can just keep/steal the coin or perhaps forwards to different address? but how? Shutdown computer, lock wallet, diconnect network, power failure. Mixer program should/will mix/forward the coins. Owner of the mixer is problem.. Do you know that mixer takes input/coins and waits at least 2 ~ 3 more blocks confirmation before forwards the coins. 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins?
True, People steal coins. you sound like mixer could take minutes or even days to mix coins. i though this done instantly? it just pass through when wallet is on then pass it to blockchain? i used to think there is no time to even turn off computer during this instant mix. but hey perhaps mixers take minutes or even days like you though? Check my analysis. There are always 2 ~ 3 blocks difference. Why ? to prevent double spending. Can't be instantly. Mixer risks - balance situation. If a block is orphaned, sender spend the coins again. 2 ~ 3 difference of what and from what? send to mixer --> tx confirmed ( included in a block) + 1 : block no/heght ex) 100 another block generated = confirmed + 2 : 101 send out coins --> tx confirmed ( included in a block ) + 3 : 102 If a block is generated too fast, +1 more. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7270701#msg7270701how do you know if a block is generated too fast, +1 more? and is there way to fix this? |
|
|
|
With XC you have to trust the mixer isn't logging the data and that the mixer won't steal your coins. Giving control of your coins to another entity is just asking for trouble.
Thansk I appreciate your (and others input here) So..with DRK the nodes merely witness the change of ownership and verify it? But with a mixer the coins pass into the mixer (rather than merely being witnessed) and then have to be "allowed" out the other end? Can you expand? 1.Where exactly is the "mixer"? 2.If the source is open, then would that mean coins could not be stolen? 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins? It's simple. You send coins to a address issued by mixer and mixer has private key of the address issued. so how mixer steal it? isn't the mixer program to mix/forward the coins? from what i understand you think mixer can just keep/steal the coin or perhaps forwards to different address? but how? Shutdown computer, lock wallet, diconnect network, power failure. Mixer program should/will mix/forward the coins. Owner of the mixer is problem.. Do you know that mixer takes input/coins and waits at least 2 ~ 3 more blocks confirmation before forwards the coins. 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins?
True, People steal coins. you sound like mixer could take minutes or even days to mix coins. i though this done instantly? it just pass through when wallet is on then pass it to blockchain? i used to think there is no time to even turn off computer during this instant mix. but hey perhaps mixers take minutes or even days like you though? Check my analysis. There are always 2 ~ 3 blocks difference. Why ? to prevent double spending. Can't be instantly. Mixer risks - balance situation. If a block is orphaned, sender spend the coins again. 2 ~ 3 block difference of what and from what? |
|
|
|
With XC you have to trust the mixer isn't logging the data and that the mixer won't steal your coins. Giving control of your coins to another entity is just asking for trouble.
Thansk I appreciate your (and others input here) So..with DRK the nodes merely witness the change of ownership and verify it? But with a mixer the coins pass into the mixer (rather than merely being witnessed) and then have to be "allowed" out the other end? Can you expand? 1.Where exactly is the "mixer"? 2.If the source is open, then would that mean coins could not be stolen? 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins? It's simple. You send coins to a address issued by mixer and mixer has private key of the address issued. so how mixer steal it? isn't the mixer program to mix/forward the coins? from what i understand you think mixer can just keep/steal the coin or perhaps forwards to different address? but how? Shutdown computer, lock wallet, diconnect network, power failure. Mixer program should/will mix/forward the coins. Owner of the mixer is problem.. Do you know that mixer takes input/coins and waits at least 2 ~ 3 more blocks confirmation before forwards the coins. 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins?
True, People steal coins. you sound like mixer could take minutes or even days to mix coins. i though this done instantly? it just pass through when wallet is on then pass it to blockchain? i used to think there is no time to even turn off computer during this instant mix. but hey perhaps mixers take minutes or even days like you though? |
|
|
|
With XC you have to trust the mixer isn't logging the data and that the mixer won't steal your coins. Giving control of your coins to another entity is just asking for trouble.
Thansk I appreciate your (and others input here) So..with DRK the nodes merely witness the change of ownership and verify it? But with a mixer the coins pass into the mixer (rather than merely being witnessed) and then have to be "allowed" out the other end? Can you expand? 1.Where exactly is the "mixer"? 2.If the source is open, then would that mean coins could not be stolen? 3.The developer of XC stated "mixers don't steal coins".....but you seem to think they can? So how would a mixer steal coins? It's simple. You send coins to a address issued by mixer and mixer has private key of the address issued. so how mixer steal it? isn't the mixer program to mix/forward the coins? from what i understand you think mixer can just keep/steal the coin or perhaps forwards to different address? but how? |
|
|
|
the pump and dump is already done with this coin  just bagholders are left now and still deciding of what to do. i've seen many many dumps worth about 100 BTC each. 26million VRC coins mined within a few weeks, some kids now are millionaire with your money.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
