The simplest thing Zack should do is relaunch ADT as new a coin with a newly built wallet and block chain. Make the coin number a lot less. So price will increase and allow current ADT holders to swap to the new coin. This crap has been going on long enough. Its a circus and sad to see DEV doesn't even have enough sense to see he's defeated with this issue. For CRYING OUT LOUD. START A NEW FREAKING COIN WITH THE SAME NAME!!! DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I did that its why there is adtv2 it cost me 4btc to get it made ( 4k usd at the time and since them paid over 10btc to people that had proven themselves reliable to make paches to sort it and not a single patch has worked it seams that everyone will do a runner if the money is right  You can get a Coin made for 0.3 BTC now... If you sit on your hands waiting forever, eventually even Cryptsy will get tired of it and just delist it and then it's worth 0. try and get a coin done for that little when all devs hate you coz you wont help them with pump and dumps How so? loljosh can do basic sourcecode for that and it works well for testing. Stop posting here and fix your coin Already done, worked over Christmas adapting the code, adding new features, final test run and had a live launch last week. |
|
|
|
I guess the question is, what temperature are "cold" wallets really? Freezing cold, or just lukewarm?
I guess a wallet containing 1.7 Million US$ worth of bitcoins = ice cold (not connected to the internet/server)? If you guys are serious : A cold wallet is one that was created on a computer without an internet connection. Coins deposited there remain in limbo until the wallet's public keys are broadcast/ the wallet goes online. If you guys are trolling : Take two addnodes, then call me in the morning.  I think it's mostly trolling but not everyone understands the definition of a cold wallet. As you, the alleged dev/coder, do not know what an addnode is. lol An addnode is where you tell your buddy "node" to add you on facebook hence the name addnode, do you know what an addnode is? |
|
|
|
I like the idea of the MicroCoin markets but the downside is that it's really not tradeable against anything else since there are no buy orders for MicroCoin, only sell orders at 1 Satoshi |
|
|
|
What size coin blocks are you guys using? I haven't used the coin control, and I'm not getting as many blocks as I expected, considering a 60 second block time and my stake weight. Are you staking continuously or letting your coin age build past 2 days?
I have blocks around 200-500 but in the wallet.cpp file you can edit the split and combine thresholds and it doesn't affect the protocol in any way. unsigned int nStakeSplitAge = 5 * 24 * 60 * 60; int64_t nStakeCombineThreshold = 500 * COIN; Split and combine thresholds work in days and amounts A combine threshold of 500 Coins and 5 days (as it is currently) means that if you have blocks older than 5 days in the same address, they will combine when you Stake into one block larger than 500 and pay the Stake reward (this happens all in one Block). If you set the split and combine thresholds at 1 day and 500 Coins, then all Blocks under 500 would combine into larger Blocks (or split into two if they are larger) since the minimum Stake age is 2 days but you want the most efficient Blocks for maximum amount of Stake so a minimum of 500 Coins and 1 day might not be as efficient since you might end up combining into Blocks of 800-900 when the average Block that Stakes on the network is 150-400. The only issue is that in order to change the thresholds, you need to be able to compile the wallet from source which not as many people can do. I'm currently working on some wallet changes which would include being able to change the thresholds yourself without having the compile the wallet. |
|
|
|
I guess the question is, what temperature are "cold" wallets really? Freezing cold, or just lukewarm?
I guess a wallet containing 1.7 Million US$ worth of bitcoins = ice cold (not connected to the internet/server)? If you guys are serious : A cold wallet is one that was created on a computer without an internet connection. Coins deposited there remain in limbo until the wallet's public keys are broadcast/ the wallet goes online. If you guys are trolling : Take two addnodes, then call me in the morning. I think it's mostly trolling but not everyone understands the definition of a cold wallet. |
|
|
|
I dont fully understand how these can hold value. common sense to me says they cant, best case scenario you come back a year later and your coins have a buying power the same as when you started. in this case that the dude with the 20,000 Zaimbabwean dollar bill is worth $50 bucks USD lets imagine this is transferrable as an example for 10K coin. If the blockchain maintained the same marketcap, those 20,000 example worth 50 US dollars would turn into 200 million coins. instead of being worth .0025 cents, theyd be worth .00000025 cents. at some point you wouldnt even be able to transfer against LTC.
then again maybe im wrong. printing money has worked well for countries in the past... (or something) lulz
ahaha, I already made FistZimbabweCoin at 100,000% per year but never got around to launching it.  Super high inflation would probably work with a cap on the reward per Block. HAHAHA! Super high inflation does NOT work a cap on the reward per block. Also, FYI, that is a TERRIBLE font selection on that coin Yes it does Just add a subsidylimit at whatever you want the maximum per Block you want it to be and eventually as it grows all POS Blocks will pay that amount like Byzantine mining. |
|
|
|
I dont fully understand how these can hold value. common sense to me says they cant, best case scenario you come back a year later and your coins have a buying power the same as when you started. in this case that the dude with the 20,000 Zaimbabwean dollar bill is worth $50 bucks USD lets imagine this is transferrable as an example for 10K coin. If the blockchain maintained the same marketcap, those 20,000 example worth 50 US dollars would turn into 200 million coins. instead of being worth .0025 cents, theyd be worth .00000025 cents. at some point you wouldnt even be able to transfer against LTC.
then again maybe im wrong. printing money has worked well for countries in the past... (or something) lulz
ahaha, I already made FistZimbabweCoin at 100,000% per year but never got around to launching it. Super high inflation would probably work with a cap on the reward per Block. |
|
|
|
no one, no robber will give 1.7 million dollars back for a 180K dollar reward!! that is so stupid
and also i find it extremely suspicious that this muck BTC was "stolen" from "cold wallet"
I am still waiting for them to comment on how the hell did they manage to get coins stolen out of a cold wallet Might be different in China but in most of the world there is a statue of limitations and for this sort of crime it is 4 to 10 years dependent on the jurisdiction. BTC could go down to $0 within 5-10 years You collect the $180K bounty and return the coins, but risk them double crossing you (jail and no money) BTC remains stagnate in price (you walk off with $1.8 million after 4-10 years) BTC goes up to $10K within 5-10 years (you walk off with $70 million after 4-10 years). That is if you think these are real thieves, which they usually aren't. You know this is going to be a repeat of the NXT hack, the hacker will come out last minute and "give back" 80% of the coin and BTER will once again hike up their fees. I think it's more to try and find the person responsible rather than offering the reward for them returning the Coins. BTER is done though, I can't see how they could possibly pay back that amount There goes my 0.05 BTC  |
|
|
|
I guess the question is, what temperature are "cold" wallets really? Freezing cold, or just lukewarm? You would expect that after so many hacks security would be top priority for exchanges, especially considering the amount of (other peoples) money involved.
Probably the third BTER hack since they have been open, they previously lost 50 million NXT and I think there was another hack as well. I think we need some more decentralized exchange options where you can trade across Blockchains instead. |
|
|
|
What is sad is that they are supposedly scrambling to setup 10k nodes to prevent this hardfork when all they will succeed if they aren't bluffing is an alt with 10k nodes and less than 1-2% hashing power. Hopefully they have some developers on hand to quickly change the difficulty retarget limit so they have a usable , but very insecure alt.
Keep in mind I am the best poker player in the world, I'll let us know if they are bluffing. Couldn't Bitcoin just do something like Clams and Start with a new BlockChain with all addresses in the first Block and get rid of that 6 years worth of Bloat? How amazing would it be to just eliminate like 50 Terabytes of data |
|
|
|
BTER was hacked for 7170 BTC
Looks like there goes BTER..
If you have Coins on exchanges, please keep them in your wallet rather than leaving them on the exchange.
I not understand how can a cold storage wallet can be "hacked"? Inside job from someone knowing the password? I don't know but we can pretty much guarantee that BTER is going to suffer some huge losses as a result and would likely be a bad idea to have it listed on such an insecure exchange. |
|
|
|
Isn't that a complete scam ? It's a legit Coin pretending to be a scam  It's how Crypto is done in 2015 |
|
|
|
|
BTER was hacked for 7170 BTC
Looks like there goes BTER..
If you have Coins on exchanges, please keep them in your wallet rather than leaving them on the exchange.
|
|
|
|
Easier to run the office when sipping Margarita's on a beach in Somalia (or wherever else he runs to) if it's within walking distance. Wow, seems like they are grasping now Doesn't like they know what to do at all, lol |
|
|
|
#53 bter with 846 points
Omg, already at 900 now!! Supervoting!!! Funny thing is that we have so much voting power now that we could down vote PayCoin to 0 in like 3 hours. |
|
|
|
The CON is growing quickly... New addnode added to the network addnode=46.233.40.104 The CON is a little stronger. |
|
|
|
a unique feature you could add to your market to make it above the rest is where users can have the option to invest in top merchants business which in return they get paid dividends weekly/monthly etc. just like owning a business and to expand they could raise funds and depending on their stats feedback, sales people can decide to invest.no other tor market does this and merchants will come running for this in my opinion.
This is a really interesting suggestion. But we need to prevent businesses from running with people's investment money, the market will focus on the consumer experience and not so much on the merchant one (although we have some things in store for merchants as well). NP. while I am at it. Can the TOR abd I2P be integrated into the wallet?  Shhhh, don't ruin the surprise well that is a risk people will take as if you see current situation with exchanges they still run off with money. a way round it would be to hold a a portion of the escrow but ultimately you should let the investor decide as they are aware of the risk. the merchant would need to build a large rep before even asking. it is basically like a ico. there will always be scams regardless of what anybody does. this is a incentive for merchants to choose your site over others. ofcourse someone may build a rep and then raise funds to run away but if someone has total sales of 20btc and asks for 100btc funding alarm bells should ring, but again let investors decide. what do you guys think of this would it be a winner i surely think so. imagine if amazon/ebay did something like this it would be huge I don't know, that would really depend if the Dev keeps up the work. |
|
|
|
I heard a rumor that the reason Bitshares dropped a lot recently is that the developers had to sell a lot to pay taxes, is that true? If so, does that mean its a good time to buy now or are they going to sell more?
Or you can be like Roger "the tax dodger" Ver. In terms of taxation, a lot of countries ruled that PoW is self-income (and theoretically so are any rewards for maintaining any networks) and BitShares' delegate setup is likely subject to it too (it creates a pressing problem as the tax authorities will probably shake down Bitshares to reveal the identities of those 101 delegates). BitShares is a blockchain. Blockchains ain't talkin' any more than Duke the Bush Beans Dog.  Looks like the Bush beans guy has no idea that his Dog just let out a chemical warfare attack on him. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
