What is that Blockdrift that you'll be upgrading?  It is a change in the Block drift for the acceptance of Blocks. In normal circumstances there is a time drift of 30 minutes into the future or past in a which a persons time can be off, this change brings shortens that window to an acceptance of 1 minute time difference closing up a potential security hole before it becomes an issue. One should never wait to make a change until it becomes a problem, we should be ever vigilant in seeking out the problems of tomorrow. Also to answer your question before about the Muggle Relief Fund, it will be open to everyone regardless of what Coin you own or what forums you are a part of. It will give you a chance to share your stories, dawn your tinfoil hat and let your voice be heard Thanks for the answer about that drift. No, I don't care about Muggle Relief Fund, I was late to join the GAW scam, so I have no paycoins or stakers, nor any of their frozen cloudmining  All good, we can also contribute to all PayCon holders as well, lets put the Coins back into the hands of the people. |
|
|
|
What is that Blockdrift that you'll be upgrading? It is a change in the Block drift for the acceptance of Blocks. In normal circumstances there is a time drift of 30 minutes into the future or past in a which a persons time can be off, this change brings shortens that window to an acceptance of 1 minute time difference closing up a potential security hole before it becomes an issue. One should never wait to make a change until it becomes a problem, we should be ever vigilant in seeking out the problems of tomorrow. Also to answer your question before about the Muggle Relief Fund, it will be open to everyone regardless of what Coin you own or what forums you are a part of. It will give you a chance to share your stories, dawn your tinfoil hat and let your voice be heard |
|
|
|
Hey now, I live in Baltimore! And yes very close to the riots........
That looks nasty on TV, it's probably worse IRL. Stay safe. Criminals taking over the City? Robbing warehouses, burning cars? Thought US is the world police and they can´t get rid of them in their own country ? National Gards etc This type of shit only happens in Canada when they win or lose a playoff round in Hockey. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4svnh0TWkQLOL @0:39 , Breakdance Vancouver Canucks lost back then or? Luongo still goalie? Luongo is shit, always chokes in the playoffs. There were atleast 2 major riots in Vancouver, mostly people pissed off and crying when they lose the Stanley Cup lol |
|
|
|
GAWCEO buying some PayCon, hilarious!
edit: Mr.CEO
lol, maybe the best investment he ever makes  PayCon Muggle relief Fund will be open to everyone, past, present and back to the future. #shhletithappen #nomorereacharounds #awesome |
|
|
|
I really like the The Muggle Relief Fund project you are doing at forum.gethashing.com, it's a pity I don't deserve a part there since I got rid of those coins at relatively high price. You could help GAW to get through their hashlet eol voucher program however, since it's stuck like all other of their projects. You know, like you sell some CONs to Homero and he distributes them for the remaining hashlets. You get more customers and Homero has one less thing to worry about also. I would gladly trade in the remaining ones  it would be for favorite stories, not the truest ones |
|
|
|
Oh wow even BitJohn is in here! Hi BitJohn!! This drama train never gets boring  How do you take your popcorn. I am on a kettle corn craze. It is not for everyone. Either kettle corn or air popped popcorn buttered, and a little salty  |
|
|
|
Oh wow even BitJohn is in here! Hi BitJohn!! This drama train never gets boring |
|
|
|
The new wallet I saw was really basic, didn't even have Coin Control. If your going to clone then why not use better source?
Marketcap estimations are out of the window, the base marketcap value of a basic cloned source with a small number of participants is 2-8k USD
It cannot be said where every Coin can be a 300 million marketcap, if not marketed and developed a Coin can achieve $0 marketcap.
You no like spurdocoin? Did you see where the 1440 blocks a day is contradicted with 144 a day in the code? Edit: the original was much better. I know you did not find the source, but, as I said before, the front end was certainly silkcoin or an iteration thereof. Yeah the old one looked nicer and had more features, it would be like downgrading. If you have time, because you are much more knowledgeable than me, I assure you, regarding wallet code, would you look at the difficulty adjustment, please? It seems fairly basic, but what do you make of it? In layman's terms. Looks like just one division to me? Edit: Also, did you see the 1440 blocks/day vs 144 blocks/day issue I mentioned? And would that create a clash of some kind? Whish source is it? What file? and What line? You know you could just clone PayCon.... It has theme's, litestake, multi-send, stake for charity, statistics, irc chat, links to social media and forums, and lots of extra handy RPC calls and that. You would just take out the couple Forks, change the links and data in the statistics, maybe an afternoon of work. +1 Do you know if Adam would be open to that? I believe he would be. If he agreed to do this, what would be the total supply of coins? This option would not include POW right? It can include POW if you want it to, you just set it at what you want. You could do it as initial Blocks for the premine, zero reward then POW to get it going. ColossusCoin2 is also cross compiled source and much cleaner from forks but just finishing adding the newest stuff. PayCon is 1 minute blocktime with 2-14 day min/max age and 30 Coins, and colossuscoin2 is 2 minute blocktime with 7/28 day min max age and 5000 Coin POS reward. It uses a static reward, you could copy ColossusCoin2 as with the POS reward as it's a bit simpler and is close to what you want as it's premined. Edit: If you are thinking about this route, the best way I can describe for you is to use ColossusCoin2, search and replace the names and commit it. Take PayCon and search and replace the names and replace the first source with the second one so you can see the differences. The main files that are always the differences are the src folder and everything the the qt folder minus the res folder, you might get confused if overlapping docs and contribution folders but really they don't mean too much. Honestly, why is anyone even suggesting using a new wallet versus fixing the original? Granted paycon has some features the original did not, but maryj1.0 also has features that paycon does not. The features that paycon brings to the table are negligible at best. This idea of forcing a change that in all reality only does one thing which is to add ~5 million coins is more or less transparent. I don't mind either way what you guys do, I was just offering suggestions. I went through MaryJ's wallet a while ago and PayCon does have all the same features plus many more, specifically Litestake which consumes about 100 times less CPU power, Multisend and Stakeforcharity that lets you send portions of your Stake to other addresses, Coin control on RPC calls, checkwallet and repairwallet GUI, enable/disable returnchange, combobox (pick blocks by size, weight, or total), Splitblock (split your Blocks for higher reward), delete address RPC and GUI, rescan from blockheight RPC call, delete address RPC and GUI, orphan removal, sorting transactions by date range (useful for Stake during a given period), sorting of Coin control by age and weight, inwallet links to Exchanges, Youtube, Forums, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook and swappable theme's. I'm probably forgetting a few as well. What is the same is the statistics page, in-wallet Block explorer, and IRC chat. K, so I'm not exactly sure where the retargeting comes in for MaryJ 1.0 but if you figure it out, you still could add all those things to the wallet as they are all great stuff to have. If you DO want to go the route of using PayCon's source, I'll even code it up for free for you guys. You could still do 5% inflation per year in the first year but use a static reward and so that would reduce slightly over time as compared to the money supply but with a static reward there isn't always 100% Stake rate so those that are Staking could achieve around 10-15% per year with a maximum loss of 5% if you never Staked. The reason I would code it for free is because you'd be making an android wallet so if it's all running smoothly for you guys then it isn't much trouble to make one for PayCon as well, plus all source changes of either would help both. There is also the case that if you are using a new genesis, you trim off all the extra data. The proper way would be to load all the addresses as a redeem script through private keys (although I have never done it), trusting someone to hold the Coins as a swap is a bit of a gamble. Shoot some ideas Does paycon offer alias addresses like MaryJaneID. I honestly feel like that is the best feature that the original wallet had, especially in regards to merchant adoption, which should be the highest priority of any coin. Edit: And again, why not just fix the original wallet? And maybe add any additional functionality like for instance qr codes, down the road? Ok, lets see if we can fix the current one then. I will say that the light staking that you have in paycon is very nice. Do you have active users using it on rasberry pi's? That being integrated into the original wallet would be awesome. Edit: and any exchange should be handled through a trusted escrow. Yes litestake was first implemented in HyperStake and allows you to run the client on something as small as a raspberry pi. Hyperstake as in HYPER? the coin oriented to game payouts? This is not a facetious question because if the answer is yes then it is a small world. No they are two different Coins but I know have worked a bit with Joe Lee. |
|
|
|
Do I have to do anything in regards to HardFork May 1st, 2015? Will it be automatic? I got PayCon-1.0.5, that black edition.
It's automatic with the newest version, the black edition. We're good to go! |
|
|
|
The new wallet I saw was really basic, didn't even have Coin Control. If your going to clone then why not use better source?
Marketcap estimations are out of the window, the base marketcap value of a basic cloned source with a small number of participants is 2-8k USD
It cannot be said where every Coin can be a 300 million marketcap, if not marketed and developed a Coin can achieve $0 marketcap.
You no like spurdocoin? Did you see where the 1440 blocks a day is contradicted with 144 a day in the code? Edit: the original was much better. I know you did not find the source, but, as I said before, the front end was certainly silkcoin or an iteration thereof. Yeah the old one looked nicer and had more features, it would be like downgrading. If you have time, because you are much more knowledgeable than me, I assure you, regarding wallet code, would you look at the difficulty adjustment, please? It seems fairly basic, but what do you make of it? In layman's terms. Looks like just one division to me? Edit: Also, did you see the 1440 blocks/day vs 144 blocks/day issue I mentioned? And would that create a clash of some kind? Whish source is it? What file? and What line? You know you could just clone PayCon.... It has theme's, litestake, multi-send, stake for charity, statistics, irc chat, links to social media and forums, and lots of extra handy RPC calls and that. You would just take out the couple Forks, change the links and data in the statistics, maybe an afternoon of work. +1 Do you know if Adam would be open to that? I believe he would be. If he agreed to do this, what would be the total supply of coins? This option would not include POW right? It can include POW if you want it to, you just set it at what you want. You could do it as initial Blocks for the premine, zero reward then POW to get it going. ColossusCoin2 is also cross compiled source and much cleaner from forks but just finishing adding the newest stuff. PayCon is 1 minute blocktime with 2-14 day min/max age and 30 Coins, and colossuscoin2 is 2 minute blocktime with 7/28 day min max age and 5000 Coin POS reward. It uses a static reward, you could copy ColossusCoin2 as with the POS reward as it's a bit simpler and is close to what you want as it's premined. Edit: If you are thinking about this route, the best way I can describe for you is to use ColossusCoin2, search and replace the names and commit it. Take PayCon and search and replace the names and replace the first source with the second one so you can see the differences. The main files that are always the differences are the src folder and everything the the qt folder minus the res folder, you might get confused if overlapping docs and contribution folders but really they don't mean too much. Honestly, why is anyone even suggesting using a new wallet versus fixing the original? Granted paycon has some features the original did not, but maryj1.0 also has features that paycon does not. The features that paycon brings to the table are negligible at best. This idea of forcing a change that in all reality only does one thing which is to add ~5 million coins is more or less transparent. I don't mind either way what you guys do, I was just offering suggestions. I went through MaryJ's wallet a while ago and PayCon does have all the same features plus many more, specifically Litestake which consumes about 100 times less CPU power, Multisend and Stakeforcharity that lets you send portions of your Stake to other addresses, Coin control on RPC calls, checkwallet and repairwallet GUI, enable/disable returnchange, combobox (pick blocks by size, weight, or total), Splitblock (split your Blocks for higher reward), delete address RPC and GUI, rescan from blockheight RPC call, delete address RPC and GUI, orphan removal, sorting transactions by date range (useful for Stake during a given period), sorting of Coin control by age and weight, inwallet links to Exchanges, Youtube, Forums, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook and swappable theme's. I'm probably forgetting a few as well. What is the same is the statistics page, in-wallet Block explorer, and IRC chat. K, so I'm not exactly sure where the retargeting comes in for MaryJ 1.0 but if you figure it out, you still could add all those things to the wallet as they are all great stuff to have. If you DO want to go the route of using PayCon's source, I'll even code it up for free for you guys. You could still do 5% inflation per year in the first year but use a static reward and so that would reduce slightly over time as compared to the money supply but with a static reward there isn't always 100% Stake rate so those that are Staking could achieve around 10-15% per year with a maximum loss of 5% if you never Staked. The reason I would code it for free is because you'd be making an android wallet so if it's all running smoothly for you guys then it isn't much trouble to make one for PayCon as well, plus all source changes of either would help both. There is also the case that if you are using a new genesis, you trim off all the extra data. The proper way would be to load all the addresses as a redeem script through private keys (although I have never done it), trusting someone to hold the Coins as a swap is a bit of a gamble. Shoot some ideas Does paycon offer alias addresses like MaryJaneID. I honestly feel like that is the best feature that the original wallet had, especially in regards to merchant adoption, which should be the highest priority of any coin. Edit: And again, why not just fix the original wallet? And maybe add any additional functionality like for instance qr codes, down the road? Ok, lets see if we can fix the current one then. I will say that the light staking that you have in paycon is very nice. Do you have active users using it on rasberry pi's? That being integrated into the original wallet would be awesome. Edit: and any exchange should be handled through a trusted escrow. Yes litestake was first implemented in HyperStake and allows you to run the client on something as small as a raspberry pi. |
|
|
|
The new wallet I saw was really basic, didn't even have Coin Control. If your going to clone then why not use better source?
Marketcap estimations are out of the window, the base marketcap value of a basic cloned source with a small number of participants is 2-8k USD
It cannot be said where every Coin can be a 300 million marketcap, if not marketed and developed a Coin can achieve $0 marketcap.
You no like spurdocoin? Did you see where the 1440 blocks a day is contradicted with 144 a day in the code? Edit: the original was much better. I know you did not find the source, but, as I said before, the front end was certainly silkcoin or an iteration thereof. Yeah the old one looked nicer and had more features, it would be like downgrading. If you have time, because you are much more knowledgeable than me, I assure you, regarding wallet code, would you look at the difficulty adjustment, please? It seems fairly basic, but what do you make of it? In layman's terms. Looks like just one division to me? Edit: Also, did you see the 1440 blocks/day vs 144 blocks/day issue I mentioned? And would that create a clash of some kind? Whish source is it? What file? and What line? You know you could just clone PayCon.... It has theme's, litestake, multi-send, stake for charity, statistics, irc chat, links to social media and forums, and lots of extra handy RPC calls and that. You would just take out the couple Forks, change the links and data in the statistics, maybe an afternoon of work. +1 Do you know if Adam would be open to that? I believe he would be. If he agreed to do this, what would be the total supply of coins? This option would not include POW right? It can include POW if you want it to, you just set it at what you want. You could do it as initial Blocks for the premine, zero reward then POW to get it going. ColossusCoin2 is also cross compiled source and much cleaner from forks but just finishing adding the newest stuff. PayCon is 1 minute blocktime with 2-14 day min/max age and 30 Coins, and colossuscoin2 is 2 minute blocktime with 7/28 day min max age and 5000 Coin POS reward. It uses a static reward, you could copy ColossusCoin2 as with the POS reward as it's a bit simpler and is close to what you want as it's premined. Edit: If you are thinking about this route, the best way I can describe for you is to use ColossusCoin2, search and replace the names and commit it. Take PayCon and search and replace the names and replace the first source with the second one so you can see the differences. The main files that are always the differences are the src folder and everything the the qt folder minus the res folder, you might get confused if overlapping docs and contribution folders but really they don't mean too much. Honestly, why is anyone even suggesting using a new wallet versus fixing the original? Granted paycon has some features the original did not, but maryj1.0 also has features that paycon does not. The features that paycon brings to the table are negligible at best. This idea of forcing a change that in all reality only does one thing which is to add ~5 million coins is more or less transparent. I don't mind either way what you guys do, I was just offering suggestions. I went through MaryJ's wallet a while ago and PayCon does have all the same features plus many more, specifically Litestake which consumes about 100 times less CPU power, Multisend and Stakeforcharity that lets you send portions of your Stake to other addresses, Coin control on RPC calls, checkwallet and repairwallet GUI, enable/disable returnchange, combobox (pick blocks by size, weight, or total), Splitblock (split your Blocks for higher reward), delete address RPC and GUI, rescan from blockheight RPC call, delete address RPC and GUI, orphan removal, sorting transactions by date range (useful for Stake during a given period), sorting of Coin control by age and weight, inwallet links to Exchanges, Youtube, Forums, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook and swappable theme's. I'm probably forgetting a few as well. What is the same is the statistics page, in-wallet Block explorer, and IRC chat. K, so I'm not exactly sure where the retargeting comes in for MaryJ 1.0 but if you figure it out, you still could add all those things to the wallet as they are all great stuff to have. If you DO want to go the route of using PayCon's source, I'll even code it up for free for you guys. You could still do 5% inflation per year in the first year but use a static reward and so that would reduce slightly over time as compared to the money supply but with a static reward there isn't always 100% Stake rate so those that are Staking could achieve around 10-15% per year with a maximum loss of 5% if you never Staked. The reason I would code it for free is because you'd be making an android wallet so if it's all running smoothly for you guys then it isn't much trouble to make one for PayCon as well, plus all source changes of either would help both. There is also the case that if you are using a new genesis, you trim off all the extra data. The proper way would be to load all the addresses as a redeem script through private keys (although I have never done it), trusting someone to hold the Coins as a swap is a bit of a gamble. Shoot some ideas Does paycon offer alias addresses like MaryJaneID. I honestly feel like that is the best feature that the original wallet had, especially in regards to merchant adoption, which should be the highest priority of any coin. Edit: And again, why not just fix the original wallet? And maybe add any additional functionality like for instance qr codes, down the road? Ok, lets see if we can fix the current one then. |
|
|
|
If you are having bandwidth problems enter "strictincoming true" & "strictprotocol true" into the debug window.
what does these both commands do? also when i did "disablestake false 999999" output has stake requirment set? = false what condition i have to put in the disablestake syntax thanks for the info or pointing me towards it strictincoming will block peers that request the same data over and over, we have seen this happening since the fork a few months back. strictprotocol will only keep you connected to peers on the most recent wallet. if you enter "disablestake false" then the wallet will continue the hashing process as usual. if you enter "disablestake true" then you have shut off staking. if you enter "disable stake true diff > 25" then your staking will be disabled if the diff is over 25 and it will say "stake requirements set? true" and once difficulty is <25 (rarely) thn staking will become active by itself, right? Yep, thats how it works. You can also do it with your wallets total weight. "disablestake true weight < 100000" for example lets rock the party, when you'll be launching another coin with 1000% PoS  I had an idea for a 50k Coin, you could launch it with a long 0 mining reward and taper up a bit and let trading takes it's course, when it hit's 0 it gets delisted and you get bags or BTC, maybe throw in some random blocks, super compound! |
|
|
|
So mullick will 100% support a hard fork to remove all PCs? I challenge him to do that. In fact I will donate to a fund so the PayCon Devs can fork XPY to remove all Prime Controllers; if Cryptsy agrees to only run the new fork.
I don't know if it is legal or possible but I would all coins generated from PCs destroyed too.
No need to donate to a fund for that, we are giving away 7.5% of PayCon to everyone who lost out though this mess starting Friday. Fuck'em, we've already got our own version of Hashtalk (cryptoplays), ConStand, Ice Forums, twitter, reddit, youtube, facebook, slack, and about 50+ features they don't have, no GAW and no Prime Controllers.
We made everything that PayCoin couldn't for less than $1000.As I said before, PayCoin was made to pay off previous debt (millions of debt), as long as it is around it can never go to $20 (not even even $5) as coins will always be siphoned off to pay these debts. |
|
|
|
The new wallet I saw was really basic, didn't even have Coin Control. If your going to clone then why not use better source?
Marketcap estimations are out of the window, the base marketcap value of a basic cloned source with a small number of participants is 2-8k USD
It cannot be said where every Coin can be a 300 million marketcap, if not marketed and developed a Coin can achieve $0 marketcap.
You no like spurdocoin? Did you see where the 1440 blocks a day is contradicted with 144 a day in the code? Edit: the original was much better. I know you did not find the source, but, as I said before, the front end was certainly silkcoin or an iteration thereof. Yeah the old one looked nicer and had more features, it would be like downgrading. If you have time, because you are much more knowledgeable than me, I assure you, regarding wallet code, would you look at the difficulty adjustment, please? It seems fairly basic, but what do you make of it? In layman's terms. Looks like just one division to me? Edit: Also, did you see the 1440 blocks/day vs 144 blocks/day issue I mentioned? And would that create a clash of some kind? Whish source is it? What file? and What line? You know you could just clone PayCon.... It has theme's, litestake, multi-send, stake for charity, statistics, irc chat, links to social media and forums, and lots of extra handy RPC calls and that. You would just take out the couple Forks, change the links and data in the statistics, maybe an afternoon of work. +1 Do you know if Adam would be open to that? I believe he would be. If he agreed to do this, what would be the total supply of coins? This option would not include POW right? It can include POW if you want it to, you just set it at what you want. You could do it as initial Blocks for the premine, zero reward then POW to get it going. ColossusCoin2 is also cross compiled source and much cleaner from forks but just finishing adding the newest stuff. PayCon is 1 minute blocktime with 2-14 day min/max age and 30 Coins, and colossuscoin2 is 2 minute blocktime with 7/28 day min max age and 5000 Coin POS reward. It uses a static reward, you could copy ColossusCoin2 as with the POS reward as it's a bit simpler and is close to what you want as it's premined. Edit: If you are thinking about this route, the best way I can describe for you is to use ColossusCoin2, search and replace the names and commit it. Take PayCon and search and replace the names and replace the first source with the second one so you can see the differences. The main files that are always the differences are the src folder and everything the the qt folder minus the res folder, you might get confused if overlapping docs and contribution folders but really they don't mean too much. Honestly, why is anyone even suggesting using a new wallet versus fixing the original? Granted paycon has some features the original did not, but maryj1.0 also has features that paycon does not. The features that paycon brings to the table are negligible at best. This idea of forcing a change that in all reality only does one thing which is to add ~5 million coins is more or less transparent. I don't mind either way what you guys do, I was just offering suggestions. I went through MaryJ's wallet a while ago and PayCon does have all the same features plus many more, specifically Litestake which consumes about 100 times less CPU power, Multisend and Stakeforcharity that lets you send portions of your Stake to other addresses, Coin control on RPC calls, checkwallet and repairwallet GUI, enable/disable returnchange, combobox (pick blocks by size, weight, or total), Splitblock (split your Blocks for higher reward), delete address RPC and GUI, rescan from blockheight RPC call, delete address RPC and GUI, orphan removal, sorting transactions by date range (useful for Stake during a given period), sorting of Coin control by age and weight, inwallet links to Exchanges, Youtube, Forums, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook and swappable theme's. I'm probably forgetting a few as well. What is the same is the statistics page, in-wallet Block explorer, and IRC chat. K, so I'm not exactly sure where the retargeting comes in for MaryJ 1.0 but if you figure it out, you still could add all those things to the wallet as they are all great stuff to have. If you DO want to go the route of using PayCon's source, I'll even code it up for free for you guys. You could still do 5% inflation per year in the first year but use a static reward and so that would reduce slightly over time as compared to the money supply but with a static reward there isn't always 100% Stake rate so those that are Staking could achieve around 10-15% per year with a maximum loss of 5% if you never Staked. The reason I would code it for free is because you'd be making an android wallet so if it's all running smoothly for you guys then it isn't much trouble to make one for PayCon as well, plus all source changes of either would help both. There is also the case that if you are using a new genesis, you trim off all the extra data. The proper way would be to load all the addresses as a redeem script through private keys (although I have never done it), trusting someone to hold the Coins as a swap is a bit of a gamble. Shoot some ideas |
|
|
|
You see? All these other cloned shitcoins are dying @BitcoinT [BT] left and right, and PayCON surviving. It's all it does and more. Next scam coin going down is Paycoin, cause it's not legit either.
That's because we are the best in the business |
|
|
|
The new wallet I saw was really basic, didn't even have Coin Control. If your going to clone then why not use better source?
Marketcap estimations are out of the window, the base marketcap value of a basic cloned source with a small number of participants is 2-8k USD
It cannot be said where every Coin can be a 300 million marketcap, if not marketed and developed a Coin can achieve $0 marketcap.
You no like spurdocoin? Did you see where the 1440 blocks a day is contradicted with 144 a day in the code? Edit: the original was much better. I know you did not find the source, but, as I said before, the front end was certainly silkcoin or an iteration thereof. Yeah the old one looked nicer and had more features, it would be like downgrading. If you have time, because you are much more knowledgeable than me, I assure you, regarding wallet code, would you look at the difficulty adjustment, please? It seems fairly basic, but what do you make of it? In layman's terms. Looks like just one division to me? Edit: Also, did you see the 1440 blocks/day vs 144 blocks/day issue I mentioned? And would that create a clash of some kind? Whish source is it? What file? and What line? You know you could just clone PayCon.... It has theme's, litestake, multi-send, stake for charity, statistics, irc chat, links to social media and forums, and lots of extra handy RPC calls and that. You would just take out the couple Forks, change the links and data in the statistics, maybe an afternoon of work. +1 Do you know if Adam would be open to that? I believe he would be. If he agreed to do this, what would be the total supply of coins? This option would not include POW right? It can include POW if you want it to, you just set it at what you want. You could do it as initial Blocks for the premine, zero reward then POW to get it going. ColossusCoin2 is also cross compiled source and much cleaner from forks but just finishing adding the newest stuff. PayCon is 1 minute blocktime with 2-14 day min/max age and 30 Coins, and colossuscoin2 is 2 minute blocktime with 7/28 day min max age and 5000 Coin POS reward. It uses a static reward, you could copy ColossusCoin2 as with the POS reward as it's a bit simpler and is close to what you want as it's premined. Edit: If you are thinking about this route, the best way I can describe for you is to use ColossusCoin2, search and replace the names and commit it. Take PayCon and search and replace the names and replace the first source with the second one so you can see the differences. The main files that are always the differences are the src folder and everything the the qt folder minus the res folder, you might get confused if overlapping docs and contribution folders but really they don't mean too much. |
|
|
|
Is that 100% per day?
It's based on 100% per year. AFAIK That's before compounding. The current codebase requires manual scraping of stake in order to prevent compounding. As much as I dislike XPY and GAW I do have to point out that there is not that big of a difference between 100% once per year staking and 100% with continuous compounding (assuming that coins stake continuously, i.e. over infinitesimal small intervals). In the former case the yield is 100% per year whereas in the latter it is (e-1)*100% ~ 171% per year. I don't think that scrapping is helping much. Btw, the difference in 350% case is much bigger: 350% vs (e^3.5-1)*100% ~ 3212% Minimum Stake is 1 hour, I'm quite sure that would be much more than 171% per year, plus you can exploit the time drift (2 hour acceptance on 1 hour minimum stake) as well for even higher payouts. I'm pretty sure you could have a looping amount of XPY sending to each other as well, tx fees are tiny so you can create millions of transactions with as little as 10-100 XPY. |
|
|
|
That is correct, and it gets worse as that is just one of the many flaws.
Keys were not rotated, Compound stake was not fixed, Stake rates are all 100% compounding, No single prime protection was developed, there is no "soft fork" or easy way to disable one or more primes, What else is there? Don't be giving Crestington ideas. He will be posting potential fixes for this shit. We want Paycoin dead not fixed by Crestington. Haha no, I'm not helping to fix it because I already have the solution. Why do I need PayCoin when I already have PayCon? |
|
|
|
So I was wrong, there is apparently a minimum. Which makes the leaked keys somewhat less dangerous - to make use of them someone would have to spend $20k or whatever the exchange rate is now. Or someone would have to be in posession of 125k coins like BTClend. Currently there are 58 addresses with over 125k in their wallets. 50 of those, 49 after last night, would be Prime Nodes themselves. That leaves 9 addresses with over 125K? Do they need to be 125K in the same address? or just in the wallet staking? They just enable the stake rate for any address in the wallet. Which is now 100% for all the prime activation keys
So if enough people had these keys then everyone would get 100%?? |
|
|
|
Crestington,
Is there any way to identify if someone starts staking with these keys? Would we just see extra inflation on the chain?
You would calculate the amount of the Stake when seeing it on the chain, it's not too hard to tell from 5% to 100% Stake rates. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
