The biggest problem with trustwallet is that it's close-source and there is no way to know how the keys have been generated and whether they are stored in their server or not. That may be why OP doesn't want to use trustwallet.
The other problem with trustwallet is that it's only available on mobile and it has no desktop version.

If one of reports is handled and the post is deleted, all reports made for that post are automatically handled and marked as good.
Otherwise, all reports made for that post should be handled one by one.
For more information, read the old post made by halab.

I don't think it's true to say that you uploaded audio in the forum. The forum doesn't have such a feature at all.
You uploaded an audio file somewhere else and shared its link here. That's like uploading a video on YouTube and sharing the link in the forum.

According to their website, users have to prove the ownership of the withdrawal address.
If OP doesn't own that address, then the question is how he/she was able to prove its ownership.


This is very likely.


I agree. It's very unlikely.

Theymos usually doesn't change the username and as you mentioned, it's only the display name which is changed. But it's not that the username is unchanged for all users.
If theymos changes someone's display name due to his/her privacy, he changes the username as well.
For more information, read the post made by theymos, before.

From forum FAQs:

With doing this, you will see the current USD value of inputs and outputs. OP wants to see their value at the time the transaction was made.

With disconnecting your computer from the internet and generating the keys, you don't make your wallet a cold storage.
You should generate your wallet on an air-gapped device. This means that you should use a device which has been always offline and will never get online.  


Your public key is different from your bitcoin address.
Your bitcoin address is actually a hash of your public key.


With doing this, you defeat the purpose of the paper wallet.
Your private keys should never touch the internet.
You should create the unsigned transaction on the online device and sign it on the offline device.

If the wallet has been created in 2013, the seed phrase should contain 16-20 words.
Blockchain.com wallet used to give users a seed phrase which isn't supported by any other wallet. They upgraded their wallet in 2016 and started to use 12 word BIP39 seed phrases.

If you have the private key, that's all you need and you don't need any password.


Maybe, you are confusing the mnemonic phrase with private key.
Isn't that a series of words? If so, that's called mnemonic phrase, not private key.

The following link may be helpful to you.
https://login.blockchain.com/wallet/forgot-password

It's possible that the banned user is interested in a service someone has posted about it and wants to use it.
As the banned user needs to know if the announcement poster is trustworthy enough, he/she should be able to modify his/her trust list.

You can use blockchair.com.
It shows the value of inputs and outputs at the time the transaction was made.
It also calculates the "total spent" and the "total received" considering the value of the funds sent/received at the time of transactions.

In the case you have changed the email address associated with your bitcointalk account, you should see an email sent to your old email address regarding the email address change.

Wasn't Pmalek talking about stats on trust list changes?
As far as I know, it's not possible for a banned user to leave a feedback at all. Correct me if I am wrong, please.

Because the seed phrase (whether it's BIP39 or an electrum's seed) has enough entropy and you can't brute force that.


That's exactly how it should work.


If you manage to brute-force someone's seed phrase, you can access the fund. But the problem is that you can't brute-force the seed phrase.

Can you access a wallet if you brute-force its seed phrase? Yes.
Can you brute-force a seed phrase without any information about that? No.


Big entropy of the seed phrase.

I am sure you are missing something.

I just visited the website you bought bitcoin from to see how it works.
According to what I read on the website, for withdrawing bitcoin, you have to send them an image to prove that you own the withdrawal address.
How did you do the verification? Did you send an image from electrum watch-only wallet window?
Didn't you send an image from exodus wallet? That may be why they referred to Exodus in their response.

Currently, electrum uses a list containing 2048 words. The list you are referring to is for the old version of electrum's seed phrase and contains 1626 words, not 1625.


If you find a seed phrase which belongs to a funded wallet, you can spend the fund.


Whether there are 1626 words or 2048 words, it's impossible to access a funded wallet.

You can delete your post even if it's located on a locked thread.
The limitation on locked threads is that you can't edit your posts.

Are you talking about the comment made by the user with the name of nbourbon?
If so, I think he/she doesn't want to use segwit addresses just because he/she thinks that it's better to use taproot addresses. I don't think that's due to a flaw in segwit addresses.
Maybe, that user doesn't know that with using taproot addresses instead of native segwit addresses, he/she will have to pay more fee for many of the transactions.

What you are talking about is called seed phrase, not passphrase.
Passphrase is an extra word or characters added to your seed phrase for more security.


You can't be sure of that if the wallet is close-source.
For example, in a close-source non-custodial wallet like trustwallet, you have full control over your keys. But there is no way to know whether you are the only one who has access to the keys or not.