The problem is that with using the forum search messages tool, you can only search in your inbox. You can't search for the messages you have sent out.
Since OP was trying to find a message in his/her outbox, that tool can't be helpful.

You are right. I just tested the shortcuts on Firefox and they didn't work. So, it seems that the behavior depends on the browser that is used.

Accardo, what browser you are using? Are you using firefox too?

I just tested those shortcuts on google chrome and I confirm that they are working without any problem.
I had the same experience as Xal0lex. When I change the keyboard language, the shortcuts no longer work.

The website in question has been created only 100 days ago and like any other ponzi scheme, they are surely scammers.
Do not waste your money and avoid any get-rich-quick scheme. No one will give you free money.

To avoid any confusion:
The user you are referring to is ibuddy122505, not ibuddy122055.

All the posts that are made in the forum are archived by ninjastic.space and loyce.club. Click here to see the deleted post.

When will be the halving?
It's impossible to know the exact date of halving.
Assuming the next blocks will be mined at the rate of 1 per 10 minutes on average, the halving will be 637,830 minutes later which would be April, 30, 2024.

How will the halving affect bitcoin price?
No one knows that.

Transactions are usually confirmed even if the fee rate is too low, but there is no guarantee that your transaction will be finally confirmed.
Your transaction will be removed from the mempool, if it isn't confirmed in 14 days. It's also possible that your transaction is removed from the mempool due to limited capacity of the mempool.

The only working free transaction accelerator I know is ViaBTC which doesn't accept transactions with the fee rate of lower than 10 sat/byte.

No need to ChatGPT for that. You could get answer to your question with a simple google search or reading the pinned topic on "Meta".
FAQ: Everything you need to know about forum 'activity, account ranks and merit

Take note that bumps and super bumps are different things and they have nothing to do with determining your rank.

Yes. JayJuanGee is a human.
Even DdmrDdmr who merited 889 posts under 16 minutes on December 23, 2022 is a human [1].

[1] 889 posts merited (by me) in just under 16 minutes–What’s got over me? (v 30.0)

100 KB is equivalent to 400000 weight units only if all inputs and outputs are legacy. A segwit transaction includes some witness data that are counted as a quarter of non-witness data.


Weight/4 = virtual size, not actual size.
400000 weight units is equivalent to 100 vKB.

The limit is now 400,000 weight units, not 100 KB. That's the default maximum standard transaction weight and nodes will likely reject your transaction if it has a larger weight.
It may worth mentioning that the protocol allow a transaction to have larger weight and nothing prevents a miner from including a transaction with larger weight.

As mentioned by nc50lc, the default time is 14 days.
If your transaction was removed from the mempool earlier, that was probably because the network was so congested and the nodes removed your transaction from their mempool due to reaching the maximum size of the mempool.
It's very unlikely that OP's transaction will be removed from the mempool earlier than 14 days.

Go to console.
Decrypt your wallet (if it's encrypted) using the following command. Skip this step if your wallet is not encrypted.

With the command your wallet will be encrypted again after 600 seconds. You can change the 600 to any number you want.

After that, use the following command to import your private key.

I also haven't seen any DT member giving negative trust to someone just because of using multiple accounts. But the trust system has been used for giving negative trust to users who use alternative accounts for cheating in bounty/signature campaign, ban evasion or abusing the merit system. That's probably what OP is referring to.

Take note that you can't always do this.
In the case the original transaction hasn't been flagged as RBF, nodes reject the second transaction even if it pays much higher fee.

Bluewallet is surely a good option. It's open-source and non-custodial. So, it gives you full control over your fund and there is nothing hidden from the users. It also allow you to make offline transactions.
Note that bluewallet only supports bitcoin and can't be used for altcoins.

I thought they haven't been banned, because that's not recorded neither on modlog nor BPIP.
nemruth and Atrain622 made post on February 2. Since modlog keeps the data for the past 7 days, their ban should be shown on modlog. It's weird that modlog doesn't show that.

Right. But note that the addresses have been already sent to the server when you created the wallet unless you generated that wallet offline.

If you want to protect your privacy, you should run your own server.
You can also use TOR connection to be completely anonymous.

Right. The master public key isn't sent to the server. But it's not that only used addresses are sent to the server, since without getting response from the server, it's not possible to know an address has been used or not.
All the addresses that are within the gap limit are sent to the server. By default, the gap limit is 20. This means that electrum sends the addresses to the server until there are 20 consecutive unused addresses.

I just checked their profile on BPIP.
5 out of the 8 accounts I mentioned above have been banned. nemruth, Atrain622 and lhfly5201314 haven't been banned and should be still able to make post in the forum.