The walls are causing gradually more and more panic each time they appear. The first wall originally had no reaction at all.
|
|
|
LOL! That's how you get a chick to show you the goods. Ok T- ya got over ten grand in your trading account, so I assume that means you started with about fifty bucks, right?
Where do you see 10K USD and why do you assume that I keep all my funds or a even a remotely significant amount of my funds in a btc-e account, especially in light of recent events.
|
|
|
That's a very crude way of drawing the chart. This one is much better. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FUoMLxT8.png&t=663&c=sGuS4fRZjXk_xQ)
|
|
|
Your mother is your primary female role model whether you chose to acknowledge that or not. Mom was a keeper, which explains why Dad kept her. My ex wasn't so I didn't. I don't hate women. It's just a fact that the ones available to me are unsuitable for long term commitment. I'm not crying about it. I enjoy the variety.
She cheated on you, didn't she? And you're scared to love again? Be honest, your life is a bad Barry Manilow song, isn't it? Come on, admit it, we won't judge you. You crack me up. That's what would have had to happen for you to cram my narrative into your model of the way the world works, right? Look, my ex is the mother of my daughter and I'm not gonna trash her to make myself look good to strangers. Think what you like. The fact is that there are very few women worth marrying and most of the ones who are don't stay on the market long. Women are a luxury. Women are not a commodity - are you from Afghanistan or something? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FdXsW0Ew.png&t=663&c=0wDestOi_c0itg)
|
|
|
As this is the official off-topic thread I will take the occasion to say something I always wanted to: I'm really amazed by the NSFW thing US folks use when linking to sex related images.... is so ridiculous I cannot even understand it. How does that work exactly? Naked ladies/porn is specifically considered "not suitable for work" but general news or other non-work related stuff is suitable? What about sports news? Bitcoin stuff? I mean, I'd say that everything non-work related might be considered "not suitable" in many circumstances (you are supposed to be working, not reading about sports or bitcoin, right?), but the fact of specifically labeling "naked ladies/sex" as "not suitable for work" seems to me the reflection of a ridiculously biggot society. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) We live in a culture where it's considered normal to show people killing each other in the most gruesome ways imaginable on TV, but god forbid you show some people making love. What more needs to be said about this? We have an overpopulation problem.
|
|
|
http://trading.i286.org/Does anyone have a good price ticker which shows an overview of the orderbook like this? But for bitstamp then. I always preferred i286 in the days of Gox. I like the visual layout. I wish they'd switch to Stamp. Merely saying "Gox is dead" just doesn't cut it. I liked i286 because of the mario coin and train sounds. It used to support bitstamp but bitstamp cut it off.
|
|
|
If it's a trap I should catch it if 1 day MACD goes down before 3 day MACD goes up, and not take too much of a loss, if any.
|
|
|
Who panic bought?? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I didn't panic buy; I made the preplanned decision to buy when the downtrend broke. wow, for 3 days nobody dumps at 550 $, and thats a downtrend broke. so naive to think that. This is exactly what I thought during the recovery in 2013. "It's only going up because nobody is dumping". All the way from $66 to $200. I have told myself many times now to ignore that thought. The lack of dumping indicates some change in supply in the background which you can't understand. no changes in supply, new 3600 coins hit the market every day. Like I said you don't understand. -Change in supply to exchanges. -Because people are buying OFF exchange. -Change in supply because people aren't shorting anymore (and are covering shorts instead) -Change in supply because no more goxcoins from builder. -Other reasons
|
|
|
BUT.. BUT.. You guys said we could buy cheap coins ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) You could have. I just didn't realize the deal would only last 6 hours.
|
|
|
Who panic bought?? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I didn't panic buy; I made the preplanned decision to buy when the downtrend broke. wow, for 3 days nobody dumps at 550 $, and thats a downtrend broke. so naive to think that. This is exactly what I thought during the recovery in 2013. "It's only going up because nobody is dumping". All the way from $66 to $200. I have told myself many times now to ignore that thought. The lack of dumping indicates some change in supply in the background which you can't understand.
|
|
|
Who panic bought?? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I didn't panic buy; I made the preplanned decision to buy when the downtrend broke.
|
|
|
very nice beartrap to 581 on finex. increased position again to 60%.
|
|
|
One could theorize that all of the short term trend reversals in the past 6 months have had something to do with the connection and disconnection of bitfinex and bitstamp.
|
|
|
"strange" movement: observing movement that is going against your position.
|
|
|
this is fun to watch ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDmxs4e8.png&t=663&c=_n2wVF1YvYnaIg) obvious maniuplation is obvious. why doesnt he simply buy into 600 if he needs those coins so bad? He's stepping his order up gradually to trigger all dark orders and sellers. It might even be some kind of algorithm. There is no rush to jump up to 600, since he doesn't really have any competition.
|
|
|
The entire rise from $0.05 to $1250 was manipulation.
|
|
|
see I am watching the bids increasing where the fuck this money came from ??!!!! was it all waiting out of the order book ? is it money that came today to exchanges ? I am so confused...
It took time for wires to process in after people saw the bottom at 400.
|
|
|
We should also question why is the volume so low yet the price rising. A low volume means not only that people are not buying but that people are not selling. Why are people not selling? It could be a trap, or it could a legitimate situation called lack-of-supply. See, in bitcoin, not everything happens on exchanges, and we have to speculate about what is going on off of exchanges. A lack of selling can be because some big player opened up a contract to buy coins directly from whales and miners offline. In this case, if the offline buying is large and consistent enough, it warrants a legitimate reversal. This has happened in the past due to Winklevoss, SecondMarket, Fortress, etc.
|
|
|
Haha moving his wall every time it goes up a dollar. Interesting to see which wall that falls first at 599
Yeah funny to see how people can "play" with almost 2M$, but i doubt he will push to 599. Shady as hell. Something's up. I doubt the whale is just messing around for fun.. Oh well, maybe not. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I've seen this behavior happen many times in 2013. It doesn't seem shady to me - just a big player accumulating a position after all the speculators have finally stopped trading. He knows people will dump into his walls because the bear market is fresh on everyone's mind and they will think the wall is 'shady', or that there are dark-orders. The question is does this one guy mean the entire market should move permanently.
|
|
|
|