Buying large quantities of GP @ 500 Sat each. Message me how many your looking to sell. Will give 750 each if you have more than 100k
This is all you have to say for yourself? What a piece of work this guy is.... |
|
|
|
the small chump change that was your instamine claims is meaningless to the amount of money invested in here today.
First of all it's not an instamine "claim" it's a proven 2+ million in the first 48 hours. Or have you not seen the chart? Second if there are only 5,273,214 DASH in current supply, how can it be small chump change when it's a HUGE percentage of the total coins in circulation? You're contradicting yourself.  Edit: Here's the chart again since you conveniently haven't seen it. This is what a scam looks like:  |
|
|
|
What's going on? I thought DASH was to hit 0.027 today?
The DASH bagholders are too busy talking about Monero. it must be exhausting being a DASHtard and constantly having to defend your scammy, centralized shitcoin built from the ground up on lies, fraud and instamines. Not to mention changed parameters after launch. How embarrassing it must be for them to try and justify. In other news, my March 31 call is working out nicely: Here you go  It'll probably have a little bump around 0.012 before continuing the downtrend. |
|
|
|
this has never been a moderated thread since the start more than a year ago. We survived countless troll attacks in here, no need to moderate it .. just use the ignore button.
When I see newbies on our subreddit asking with genuine interest in the project whether they should buy some DASH or better stay away from it because they "heard it's a premine scam" the Ignore button doesn't help shit. Where do you think they "heard" that bullshit? i exspect even newbies to do their due diligence and do some research for themselves and not simply believe what some anonymous person typed on some internetforum. Any newbie that starts with those kind of questions makes me doubt they did any research at all and makes me even question their real motives. Suspecting hidden agendas hinders widespread adoption just like an elitist attitude towards newcomers does. BCTalk gives us the chance to deliver the actual facts about DASH through this thread to the public and we have the right to do so without trolls plastering their idiocy in here for hundreds of pages unintervened. I'm not even calling for something outrageous here, it's the most basic and universal forum rule: It's called off-topic posting and results in deletion and a ban of repeated offenders. I call again for heavy moderation due to excessive thread digression. The unmoderated past of this thread is no argument: Things have changed. A lot. Yes! We MUST moderate heavily so that new people aren't aware of the 575,000 coins instamined by the dev team in the 1st hour.. all while announcing "no premine" Such integrity!  Oops. |
|
|
|
i don't think that FUD because people want to get cheap DASH by fud, DASH community is more strong and large than any other altcoin. DASH is the future crypto currency.
TIL the future of crypto is a fraudulently instamined, centralized shitcoin with changed parameters after launch.  Good luck with that. |
|
|
|
You know who else besides vertoe is "hidden behind an anonymous internet nickname." Satoshi.
You know who else besides Duffield "is public?" Josh Garza.
 |
|
|
|
You are by far the lowest quality troll we've ever had.  So yes there is ideology behind this coin : privacy, liberty, freedom, try to make the world less directed by "power" and more with the heart...
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'. It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money. The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard. no. i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base. the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity. i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be. if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning? good luck  |
|
|
|
Hi Gang! Back at the desk! Anything new to report?
We are going back to being called DRK on Saturday. No, DASH is closing down because AdamWhite's parents posted a message to stop DASH people teasing him. Apparently it's affecting his school work and playtime. We all decided the right thing to do is respect Adam, close down DASH and let him get his way so he can get back on track at school. It's about time  But seriously, how's this for a schooling: So yes there is ideology behind this coin : privacy, liberty, freedom, try to make the world less directed by "power" and more with the heart...
I hope that changing the name will not make the ideology behind it change too, otherwhise it will failed.
There's no ideology in something that nobody uses. The ideology's in the design, not the name. Vertoe is justified in leaving over not being consulted but less so over 'ideology'. It's not a rock song that's being built here it's electronic money. The name can easily be compromised without any loss of principle but the functionality can't. So Evan has got his priorities right in that regard. no. i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base. the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity. i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be. if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning? good luck |
|
|
|
it's just a PR exercise, we just want as many posts as possible mentioning our sh*t coin (good or bad). it's the only way we can get attention... if you post here, you are giving us free PR, and helping The Darkcoin Foundation to perpetuate its scam further exploiting well meaning nerds with some sh*t we took off the shelf...
Agreed 100% |
|
|
|
Crossposting from the Darkcoin/DASH victims thread: Congrats on the award winning scam! |
|
|
|
no.
i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
good luck
Very well said. Thanks for sharing |
|
|
|
Curios to read some TA on the Dash price!
Anyone?
Here you go |
|
|
|
Well done GTO, AdamWhite and the other people FUDing Dash 24/7....you're even alienating people with no association with Dash. I'm surprised that your own coin communities haven't intervened yet.
Explain to me how this thread is "FUD" stonehedge. You should look up what FUD means.. or do you agree with the posters in the OP? Why don't you try doing something good for crypto instead of supporting a known criminal enterprise attempting to commit the crypto scam of the decade by trying to pass itself off as a legit coin. BTW, vertoe just 'fudded' your cult thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10925445#msg10925445
no.
i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.
the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.
i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.
if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?
good luck
|
|
|
|
LMAO AdamWhite, you post all day everyday about dash on an internet forum. Get a life chump, it's really sad...
You're one to talk... a quick look at your post history shows you're one of Darkcoin "defenders" who mocks and belittles anyone asking questions about Darkcoin / DASH. But hey at least you're using "attack the attacker" and not the strategy shown in the OP |
|
|
|
Actually Spots is a really nice guy.
I've had the near same thing said to me and I just don't get it
~BCX~
It shouldn't be that hard to understand. he's a deceitful shitcoin cloner who scams BTC by instamining or pre-mining his coins |
|
|
|
This is how they act when their scam is threatened.   |
|
|
|
Well, what a shitcoin this turned out to be Dev that couldn't give less of a fuck and private GPU miners dumping at any price Fuck yeah |
|
|
|
I wonder what igotspots next scam will be |
|
|
|
No, im trying to show people that you just FUD without even looking at your coin first and how filthy it is with all your Pump and Dumps + the shills you set loose when your team is pumping again.
Crypto is a haven for pump/dump.. those groups should also be investigated This isn't at all relevant to the DRK scam we're talking about but i'm sure you already knew that |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
