it's not how humans work.
if women want some cock then they'll have to start working that way. there really aren't that many 6ft 2inch millionaires to go round, and even fewer who are dumb enough to get tied down.
|
|
|
I just look at statistics. The odds of a marriage in the states surviving ten years today is something like 3%. Herbivores, mgtow, the beautiful ones, all the same shit. Women today are not just useless, they are actively dangerous. Happened back in the roman days too, it's just what happens when things go too well for too long.
it's very, very simple. if you really gotta marry someone, and i see no reason why anyone should, marry a woman who's richer than you are. there are plenty of them these days.
|
|
|
microsoft are big but they're not stupid.
they know perfectly well that if they started to meddle with github's parameters its value would be nil in no time at all. they're just as invested in keeping it healthy as the users themselves.
|
|
|
So you spend all your energy knocking projects and spreading FUD. Does that make you feel like a man?
i call out worthless projects and services. weiss proved to be worthless and clueless. not one single person who knows anything about crypto rated their ratings. it's junk designed to scrape a few hundred dollars out of people who should be looking to the informed for their info.
|
|
|
If you don't move or use it at all after 3 years or is this to do with the transition from the ERC20 coin to their own coin and blockchain? Seems very ridiculous to have a usage requirement every 3 years. Good to see they're using their 4bn dollars well and making smart decisions it's nothing to do with coin transitions. that's happening right now isn't it? i have no idea what they're thinking with this. people are saying it can be voted out of existence. why is it there in the first place?
|
|
|
Once the Whitepaper is ready, we can also contact Weiss Ratings, one of a few crypto ratings in the US. I believe, BTX would get an "A".
an absolute waste of energy. they had one week of publicity making hints about their earth shaking conclusions and then disappeared again when their results proved they know and understand nothing about crypto. it's worth one email and that's it.
|
|
|
it has stayed the distance and often has more transaction volume than bcash.
no one should care what the creator thinks of it. that's the whole point of crypto.
there's no reason why it can't be developed further and i'm kinda surprised it hasn't been picked up on. maybe there's an if it ain't broke don't fix it element. it would be interesting to see how receptive miners are to changes.
|
|
|
i have a soft spot for this coin so i'd like to give this a try.
username - european central bank
post count - 6659
bitcore address - 1FoXhKRqAn7PFHNfgJ15pfLxNo4PpBE9KS
|
|
|
isn't this guy the planet's most deluded bull who vanished when his ridiculous predictions turned out to be, uh, ridiculous?
|
|
|
the only reason there's a run is because of restricted supply. as soon as deposits are open on the exchanges expect a cratering like always.
|
|
|
Crypto market going down because CoinRail, South Korean crypto exchange has been hacked. That's why BTC, ETH and XRP falling down badly! Exchange hack news is true or just fudding? (Share info)
why would one nothing exchange in a country that you can't get money in and out of affect multiple entire markets across the world? it was a bubble. now it's popping. for me at least $3 freaking XRP was the clearest insult in crypto so far.
|
|
|
I am thinking of going to Sweden, with the express purpose of seeing just how bad muslim immigration is for a country, most especially a Scandinavian country.
the fact that bitcoin has permitted you to afford something like this is the biggest bubble indicator so far. instead of standing in a foreign street watching one muslim per hour go buy a newspaper you could be working on cold fusion in your lab at home and make the world a better place.
|
|
|
Screw that noise, Jack! You should be more salty. This is a bloody epic tragedy of epic proportions.
uh, ok. oh the humanity. yowzers and stuff.
|
|
|
Let’s hope so because I’m starting to get a little concerned atm
why? 20 grand was just as dumb an overshoot as 2013 but maybe less crooked, though that may not be a dead cert yet. $3-5k is more than possible or lower and that would be pretty normal based on previous behavior. i'd only get concerned if it went sub $1000.
|
|
|
http://fortune.com/2018/06/07/blockchain-firm-r3-is-running-out-of-money-sources-say/mike hearn's pet R3 is running out of money. how do you run out of over $100 million? do you eat the money? do you shovel cash into your heating boiler? in silicon valley is a million dollars a euphemism for $10,000? at least if you throw 100 million dollars at a film you usually wind up with something to watch at the end of it. this'll finish with some strings of 1s and 0s with 0 purpose.
|
|
|
bitcoin just had a 14.7% difficulty change upwards. that's the biggest since january. there sure is a lot of firepower out there somewhere.
|
|
|
We launch all the time with no problem these days, If all that stuff that came after the launches is so easy, why do we never just throw in the 10% more effort on any one of the modern launches and go back some time? I'm not arguing the moon landing was a hoax here. Just pointing out the obvious followup question to what you said.
90% or more of launches these days are for ruthlessly commercial reasons. and the next people to make the effort will be doing it for ascendant prestige which means china, not the tired old west. it might even be a private operation. and that whole era was a freaky anomaly. there's no appetite to push the limits any more. these days it takes airliners longer to fly many places than it did back then. the world's fastest plane designs like the sr-71 and x-15 are over 60 years old now.
|
|
|
Yeah but landing in one piece...
there's little to no gravity, plus you only have to put a few tons down versus lifting several thousand of high explosive but let's not get too technical.
|
|
|
I like the famous anecdote about the US's phenomenal talent of wasting money. NASA engineers spent millions of dollar trying to develop a pen that could write in space, or so the story goes. Meanwhile, the soviets used pencils.
pencil shavings floating around were perceived to be a problem as they could get into delicate electronic packages. hence, pens. at least there was some reasoning involved. whether it was valid? who knows. NASA (back then) was all about safety, anything that might cause equipment failure was minimized. use ten pencils per flight so they don't have to be sharpened? that still saves millions of dollars.
|
|
|
|