Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 02:34:26 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 »
2401  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [150'000 GH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees, Stratum, MergedMining, Private Servers on: August 28, 2013, 08:16:18 AM
It's a bit 4F here too.

(4F = Fu**ing F**ker is F**king F**ked)
2402  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Low speed at two Block Erupters (CGMiner) :( on: August 27, 2013, 02:44:05 PM
Quote
500mA + 500mA = 1A.  Not counting the hub's overhead, so your hub's PSU is underpowered.
Quote
//definetely not. Now i tried with one Block Erupter connected to HUB and one connected directly to computer, and effect was same, so i am sure there isnīt problem with power


I'm sure it is, but hey, whatever.  Knock yourself out chasing your tail.
2403  Other / Archival / Re: Need volunteer to help me create my own Bitcoin POOL on: August 27, 2013, 02:36:31 PM

I will use my name and my brand to promote the pool

This only works if anyone know who you are.
2404  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: [Lost] USB Block Erupter on: August 27, 2013, 08:46:14 AM
No, I can' find it. 

Where are you in Canada? I'll just hop on a plane and come help you look.

2405  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Setting up a company in the UK to Mine on: August 27, 2013, 08:44:59 AM
Yes.

God no.

What?   Huh  Setting up a company?  Tax?  Stop huffing the glue, man.  It's bad for you.
2406  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: PPS VS PPLNS BTCGUILD on: August 27, 2013, 08:43:28 AM
PPLNS is better if you're leaving it running 24/7.  You don't have to pay fees, and you get some NMC as a bonus. 

PPS is better if you're only mining intermittently, but you have a 7.5% fee, and no NMC merged mining.
2407  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.4.0 on: August 27, 2013, 08:37:17 AM
Solo mining with GPU?    Shocked  Did someone fall asleep for 2 years?  Huh
2408  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Low speed at two Block Erupters (CGMiner) :( on: August 27, 2013, 08:05:24 AM
maybe its a bit underpowered? I had a similar problem when I connected two Block Erupters to a 5-port USB hub with cardreader that only has a 1000mA PSU.

I think not,

Output voltage 5 V

Output current 1 A


500mA + 500mA = 1A.  Not counting the hub's overhead, so your hub's PSU is underpowered.
2409  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Nvidia Quadros? on: August 27, 2013, 07:58:18 AM
If you're mining on Nvidia GPUs, make sure to use CUDAminer. You prolly won't even make back the electricity it uses, but it will be a lot faster than the typical OCL applications used by almost every other mining software.

It's not "a lot" faster.  It's a little faster.  A little faster than incredibly slow, is still incredibly slow.
2410  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: **UPDATED** Current P2Pool Server List on: August 27, 2013, 07:46:21 AM
I think it would also be important for the pools to list their bitcoind limitations.
Some p2pools are configured to limit transactions drastically on the Bitcoin network and thus are bad for Bitcoin.

Mine has no limitations set, and never will.  I'm not going to support sending dust.
2411  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [19000 GH] Eligius: Decntrlzd, ASIC-rdy, 0Fee CPPSRB, 0reg, BTC+NMC, 877 # on: August 26, 2013, 03:50:57 PM

can i use the bitstamp as a wallet address?

Probably not, Eligius generates "mined" payouts, so you probably need a real wallet, or an online wallet that supports mined payments.
2412  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [19000 GH] Eligius: Decntrlzd, ASIC-rdy, 0Fee CPPSRB, 0reg, BTC+NMC, 877 # on: August 26, 2013, 09:50:42 AM
how do i sign a message to save changes?

I've entered my bitcoin payout address, i've entered the message as above ( my eligius...) but it doesn't work.


Copy the message to your Bitcoin-qt client's "Sign Message" function.  You should get a long string of random letters.  Copy and paste that to the second box on Eligius, job done.
2413  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.4.0 on: August 25, 2013, 04:00:03 PM
Windbloze 7.


Grow up.  Roll Eyes
2414  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.4.0 on: August 25, 2013, 03:59:35 PM
Heh, well at least you pretended that you knew what you were talking about Smiley
1) A different serial-USB driver for EACH USB chip ... we only use one
2) Oops - you can't send a control transfer with serial-USB damn shame about that hey Smiley
(I'm sure that one will be well above your understanding)
3) Though I guess you didn't notice the drivers in your God's miner that do use direct USB ... damn! Smiley

What about the crashing on first run with GPU mining on Windows?  You've still not acknowledged this.  

On several machines, several installs (Win7x64 Pro/Enterprise or Win8x64), I can only get cgminer to work with the ancient 12.8 drivers - and even then it's only 75% success rate.  Yet 'the other miner' works with 13.4 and newer no problems.  It doesn't make sense.

Edit: Spelling typo
2415  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.4.0 on: August 25, 2013, 02:06:57 PM
...

 Thanks Kano. Much like with Butterfly Labs, your terrible attitude has driven me to your competition.

One less dick in this thread Smiley

Nah, the dick is still firmly embedded in the thread.  Right up to the balls.
2416  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER ASIC FPGA GPU overc monit fanspd RPC linux/win/osx/mip/r-pi 3.4.0 on: August 25, 2013, 02:05:56 PM
Yeah, well one mining program uses stupid USB drivers which need so many hoops to be jumped through to get working, if they do at all, for no apparent benefit. The author(s) refuse(s) to accept that changing to the new more difficult and stupid USB drivers was a mistake, and won't go back to the original "just works" way of doing things.  That miner also has issues compiling it's OGL kernel, crashing out instantly, unless the correct number of chickens are slaughtered while the moon is in the third quadrant and sacrificed to the SDK gods.  The issue is also ignored by the authors, and has been for months upon months.

The other needs one set of USB or GPU drivers installed and everything just works.


I won't say which one is which, but I think anyone reading this has a fair idea..

2417  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [UK GROUP BUY] ASICMiner USB Block Erupters and Blades #5 on: August 25, 2013, 01:27:39 PM
Price is still too high for me, so I'm no longer interested.  If it were about BTC8 I'd jump on it.  But BTC12 is far too much considering the difficulty increase recently.  Cry
2418  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [LTC] Seems GPU mining is getting difficult on: August 25, 2013, 01:23:04 PM
apparently don't live in Alaska

Up here,

You in baltic region or in north america?

 Huh Roll Eyes
2419  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: [Lost] USB Block Erupter on: August 25, 2013, 12:31:44 PM
I haven't seen it here.   Hang on till I go out and have a look for it...

 Undecided
2420  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMiner Problem on: August 25, 2013, 09:43:11 AM
Don't waste your time mining on the Intel GPU.  It's too slow to bother with, I think I was getting 10KH/s mining scrypt coins on the HD4000 in my i3-3225.  The HD2500 in my i3-3220T does about 6KH/s.  Rubbish.
Pages: « 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!