Next person to buy 3 tickets in the main raffle gets a 4th ticket for free + 2 free random polymerbit notes when raffle is full
Is this retroactive?  |
|
|
|
I do not know if Stake.com configure all games to match their house edge or if they give different odds to different games? <So they might give a house edge of 0.4 to say Plinko and 0.6% to Video Poker, based on it's popularity.  > Far as I know, the house edge of each game have not changed since their inception. Despite anticipated payout changes, the house edge is preserved. Most are 1%, so if you were to say they were "aiming" for a specific overall house edge then perhaps that would be your number. |
|
|
|
|
Like a flash of lightning, Zepher had granted us a spark of light.
Every interaction that I've had with him was a gentle gust of words.
Rest in piece, dear friend.
1ZephertJThxkHih7XcaUHBkMSnvkTt5u
|
|
|
|
Thank you for confirming and helping me to verify. I hope your confirmation would be trusted by most of the people here. If it was discussion via Telegram, surely you can forward the messages so that an outside source can ensure the screenshots weren't doctored? |
|
|
|
|
Aye. It makes no sense when one sends dust to an address (which 2double0 presumably does not know prior to hacker's tx) just moments before the loan is fulfilled.
Unless we see evidence of some kind of communication that justifies the 20 uBTC transaction, this seems like a case of a self-loan.
|
|
|
|
The odds of winning on the new video poker must be very low too, you get nothing for a pair lower than Jacks.  In any way, I know most of the games are very difficult to beat, so this is not new to this kind of game. The house edge is less than 0.5%. Jacks or Better is a common game type in Video Poker. However, to one that is ignorant of the game, it may appear to have high variance wherein one henceforth concludes that it has a high edge. Low payouts for common outcomes != High house edge. |
|
|
|
Anyway, why you guys not believing on something that he said? Any user can post bet IDs. They may not belong to them, necessarily. Definitive proof comes from a tailored response from the actual profile. |
|
|
|
If you are choosing between the waves and ethereum classic. You will better to choose waves remember ethereum is different to ethereum classic.so for me waves coin is the better to choose compared to ETC that is my opinion and I think it is right base to my research. I'll give 2 merits to first member (without Stake's signature  ) who deciphers this. The choice between Waves and Ethereum Classic boils down to this: Ethereum is different to Ethereum Classic. Therefore, Waves is the superior choice. We have foo(firstCoin, secondCoin) {
if (firstCoin != "Ethereum") return secondCoin;
}
foo("Ethereum Classic", "Waves") |
|
|
|
|
Wherever there is a tool, others will find ways to exploit it.
There is no perfect safeguard apart from hard research, which most are unable/unwilling to do.
If you prevent one scam from being founded, scammers will try and sneak their way to a different kind of scam.
Some time ago, a user was scammed because they had trusted a fake Telegram account with the same name as mine.
They were certainly not new to crypto but had a lapse in security. This happens frequently and is unavoidable.
What is most important is to ensure that users are constantly cautious and verify what others are saying.
|
|
|
|
Don't understand the purpose of this post and how this thread managed to be 6 pages long without second comment from OP? The thread is 6 pages long because it is filled with people like you who spam the forum. If you had read one reply above your quote, you would have seen a reply. I guess it's easier searching for vague posts to respond with equally-vague replies, huh. |
|
|
|
Don't you think you are putting too much weight on the word 'centralization' here? Absolutely not. I'm talking about DT and highly trusted members' votes only. And if you think that they will do it based on their personal emotions over this Essentially, you want DT to select future DT members. I don't like that idea. |
|
|
|
Considering how you've hidden your profit, I'm going to assume that it's heavily negative. The luck 85% value on your account also doesn't do you any favors. |
|
|
|
I have proof of the loan. It's being repaid.
Now, if someone wants to loan him again. I have no objections - he is asking it for a trade that I would make myself too. The account cannot be given as collateral though. Did you repay the loan? |
|
|
|
I don't find anything wrong with the elections logic of some users here, but it should be limited to DT and some other highly trusted users only to vote for a new member to be included in DT (understand my words clearly, I said new member and not newbie).
What I'm trying to say is there should be a list compiled by DT members themselves which must be made public, and it should be restricted to DT and highly trusted members only to make them only capable of voting for a new user they think can add more value to the forum. I mean anyone who is helping the forum in any way should be considered to take part in DT elections. I disagree. Your proposal increases centralization and is based on subjective whims. These cannot be categorically identified and are they will only be propagated by those of current-DT status which is a feedback loop you don't want to see. |
|
|
|
|
Bump. Get this boy loaded!
|
|
|
|
If you try to compare other gambling sites with stake then you will get more success and more good reputation than others. Where maximum gambling sites losing their reputations at the same time the reputation of stake.com is increasing. Interesting blanket statement. Do you happen to have any examples of these "maximum gambling sites losing their reputations" or is that just something incredibly vague and general that you decided to say? |
|
|
|
|
Not sure why this transgression happened. Locked.
|
|
|
|
It is evident that you are using a thesaurus. If you had learned the meaning of those words, you would not use them in such a way. Please do not attempt to use language of which you have little understanding. |
|
|
|
Its about gambling in general on this forum.
Its the double standard of the high ranked members claiming to protect forums member by tagging everyone for the lowest shit but when it comes to gambling they close their eyes and promote it themself because they get money for it. See: Betcoin.ag BetKing.io MoneyPot JackpotRacer and then the reply goes "DT members only tagged them because they didn't get paid" |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I respect the opinion of all -nip- And the importance of everything is that we are many people who want to continue growing in this prestigious forum and Mr. Steve is providing opportunities to very valuable people. This is my humble opinion. I don't understand why you needed to write so much to convey so little. Regardless of your English ability, it should be easy to cut down on irrelevancy and redundancy.
(and I see nothing about confronting spam at all, only "stake is a campaign that allows members to earn bitcoin") |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
