|
Looks like they're forcing you to wager an amount equal to your balance before withdrawals in order to 'protect against money laundering'.
Considering their lowest-edge game still has a 1% edge, they are essentially taking at least 1% of your balance as a fee for each deposit. A hidden withdrawal fee, if you will. This is asinine.
Genuine money launderers would not be stopped with a 1x rollover and this rule only serves to harm your real players. Much like every time some regulation is created to "protect", an unintended consequence (or is it?) arises to kick in the teeth of people who have nothing to do with the regulation.
|
|
|
|
What an dumbass. With each hard fork, Bitcoin is loses its originality. Soon it will be completely washed out at forks flow. WTF are you even talking about? Hard forks can come in all sizes. There are literally dozens of Bitcoin forks out there, but do you know why we never talk about them? Because they are worthless. They are nothing more than get-rich-quick attempts by scammers using the Bitcoin name to rappel upwards more quickly. They are manipulating others to think there is an association with Bitcoin. Only BSV remains true to the Original Satoshi Vision philosophy. That's why BSV - is Original Bitcoin and CSW is a author of Satoshi Vision I think the idea of forcing centralization on your financial network just so you can store weather data is one of the stupidest things I have ever seen. Others just a hyipers like a Roger Ver Remember your roots. Where did you fork from? |
|
|
|
I got kicked out of the signature campaign and that's my only problem. How does being kicked out of campaign become a problem for anyone ? Because they took the forum for granted and treated signatures like a "job" without any effort whatsoever, leading to a cesspool of spam and an eventual ban which will make them realize, "I should have made more accounts," rather than the reality: "I should not have spammed". |
|
|
|
Yes, only extremely mentally ill and or brain dead brains claim that someone did something and are not able to quote it!   Exactly! So, where did h4ns lie? After all, if he did not lie, then clearly, it is not defamation. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, only 20-30% of yobit participants are good and helpful writers, the rest are spammers. I wouldn't even put a high number like 20% to this forum's quality. Roughly 2% of this forum contributes to substantial posting. If we're talking about CryptoTalk, I'd put the number around 0.1%. Probably even less. |
|
|
|
As long as you are not able to quote it, I am logically not able to read it! Only extremely mentally ill and or brain dead brains behave that way! Most people don't require hand-holding just to read a couple passages but I guess you're the outlier |
|
|
|
Translation:
I scammed h4ns Considering your criminal style, I am not surprised at all that you scammed h4ns! Nice. Glad to see you are finally confessing.
Pack up, boys: we're done here. |
|
|
|
Translation:
I scammed h4ns Finally you got it!  Cool, thanks for verifying that. |
|
|
|
Considering that the group support a July 2019 scam, even though h4ns himself publicly states that he asked to get the 210€ back September 3rd and I confirmed his request with immediately closing all his pending support tickets, it is obvious and clear that the group supporting the false and misleading scam accusation is extremely mentally ill and or brain dead! Translation: I did not scam, because the flag says it's around July when the scam was actually supposed to be on September, when I refused to pay back h4ns! |
|
|
|
|
Nice linework. Glad to see you backing up your digital artistry.
|
|
|
|
-snip- The difference between posting just an article and posting the article along with a few lines of vague generalizations is very little and if there aren't any semi-insightful points beyond surface-level nonsense, then it is no different from a one to three-liner in any other section. We should never be looking at posts that host any quotations as the holistic product of the accumulation but rather as a discussion using the quote as a launchpad. That is: the post should be able to create its own foundation separate of the quote as well as build upon it rather than only the latter.
For example: If you have a post like this, we should only be concentrating on the last line to gauge for spam/not-spam. The price of bitcoin in the past few days has spiked and follows the flying Bartman pattern...
(continues on for about 20 lines) this article talks about the price increasing, what do you think about the analysis regarding the bitcoin price?
Addendum: question-based replies are some of the most rancid forms of spam because they "kind-of" pass as substantial but you could ask any vague bullshit question about a general premise, like "why price go up". Not sure about the moderation policy. |
|
|
|
And I'm off to dinner.
-Dave
cheers A @ 0.043 |
|
|
|
Lot 5 - 0.004 BTC
I am unable to delete this. I shouldn't bid on anything as it is hard to get things here.
Chronicsky knows it as well. Please suggest If there is any way to get it without much hassle.
Can take over this bet. |
|
|
|
Only because an extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk account is not able to realise that he is extremely mentally ill and or brain dead does not mean that he is not! Exactly! Only Just because an irreparably mentally damaged beyond the point of return user is not able to realize that he is irreparably mentally damaged beyond the point of return, it does not mean they are not! Your claim that the brains of the below mentioned extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk are irreparably is false and misleading, because only a physical examination could assess whether or not they are reparable! I did not mention any of those users and you are doing some heavy projection. |
|
|
|
Only because an extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk account is not able to realise that he is extremely mentally ill and or brain dead does not mean that he is not! Exactly! Only Just because an irreparably mentally damaged beyond the point of return user is not able to realize that he is irreparably mentally damaged beyond the point of return, it does not mean they are not! It is so laughable and obvious! This. This. |
|
|
|
game-protect owes me 20 000 Euros for this assessment. Thanks. In the real world, the "assessments" of extemely mentaly ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts are worth zero cents! Exactly. Since I am not "extemely mentally ill and or brain dead" and since game-protects is an "irreparably mentally damaged beyond the point of return" user, his assessments are not substantial and can be ignored with full fruition. It is so laughable and obvious! |
|
|
|
Art by Sebastian Stoecker
,------------. ,.--""-._
| Alice's `. __/ `.
| Adventures in | _,**" "*-. `.
| Wonderland | ,' `. \
`---------------' ; _,.---._ \ ,'\ \
: ,' ,-.. `. \' \ :
The Mad Hatter | ;_\ (___)` `-..__ : |
;-'`*'" `*' `--._ ` | ;
/,-'/ -. `---.` |"
/_,'`--='. `-.._,-" _
(/\\,--. \ ___-.`: //___
/\'''\ ' | |-`| ( -__,'
'. `--' ; ; ; ;/_/
`. `.__,/ /_,' /`.~;
_.-._|_/_,'.____/ /
..--" / =/ \= \ /
/ ;._.\_.-`--'-._/ ____/
\ / /._/|.\ ."
`*--'._ "-.: :
:/".A` \ |
| |. `. :
; |. `. \SSt
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
