Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 03:05:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 [1245] 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 ... 1370 »
24881  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: $250 (0.04 BTC) reward for anybody who can help me get my bitcoins back on: October 30, 2017, 11:51:00 AM
I have the Public Address, Private Key (Encrypted), Checksum stored off-line. And the password I know off by heart.
How is it encrypted, how did you create it, and what did you use to try to decrypt it?
Does the encrypted private key use BIP38 compression (AKA does it start with 6PR)?

From your description, it's unclear to me what exactly you have there.
24882  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Wallet reading incorrect Wallet.Dat on: October 30, 2017, 11:46:45 AM
I downloaded the standard 'Bitcoin Core' wallet onto my laptop however due to the size of the file containing all the block i stored all the data on my PORTABLE hard drive. Once it completed downloading I noticed all the files spread across the hard drive directory. I like keeping things clean so i cut the files and pasted it in a folder named bitcoin in my hard drive.
You can't just move the files without telling Bitcoin Core where they are. Use this as a startup option:
Code:
  -datadir=<dir>
       Specify data directory directory

Quote
I have no idea how to make it read the original wallet.dat file, I have tried researching either everyone prompting it to rescan in the cmd, however, these methods are based on windows 7 and now windows 10 doesn't have a cmd option for the software at that location
Use this option:
Code:
  -wallet=<file>
       Specify wallet file (within data directory) (default: wallet.dat)
I don't use Windows 10, but I assume you can still add startup options to any shortcut on your desktop.
24883  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Betting on the price falling on: October 30, 2017, 09:29:10 AM
That's easy: sell your Bitcoins.

Or, if you want to do it without owning Bitcoins, it's called shorting Bitcoins. Several exchanges offer this, and it's a great way to burn through your money if prices keep rising.
24884  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Replay issues on split on: October 30, 2017, 09:15:10 AM
i don't see how are they going to launch it on november 1st, this fork is a fiasco.
Think about what that means for exchanges: they started trading on a coin without working wallet and without a valid blockchain. It literally means the exchanges forked Bitcoin based on a hype, and if the hype doesn't pan out, it simply disappears.
At least Bittrex is smart enough to wait until the first block is mined.
24885  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: My friend have a broken laptop with 200 BTC in offline wallet. on: October 30, 2017, 08:34:18 AM
well the specialist tomorrow will come and help take out the hardware and plug it in other computer to recover
Some pointers:
1. Make sure the other computer is not connected to the internet
2. Make a backup as soon as possible
3. Make another backup, then just make another one!
4. Think about a plan what to do with the 1 million euro once it's recovered. Considering the fact your only copy now is a broken laptop, you should come up with a safer plan.
24886  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Sent vertcoin to bitcoin electrum wallet on: October 30, 2017, 06:43:19 AM
I apologize if this has already been discussed

I'm very new to cryptos and today i bought $150 worth of bitcoins on coinbase. I sent it to shapeshifter which converted it to vertcoins and put the receiving as one of the addresses in my electrum wallet.

The problem is it's the bitcoin electrum as i didn't know there was a specific one for vertcoins. The transaction was completed on shapeshifter but my wallet still says 0 on electrum.
Did you use the real website https://shapeshift.io/ or a fake "shapeshifter"?

Vertcoins can't be sent to a Bitcoin address, you'll get this error:
Quote
shapeshift.io says:
There was an error creating your order, please try again in a few minutes.

If you used a fake website, your coins are gone. If you used the real website, it shouldn't have gone through. Please clarify.
24887  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Procedure in case of Blockchain.info collapse on: October 30, 2017, 06:35:00 AM
Given the uncertain nature of the exact fee to be paid for the transaction, aren't I right in thinking that there will always be some bitcoin left in the original account?
That depends on how they/you set the fee. Isn't there "send max" button?

This thread somehow changed direction from making a backup or exporting private keys to leaving them entirely.

No matter what you do, always make backups before funding an address, and - just as important - test your backups too.
24888  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Whole Bitcoin Core 0.15 blockchain database on Google Drive on: October 29, 2017, 07:06:14 PM
All of the time all of my own main components (CPU, RAM, download bandwidth) were busy at 2-5% (peak loads 10-12%). My ONLY possible bottleneck could have been the hdd which was a pretty fast 7200 rpm, but still a usual hard drive (not SSD).
But! Trying to figure out why the download was so slow at a moment I copied all Bitcoin Core 0.14.2 (already downloaded) data directories into a fast USB 3.0 128 Gb flash drive.  The syncing process did become a little bit faster, but not significantly!
So, I am still sure the bottleneck can be anywhere but never inside my PC or my internet channel.
There was someone else earlier (see my test-link) having the same problem on Windows, and he eventually moved his pruned blockchain to a RAM-drive. That solved his problem.
If you haven't checked the number of read/write-actions to your hdd, you can't rule it out from being the bottleneck.

I'm no export on Windows, but as far as I know most flash drives don't use write cache (to be safe when you suddenly unplug it).

Quote
I assume it was insufficient number of other WIDE UPLOAD bandwidth, accepting incoming connections full Bitcoin Core nodes.
That's not what I experienced. A very simple way to test it: when you start your download, and blocks are still small, there's much less checking per block. At that point I download at the maximum speed my internet connection can deliver. It only slows down later, when blocks require more checking.
24889  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How many Bitcoins are lost for good? on: October 29, 2017, 07:00:44 PM
How many Bitcoins are lost forever?
24890  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Transaction Fees Sustainable? on: October 29, 2017, 06:57:13 PM
For microtransactions there are other coins you can use.
You could also use your creditcard. That's irrelevant if I want to use Bitcoin.

The problem with transaction fees at the moment is not that the network is overly congested. It is coming close, but in reality the real reason is exchanges and companies, and wallet providers are setting their fees too high in order to push transactions through as fast as possible, which then causes lower fee txs to take longer. If everyone would drop their fees accordingly, we would not have this problem.
It's a combination of both: the network is congested, and wallets automatically try to use "a fast fee". That's why recommended fees can quickly jump from 20 sat/byte to 250 sat/byte. And because most wallets now automatically try to use a "next block"-fee, paying a higher fee doesn't help you get in the next block at all. I recently found a 10 kB transaction with $115 fee, that took 11 hours to confirm. It's outrageous!

Automatic fees are the worst thing for fees ever, and miners earn millions of dollars from it! Without automatic fees, most users would just select for instance 0.1 mBTC, and if you're in a hurry, you'd pick 0.2 mBTC. Note that 0.2 mBTC is already more than a dollar.
With automatic fees, all users pay (say) 1 mBTC, and in the end, since blocks are full anyway, we're still waiting!
24891  Other / Archival / Re: Custom BTC address! on: October 29, 2017, 06:35:04 PM
Anyway, to OP please generate me 1LoneSharkLoans. Since you did not even specify the limit to the length then, I'll ask a very long one from you even without split key. Cheesy
I actually have 1LoanShark in my vanity search list for a very long time already. If I ever find it, I'll give it to you.
The more long prefixes I add, the more likely it becomes I will eventually hit some of them. Of course, you should never trust anyone, and never use it, but even so: it's would be cool to have Cheesy

Your offer is an interesting one and i am interested in it but i have one fear. You will know the private key of the address generated and you will hand over that private key to us. What if you keep that private key safe with you as well and regularly watch the generated BTC address. Once you see big amount transffered to that address, you can yourself withdraw it. Isn't it ?
Yes, he can. And that's why you should never trust a private key that someone else knows.
And even if OP is just too trusty and naive, and even if he wouldn't steal your funds, you'll also have to trust his computer, and his email provider or whatever he uses to send you the private key.

Long story short: make your own private keys.
If you want 1Sweet, I'd be happy to make it for you, in a safe way. I've been offering a free secure pretty addy service since April last year. If you want 1Sweetbtc, I can't help you, as it will likely take years to find.

you are right, it's a matter of trust in any form of transaction.. i trust too much humans and i hope i'm not the only one because otherwise we'll be screwed.
From the way you put it, you're either dumb or a scammer. Rule number one in crypto club: trust nobody with your private keys!
24892  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Best Linux distro to run a full node on: October 29, 2017, 06:03:55 PM
If you don't have much experience with Linux, I suggest to just try a few distributions. I've had several of them, I especially didn't like what Ubuntu did to the GUI, so I left them. You could try Kubuntu too, or Elementary OS, or Linux Mint, or Arch Linux, or CentOS. There's also the "classics" like Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian and Fedora.
In general, they're all quite safe, but some focus more on security than others. But if you have some time to spare, I recommend to just try a few and see which one fits your needs.

I would also like to know if I can re-use my existing "blocks" and "chainstate" folders of my Bitcoin Core windows folder into the the Linux folder to not have to go through the entire thing from scratch.
I'm pretty sure you can just copy it, but I'd prefer to just let it run from scratch.

Quote
in order to be able to run a full Bitcoin Core node and forget about constantly being paranoid of doing so in Windows.
For what it's worth: I'm just as paranoid running Linux. I actually consider it a good default, don't ever assume your computer is safe!
24893  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Whole Bitcoin Core 0.15 blockchain database on Google Drive on: October 29, 2017, 05:36:46 PM
"PRUNED TO a RAM drive" - that's the key to your success,as I understand it.

Try to download the full 160Gb (not pruned) blockchain from the start, then tell us how much time it has taken you
Of course that's the key, but my point is still valid: it all depends on your PC.
Downloading to an SSD is much faster than downloading to a hdd.

That being said, my test also showed downloading a pruned chain on ramdrive did less blocks per minute than downloading blocks to my full chain on hdd. It took 70 seconds for 11 hours of blocks, that's about 1 block per second (see my test).
I don't really want to spend the time to do a full test, but from this small test, I extrapolate I can download a full blockchain to my hdd in 2-3 days.

I have no experience on Windows though, especially a system low on RAM can take much longer.
24894  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: syncing the blockchain on an offline pc on: October 29, 2017, 02:26:44 PM
When you're talking about 150gigs, I assume you're talking about Bitcoin Core. I use Bitcoin Core, I have some Watch-only addresses in there, but (with Coin Control Features enabled), it doesn't let me select them. What would I have to do to create a transaction in this hot wallet, to sign offline?
Being able to do this would be a very nice addition to my current setup.
The easiest way is to use coinb.in/#newTransaction. Absolutely zero security risk as long as you use the console to verify it before you sign it. You can also do it yourself via the console though this would be more tedious.
I've seen and tested coinb.in before, but didn't realize I can use it to sign a transaction on an offline PC. I tried making a new transaction (with some random addresses I found in recent blocks), and it does work, but seems a bit too "die hard" for me. This seems like a good way to mess up and send a huge amount as fee.
Also, I can't figure out how to sign with more than one private key.
Thanks for mentioning the option, but I don't feel comfortable using it.

Quote
I'm still not comfortable with the fact that I'd have to trust the hardware wallet manufacturer completely, as it's a black box and I can't see it's inner workings. And storing backup seed words gives the same risks as an unencrypted paper wallet.
You can flash your own firmware. Some hardware wallets allows the user to select an encryption for their seed.
Flashing my own firmware still makes it something I can't verify on my own.
24895  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Primedice 20 Bilion bets GIVEAWAY!!! on: October 29, 2017, 01:27:51 PM
Username: dsffdssdf

I'll try to hit the 20 billionth bet too.



My username is ddfsdfaf on primedice.
Damn that looks like mine! Let me guess: you hit the keyboard a few times with your left hand too?
24896  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Security Risks in downloading the whole Bitcoin Blockchain from external srces?? on: October 29, 2017, 12:29:18 PM
It would be great if there was a pruned blockchain available for download.

But the only way it could work with maximum security would be if it was somehow verified by the network. For example so that enough miners have validated it  and signed that it is correct.
This would solve the problem of needing to download 140GB of data ... because pruned blockchain could fit in 1 GB
I've been thinking about creating a pruned_Bitcoin.zip for a while now. It will be around 3 GB (uncompressed), as I think the chainstate directory has to be included. All I need to do this, is a simple VPS.
But, I see two main problems:
1. Anybody who downloads it has to trust me. Unlike a full blockchain, a pruned blockchain can't be rescanned.
2. I could set up a VPS, but I don't have the skill to be absolutely sure it won't get compromised. Or the hoster could give someone access after social engineering.

The reason I would like to offer it though, is that Bitcoin Core is the most basic wallet, and I consider it a good thing if more people are able to verify their own transactions.
Recently, someone gave me a zip of all 20 million Bitcoin addresses with balance. Read that again: just 20 million addresses! Uncompressed, that's just 800 MB. If you'd add details on all individual outputs, it may rise to a few GB.
If - in the future - a pruned Bitcoin Core can read TXID-data from just a database, you don't have to prune all blocks, you just have to keep a record of all balances. Once you have that, 10 GB may be enough to be able to verify all transactions in existing wallet.dat files.

The minimum for a pruned blockchain is 550 blocks (4 days) of data. If you'd download a pruned blockchain as a .zip, you could just wait four days to have all downloaded data replaced by new data already. I'm not sure how secure that would be though.

This would solve the problem of needing to download 140GB of data ... because pruned blockchain could fit in 1 GB
I think Core would still force a reindex even if the wallet.dat is newly generated. Without all the blocks, the client will not be able to retrieve all the transactions associated with a specific address.[/quote]
I can tell you from personal experience that a pruned blockchain doesn't require a rescan to create a new wallet. There's no point to check if new addresses hold any balance.
24897  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] MIXER.TO - High Privacy Bitcoin Mixer on: October 29, 2017, 12:04:19 PM
Our Bitcoin reserves have been increased.
Seven days, and nothing received more.
I confirm, after checking the address in the Letter of Guarantee: no deposit arrived.

Quote
Admin ignore mails. Think selective scamming.
That's very likely, small amoungs to through, big amounts are taken.

Quote
BE CAREFULLY WHEN USE THIS SERVICE
Can you open a topic in Scam Accusations? If you do, post the link here, and I'll confirm I checked your Letter of Guarantee in the Accusation thread.
It's up to you how much details you want to share.
24898  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Whole Bitcoin Core 0.15 blockchain database on Google Drive on: October 29, 2017, 11:42:13 AM
I have tested the archive, so you may download safely.
Just playing devil's advocate here..

That's great that you've "tested the archive"... But how can we "test" you? A "member" with 70 odd posts... Huh

What guarantee do we have that this Blockchain is "legit"... Other than you word?
As far as I understand, you can just install Bitcoin Core and -rescan the database:
Code:
bitcoin -rescan # or any Windows equivalent
Assuming you download a legit Bitcoin Core, it will verify all blocks on your disk and you can be absolutely sure you have a legit blockchain.

That being said, I wouldn't use this myself, I'm totally fine letting Bitcoin Core download it's own blocks.

Secondly, I wrote a great number of posts in  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2303869 explaining :
how long I had to be waiting (weeks) till my Bitcoin Core 0.14.2 fully synced itself at last. And the bottleneck was NOT in any way related to my PC or internet bandwidth.
As a test, I recently downloaded a full blockchain (pruned to a RAM drive) in less than 24 hours, on a several years old PC with an average internet connection. Given the fact that I can do this, your bottleneck must be related to your PC or internet connection.
24899  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: finding old bitcoins on: October 29, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
this is what i know so far, unfortunately its not the gold mine i had expected it was only a mere £2.50 haha. it was bought on 24 june 2013 from what looks like a personal account not an exchange company as the transaction reads Mr PM Greenland. i have no idea if its still worth perusing? can anyone tell me if its worth anything from what i know now?
ill have to pick up my old laptop from my parents house tomorrow and see what i can find on that too.
On June 24, 2013, 1 Bitcoin was worth £64.48 (check bitcoinaverage, set graph to GBP and zoom/scroll). Your £2.50 would have been 0.03877171 BTC at that rate, currently worth £171.11.

Don't give up yet, find back whatever wallet you used and enjoy the best ROI you ever made!
24900  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: syncing the blockchain on an offline pc on: October 29, 2017, 10:53:11 AM
Well... if you want to transfer the initial 150gigs via a USB drive... plus the ~150meg per DAY via USB everytime you want to make a transaction... no one is going to stop you! Tongue

It also basically means you're running two copies of the blockchain, which is a bit wasteful... when you can create an online "watching only" wallet... have that fully synced with all the block data... create unsigned transactions and just use the offline machine to just sign the transactions.
When you're talking about 150gigs, I assume you're talking about Bitcoin Core. I use Bitcoin Core, I have some Watch-only addresses in there, but (with Coin Control Features enabled), it doesn't let me select them. What would I have to do to create a transaction in this hot wallet, to sign offline?
Being able to do this would be a very nice addition to my current setup.

Quote
Also, as a lot of people have already pointed out in countless threads... hardware wallets have effectively made the "air gapped" offline wallet setup mostly irrelevant. Why mess around with a 2nd computer and transferring files back an forth when you can simply plug the device into the online machine and sign the transaction. Wink
I'm still not comfortable with the fact that I'd have to trust the hardware wallet manufacturer completely, as it's a black box and I can't see it's inner workings. And storing backup seed words gives the same risks as an unencrypted paper wallet.

I don't really buy the "but how can a trust it?" argument... How can you trust the OS you put on the pi unless you audit every single line of code yourself? I'd think it would be easier to audit the code on a hardware wallet given the smaller codebase.

Given the level of paranoia within crypto, and the number of teardowns and code reviews of Trezor and Ledger... I'm comfortable they are "safe" from deliberate backdoors... The recent Trezor "exploit" obviously highlighted that this doesn't mean they don't have undiscovered flaws tho
I am quite confident they're safe too, but even 99.99% is still a risk. Recently the Antminer backdoor was discovered, who knows what comes out many years from now.
The easiest way I know to be absolutely sure I don't have anyone to trust, is creating my own private key from throwing a dice many times. But this is too annoying to do every time.
Pages: « 1 ... 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 [1245] 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 ... 1370 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!