|
Then people will say "I vote no because I do not think the owner is reputable enough". This can apply to everyone, even say friedcat or burnside or John K, because you can argue that nobody in the BTC world is trustworthy / reputable enough.
Pointless. If someone hates the asset issuer, they will make up a bullshit reason that cannot be proven false.
|
|
|
|
we were going to run into this problem sooner or later, script allows for data to be stored in the blockchain, however since there is currently no incentive to hold the blockchain (fees being paid to hold it), eventually we'll run into serious storage problems enhanced by using the blockchain for storage, my companies design is looking at that seriously and we're currently trying to figure out a method that will keep bloat down to a minimum while maintaining a DDOS proof account ledger.
short answer is no 0 btc fees, which I would happily support. +1 Zero fee trasactions should be banned. Under all scenarios possible, sending 300 BTC should cost more in transaction fees than sending less BTC. In real world, we already have fucked-up monetary system that favours rich over poor, do we want the same or similar system online as well? No.The purpose of fees is to limit spam, not to create an advantage/disadvantage of the rich vs poor. If you want to "even it out", then simply require a fee that grow linearly with how much room the transaction takes. Say, 1 satoshi for every byte of room on the blockchain, or something. See this except it's outdated and the fee/kb is 0.0001: http://bitcoinfees.com/ |
|
|
|
|
My personal details (name, address, dox for AML/CTF) etc are known by people or businesses who have a need to know them. Security isn't all electronic, physical security is important too.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I remember giving away a total of 10 BTC randomly on coinchat when we had a launch party.
|
|
|
|
|
The admin doesn't seem to remove any feedback, including those from someone who was sending phishing links to people.
|
|
|
|
Really ? Executing bitcoind with the walletpassphrase switch 10000 times (considering you have the worst possible luck) takes several minutes ?  Never tried, actually, so I'll beleive you, but that looks very slow. Bitcoind forces decryption to take an average of 0.1 seconds, and reencrypts to make it stronger if your hardware has got faster. |
|
|
|
Any chance of adding on chain transaction functionality?
using inputs.io for smaller instant transactions (and the mixing) is great, and then combine that with onchain transactions for larger amounts?
and then an easy way to transfer back and forth...
You can make transactions on the blockchain. EDIT: If you couldn't, Inputs would be a rock instead  |
|
|
|
The site's back up: They're not anywhere in particular - they are always been stored in multiple players after been PGP encrypted. We're transiting to a new system internally very very soon. (not mtgox or BFL soon  ) |
|
|
|
This is naive. Of course they would not do the obvious. But for a group of knowledgable persons it is easy to implement some "errors" that go unnoticed long enough to inflict serious damage.
Only a tiny fraction of all bitcoin users is able to understand the source code. And of this tiny fraction only few do actually verify it.
Come hang out in #bitcoin-dev for a while. |
|
|
|
|
I'm getting 4 primes per second for PrimeCoin on a i7...
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin Foundation controls the Bitcoin source code and has placed itself as the defacto decider in all things concerning the Bitcoin source code, therefore all things blockchain, all things the Bitcoin network, all things Bitcoin.
Historically, Foundations have awesome public agendas, but internally they are often clandestine and greed and ideologically based ... hidden agenda driven, and the people they allow through their turnstyles to "serve" are all the same in that they agree with the end game goals of the Foundation.
Is there more to know?
We may never know.
What we DO know is that The Bitcoin Foundation goes against Satoshi's dream of no-trust-needed and complete decentralization, because TBF controls Bitcoin and its source, and I believe it can easily be proven in a court of law.
The foundation may control the github repository of bitcoind/bitcoin-qt, however they do not control Bitcoin. If they have decided to give themselves 1 million coins or whatever, no one will use and people will fork in true open source fashion. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry. Sometimes I do make mistakes. I've sent you double the amount.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
