While the trust system is far from perfect, there isn't a significant amount of abuse on any level. Any system gets misused to some extent. As long as the amount of misuse is insignificant, it is acceptable. ....because there are no such thing as merit abuse..
Stuff like this is precisely why almost all threads complaining about the trust system are pure bullshit. Alts of busted people start pitching in in hopes that their accounts will return to non-negative levels. |
|
|
|
Are you mentally challenged or are you writing absolute bullshit just because you are bagholding this shitcoin? EOS is a disgrace and exactly the opposite of what crypto was envisioned as. |
|
|
|
Oh how the tables turn quickly. Bumping this.  |
|
|
|
How about you mind your own business? Butthurt alts got no say in this. Not suggesting that gender plays a part in determining people's trustworthiness - but just saying that if a user can't trust this community with their gender why should they be "trusted" ??
It's none of your business and attacking me like this (again, with random alts) ain't doing you any favors. |
|
|
|
One way to try avoiding negative ratings for lying is to insult and argue (again, with lies) against everyone thereby being able to call them out for "bias" and other nonsense ("losing debates"). This is what the baboon has been doing. Once you start making up fantasies about "gangs" when there clearly are none, you know you've lost. |
|
|
|
I will read over more of his posts at a later date (soon) and reconsider the rating but for now I see marlboroza's as a spur of the moment—a rash move transpired from the events thereof.
If you look through some links in recent threads, this has been apparently going on for some time and in multiple threads (some of which I have yet to read completely). Therefore, I highly doubt it was a 'spur of the moment'. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Really?
When you start chronically posting lies and attacking anyone that disagrees with you left and right, what exactly did you expect was going to happen? That this is going to be considered trustworthy behavior? I'm actually surprised how lenient certain members are depending on who is making these kinds of statements. Psycho bitch was being attacked for the tiniest mistakes during certain periods. Don't play dumb eddie.
I'm waiting for marlbozora's trust abuse thread. Welp, it's already here. |
|
|
|
So remain silent snake tongue. Else I..
Its true colors quickly show themselves. Cryptohunter IMO is just a cranky contrarian who thinks everyone's brain should function with the logic of a computer, and yet he has this obvious bleeding-heart liberal mentality which manifests itself in him constantly thinking there's some underdog situation on bitcointalk whereby a cabal of senior members are keeping the lower ranks down, like slaves on a 19th century Louisiana plantation. I just don't see it that way, and I've put him on ignore. I'm just tired of reading his posts, which are probably made with good intentions but are consistently way off the mark.
Don't let someone push you aside with pseudo-logic. If only it remotely resembled actual logic, we wouldn't even get to this thread to begin with. That is, a good merit source, in my opinion, should merit a post even if he don't agree with, acknowledging the effort from users.
If you reward people just for the effort, then you going to raise a wave of spoiled users very quickly (which most people complaining about this nonsense in fact are). |
|
|
|
The complaint stems from jealousy and a lack of own constructive opinions worth "meriting". This is the classic "everyone else is to blame except me" nonsense. Do people not have something better to do than to create "useful statistics" which only result in TV-like drama regarding who got a lot of useless points from who? Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give, so he gets few. Not that he needs them for any reason anyway.
A lot of big posts full of garbage and horrible opinions. A TMAN style "insert random swearing" response to a nonsensical thread is in most cases more worthy of merit.
I need to look up who the top givers in these circles are. I'll only read their posts from now on (placing everyone else I see on ignore). Since I see nothing else, meriting their objectively constructive posts is proper use of the merit system. Am I doing this right? I don't think it'd work out. I'm already in a three-way with Moloch (58% of his merit was sent by me alone) and gmaxwell (37%), and like most foxes I only have so many holes available.  I'm certain that you have a dinner invite planned for me somewhere down the road. Why else would you be showering me with all these merits? Quite classy I must say. |
|
|
|
Owner keeps the right to cancel the auction at any time and keep the coin.
How about you go somewhere else and waste other people's time? Plenty of way more trusted users do this. Why is it a problem when a new user does it You're an idiot that shouldn't comment on things above his pay-grade. OP killed his own auction; quite pathetic actually. If he were intentionally trolling, he could have at least made it amusing. |
|
|
|
Owner keeps the right to cancel the auction at any time and keep the coin.
How about you go somewhere else and waste other people's time? |
|
|
|
Both btc-room101, and Zin-Zang are alts of other already banned (and/or neg. rated) trolls. The irony here is that the forum is actually way too liberal, not the other way around. I wonder what hilarious and mprep are waiting for with this case. The fact is that his trolling would have resulted in a ban a long time ago on many other forums - the fact he is still allowed to post the same nonsense 20 times a day about how we are all retards, bitcoin is dead, and the Chinese own everything is testament to the non-censorship policies and moderation in bitcointalk.
They probably wouldn't reach a post count of 10 elsewhere given the ridiculous amount of lies that they're posting. |
|
|
|
|
I've complained about this possibly happening once people started tagging "legitimate" managers for externalities that are out of their control. Just tag it.
|
|
|
|
The following users posted that link: 1. mdayonliner (lol) 4. tuthienloc92bk (lol)I'll report them saying this: Spam for airdrop.sapien.community , it's paid spamming as shown in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082661.0 I assume it read the quoted link posted in this thread? |
|
|
|
99.99% of dapps are useless and create no value. Stop drinking smart contracts = future of everything kool-aid.
99.99%!! That means usable Dapps are countable on fingers. Are there any Dapps which Lauda herself uses and applauds? But as far as Dapps go, I think the only reason people use them right now is for monetization. You know, like use a social media Dapp, earn some tokens and then sell them. I have yet to see something really innovative that can't be done on centralized apps. oh, things can be done on centralized apps, but maybe, sometimes, is better when they are in decentralized apps, for example some financial and banking service. centralized and decentralized dapp have huge difference and you are right about decentralization financial and banking service for example when deposit or withdraw your crypto then decentralized Dapp exchanges are very fast because you control you transaction with you own determined gas and on centralized exchange withdraw fee fixed and you have to wait more for you withdrawal process to finish i am big fan of decentralized exchange like forkdelta and idex currently i am using eos transaction speed is fast and Dapp exchange on EOS will work faster then eth based Dapp exchange Which is absolute bullshit. What you call a DEX is, objectively, at best a semi-decentralized exchange. The devs can do a lot of things that the owners of centralized exchanges can. Stop drinking kool-aid. No worries, the EOS cartel will blacklist/undo the transaction(s). We're talking about a decentralized currency after all. |
|
|
|
|
It's well known (at least for the experienced forum users) that most BMs and these ICO services are fraudulent. New projects are sometimes very unfamiliar with the forum, which leads to them hiring one of these frauds.
|
|
|
|
Why should the forum change its requirements to conform with some random bounty allocations?
You can read bounty as "Activity" then. When we says Jr.Member are spamming for signatures then activity based merit system will just discourage them to go on creating multiple accounts. Anyway I guess bounty stakes basis was "Activity" only. If you agree Signatures are cause of spamming then you have to create rules that can effectively counter it and it is not equivalent to "forum change its requirements to conform with some random bounty allocations" Increasing the merit requirement for jr. Members without making any reductions anywhere else is the way to go. |
|
|
|
Just noticed this thread now. Excellent thread and excellent results. I'm sure that we'd even have better results if the requirement further increased. - In the eleventh week after the announcement, 177677 posts were made (-49.78%).
 |
|
|
|
|
Why should the forum change its requirements to conform with some random bounty allocations?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
.
