Ohh and EOS, they shouted that it was a killer of the air, mine Larimer never brought the projects to the end, and this project will be exactly the same. I do not see any prospects high for this project, and even more so to be a killer of the air.
It's a shitcoin designed to enrich the psedo-scientist Larimer. It served its purpose. What else did you expect? Ye, I see the same. And I was surprised by Justin Sun with his tweet about fund that will help to ETH and EOS programmers after zero price  Good decision! But for EOS it's some incredible. Many projects moves from ETH to EOS blockchain or make dApps for both. But price dump and we can see same situation as ETCdev 99.99% of dapps are useless and create no value. Stop drinking smart contracts = future of everything kool-aid. |
|
|
|
Wrong political leanings lead to bad management practices. This has been a known issue for a very long time, and very little has changed ever since people started bringing it up. It's either ignored completely, dismissed as a 'non problem yet' or you're told to "just report it".  |
|
|
|
Bitmain will never go bankrupt, this is the number one in the bitcoin industry
If by "number one" you're trying to say: Number one cancer in the industry, then you are indeed right. They're just slightly ahead of Bitpay. |
|
|
|
The sMerit calculation is off. I have well over 200. The airdropped sMerit amount isn't published, so it's excluded here. Yet when spending airdropped sMerit, it is being deducted here. |
|
|
|
A system in which verifiable trades get chives positive trust in return, is as I see it, a much better system.
All cheer for trust farming via 0.01 BTC trades.  For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities).
Yes. Apart from the hijack/hack danger, trust is dynamic not static. It looks like a lot of people don't understand this here, or at least do not mention it that often. An examplatory question: If you trusted someone after a few smaller trades a few years ago, do you still trust him equally now (assuming you didn't trade with the user anymore after that e.g.)? The sensible answer would be a no. Decay and inappropriate actions should make it shift. |
|
|
|
|
The sMerit calculation is off. I have well over 200.
|
|
|
|
Logging in is trivial and means nothing. It doesn't mean that someone is actually reading anything or available at that time.
It means something. - got access to his account
- got Internet
- is mentally fit to remember passwords so probably could write a post
- has time to log in and out
Not really, no. This is you making conslusions based on putting yourself in this scenario. I log in without 'remembering' or even knowing my password for example. If you can log in (and sometimes even post) you can certainly post an update as well, here and there.
Not necessarily, no. |
|
|
|
What I worry about is inactive accounts getting hacked or sold.
For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities). It took forever to kick out DeadTerra for example.
^this. I had to bring this case up several times. |
|
|
|
For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities). It took forever to kick out DeadTerra for example.
I wonder whether this will cause flame-wars again or have people grown tired of them. It is a bit weird that a lot of people on dt are getting positive and negative trust.
Don't question the establishment and no negatives will be sent your way. |
|
|
|
But he is loging in to Bitcointalk very often, is it so difficult to drop an message and say that payments will be delayed or that he can't make payments currently due to some problems. People would understand him and would have more patience before starting to accuse him.
Logging in is trivial and means nothing. It doesn't mean that someone is actually reading anything or available at that time. True. Its just an odd situation to find a member who has a very good reputation such as Lutpin to not be outspoken about this situation.
It's odd that he doesn't want to share because he has a very good reputation? |
|
|
|
I do not think that the EOS will be able to overthrow Ethereum quickly, as Ethereum has proved to be a good and relatively reliable coin.
Replace the wording "will not be able to...quickly" with "will never" and you've nailed it. $4 billion rised in ICO.. ..current market cap: $2,674,294,013 So far i dont see any significant development with eos anywhere. Who in their right mind wants to get involved with a "cryptocurrency" that does blacklisting and reversal of transactions? FED 2.0 at its finest. so, where did the money actually go??  Lambos and parties for Larimer. EOS was a money grab, nothing more.
If you're a bagholder, initiate automated response "FUD!!!". |
|
|
|
The change seems to be catching a few people out.
It wasn't specifically described in the release notes, but the PR was included. I've asked in the dev-chat about it because it seemed a tad weird; more information can be found here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12721. |
|
|
|
I think this is why you always hard copy print your private-keys, and put them in a safe place, like a fire-proof vault.
Disks go down, backups fail, online storage can be hacked, computer get stolen, exchanges steal or go bankrupt taking your keys, hard-disk write caches clobber files, ... the only safe place for magic-numbers is a hard-printout that will not fade over time.
If you didn't print it and store it in a safe place, then you never had it.
This is quite bad advice, with the last sentence being completely false to begin with. Things get stolen, vaults get broken into. It's alwalys a trade-off between different threat models and convenience. I posted the standard recovery procedure for the kind of corruption described here. It seems to be being ignored.
I would take a substantial bet that the OP here is either scamming or is going to get scammed.
It seems very fishy that the reward is 100 BTC anyways. P.S. please change your forum’s settings that I can send you PMs. Also, I have send you a message on Reddit. Thank you.
Please don't.
You're using Core 0.11  . |
|
|
|
So just to clarify, you could have all the "protection" you want, such as 2FA, email verification etc. - but if someone has your Blockchain 12 word seed - he can easily move the funds without having to go through all these security steps, correct?!
All of that creates a false sense of security for newbies. Stop using online wallets and start learning how to secure your systems. It might a,os be easy to find an innocent bystander who’s had their identity atolen too...
You might also have to check their and your jurisdication. Sometimes they like you to sue people in their country of residence...
The owner of Crypton-Exchange.net was the one who "guided" our admin what to do, he told him to install the addon (and yes, it was naively done, a rookie's mistake), but legally speaking the chats are documented, when we confronted him for the theft he left the chat (he did speak to us initially), it's all documented - it was done from his site, using his site, it wasn't a Skype conversation where you can say it was a hacker hiding behind someone. Which addon was that exactly? |
|
|
|
Can someone explain me how Veleor can see those plagiarized posts? I tried clicking on those quoted posts he mentioned and they're not yet deleted, but the post history of wawanwawan96 shows Oct. 27 as his/her last post.
The year of the posts is 2017. Read closely. |
|
|
|
Cat turned on the rocket boosters? |
|
|
|
CW displayed absolutely no common traits with the user Satoshi. He is a proven fraud. Anyone who believes this baboon is Satoshi is an idiot. https://youtu.be/2Rzcgpdj7SA?t=91"Satoshi".
Why is this in Meta? Attempting to fetch some merits? |
|
|
|
Update the extended extension is now over. All remaining TG payments will be sent shortly.
Do you know when FB and twitter campaign participants will be paid? Thank you Lauda for your great management and for keeping us updated. I hope that it can be done soon. The swap from token to coin structure during the bounty did us no favors here, among other issues. One possibility is to send those out in tokens and then let users manually swap (which would be significantly faster than waiting for people otherwise). Will keep everyone updated here. |
|
|
|
Any kind of reputation or trust system introduces a power structure, thus inherently making people unequal. In the forum's case, you'd be talking about Staff, DT and/or users who just have a high trust rating. This is a crucial part of pretty mcuh every society, relax. And boy, I'd really love to hear from more of the campaign participants themselves. Some have spoken up, but most have not and I can't imagine that it's because they don't have an opinion on the matter.
There's really no need to do this. There's a very good reason why they aren't complaining, i.e. they are not very good posters and need the campaign for its income. If they were certain that they could strike a similar deal elsewhere, and had integrity, they'd be more willing to speak up. And I think you confused Secondstrade with Bitmixer. Bitmixer was automated campaign, not Secondstrade and they a lot of shitposters in their campaign, until they decided to hire Lauda. Secondstrade campaign wasn't that bad.
Ahh, the good ol' days until the agencies came knocking on the door.  |
|
|
|
Our company with legendary rank believes that we have affordable packages and reliable team which can do this job in best interests for your company.[/b][/color]
Are you sure you didn't acquire your army of farmed accounts elsewhere? Hello I'm Looking For Bitcointalk Account
Status Must Member
And No Negative Feedback
Escrow Accept
PM Me
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
