How to earn/gain money online would be a better question.
It is much easier to lose it.
Agree 100% with this statement. Even if you are the richest person in the world, it will take less than 24 hours to become the world's poorest. But if you start as the world's poorest person, you will never become the richest person in your lifetime. The topic in itself was intended to be sarcastic from the beginning. OK, so what would be the MOST DIFFICULT way to lose money online?  I mean, you would be guaranteed to lose money but you'll have to try hard for it! |
|
|
|
|
Gavin recently stepped down from his position and the new lead developer Wladimir van der Laan is not part of this documentary? After Gavin, Wladimir was the most active member of the development team. Does he appear in the film?
|
|
|
|
Even if every bit of that article is true, MultiBit is not a scam; a bug in the software at best. Topic title should be changed to reflect this, don't mislead people. |
|
|
|
Where do I move them? I'm worried my whole computer is compromised
Install a wallet software on another computer, keep it disconnected from internet. Generate a new address, send old coins to new 'offline' wallet address. |
|
|
|
That B looks like it has oral herpes. Simply repulsive.  Do we really want people to be repelled by bitcoin? Agreed. I am comfortable with idea of changing the symbol to something Unicode, but this proposed one looks no good. More alternatives needed. |
|
|
|
|
Poll has been added; express your opinions!
|
|
|
|
OK I was just giggling at the name 'Eternal Coin'. Then I read the tagline "your coin for afterlife expenses" and that made me explode; I almost spilled my coffee |
|
|
|
Here's the interesting part: Having a symbol in Unicode form means it would work in different fonts and formats and would help to better convey the cryptocurrency to the masses in various forms of media. |
|
|
|
Buy or mine a hell lot of BTC and LTC, sell half of them in Nov 2013, put the rest half in cold wallet and HODL them. Then retire for the rest of my life; spend a lot on hot chicks, probably thailand. |
|
|
|
.... i removed the full wallet ...
Can you elaborate on this part of your comment? What EXACTLY did you do which makes you feel you removed the full wallet? Did you locate the wallet file and deleted it? Did you just go to the File menu Wallet--->Close? What exactly did you do? |
|
|
|
quick question: is betting in India illegal or are they chasing match fixers?
'Betting' is illegal right now. And If everyone continues to play like Yuvraj Singh, 'Batting' will also be illegal soon  |
|
|
|
Ok you got me lost, you are way way smarter than me!
I sent John 10 BTC, John received them,
an output from my wallet was created, an input for John's wallet created.
John has now 10 BTC,
now John spent 3 BTC at amazon, an output of 3 BTC for John, an input of 3 BTC for Amazon
BUT I think you are saying my example of (John and Amazon) is wrong when you say partial output,
if I am not mistaken: you are saying that the whole BTCs in the wallet create an output even if you spend only part of them? like when John spent 3 BTC on Amazon from that 10 BTC, it means: an output of 3 BTC created to amazong and another output for 7 BTC created to John (output of his own money to his own wallet)?
Not the whole wallet balance has to go out, only the BTC you received in a single transaction. Think of it this way: Someone gives you a $50 bill and a $20 bill. Now your pocket has $70. (That makes 2 incoming transactions for you) You now need to give $40 to James Bond. What you will do is take out the $50 bill (from a single incoming transaction) and will split it into 2 bills: a $40 bill and a $10 bill. The $40 bill will be spent in the outgoing transaction and the $10 bill becomes the incoming transaction for you, which goes back into your pocket. You now have $30, which comprises of one $20 bill and one $10 bill. The $10 bill becomes the incoming transaction for James Bond. If James Bond needs to spend an amount smaller than $10, he will also go into the same process as you did. Now think of the whole process again by replacing 'pocket' with 'wallet' and 'dollar bill' with 'Bitcoin' |
|
|
|
|
1. DarkCoin (DRK)
2. MintCoin (MINT)
3. BTC-Scrypt (BTCS) <--- face-palm
|
|
|
|
Greetings once again folks, We have two small issues we are fixing this week, and once we do, a relaunch is imminent. AT that time, we will cover the last 4 days of this promo, award a monthly giveaway, and launch a new promo. Good times are on the way  The week past , so , where are you? I am getting more and more impatient now; satcircle come and go every few days and posts a little update. I mean, is it going to continue for the next year or so before the site goes completely offline? Is this the new strategy from saving your ass of the 'scammer' tag? I really do hope I'm wrong! |
|
|
|
Probably tomorrow? Maybe next year? Or maybe 2080? Or never? Sorry, but probably no one can answer this unless you have a time machine  |
|
|
|
|
Many people are arguing about legibility of Satoshi's real identity instead of focusing on the main question here. The question implies that the identity is proved; the real question is if you'd switch to the new coin or not.
For me, I'd definitely switch to the new coin, because most others also will, and the network effect will benefit the new coin in real world market, not Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
 /win Could have photoshopped his boobs to make them bigger than hers as well |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
