It's even worse
Error: "The specified module could not be found. LoadLibrary(pythondll) failed"
Error: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Armory\Armory Bitcoin Client\PYTHON27.DLL
That's happened before when there's been some kind of messup in the install directory. Can you completely uninstall it and remove the C:\Program Files (x86)\Armory directory. Then reinstall. It should go away. I never quite figured out what conditions cause that... I reinstall using the "repair" and it works now. However, it still can't detect bitcoin-qt in "traditional mode"
|
|
|
It's even worse
Error: "The specified module could not be found. LoadLibrary(pythondll) failed"
Error: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Armory\Armory Bitcoin Client\PYTHON27.DLL
|
|
|
YAY quickly skipped Niger, briefly visited Cambodia and Suriname, watching for Laos now Cambodia Suriname: Laos, you are the next stop Laos has been surpassed. You need to update the parity values based on latest number of total coins (10978925 atm)
|
|
|
Mission accompanied: 98.1 vs 97.23
|
|
|
I heard that you removed the option to have bitcoins sent straight to an address? Is this true?
Just for the night while were under attack. Will BitInstant still support MtGox when they stop using USD code in April? Yes of course. Will it be bi-directional (i.e. other currency -> mtgox USD and mtgox USD -> other currency)? How will it work? I ask this because I'm not sure if I should keep USD on mtgox now as I worry that I won't be able to transfer it to other exchanges later
|
|
|
To create a 20000BTC bid wall 10% below the ATH, 18000BTC has to be sold at the ATH, and this will pull it down >20% below the ATH.
|
|
|
This is one of the two major upgrades I need in order for Armory to be usable to users with shorter attention spans. When this is working properly, you will never need to run Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind again. Just start Armory and it will do the rest. The other major upgrade is the resource usage and load time. Those are both getting knocked out with the blockchain management/DB stuff. That is top priority after this (including not rescanning every time). I finally have a testing version in Windows (64-bit only). This really is a remarkable P.I.T.A. ... and this is still quite a bit rough around the edges, but it's at least demo-ready. A lot of time was spent making the download-and-run window for when you click "Install for me!". Especially if you are running an old version of Bitcoin-Qt (not 0.8.1), please uninstall it and then run Armory and let it install it for you. And don't worry, there is cryptographic verification of the installer before it runs it! (see the top of versions.txt) Linux users can still help test, but you have to use the "managesatoshi" branch and compile it yourself. What I've done:If you are running Bitcoin-Qt when you start Armory, it will now tell you to stop. "Let Armory manage the Bitcoin software" is the default. You will be told to either close Bitcoin-Qt, or change your settings (with a convenient button in the middle of the dashboard). You can go into your settings and uncheck the box to carry on using Armory exactly as you used to. Or you can leave it checked and just close Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind. If you do not have bitcoind installed or it is in a non-standard location, it will tell you to install it, or change your settings to point to where it is located. I just spent a fair amount of time not only producing instructions for installing in Linux, but a "Do it for me!" button for the PPA. It's experimental, but so far it has worked for me in two environments. Please try this feature! I want to find out if it is actually reliable (I actually don't know why it wouldn't be; it simply executes the 3 commands using gksudo, but I suppose it could choke if your package manager is broken, in which case I have no clue what happens). ( EDIT: yes I know gksudo is a gnome thing ... but if you are not using gnome, i.e. default Ubuntu, then you probably can handle setting up the PPA yourself or manually installing it). I need help testing, especially from the Linux folks, because they're the ones most likely to have non-standard configurations that will break this. I also need testing in non-Ubuntu environments. I've done a lot of testing, but somehow I'm confident it won't be enough. And I know there's still some things missing (like the count-down timer on the initial blockchain sync). Also, bear in mind this version has a lot of debugging output left on, to help me figure out the code flow. I'm sorry if it's annoying (it sometimes annoys me, too). To use 0.87.8 (which will be 0.88 when it's released):Linux: -- Pull and switch branches: "git checkout managesatoshi" -- Must install python-psutil package. This is a new dependency to help with managing the background process. It will be added to the next offline bundle. -- Recompile Windows: -- http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1139081/ArmoryTestingReleases/armory_0.87.8-testing_win64.msiPlease mention everything that doesn't look right. Most likely, configurations/combinations of options that lead to a dashboard that doesn't say the right thing, or buttons missing that should be there, etc. Try out the new settings (renamed from "preferences"). One thing I threw on top was added a permanent "--skip-online-check" to the settings. Try that out, too. It doesn't work for me. I'm running Windows Server 2008 R2 64bit. bitcoind is launched automatically, blockchain is synchanized, but armory keeps saying "initializing bitcoin engine". I change it to the traditional mode but it keeps saying offline while bitcoin-qt is running. I have moved back to 0.87.2 and everything work as usual
|
|
|
I heard that you removed the option to have bitcoins sent straight to an address? Is this true?
Just for the night while were under attack. Will BitInstant still support MtGox when they stop using USD code in April?
|
|
|
All submitted deposits will be credited to account! Got credited. Thank you btc-e support! You are running an excellent exchange! It semms they are still not accepting liqpay. Don't use it until they have further announcement
|
|
|
Earlier I sent $1700 to btc-e with liqpay as usual. BTC-E suddenly says they temporarily stopped accepting liqpay. Liqpay refuses to cancel the transaction and I have no further response from BTC-E support. Got credited. Thank you btc-e support! It semms they are still not accepting liqpay. Don't use it until they have further announcement
|
|
|
Earlier I sent $1700 to btc-e with liqpay as usual. BTC-E suddenly says they temporarily stopped accepting liqpay. Liqpay refuses to cancel the transaction and I have no further response from BTC-E support.
|
|
|
i probably would not have paid you the coins if i lost. but i am bipolar so if i was in the mood to man up i would have. what i would have done or would not have done does not excuse you or give you a free pass to man up with everybody but me. if you want to man up and accept responsibility for your actions you will have to deal with me.
matthew, i have enough coins right now to pay back every person i burned and pay you twice over.
Quoted
|
|
|
Maldives $974,900,000.00 $89.28
ATH: $89.25
so close!
It's passed: 89.245*10956700 = 977,830,691.5 > 974,900,000.0
|
|
|
In the grand scheme of things this run from the teens to ~$90 will appear very short lived and ridiculously bubble-ish. Years from now at the bottom of the coming correction we'll all recognize how absurd it is that BTC traded at this level.
What market size should bitcoin be, in your opinion? The size needed that it can be used to transfer wealth around without pushing the price around too much. $10,000 to $100,000 a coin at least if this goes main stream. I agree with Goat, at ~$1000 per coin the market cap would be about $1 Trillion which would make it difficult to push prices around. For 1000 per coin the total would only be 10 billion
|
|
|
New ATH 87.7, next target: Maldives
|
|
|
86.52 v.s. 96.14 now. Could we see it in March?
|
|
|
I think I was sleeping while all this happened.
Could somebody please explain me one thing.... The whole point of this "version 2 blocks" was just to include the height in the coinbase? I mean... can't the height just be calculated? Couldn't local databases add the height on their data, in an extra field of some kind? Need it be on the protocol?
I fail to see why going through all this hassle just to add the block height to coinbase...
It's to avoid identical coinbase transactions: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0034
|
|
|
The money still isn't on my account, it's 24 confirmations now. What makes me a little angry is their attitude of not looking into this before 48 hours go by.
Congrad, you will have a much better price when it is credited
|
|
|
I don't know your current financial situation but $80 is a negligible amount in the whole life for most people in developed countries. If this is true for you, buying 1 BTC right now is a good idea.
|
|
|
|