I don't know much about scientific community, but will the freelance platform for scientists be in demand? I don't really know how popular it is among scientists not to be on a steady payroll.
I think platform will be in demand, there are many outstanding scientists who need funding for the implementation of their inventions, but their attempts to find investors can be compared with bird that can't start fly. |
|
|
|
|
Is it true that Aubrey De Grey their advisor? I would like to know whether this information is confirmed ?
I found a lot of interesting video with this person at YouTube channels.
|
|
|
|
|
What about partnerships? Is there been any announcements or confirmations of cooperation with other projects, or they are completely independent?
|
|
|
|
A phenomenal project.
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?
It's normal that most of the people pay more attention to social media than science intheir freee time. At the end what most want to do in their free time is to relax and be with their family and friends. I think if they launch science projects that are really useful for everyone or make everyday life easier people will get interested. Of course, good marketing is crucial for the success of the platform. The platform could also attract some people who are not interested in profit but only in science. These people would support projects only because they like them. Correct point of view definitely, because i have a lot of friends that they dont have any interest in crypto but they like funding projects in web platforms. With this you can take them on board maybe. Such people should just have an inherent pursuit for science and at least a little belief in crypto) maybe it's true that people are more interested in social media-based projects, but there are also sector investors interested in scientific projects, so marketing will be fundamental for this project... I think this is the reason why they don't have a normal ICO, they know there aren't many smaller investors in the crypto community that are interested in science projects. Especially these days, when the market is already tough as it is, investors don't have much money to invest. Not having an ICO might be actually a good idea. It is quite risky still I think, but we will see how it will work out for them. Scientific projects have great potential, because for example - if in the future will be invented cure for cancer it will be useful, and it would bring lot of money and glory to this project! |
|
|
|
The engineering team of the Vidy project, striking with its rewards, it has already collected 10 million users, patented multi-million inventions and received decades of success in the world of software development, it is worthy of respect!
I also like their team, they are very active in the telegram channel - all investors are kept informed and know all updates of the project. |
|
|
|
Well, they have not been updating (I mean in the sense of adding new content) their Youtube channel for a month already, no news here and in other resources, right? I only hope they are busy with all the developing-the-project stuff.
Hopefully, they will be back with some positive news as they have created a void between the team and the community which is not good for the reputation. It's a holiday season, so I wouldn't be surprised. But anyway, this kind of project demands dedication, so I hope they gonna be back on track really soon. Indeed august is probably the worst month to publish news. Because most of the people are on vacation so are not going to pay attention to them. Experts say - September will see a series of deadlines for bitcoin ETFs, starting on September 15, the date by which two funds by GraniteShares will receive a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. This will determine the position of current ICO projects and I hope that EHF can obtain for good news. For months I have said this, September will be a watershed for many promising projects, and Ehealth is one of those I will follow very closely, relying on its success and superiority in the sector there are no news /updates from any channel for a while, maybe there are no relevant news, just hope that in September there will be some important news or maybe some prestigious partnerships... Perhaps they save the best news for release at auspicious time. This would be strategically beneficial for the project, because during the bull market, investors are more active. |
|
|
|
What particular field of science projects this platform is most likely aiming its market for? I would only hope it could get projects in bio-sciences and pharmaceuticals where it could generate a lot of ROI to its investors. Imho.
It should be projects that when finished can generate revenue by being implemented in a product on the market. If I correctly understood the field of science will be completely diverse, all will be decided by experts who will determine the rating of the project. |
|
|
|
Well, they have not been updating (I mean in the sense of adding new content) their Youtube channel for a month already, no news here and in other resources, right? I only hope they are busy with all the developing-the-project stuff.
Hopefully, they will be back with some positive news as they have created a void between the team and the community which is not good for the reputation. It's a holiday season, so I wouldn't be surprised. But anyway, this kind of project demands dedication, so I hope they gonna be back on track really soon. Indeed august is probably the worst month to publish news. Because most of the people are on vacation so are not going to pay attention to them. Experts say - September will see a series of deadlines for bitcoin ETFs, starting on September 15, the date by which two funds by GraniteShares will receive a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. This will determine the position of current ICO projects and I hope that EHF can obtain for good news. |
|
|
|
The team communicate nicely about development and future of people ask for it, but they communicate especially on telegram. I think it’s a very important to have a sucessfull ico to handle the communication very well, especially during this period.
You are right, the bull market can start at any moment - and if communication would maintained at that level, as at this time - project will be able to raise hard cap. |
|
|
|
Did you guys already started to search for projects that could be listed on your platform? Did you do some research on what's the demand for such a platform as scientificcoin might be?
Yes, of course. At the moment we are using projects from the Novosibirsk research center. In future, thanks to our partnerships/communities, we will bring projects from all around the world That's good. So the platform won't be empty as soon as you will launch it. Do you already have some partnerships from outside of Russia? When they launch it they need to have at leats a few projetc to invest in them because otherwise the platform doesn't have any use and its not worthy to launch it. Yep, it's comparable to a gaming console launch. You need a strong game that is available at launch to boost the sales. Here you need a few great projects that will attract users. I completely agree with the above statement.. if you are launching a framework but have no applications on it to launch you will have a hard time getting adoption rate up. History has proved that when you can launch something and have 1 good backer, it will make all the difference. Hello, as already stated, we will have several projects in Feb 19 (official platform release). i fully agree at the time of launch the platform must have at least some project in the list to choose from to make a good impression among possible users/investors, well i see that the team has also thought about this, congratulations... So I suppose this platform will be available in English or Russian? or will it be possible to have a multilingual interface? |
|
|
|
|
Bounty manager, please answer the question:
This Bounty already goes 30 weeks, is this will be ever ending? each time only extend the end date, with the same reward pool - this is unfair.
I hope for quick reply or this is another one russian scam-project?
|
|
|
|
In fact, you are creating a platform on which other people can launch their ICO, but why should they do it exactly on it?
like any other crowdfunding platform like Patreon, kickstarter I think this is for scientific researcher and scientist who needs fund to start his research and some big companies backing for patent and profit.. probably Because like any other crowdfunding platform fo investors in much easier to look for projects to invest in one platform that surfing the net to find them. yes actually for the investors is much easier to search and find any projects on which to invest from a certified list by scientificcoin rather than looking for them one by one on the internet I do think so, this project could be the leader in crowdfunding for scientific innovations and I can't seem to imagine the very big potential it could have. In addition to an excellent Crowdfunding platform for the scientific branch, a way to form a strong Community in this sense, and with great participation in projects and new platforms Later, this platform could be recommended by professors from various universities for gifted students. I think this project could promote science, as well as investors could make super profits. |
|
|
|
Yes the team has already said that they will provide proof in time of the 16 millions raised with private investors. If they really have that much money I think that they already can developp something interesting. I’m impatient to see how much they will raise during public sale.
On which stage they raised that 16 millions ? I saw there are some scam projects that deceived their community and said theyve raised big amount of money. So i think vidy should be more transparent to get more investors trust. If I'm not mistaken, I think that $16 million they've raised was from the private sale. And maybe we could also consider that this project could generate a lot of interests from big advertisement clients and I'm very positive its ICO will have very good results. Yes. the 16m USD come from private sale. They will show a list of investors soon. That's the reason why we want to see some proves about that amount because there have been another projects lying about it. In case they can prove it that would be huge news. Good news must be spreaded and there is no reason to hide it. Idk why the team keep silent with such news about the fund raised. It can help to boost the project if they willing to share the proof with us. On the other hand, if it was a private sale, then this is a closed round. But you are right - I do not see the point why they do not want to share evidence, for project this will be huge plus. |
|
|
|
the developers of this project came up with a very interesting way to attract people to invest in this project, due to the fact that if you are the holder of this coin, you will be given it yet.
You mean dividends? They are always attracting attention to a project. But I hope the team also works in the background in order to achieve set milestones, get partnerships and attract investors. This is also true, first of all the team must work hard, and follow to roadmap. Other pleasant bonuses are additional stimulation for investors and no more. |
|
|
|
How long will the expert have to evaluate the project?
So I suppose they will need a lot of experts from different fields of science, it must be people with vast experience and unique knowledge. It must be like kickstarter, you have a possible flying machine. You demo it and ask for research funding promising patents and profits ? i should dig into the whitepaper i think it will be like that, similar to kickstarter, a group of experts will evaluate a demo of a project and establish if it will be successful on a practical and economic level if yes it will be financed, there are any news of some partnerships?... That sounds good. It will give the platform credibility. This is important aspect, as it was said earlier, these experts should be independent and impartial in order to determine the best of scientific works. |
|
|
|
Plus one million dollars is great for the future of the project. Several such investments and the caps are ready)
1 mill is enough to get the project of the ground until it's ready for prime time The project is so broad and i feel that 1 mil. is not enough, it may cover some of the expenses and other marketing program but getting of the ground will take a lot budgeting and tightening of expense. 1 million alone is defintive not enough to build this project, but it is a good start and they have raised money before too. So it is a step into the right direction. Health is a very vital platform and it will need more funds to make the project run steadily. 1m at the beginning is a good start btw. I do really think that here is the more money the better. They can insert them in new areas of field or investigate and further develop the existing ones. When project raised hard cap it's not always good, often there is such that the team in this case becomes lazy and cannot fulfill the promise according to the roadmap. |
|
|
|
I didn't read anything yet. Anybody knows what kind of scientific project we are talking to target in here? What kind of contacts are in place now?
This sounds good but details about it will make the difference between a mediocre project and something worth investigating
Hello sir. I think it is much better if you will read the reading materials of this project. I already read those and I learned a lot and obviously I find this project really impressive. You better read it for you to understand the project really well. Reading is really fundamental for understanding, especially in technical papers, and besides, I see some questions that could be easily solved or even made if we practice basic reading Funny) Besides, hearing may also help sometimes. This project is neither the hardest nor the simpliest one in terms of understanding that I have met here so far What did you mean with contacts? As fas as I know they don't have any partnersihp yet. But as we are in the first stages of the project there's plenty of time to get them. I really want this team start to participate in various crypto events, In this case, it's more likely that the project will succeed and will find worthy partners. |
|
|
|
I didn't read anything yet. Anybody knows what kind of scientific project we are talking to target in here? What kind of contacts are in place now?
This sounds good but details about it will make the difference between a mediocre project and something worth investigating
I think the same so far, there is still much information to be complemented here, or found in your documents, I will allow time for reading, as it really seems to me to be an interesting and worthy project And yet I was glad to have this blockchain project with a unique use case. I'm sure the scientific community would be glad to know more about this. Have you guys seen any potential competitors of this project? Some platforms targeting a scientific community? The idea looks interesting to me. Need to read some more about it. So far I don't see any competitor in this platform. This for sure will be good for this project to get more investors to come to invest. This is a good sign to start, but given the potential of the Project and the field of action, I would not be surprised if bold competitors start to emerge soon, but pioneering Crypto is very important You are right, this platform will be useful for the scientific community - worthy projects will find financing and there can be many new discoveries ahead. |
|
|
|
16 million is a very huge amount. I guess they don't even need an ICO after getting this much sum.
in effect with what has been raised so far in the private sale even if during the ico they should not reach the hard cap i believe that the project will continue anyway... If the project is collecting more money than intended, the devs are reviewing some of their directions, right? The project can not raise more than planned - they have hard cap, right? Steady follow the road map, this is what they must doing after ICO. |
|
|
|
|
Interesting, they have experienced doctors in the team? It seems to me that for medical project are needed people with experience in this field.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
