This is a very real possibility.  I think we have thousands of merge miners holding a few thousand iXcoins each and most don't sell cause its not worth enough to make a difference.  Early huge miners like BCX hold 200,000 coins but that's rare so that means the newer miners hold much much less. 

This is a good thing for iXcoin.  This is what you want to have in any global coin.

But he's saying the miners don't even hold the coins.  He's saying they don't even have wallets so then where are these merge mined coins going?

And yes, why does DVC, NMC and other merge mined coins have lots of volume.  There's something else going on.

42 trillion, not 420 trillion. 

Sounds like maybe a dubious Mickey Mouse exchange.  We can't even get on a good exchange and Luke thinks we will have media access like no other coin.  lol, I don't know if I wanna laugh or cry.  What's the guy talking about?  Maybe he's the one looking for a quick profit with talk like that.

Yeah, Luke, can you add to this?  iXcoin has no access to any media.  We can't even get coindesk to write an article.  Most think iXcoin is dead so what and how exactly does iXcoin have access to media that no all coins have cause I see many alt coins in the media all the time.  Even crappy coins like Coinye and FeatherCoin.  iXcoin gets zero media compared to these coins and a new website and logo Will not change much at all so what so you mean, Luke?

We would all appreciate some honest help here cause I feel Vlad and Friction are right, we will soon be buried under a massive avalanche of new coins and with new high budget brand coins coming in they will steal all the media, mindshare and investment money.

We have to move on this and if most votes are in I see no reason to wait 2 more weeks.  I feel there are important things you're not telling us, Luke.  I'm a long term holder as are many here so please level with us.

Wow, interesting.  IXC means Jesus Christ?  Then what Vlad was saying about XIC being the devil holds some water since the devil likes to do everything backwards.

Wow, the symbolism just keeps on coming.

The reshaping yes, but not the rebranding.  We need to keep the same name and the same protocol.

I will too.  Like vlad was saying, More of us should post our opinions and we should really try to keep the discussions central to one location so new investors can more easily find it.

That said, this thread is probably the best place to hold voting and discussions.

I really like these 2 background effects.  I think they would look great with the red color as well.  Of course we can us different backgrounds at various times.

Anybody else like these backgrounds more than others?



 

I like the black background, it's chic and it makes the logo stand out.  I like the bright gold logo but the red as well so I would support either one.

Did the yellow/gold one just become more orange?  Kind of looks different.  I agree the spacing should match to be more pleasant.  Good catch.

I see Friction's point with the red.  We need to get the final 2 colors perfect and side by side and then do a vote.  Like friction says, we do need to think about the branding and long term.  At this point I'm not so sure which one is best.  I like the gold one best but I also see what Friction is saying.

Let's get them touched up and perfected and see them side by side and do a vote.

I totally agree, that's a nicer red than the first darker one but the gold is beautiful.  Vlad hit it with that suggestion.  Thanks to the designer who made it all look so great.

Why, it looks like the reddit guy is willing to cover a bunch of the costs.  Nice!

Those 2 are my favorites.

Roll some of that into iXcoin.  Speaking of being accurate, Vlad has been accurate about so much - and it doesn't hurt to diversify.  I'm thrilled to have gotten into CENT at the bottom and I'm planning to buy more iXcoin with my profits. 

I agree with the guy who says once it breaks 10 it's gonna run wild.  At this pace it's gonna only take a few days.  Somebody wants into this thing in a big way. 

Big plans on the way.

There's 17 million coins out there.  I have such a hard time believing $.11 is too low giving almost all those coins were either mined for free or bought at 1 Penny or lower.

So why isn't any other coin with that many coins outstanding not behaving this way?  Especially for a coin supposedly nobody wants.  Why aren't the pools and miners dumping everything they have?  It just doesn't add up.  Out of 17 million coins there should be a few million with low standards or in need of quick easy profits and we have never seen that on this coin.  It really makes you wonder what's going on behind the scenes. 

Ironically, because CENT proved XPM is not enough for cheaper or highly diluted coins.  CENT wanted and deserved to be priced lower but it simply couldn't.

So how long before someone (like Vlad with his ShitCoin) figures that out and releases a CrapCoin with 100 trillion coins.  Such a coin would garner a huge value not cause it's good but simply cause there is nothing cheap enough and liquid enough to price it with.

CENT is perfectly named and perfectly fit (now) to be the perfect currency base for a 4th market which will deal with ultra cheap coins (like NXT, LOTTO, SHT, etc) and ultra diluted coins.  With hundreds of new coins coming out there's gonna be a lot of those and unless they use CENT then someone like Vlad can come along and Greatly and profitably game the system.  I believe that was one point he was trying to prove, that with 100 trillion coins he could have had a top ranked coin even though it was a total ShitCoin.  Good for us that the name itself kept the coin from being listed otherwise he would have proved to be correct.

Lol.  How would destruction of trillions of their own coins be a win for Cryptsy?

Why wouldn't they rather buy up even more at the rock bottom price of 1 XPM-Satoshi and when they're done accumulating then they announce a 4th market using CENT which would take cent up at least 5 fold, especially if they remove their trillions off the market and then slowly unload their large share over a period of mo ths into any major buying price spikes.

That's the smartest move unless you'd go destroy large chunks of your coins to help out everyone else.  

Very good point - We need to stay focused. 

I also agree about the competition.  Namecoin doesn't seem to ever do anything and not to mention they had a horrible death late last year.  I remember reading about it on their thread.  Also, isn't Namecoin very specialized - I mean, it's not ideal for a general purpose coin - it's more about domain names so it's not a good fit for other things.  So Namecoin is out of the running for global adoption in my opinion but that didn't stop it from going from .$001 (one tenth of 1 penny) last year to $1 (that's -1,000 fold) and now with the latest run it went to over $10.  So that coin went up some 10,000 fold, which has never happened in the history of the stock market (according to the Vlad).  And it did it in under 12 months, and with no marketing and with nothing really ground breaking or special.

As for DVC, it has a great community and it is a well known coin but yes, miners get very little and the dilution (infinite) turns off any new investor who knows anything about investments or stocks which where the smart money comes in.

So, out of all the classic, old school coins, the most secure in the world that only leaves iXcoin and iXcoin has so many good attributes that I really becomes a no brainier.  From it's shocking similarity to Bitcoin to its benefits with nine of the stigma and negatives which Bitcoin carries to the fact iXcoin can be molded and shaped exactly as needed to become a true SmartCurrency, a currency which can be pushed out to the masses and easily understood (because it's just like Bitcoin) and integrated (cause anything which recognizes Bitcoin can be made to recognize iXcoin) so much so that it almost looks like it was planned out all along.

I wish I had money right now to buy more iXcoin cause although there may be new "hot" coins like dogecoin, those coins honestly don't look like they'll be popular or even around in 6 months, let alone 3 years and its funny how none of those devs understand the security factor cause they all keep pushing out scrypt CrapCoins so even though there's hundreds of coins out, there's really very very few which can even compete with iXcoin and it doesn't appear that all these wonderful devs even get it.  I love it - iXcoin stands alone and all these new coins aren't doing anything to even challenge it (on the security side).  Lol.

There was no big push to do anything.  This is simply what happens when buyers show up.  The idea is to try and guess what the buyers are thinking.  Is it just new buyers who see a cheap coin or do we have the same concerted effort which I felt were trying to buy up a big chunk of cent in order to profit from it after putting it to use. 

My best guess was that Cryptsy would use it as a fourth market currency which would of course create a massive spike in demand so that may still be going on.  This is just speculation given cent is looking near death so who would spend over 20 Bitcoin now buying up nearly 1 trillion?  It just add up since most who wanted cent probably already bought it so who then, is buying now?

Any ideas?