cant seem to buy any on coinswap :|
Try RapidCX.com |
|
|
|
Just a quick note to let you know that we set up a cluster of PAYPROCOIN nodes for public access at our pool.
You can add us by using addnode=paypropool.com in your payprocoin.conf file or by simply typing 'addnode paypropool.com add' in the help-debug-console section of the wallet.
paypropool.com
I used this node address and it worked for me. On the MAC it was easiest to use the debug console. On Linux, it was easiest to just type 'payprocoind addnode paypropool.com add' at the command line. |
|
|
|
 IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTThis week PayProCoin will be destroying half the premine. The 40 Million coins will be destroyed by a third party. We have currently requested bittrexExchange perform this action as they are the largest altcoin exchange. The schools project will still continue as planned. I will update members of the community when and how the coins are destroyed here very soon. Our launch statement will be updated too. Kind Regards Darren Palmer CEO Mr. CEO, I love your style! I am sure I am not alone in that. ~CTYA |
|
|
|
no one is actually selling  You can also post a quantity and price here and somebody might PM you to make the deal. |
|
|
|
no one is actually selling You only need to find the right "buy" price. Once you find it, someone will sell to you. |
|
|
|
Well, I voted for PRO at coinpayments.net There are only 154 votes in the entire competition so far (all coins) The vote ends at July 16, 2014 at 07:59:59pm EDT We can surely get the majority of the votes before then! It is a .001 BTC charitable donation to cast your vote. https://www.coinpayments.net/vote178 Votes at coinpayments.net now. Things are accelerating now that the deadline is approaching. PRO needs your vote! https://www.coinpayments.net/voteThis looks really good. Anyone able to check if its legit ? Can confirm... legit operations. We use some of their merchants to exchange alt coins for precious metals. CoinPayments acts as the payment processor for those transactions. paypropool.com Nice, thanks. We should wait to vote on this to prevent a voting war. If we keep the element of surprise on our side, we could win this for min outlay! Aye aye Chief. Holding all further campaigning on this one until further notice. |
|
|
|
Well, I voted for PRO at coinpayments.net There are only 154 votes in the entire competition so far (all coins) The vote ends at July 16, 2014 at 07:59:59pm EDT We can surely get the majority of the votes before then! It is a .001 BTC charitable donation to cast your vote. https://www.coinpayments.net/vote178 Votes at coinpayments.net now. Things are accelerating now that the deadline is approaching. PRO needs your vote! https://www.coinpayments.net/vote |
|
|
|
so whats going down on our coin here? i quit mining a bit ago just pondering hitting it again?
Come mine at PayProPool! High performance, load balanced mining farm PROP (proportional) pool system. Equal payout for equal shares. Fast payouts after 32 confirmations Automatic miner difficulty adjustments each 30s Professional data center and responsive admins Low 0.5% fee : supports pool operations and development http://paypropool.com
We just gave 100 PRO to each mining address at our pool! This is a reliable pool, so far so good. |
|
|
|
Well, I voted for PRO at coinpayments.net There are only 154 votes in the entire competition so far (all coins) The vote ends at July 16, 2014 at 07:59:59pm EDT We can surely get the majority of the votes before then! It is a .001 BTC charitable donation to cast your vote. https://www.coinpayments.net/vote |
|
|
|
CryptoSkills team set up a pool for PayProCoin at: http://pools.cryptoskills.com/
 Low fees High performance Node.js backend User friendly mining client Multi-coin / multi-pool 24/7 Support No registration needed! Point your miners to our pool, set your own address and start getting payout every 20 seconds! EU based DDOS protected Under constant improvements for your mining pleasure! Hi Cryptoskills, An EU pool is a good thing I think! Let the PRO community know: what are your pool fees? Thanks! |
|
|
|
.... shall we do it again?
YES Please!!! Within the next three hours after this post, we will be giving free PRO to all mining addresses on our pool. PayProPool.com High performance, load balanced mining farm PROP (proportional) pool system. Equal payout for equal shares. Fast payouts after 32 confirmations Automatic miner difficulty adjustments each 30s Professional data center and responsive admins 0.5% fee : supports pool operations and development I think this speaks highly of this developing community. Here is a pool that was developed solely for this coin and promoting itself by giving miners some of its fees in return for their patronage. Does it get any better than that for a new coin? I think not! |
|
|
|
You fanbois are riding shifty too hard, he raises valid points that must be addressed. Be more objective to people raising a valid concern.
I agree he raises valid points. Contradicting points, but valid on their own. I also believe those questions are being addressed. Yet he persists to ask the question again and again in multiple threads, ad nauseum. Also, we won't allow anyone to imply the team is either incompetent or scammers without a backlash. That is just unfairly insulting the hard-working devs and their management. These alt-coin forums are full of FUD'ers and people yelling this or that is a scam. It is a shame to behave that way and simply not tolerated here. Keep it respectful. If shifty was persistent but avoided the insults, then shifty would have received a different response. |
|
|
|
The autism is strong with this one.
Is it not relevant that the premine is claimed as being 1%, but actually appears to be 27%? I don't see why Darren can't explain how the figure of 1% is reached, i.e. how the figure of 8 billion total coins is reached, when the code shows a maximum of 290 million coins (or infinity, if the bug isn't fixed, which it clearly would be). I simply can't take the bait and argue your faulty premise. The present code does not prevent present day mining at the agreed rate. The OP spells out the 8 Billions and that is the agreement. Surely the code will be consistently updated to meet this agreement when necessary. Just as Darren will have developers update the code to meet his other business objectives when necessary. Now stop being ridiculous, please. |
|
|
|
ANNOUNCEMENT 1:After weeks of negotiations, we are excited to announce that PayProCoin have struck a deal with a well known gift card company to allow us to ... - Add a PayProCoin wallet with every digital card purchased
- Add a PayProCoin paper wallet with every physical card purchased
On either occasion PayProCoin will add a small faucet amount to the wallet and a link to our PayProGift website (to be ann). Also the card sender will be able to add funds to the wallet easily. We expect this service to be available to the public before this Christmas and will announce the launch of PayProGift on this thread in the very near future. Our partner in this service has requested it is allowed to announce the service officially and publicly when the service is up and running later this year. ANNOUNCEMENT 2:PayProCoin is also pleased to announce the start of our college and university project on Friday 11th July 2014. Students and teachers will be able to register themselves and their schools for inclusion to the projects first event this Christmas. Very exciting progress Darren and team. Keep up this great work! |
|
|
|
But we can't grant your premise because it is complete contradicting in two statements:
First, you are saying that there is a total of 290 Million through block 630000 after which no coins can be mined.
Next you admit that there is a bug in the code which does not prevent the mining to continue after block 630000.
So you are correct that the halving bug does indeed exist in PayProCoin and does not exist in Bitcoin.
You are not correct about the subsidy count because there is still plenty of time left in the coin to fix the end date of mining, which was announced in the OP as decades.
We are all certain that the code updates that follow between now and decades will allow us to mine Billions of coins as stated in the OP.
So you will just have to wait to find out about the dev team's production efforts. But calling them a scam or incompetent based on something that may or may not occur years from now is quite unfair.
I will add that based on Darren's professionalism so far on this forum and everywhere else on the planet, you sound like a crazy person when you throw such weak scam accusations.
The next sound you heard will be the rest of this forum clicking the ignore link under your profile.
First off, let's ignore the halving bug. It would certainly be fixed long before it becomes an issue, and so is almost totally irrelevant. The important points are: - The development team claims that the maximum number of coins is 8 billion, and that the premine of 80 million is 1% of this - Ignoring the halving bug, the code clearly shows that the maximum number of coins is 290 million, and the premine would be 27% of this. If we weren't to ignore the halving bug for some reason, then the number of coins has no limit. I am not calling the team scammers. I am instead asking them to explain why they state that the maximum number of coins is 8 billion, when according to the code it is actually 290 million (or infinity, with the bug not fixed). You are again contradicting yourself. You say you are not calling the team scammers, but quoting yourself as writing "Should we conclude you are incompetent, or outright scammers?" |
|
|
|
Do you have any feedback from the head developer yet on this point about the total number of coins?
Are you really trolling about a halving bug that won't affect the coin for years? The source code is constantly being developed and patches will make their way into the code as priorities permit. Calling someone a scammer because their posted software repository has an irrelevant bug really isn't fair. Point out the bug in a PM and give him a chance to patch it before it causes problems. For this particular bug, the problem would not arise until much later than now. No, I'm not. You can find the full conversation in the bittrex thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=635824.msg7740789#msg7740789). I'm calling out the PayPro development team on their claim that the total number of coins is 8 billion, and the premine of 80 million is a reasonable 1% of this, whereas the source code clearly shows that the total number of coins will be 290 million, with the premine of 80 million being over 27% of this. Darren stated he would check with the head developer about this discrepancy. The halving bug (which means there is no limit to the number of coins mined) would clearly be fixed long before it had any impact, and so is not relevant to the point in question. For all practical purposes, the maximum number of coins with the current codebase is 290 million. EDIT: my question "Are you really trying to get out on this technicality? Should we conclude you are incompetent, or outright scammers?" was due to Darren's response at one point of "If your stating that 'without limit' ... then 8 billion coins must be reachable?" as if the halving bug someone justifies the claim that the total number of coins is 8 billion. But we can't grant your premise because it is complete contradicting in two statements: First, you are saying that there is a total of 290 Million through block 630000 after which no coins can be mined. Next you admit that there is a bug in the code which does not prevent the mining to continue after block 630000. So you are correct that the halving bug does indeed exist in PayProCoin and does not exist in Bitcoin. You are not correct about the subsidy count because there is still plenty of time left in the coin to fix the end date of mining, which was announced in the OP as decades. We are all certain that the code updates that follow between now and decades will allow us to mine Billions of coins as stated in the OP. So you will just have to wait to find out about the dev team's production efforts. But calling them a scam or incompetent based on something that may or may not occur years from now is quite unfair. I will add that based on Darren's professionalism so far on this forum and everywhere else on the planet, you sound like a crazy person when you throw such weak scam accusations. The next sound you heard will be the rest of this forum clicking the ignore link under your profile. |
|
|
|
Quote from the bittrex delist thread: Are you really trying to get out on this technicality? Should we conclude you are incompetent, or outright scammers?
Every 64 years a bug in the block halving code will cause another 290 million coins to be mined. This bug has already been fixed in Bitcoin (despite it not affecting that coin for another 200+ years) and can clearly be fixed in PayPro very easily. Without a fix, the total number of coins is not 8 billion, it is infinite (with obvious caveats about 64 bit storage of numbers). With a fix, the total number of coins is not 8 billion, it is 290 million.
I ask again, what is your basis for stating that the total number of coins is 8 billion? If 8 billion total, what is the expected number of coins as a function of time (or block number), and why isn't that reflected in the code?
Im the CEO, not a programmer - but with your second explanation i understand what you are trying to get across better. Our head dev came with outstanding references which we checked and his work has been faultless on every project we give him and his team. When we set the volume I was assured there would be no problem and after you brought this issue up before... was assured again there is no issue. If there is something you did not understand when speaking directly to our developer I would be more than happy to set up a 3 way meeting as suggested earlier. If you decline this offer, I will still put your posts here to him and post my findings. Kind Regards Darren To be honest, my only issue is the disagreement between the code and the communication coming from the PayPro team, rather than a lack of understanding of the code (which is quite clear). In the interests of transparency and full disclosure of information to investors / potential investors, I'd rather keep discussions on a public forum rather than a private meeting. But yes, please post the findings either here or a less heavily moderated thread that the main PayPro one. Do you have any feedback from the head developer yet on this point about the total number of coins? Are you really trolling about a halving bug that won't affect the coin for years? The source code is constantly being developed and patches will make their way into the code as priorities permit. Calling someone a scammer because their posted software repository has an irrelevant bug really isn't fair. Point out the bug in a PM and give him a chance to patch it before it causes problems. For this particular bug, the problem would not arise until much later than now. |
|
|
|
Let's DO THIS BittrexExchange ! We are voting on Mintpal... but we want BittrexExchange MORE! |
|
|
|
MintPal Voting changesEffective immediately we are removing the paid vote facility for all coins and we are officially announcing the phasing out of the voting system altogether. It's only fair that we allow the coins currently on the list to have a fair shot at making the top spot, so we will operate a further 8 'Voting Mondays' including today, thus ending on 25th August 2014. Some good news to consider: Hashrate for the network is consistently climbing. There are Buy orders for about 3.5 Million PRO at rapidCX PRO is climbing the mintpal voting list very quickly (#60 as I write this!). Go vote. Are we also voting for PRO at coinpayments.net? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
