I have a solution that will allow almost complete fairness and can identify accounts being controlled by a singular user/group to change the result.

I think this  a perfect time to use weak artificial intelligence algorithms.

Ouch, that's not good.

Are you serious ?

Gliss stated in the coinmarketcap thread that he's already done this.

Well, actually it will be Peercoin copycat...

That would be useful. Do you know of a way to export the coinmarketcap to a spreadsheet? This would be useful for analysis. I'm also inclined to think the true value of an asset is a function of the market's ability to absorb it, so just multiplying the last sale price by the total in circulation is misleading and overly optimistic.

no, because they are optional but available on demand. separating the client from server makes a lot of sense
for the expected growth and the expected features. with a lean client version i can decide to connect to my local
node, my public or private 24h vps node (if exists) any unsecured open node if i don't need a transfer but just a
quick account balance or even to fully trustet nodes in case a transfer is needed.  and if you think further to some
special nodes, offering services by a custom built api. moreover there is no need to keep the client in sync with the
core source which improves security, the most important mantry shortly (hear me now and believe me later) and
important too, i can reduce or better cut dependencies completely, gaining better cross-os properties.

at least i like to mention that i am lighhtyears away from seeing you or any other dev as an competition, i can ensure
you i would be *very* happy if a open source client would appear in this second. this way i could concentrate on the
project i am really after, the hive. while the explorer and the client is a service to the community the hive is a personal
and commercial poject, which could lift nxt to the global finance level and into another league. this project would be
also listed on asset exchange if done and i would be glad if i could start this tomorrow.

There is a distinct bias towards dev work in the community.
Not surprising, seeing the initial group that would use any crypto, especially an innovative one.

However, I've seen a lot of work seen go unrecognised, too.
The people who keep the sites and wikis running spend hours a day keeping stuff up to date.
If the sites weren't there, this would be the only place Nxt would be seen and it would fail.

Also, the calls for funds do not go into the pockets of these people as "stash" but are prespent on buying domains, webspace, or tickets to go to conferences.

I already said earlier there is a tendency to negatively comment on marketing, as if it's in some way dirty and people asking for funds are asking for free Nxt.
Not by all, but it's there. Imagine if that were done to the devs who put in shitloads of hours.

I can't speak for others, but the time and money I put in is spent because
a) I believe in Nxt and want it to succeed.
b) I don't have dev skills, but don't just want to sit on the side, but actually contribute.

To hear someone say that such people are shitheads that basically think they are great and the devs are not makes me more than a little angry.

Now, having said that, I am going to eat, chill a bit and come back with some more positive attitude.

You and Niffy could ask for a fund reserved specially for people going to conferences and promote NXT. This could be separated from salsacz's efforts

Devise a plan with funding details, all the conferences and cost. I will support this effort.

This is interesting. My NXT client shows 2 decimal places. What is the smallest divisible unit? I don't really look at number of currency units issued, but more at what fraction of total issue do I receive for investment. 1 decimal location is as good as another, but comparing quantities of minimum divisible unit along with the minimum transaction fee to send a unit does make sense.

Ethereum, for instance, lists its minimum unit as the Wei, 2¹²⁸ theoretical max, 2¹⁰⁰ = 1.26765x10²⁹ expected maximum Wei, 1 Ether (ETH) = 10¹⁸ Wei

Minimum practical unit size would be some multiple of minimum transaction fee.