Nowadays you see everywhere that the men

- have a tougher time finding a girl, compared to the past, and they have to make compromises to get one ( be a money slave, and/or get a girl with looks lower than his)
 
- men are ridiculed for doing something, while women are praised to do the same thing. Double standards.
Example: girls make a sexual compliment to a guy on the street. It's "normal". When a guy does the same to a girl, he's a pervert. And if the police is watching him at that very moment, he's at risk.
Example: if a girl insults a guy, the people watching isn't going to defend him. Conversely the same people would defend the girl even if he's right.

To be fair extreme right ideas get more and more popularity...
But don't know if the "nazi" idea will come back.
I think it will take another form. They won't wake up the monster, they'll just create a new one.

There will, and it's a terrifying idea in the hands of a country that is perfectly at home practising wide-scale internet surveillance and censorship.

Trump will probably be getting a briefing about the various psy-ops undertaken during the previous administration.  I hold out hope that he will do the right thing and declassify them.  One way or another, I doubt that Trump will retain Cass Sunstein as and adviser or continue the guy's strategies.

Sounds like you may not know it, but nobody actually believes the 'flat earth' thing.  The main goal was to give people without an argument something they perceive as 'clever' to say.  Most of the people who fall for it are to ignorant to realize that the joke is on them.

edit:  As a taster, here's a decent piece at Salon from back in the day when Greenwald was a contributor:  http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

I saw the inaugural speech on CNN (via YouTube) and they finally turned the camera around and showed the crowd! I bet Trump had to have the secret service force the camera men to do it at gunpoint.

This is not how things work in general

Some two-three thousand years ago people most likely had been thinking along the same lines, though the numbers were a few orders less of course (say, that the Nile river could only feed a few million people). What you call as the end of growth is only the end of growth in the current technological paradigm. But we have already been through a few of such, and there is absolutely no reason to think that there won't be a few next technological shifts in the future. Basically, what you refer to as growth being over in fact refers only to the limits of our current knowledge and understanding. A simple but explicative example (your example really), a few hundred years ago people thought there was no speed limit, then they started to claim that the speed of light is such a limit. Now this position is no longer considered valid and people again think there is no such limit

It is not possible to have twice this amount of people.  They were full at 6am when the gates opend packed by 7am and folks were still in the streets trying to get in after it was over.  The streets were full of people who did not get in.  So sorry I do not agree with your statistic.  And I was there so this is personal observation vs what probably you read in the media.  If you have any link I would love to read where you got this claim from.  Thanks

If he was one, then there is no evidence to prove it. The FBI has never claimed that he personally dealt with drugs. He set up an online market place, which was used by a number of users, including a few drug dealers.

At least in Germany, the migrant crisis had no effect on the popularity of Nazism. The neo-Nazi party (Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands or NPD) has seen its vote-share declining in the 2015/2016 elections.

The problem is not that the book was reprinted, but the fact that the idea that promoting this book recently enjoyed great popularity. It seems to me that this pushes the migrant crisis and the rise number of attacks.

I wonder how the German finances will hold up after the UK and France have left the EU an they are left to pick up the tab.

If you write a super complex software, the "brain" will still be limited by its ability to process it. The more complex the program the more time it will take to compile an answer.
Also, the software will only allow it to create an answer based on the directions the programmer has thought of. Meaning that if you ask it a question it will answer it, but it won't be able to formulate its own questions, ones that the programmer hasn't thought of. It won't be curious and it won't understand what it is and try to improve.

It's fascinating to see people assign the worst of bungling to Trump.

A guy that fought through a Republican establishment that was totally against him, then against a dominant Democratic environment, against media forces and many other factors, and came out the winner.

That's just like playing poker, and drawing to an inside straight and winning, when it is done by sheer skill and guts, not chance.

Ah, the sad babbling of the losing liberal.

"We didn't get the corruption we wanted. The corruption we deserved.  THEY got it!"

This book can be read on the Internet. Once they buy it so for them it is not just a book it is a symbol. It is a bad sign. After the democratic reform can come of radical nationalists. It will be the same as in 1933.