death to non-Muslims who won't be converted (infidels)
There is no such requests, they offer the conversion or to join, but with no constriction. Find this "Letter to ISIS" in English, there are many points of Islamic Study to put out from being "muslim" the salafi jihadists. The URL have detailed description of all that rules (In Russian). Again - An Nisa, 4:59 This is a Why all those fucking Forced Democratisation in Syria is a Salafi Jihadists job, and muslims are fighting them. The real thing, that reading Quran is useless thing, there is so much Data, the normal man have no chance to hold that all in the head. People use the Shariah Law for living rules. Why don't you just state that you are not going to read or understand what the Koran says as indicated here http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm ? Explanations are given as to why the Koran says what it means, and is not taken out of context regarding its violence directives.  |
|
|
|
We see the earth as flat because it is too big for us to see the curve of our planet that's all -_-
It looks flat because it is flat. And you look stupid because you are stupid... yeah, it works! Fuck off. Oh... notsmartman, you're so mean...  Well of course battyman is going to call himself notbatman.  |
|
|
|
earth cant be flat, that's dumb
Educate yourself I educated myself, and here is what I found: A transit with a powerful telescope, combined with observations 91 days apart, observations on the sun and on a horizon star, can show the 93 million mile distance to the sun (plus or minus 10%) by trigonometry. Nothing can refute this, since it can be repeated over and over to give a nearly accurate answer. Using a better telescope, and making similar measurements gives the 93 million miles rather accurately. Now I'm happy.  Fuck off, using a sextant and plane trigonometry the distance to the Sun is measured at about 3,000 miles. That's because sextants were never made for this kind of measurement. Give a sextant a powerful telescope, so that it acts like a transit, and you will get a more accurate reading, close to the 93 million miles. |
|
|
|
If Shariah Law does NOT follow the Koran, then it is not Islamic, and the clerics are liars.
LOL, this is a point of all salafi jihadists, they have no clue on whole text of Quran, have no education and are guided by CIA instructors to fight enemies of CIA owners. The point is that the Sharia law of many countries is based on Quran and the understanding of the contest. Just check the data about the Quran knowledge by ISIS fighters, they have comunicate to have low knowledge of Quran in 80% of cases. This is the same point of You - taking out the text with have no idea about the modern Islamic World. Study of Quran and the Sharia law help to see clearly, who is a salafi jihadist sectant and who is a muslim. They are not the same. Do You will call some FLDS dude as "cristian"? Is there in english Open letter of 126 scentists of the Islamic world, addressed to the leader of IGIL ("Islamic state" in Iraq and Sham, or "Islamic state" in Iraq and the Levant), Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Just listen it, and You will see the Why salafi jihadists are not muslims. http://azan.kz/article/show/id/6900.htmlAn Nisa, 4:59 - No way to make the ribellions against the Head of the State, army or police. All countries are permitting to mislims to execute their religion, so, no ways for rebellion. All those Jihadists are in hard contrast with this section of Quran. The context of the Koran is peace to Muslims (who pay their taxes), temporary peace to non-Muslims while conversion is being attempted, death to non-Muslims who won't be converted (infidels), death to Muslims who fall away from Islam. So-called Islamic fanatics like ISIS, are simply a little too zealous for the Islamic religion. But they are this way because the other Islamites are not doing their job of killing infidels the way they should have been all along. This is what the whole religion of Islam boils down to. Saying more than this simply clouds the truth of Islam. |
|
|
|
I did not find any lucid discussions of basic physics in the Bible but I was able to find these ideas and explanations in the Pleiades Connection series. What Jesus was teaching 2000 year ago, is not different from that what Krishna was teaching 5000 years ago. God, as the Supreme Person, has everything in full, with no shortage in any way. No one possesses anything beautiful, intelligent, great, powerful or more opulently than God Almighty. Even the Atheists are attracted to the power of God Almighty, albeit, in a negative manner. We may want to object, but God Is ONE, portrayed differently in different cultures and lands of the world by his different names and pastimes. Knowing this truth is the beginning of wisdom and inner peace, the initiation of our own personal mental healing, the casting out of our own "devils" of prejudice and of our unconscious hatred for others. Understanding that God is ONE for all people of the Earth implies; the eventual dissolution of our inner feelings of mistrust for others who seem different than ourselves, but whom Jesus taught us to love even as our very selves. God is ONE, and all human beings are family members. http://www.harekrsna.de/christo-krishna.htmHowever, there is a major set of teachings that is different between the two. Jesus taught salvation of the world through His sacrifice on the cross, combined with His resurrection on the third day... salvation to all who believe in Him. Jesus taught that He is the begotten Son of God as well as the son of mankind. Krishna might say some things that by a stretch, could be considered to be the same. But the whole salvation thing, made available to all people, through faith in the death and resurrection, isn't in any Eastern teachings. The whole salvation thing? I think you are salivating for some thing that was not taught by Jesus himself. Salivating? What is that supposed to mean? Read my link and you see this: Jesus said "Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone" (Mark 10. Jesus is God. His question is rhetorical. "My teaching is not my own. It comes from him who sent me" (John 7:16) Jesus said "I go unto my father: for my father is greater than I" (John 14.28) "I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself" (John 5.19) Jesus, when He came as a man, set aside most of His God-power. At that time, He depended on the Father's teaching.
Jesus Christ means: Jesus, the son of Christ or Krishna. He declared Himself to be the son of God, and NOT the Father. Therefore it does not matter, if we call God "Christ" or "Krischto" or "Krishna".
Jesus Christ means Jesus the Christ. "Christ" means "Messiah." It means the Anointed One, anointed of God. Jesus is not the Father. But, as Jesus declared, He and the Father are One. So, they are individually God. They are jointly God. |
|
|
|
For all the talk of bravery, people of the u.s. are some of the biggest most pathetic cowards. Actions speak louder than words.
What actions are you talking about? You mean like when they saved the world from tyranny in 1945? Who saved who in 1945? please tell, thanks. The US saved Europe and probably the rest of the world when they landed on Normandy beaches in 1944 and defeated the Nazis in 1945. If it wasn't for the US then the its more than likely that Russia would have defeated the Nazis and kept Europe for themselves. Remember what they did to the Ukrainians afterward. That would have happened to the rest of Europe. USA saved all those people. Plus their efforts before committing ground troops are notable. Without supplies and trucks the Nazis would have defeated Russia. USA saved your asses and now you're all hating on it. So you can say that the Americans saved Europe from Russia. But claiming that the Americans saved the Europe from the Nazis is completely false. The Nazis were defeated, as three-fourth of their army was decimated in the fighting with the USSR. If the Nazis had put half their army into building V2 rockets, they would never have been defeated. |
|
|
|
Nation, religion, human race.. can't be evil.
Individuals can be good or bad based on their character only, not based on their nationality, religion, sex etc.
So, we can talk about good or bad people in America, Russia, Saudi Arabia etc. but we can't talk about good or bad America, Russia, Saudi Arabia etc.
I'm sorry but you are wrong.
Do you really think that your nationality or religion can decide if you will be good or bad person?
I don't think so. When the vast majority of the citizens of a particular country are supporting the invasion of defenseless small nations, and contributing to it in the form of taxes, you can call a nation as evil. It isn't the citizens of the U.S. They are as much slaves of their Government as anybody. Their ignorance and their Government are keeping them in bondage. If you want to bring the U.S. down to the level that it should be at, learn, and then teach Americans how to get their freedom back, through the things that Karl Lentz is teaching. For starters, look here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twn96nj0jfw&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D&index=10 and here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN3MI70PFBw. This stuff won't work for nations other than the U.S., except that it can be adapted to work in Canada, the U.K., Australia, and Belize... and India and Bangladesh, and a few other countries here and there. You have buddies who will work with you on this, don't you? If you don't do it, you are as much the cause of U.S. Government evil as American citizens are. |
|
|
|
What about the freedom to take out a car loan? One who trades nothing ( "a signature") for something is a thief.
Shall I choose my wants or shall I refuse the "false gifts"?
And what about the freedom to travel freely in that car?? There is no such freedom in the usa, travel must be approved by patrol agents who use "emergency powers" and authority status to convince the public that travel must be tracked and regulated. Almost nobody can truly assert a right to travel, due to indoctrination and acceptance of this norm. A similar example is when the nation's high court ruled that the right to remain silent does not amount to freedom from having to provide response or answer to a question, and that only someone who is very clever can practically choose a beneficial course of action in this situation. Here we have replaced "one nation under god" with a perpetual state of fraud and darkness. Police claim to enforce a "moral law" under their own authority and coded rules of deception. The commercial enforcement and bail/fining process is not about control of your car but rather control over your signature and freedom of motion. God and freedom are a long way away, the situation is looking more like "1984" where freedom merely denotes the relative size of one's cage.
Freedom does not mean not being bound by our word or the inability to enter contracts. Freedom is self-control, and self-government. Provided the choice is made without coercion if we willingly choose to limit our autonomy and freedom via an obligation to another there is nothing wrong with this. With two caveats: 1) In our current system whenever we take out a debt we are simultaneously stealing from everyone else thus debt under in a fractional reserve fiat system amounts to a form of legalized theft. Though we may be forced to participate in such theft in order to function we should at a minimum do what we can to promote reform and oppose the status quo. See Finance: Part 1, 2, 3 for details on how the current monetary order works. 2) Usury is general is probably a very bad idea which we should all strive to move away from. This is a lesson society has yet to learn. Your other examples simply highlight that we have a very long way to go to truly be a free people. Freedom is not an all or none affair. We are not a free society, yet we live in a society that is far more free than societies of the past. We are not far enough along the road of self-improvement to even consider abolishing police forces or allowing unrestricted travel across all national borders. Freedom comes from moral self-control and we lack the required moral fiber. You say the situation is looking more like 1984 and I do not entirely disagree if we limits our view to the west. However, perhaps I am an optimist when I argue that if one expands one's view to the entire human race freedom continues to move forward. Just a note. In our current system, even though the language says a debt is a debt, all borrowed money is really a creation of new money, based on the signature of the borrower. This means there is no debt, even though the paperwork says that there is. This has been proven out by looking at entries in bank financial journals. Google "Tom Schauf", "Modern Money Mechanics", and "Two Faces of Debt." It will take a little study, but you can see that this info is available all over the place. The part that is wrong is thinking that there is a debt to pay back. This is why the banks are rich... because they are receiving payment and giving nothing in return. If there was zero interest, they would still be raking it in on the simple so-called loan repayment. |
|
|
|
All joking aside, peruse http://naturalnews.com/ to see a whole bunch of ways to stop cancer, and to remain healthy so you never get cancer. Even now physicians are not sure what causes certain types of cancer. And also, no cure exists for third stage and terminal stage cancer. Even second stage cancer survival rate is very low. Of course the medical will tell you this. If marijuana oil were in use, we wouldn't need doctors, and people would barely ever get sick. The medical would be out of a job, and the big pharmaceutical companies who are poisoning us with legal drugs would shut down for lack of business. |
|
|
|
https://farefreepublictransport.com/city/Free public transport exist and there arent just two cities in east europe that have it  Seems france, poland and the us are pioneers regarding free public transport. To say it is free, doesn't make it free. Transit workers still get paid. |
|
|
|
If it is not possible to protect yourself, that there are few who will do it for you. If we take into account what is happening in Europe, where people are dying of peaceful streets, the availability of weapons could stop the terrorists.
Armed citizens dont stop terrorist. Remember 9/11 [insert any other terror attack]?¿?¿ From http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/16/officials-say-1-killed-1-wounded-in-pennsylvania-pizza-shop-shooting.html: A pizza shop customer shot and killed one robber and injured another after they tried to hold up the restaurant Tuesday night, Pennsylvania officials said. You can find stories like this one all over the place if you look. Getting rid of out-of-control-government would stop things like 9/11, since government was behind it. |
|
|
|
iam believe
if the thread vote or comment not believe
i want to ask, what do you think about earth, who create earth
and who fist in human in earth , and who create human
who fist in human ..Some might say GOD Hmmm nice..Some might say the DEVIL ooo OUCH.. who create earth?..Not who but WHAT  .. What ever created the earth makes no difference because the earth created YOU AND I .. People came about by cause and effect, because cause and effect works in everything. To make cause and effect happen so that the earth could bring forth people, there must have been some very deep calculations going on. Why? Because we haven't been able to come close to making life... to say nothing about intelligent life... to say nothing about life in abundance. The "What" that did all the planning and calc and set everything into the motion that went into creating life and intelligence, is God way beyond our simple meaning of the word "God." Remember Religious freaks believe a man like being went ZAP and the earth was SO.. Impossible .. But logical religious people realize it didn't happen by ZAP. The atheist freaks aren't logical enough to see that God (whatever He/She/It is) is the only way things could exist as they do. Now imagine Aliens created the earth?..STILL NOT GOD .. Well, God certainly is not man. So, He is a form of alien.
If i plant a seed and make it grow am i a god?..The earth..
If you formulate the process whereby a bunch of chemicals come together and form a seed, and then force the chemicals to come together... because of how complex this process is, you would be God. But you can't do this, although it has been done... by God. Science is the key to life .. God is the Maker of science. The main problem is people who believe in a god and believe in the religious books they read.. CRAZIES .. The main problem is that atheists can't think deeply enough to understand that science shows that God exists. People who say Arrr well something put us here but i don't know what.. You people are not the problem.. Nutters who say a human like being went zap and made the earth are crazies .. Nutters who think that they know even a fraction of the things that go on in the universe, don't realize that they don't know enough about God to say that God couldn't go ZAP and make everything just like that. Then these same nutters go off and accept and confirm and support Big Bang that says the universe was created just like that... ZAP.
No one really knows how we got here YET..
If we had no religion we would be 5 thousand years ahead or dead in science?..
If we had no religion, Big Bang ideas would not exist as though they were factual. This means that if we didn't have the religion of science, science would be far ahead of where it is.
Who knows religion might of slowed us down from killing ourselves..
Or it could of slowed us down from having a better life on earth..
Rather, it shows us things about God, who created everything... except for the religion of atheism.
Me thinks it slowed us down from having a better life on earth..
BUT we might of killed ourselves already..
You thinks, but not very much. And you doesn't know. |
|
|
|
I think minimal taxes equals a night-watchman state with high social tensions and in the end, wealth being accumulated by the few lucky individuals. Higher taxes can be used to distribute some of the wealth for the poor. I'm not talking about full-scale socialism. But I understand this kind of idea is probably not very popular in the US where there's still a culture of a mythical self-made success even though it's being made almost impossible for the poor people of the society. Money is being printed out as much as it's being needed so it's not really about lack of funds to have a few social programs for the poor. But the current situation, "the central banking socialism", where the printed money is being given straight to the top 1% and then others have to get by on what's left is totally unsustainable. But it's done on purpose, to destroy the system completely from inside to take control of everything.
Make them start their own business for instance or start looking for a job? You have to give them means to support themselves, the rod not the fish. Well I agree with this for now but how about when robots and automation owned by few companies and individuals make most of the jobs obsolete? For example: Self-driving trucks: what's the future for America's 3.5 million truckers?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/17/self-driving-trucks-impact-on-drivers-jobs-usIf people can't afford the things that robots make and do, then companies will fail because nobody buys their products. The robots will go down with the companies. Before the companies go down, people will get on welfare because they are not earning the money because robots all have the jobs. Prices on everything will come down, because robots, once set up, can manufacture and do everything free, including making and repairing themselves. After this there will be no incentive for anyone to be wealthy, because money won't be needed any longer. People will get everything free, from the robots. The robots do everything for free because (if they are not AI) they will have no incentive to ask for pay. |
|
|
|
earth cant be flat, that's dumb
Educate yourself I educated myself, and here is what I found: A transit with a powerful telescope, combined with observations 91 days apart, observations on the sun and on a horizon star, can show the 93 million mile distance to the sun (plus or minus 10%) by trigonometry. Nothing can refute this, since it can be repeated over and over to give a nearly accurate answer. Using a better telescope, and making similar measurements gives the 93 million miles rather accurately. Now I'm happy. |
|
|
|
I did not find any lucid discussions of basic physics in the Bible but I was able to find these ideas and explanations in the Pleiades Connection series. What Jesus was teaching 2000 year ago, is not different from that what Krishna was teaching 5000 years ago. God, as the Supreme Person, has everything in full, with no shortage in any way. No one possesses anything beautiful, intelligent, great, powerful or more opulently than God Almighty. Even the Atheists are attracted to the power of God Almighty, albeit, in a negative manner. We may want to object, but God Is ONE, portrayed differently in different cultures and lands of the world by his different names and pastimes. Knowing this truth is the beginning of wisdom and inner peace, the initiation of our own personal mental healing, the casting out of our own "devils" of prejudice and of our unconscious hatred for others. Understanding that God is ONE for all people of the Earth implies; the eventual dissolution of our inner feelings of mistrust for others who seem different than ourselves, but whom Jesus taught us to love even as our very selves. God is ONE, and all human beings are family members. http://www.harekrsna.de/christo-krishna.htmHowever, there is a major set of teachings that is different between the two. Jesus taught salvation of the world through His sacrifice on the cross, combined with His resurrection on the third day... salvation to all who believe in Him. Jesus taught that He is the begotten Son of God as well as the son of mankind. Krishna might say some things that by a stretch, could be considered to be the same. But the whole salvation thing, made available to all people, through faith in the death and resurrection, isn't in any Eastern teachings. |
|
|
|
This thread is stll alive? Nomad you can't be real. You know better, don't you?
Nomad tell me, why is it summer in December where I live whereas in North America it is winter? That is, the days are longer now and get short during July. It is the opposite in North America. Why?
Explain to me why the Orion constellation is upside down now since I moved from Canada? Was my move such a disruptive activity that the cosmos itself was upset? Observe it. Is it upside down?
Lastly explain to me why I cannot see Everest if it is the highest point of the Earth?
Science can start with a flat world view but in light of this gross evidence, or more subtle evidence when distances are much smaller than 10000 km, we reject that and come to another theory that explains these anomalies. That is science.
A circle drawn in a 24 Mpx image will appear as a straight line when you zoom in enough. So a germ on a basketball experiences no detectable curvature.
They won't answer you. I've tried, they can only refute the simplest of arguments for a curved Earth, as soon as things get complicated and you propose some solid evidence they ignore you. This is true. For example. A transit with a powerful telescope, combined with observations 91 days apart, observations on the sun and on a horizon star, can show the 93 million mile distance to the sun (plus or minus 10%) by trigonometry. Nothing can refute this, since it can be repeated over and over to give a nearly accurate answer. Using a better telescope, and making similar measurements gives the 93 million miles rather accurately. |
|
|
|
God tells us to pray, in the Bible. It also tells you to: Kill To not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material Strictly forbids you from eating rabbit, shellfish, pork, weasels, scavengers, reptiles, and owls Own slaves Not accept disabilities Not to plant two crops in the same field No Jewelry And finally.... a rape victim must marry their perpetrator. How many of these do you do? Nope. You are wrong. The Bible doesn't tell anybody to do these things. Those instructions are listed in the Old Testament, and were for the ancient nation of Israel. They aren't for today's Israel, because Israel has stepped out of the God-fearing nation that ancient Israel was. The New Testament is for everyone. It tells nobody to do the things you have listed. However, those rules you have listed, under similar life circumstances today as were found in ancient Israel back then, are some of the best rules that any nation can follow. And there it is...... the time to suddenly change from " The Bible is the word of God and should be obeyed" to " That's the Old Testament and shouldn't be obeyed - The New Testament is for everyone". No. What there is, is your attempted deception. If you look at many instruction sheets, especially for filling out info on the Net, they often tell you to skip certain steps if they are not applicable to you. You don't even want to accept the fact that God exists, and you are trying to teach other people about what He says? Are you living at one of the funny farms, btw?
If that is true, why do you believe in Genesis and the aspect of creation?
Besides..... I have just written a NEW - NEW Testament, therefore this supersedes the old new testament....... "God isn't real! End of Story"
Actually, the wording in the Revelation at the end of the N.T. says that nothing shall be added beyond the things in the Revelation. Anybody who adds anything beyond the Revelation, will receive all the plagues listed in the Revelation. BTW, this is part of the reason that the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D., scrapped a whole lot of the books of the then New Testament. They were written following the writing of the Revelation.
You have been totally sucked in by the biggest scam on earth!
Well Done!
No, it is you who has been suckered in by the devil's scam, to drag you into Hell with him. |
|
|
|
I like the way BADecker has posted in a topic which is called "Why I am an Atheist".
He loves to try and fight the fact he is not an Atheist by trolling others, when in fact he is no different to the rest of us and does not believe in any God.
Well played Sir.
Thank you. But you are missing one little point. In the same way that neither I, nor you, nor anyone else can make a human body and life... in that same way, nobody can believe in God without God strength holding him in that faith. Because of this, I declare to you that I am weaker than you. Why? I don't have enough strength to fight God, and think that I am an atheist like you can. I am too weak. God is stronger in me than I am. I can't resist Him. But (unfortunately for you) you still have strength to fight God-faith. However, this is talking about faith... faith which has to do with what God tells us, both in words, and directly through our spirits. Knowledge that God exists is undeniable, except by the ignorant, the unthinking, and by liars. You can see why, here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380. Quoting yourself means you believe what you write. Good for you. It still doesn't prove anything. Perhaps you live in a building with walls. If somebody tells you that the studs that hold the wall up are made of wood, and somebody else tells you they are made of aluminum, who do you believe, especially if there is a possibility they could be made of either, wood or aluminum? If it isn't important to you, who cares? But the proof for God seems to be important to you. So, you just might have to chop your way into the wall to find out for sure. In other words, don't take my word for it. Seriously investigate. I am only showing you a direction that makes sense.
I do not fight God, there is no such thing as God. I choose to question people when they state that God is real.
I say there is a real God. So, since you don't have any proof that there isn't a real God, you are setting yourself up above Him if He exists, and you are attempting to set yourself above me by contradicting "this god, me." So, you are making yourself out to be a god like this, thereby proving that god exists.
Show me Physical evidence (I believe you were asked to get him/her/it to post a selfie) and I will believe. You continue to deny this request but oh well.
If God posted a selfie, you still wouldn't believe. Why not? God is so great that even His selfie would kill you before you knew it what was happening
Until then, I will continue on my merry way.
Continue as you wish. Even God accepts your continuing as you wish. |
|
|
|
Acts 13: ( talking about Jesus )
Act 13:37 But he, whom God raised again, saw no corruption.
Act 13:38 Be it known unto you therefore, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you the forgiveness of sins:
Act 13:39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
Galatians 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
The point here being, that the law is not done away with, but to lead us unto Christ, so by faith in Christ, you are no longer under the law, but under the commandment of Christ, which is (John 15:12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.); therefore many parts of the law of Moses is still applicable, because many parts of the law has to do with loving your neighbor as yourself. But the parts in the law of Moses such as many food ordinances, circumcision, clean, unclean, tithes to the temple, etc are not applicable today.
Act 15:24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:
.....................
Act 15:28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Act 15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
Gal 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Gal 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
Gal 4:23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
..............
Gal 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
Gal 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
Many parts of the Mosaic Law are applicable, but they are not applicable as the Mosaic Law. In other words, do them because they are right. Don't do them because they are something that Moses wrote down. For example, much of the Code of Hammurabi is morally right. But doing the right things because they are part of Hammurabi's code is silly. Do them because they are right. In addition, you can find all kinds of good laws in most of the major governments of the world. Yet, you don't do those laws because they are part of this or that government. You do them because they are good and right. |
|
|
|
Your thinking seems to be based on lack of knowledge. "Christ" is the way we say the Greek word for the Jewish word "Messiah." The Christ was essentially around from before time began... with God, as God. That I am aware, there is no word "Messiahian," or some similar form. The point is, there was no time before Christianity. No, it is not Christ is not the Greek word for the Jewish word "Messiah" Christ is a "person" from 0 BC/AC If you think everyone born before him should burn in hell, fuck you If you look at what I posted, above, that you quoted, I didn't say that "Christ is the Greek word for the Jewish word Messiah." However, from https://carm.org/what-does-christ-mean: The word "Christ" means anointed. It comes from the Greek Χριστός, cristos, and is a translation of the Hebrew word for Messiah, מָשִׁיחַ, meshiyach, which means anointed. "He found first his own brother Simon and said to him, 'We have found the Messiah' (which translated means Christ)," (John 1:41). And, you can find many other websites that say the same. One of the greatest pleasures people have in the world is sex. People go after that pleasure even though it may mean much hardship for involving themselves in sex. So, I am guessing that you like the idea of burning in hell, because you use the near expletive term that has to do with sex. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
