Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 11:09:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 ... 405 »
2621  Other / Off-topic / Re: Already delays in BFL shipment plans? on: December 04, 2012, 11:51:02 PM
So BFL cancels one delivery date after the other, because they are supposedly only waiting for parts (mainly the ASICs themselves!) - yet they are still fiddling around with the design of their casing?!?!

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/bfl-forum-miscellaneous/459-new-single-sc-pics.html
BFL_Josh: "I was taking some pics for some promotional stuff tonight, so I thought I'd share some of the pics. This is the new, taller case to accomodate some better airflow, ..."

One could expect that they by now have tons of casings ready just waiting for the PCB to be plugged in - yet they don't even have that!

Man! How on earth would you have kept your initial deadline for October (or even November) shipment?


So if the case is not fabricated yet....
Then it is going to be AT-LEAST another 30 days from when the toolmaker receives the plans and that is the time it takes in Asia got get a mold tool ready.(and that would be a GOOD tool maker, right first time)
Then proofing (1 week)+ final polishing (1-2 weeks) depending on external finish.

Can you get me  side pictures, without me having to log into BFL, so I can see how many sliding cores (if any) the tool may need.

Josh already stated that it takes 2-5 days from design to product-in-hand.  They must have someone local doing it for them.  Stamping sheet metal isn't a difficult or lengthy process.

Its a stamped metal case with rounded corners?


LOL 30 days to punch out metal case. Only if your using union labor. Seriously I used to make aluminum light fixtures and from design to final product would take a week. Two days to make the blanking die. A day for setup and testing. A day for assembly. A day for coating.  Nothing to special or hard about it.

Obviously you  you did not read the FULL post , it clearly states mold tool..  not stamping tool or die-cast tooling.
Where does it state mold tool?  The prior-gen cases were not made of cast metal (they were stamped), and to be quite frank, it would be extraordinarily strange for someone to make a low-volume casing with molds and cast metal instead of stamping them out and anodizing.
2622  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bad news for bASIC - not shipping til mid Jan at best on: December 04, 2012, 10:54:18 PM
I will admit, I am a natural optimist.

No proof of the venture capitalist, but I have no reason not to trust BFL at their word (despite what other people claim of them).

Ok, I will agree there is SOME risk.  There's also risk I could die on the way to work tomorrow.  Both are negligible risks, IMO.

I don't believe BFL would lie about something like this.  They are businesspeople.  They would rather make sales than scams.  They are not interested in mining for profit, because what they could get away with really is a small amount of money compared to what they can and will bring in in sales, at the risk of completely ruining their reputation and bankrupting themselves... it is not worth it.  Some people do not see it this way, but I don't see any viable and productive means of them mining any significant portion of Bitcoin and getting away with it, and for that reason, I believe them when they say they won't.

They can start mining a month after shipping. No one will recognize that they are mining, it will be too much confusion. They have ASIC technology and access to very low-cost ASIC chips (for free - with the customers money Wink lol ) The problem is that with the money from the sale of 60GH they can produce ~ 600GH.  BFL is a company and they have to make money, why would they not do that?

Daily comes ~3500BTC = ~ $ 42,000 / per day = $ 1,260,000 per month - its not "a small amount of money compared to what they can and will bring in in sales".
No one will recognize that they are mining until...
- An unsatisfied employee squawks
- A visitor happens to notice
- Suspicious activity is recognized at a pool or particular IP address
- Something else happens (other unknown risk of being discovered)

Now couple that risk with the fact that they wouldn't be able to mine the whole 3500 BTC.  They might be able to mine a few hundred BTC and not be noticed for at least a little while. But what is a few hundred BTC a day?  $3,800?  Over a year, they make less than $1.5M?  Sure, not pennies, but far less than what they have generated in sales thus far, and they're looking at the long-term plan too.  You think they're going to risk tens of millions in future sales (if Bitcoin continues to be successful) for a measly $1.4M in a year?  I just don't see it as a viable business plan, much less an attractive alternative compared to maintaining a solid reputation and continuing sales.


I don't believe BFL would lie about something like this.  They are businesspeople.

They have every reason to lie. As long as no other ASICs are shipping, they will keep stringing you along with "real soon now" so that they keep your money. One of their company owners is a convicted felon. Their lies have been quite successful. They've tied up customer funds for 6 months. They claim to be "venture funded", but refuse to publish who the venture capitalist is so that you can't prove they're lying about it. And on and on and on.
They've not said one lie to me or anyone else (that I have seen).  Everything you and others have tried to conjure up as lies are not actually lies.  They're speculation and conspiracies.

It is POSSIBLE they are lying, sure.  But I don't believe they are.  If you want to believe that, then go right ahead - that is your right.  Looking at it from a rational perspective, they are a small startup company with real-world problems that crop up.  I've worked for such a company before, I know how it is.  The company I worked for was 7 years old and made $50M in sales annually, but still had plenty of issues surrounding being a new company and processes that hadn't yet been perfected, causing delays, etc.  It happens.  Everything I have seen from BFL indicates that they are doing the best they can with what they have to work with.  They have given me NO reason to distrust them whatsoever.
2623  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bad news for bASIC - not shipping til mid Jan at best on: December 04, 2012, 08:49:57 PM
I will admit, I am a natural optimist.

No proof of the venture capitalist, but I have no reason not to trust BFL at their word (despite what other people claim of them).

Ok, I will agree there is SOME risk.  There's also risk I could die on the way to work tomorrow.  Both are negligible risks, IMO.

I don't believe BFL would lie about something like this.  They are businesspeople.  They would rather make sales than scams.  They are not interested in mining for profit, because what they could get away with really is a small amount of money compared to what they can and will bring in in sales, at the risk of completely ruining their reputation and bankrupting themselves... it is not worth it.  Some people do not see it this way, but I don't see any viable and productive means of them mining any significant portion of Bitcoin and getting away with it, and for that reason, I believe them when they say they won't.
2624  Other / Off-topic / Re: Inside kills, outside heals on: December 04, 2012, 08:45:29 PM

I suppose I do not really see a way to live joblessly right now even if I wanted to, unless I wanted my family to be homeless.  So it's not really an option.

Regardless, I know that I live much happier when I am not financially stressed.  I also know that if I lived for today instead of tomorrow, I might enjoy it for a little bit, but then have to pay for it tenfold down the road.  Been there, done that already.  Now, I am focused on financial freedom.  Paying off my remaining debts as quickly as possible, saving money into investments, etc.  If I decided to enjoy myself "in my prime", I would very quickly imprison myself to working until whatever age at which social security would kick in.  Instead, I am using my prime to provide for my family and better myself in terms of employability by gaining experience, as well as continuing to set myself up for an early retirement and living stress-free with regards to my finances.

I am very happy with this choice.  I can see that you do not share the same sentiment, which is fine.  Some people like to live for today without regards for tomorrow, and I suppose they will be the ones still working a minimum wage job when they are 70 years old, waiting for the social security to finally kick in.  Wink

I see your point. But I also see how huge is money impact for you. You seem to be in a financial distress very deeply like most of the "normal" people. It also looks like you are not planning to change your values in a near future (money). It was your choice to take a mortgage, to have things, that you cannot afford now. Instead building it step by step, you have chosen to have it now, but pay higher price and have greater financial distress and liabilities.

Of course no one can blame people who have to obey the law and current financial system. You can't buy a house for your family by saving money in a pocket. But it is wrong system, that you have to take loan and then be full time slave for decades until you pay off and get a retirement.

 I thought the main idea of Bitcoin, was at least partially to escape current monetary system based on DEBT. But it is also important to notice that only people can change this. Bitcoin itself won't bring any fair system, if majority of users base their values on current "wrong" financial system.

Actually I support Dank opinion that current financial system is going to collapse anytime soon if people change their way of thinking and understanding "money and debt".
I'm not in financial distress any more, but I certainly have been in the past.  When my wife and I were newly married and both working, we had plenty of money, and we got into debt because of it (it's easy to tell yourself you'll pay it off when you clearly have the means to do so).  Then, we bought a house (still within our realm of financial ability), and she switched jobs to something much lower paying (uh oh, trouble).  Then we had a daughter, and she had to work fewer hours at this job (we're not believers in letting daycare raise your child).  So, we had a lot of smaller debts that added up to a lot of payments we had to make every month, and not enough money to make those payments for a few months.  I think we had 6 credit cards with balances on them, a car loan, a line of credit, etc.  We've paid off all but one at this point, in about 1.5 years.  And in that time, I switched jobs and am now paid several hundred a month more.  So we're comfortable, for now.  But I never want to take on more debt at any time in the future because of that experience.  Housing and investments may be the only exception.

Yes, back then, I absolutely chose to have things now instead of planning for the future.  I've been there, done that, and hated it.  Which is exactly why I refuse to live that way any longer.  Sure, I could live life "in my prime", not working and just doing whatever I feel like, but that doesn't properly support a family, it doesn't leave anything for my children, and it doesn't leave me feeling good about myself or my life.  I cannot think of a more selfish ambition than living for oneself and only today, and I try to not be a selfish person.

I don't think the system is wrong.  For one, people taking 30-year loans on houses are idiots (myself included).  A 15 year loan ensures that a person buys only as much house as they can afford and pays it off quickly.  Also, FHA is a scam (another mistake), as the required mortgage insurance eats away at money that could be paid towards principle.  Finally, housing is a supply-demand marketplace.  Of course everyone would love to own their own home, but homes are not free to build, and land is not limitless.  Those resources and services must be paid for.  Unfortunately, with expanding populations and needing to keep the planet sustainable, consumption of resources used for housing must be limited, which is done, in part, through regulating the logging industries.  I suppose the only part of the housing "system" that I don't believe in is zoning rules and urban growth boundaries.  People should be free to build what they want where they want, and the restrictions on those requirements do inflate housing prices.

Anyway, I suppose that your comment that the system has to change because it is unreasonable to expect people to slave away at loans for decades just reminds me of utopian dreamers who love to spout off ideals without any reasonable way of accomplishing them.  Please correct me if I am wrong, and if you do have a way to magically reduce housing prices.  Wink
2625  Other / Off-topic / Re: Polls of what we think Satoshi likes and dislikes on: December 04, 2012, 08:17:37 PM
With all the experts around here at tracking people's real identities down, I find it interesting no one ever found out who he is or what happened to him.  

If someone knew who he was, do you think they would go around telling everybody?

Why not?  

Only a very non-empathic person would do that like say a lawyer or something. The guy stopped appearing under his alias for a reason. I've outlined the very probably reasons above.

No, I'm not an empath.  You're correct about that.  I am quite empathetic however.  My interest is that maybe he didn't voluntarily choose to disappear, as there is (to my knowledge) no indication that he did.  Perhaps he died is basically what I'm getting at.  

I really didn't mean to come across as callous.  If he chose to disappear, then obviously his privacy and wish should be respected. 
He did choose to disappear.  I believe he worked with theymos on achieving it.  The only one here who I know of who might know his true identity is theymos...  but I wasn't around while he was here either, only a few months after the fact.

Ah, clearly I was ignorant to that fact when I made my original post "Why not?"  In that case, obviously no one should reveal his identity.  Thanks for letting me know. 
I think out of respect for the man and what he accomplished if nothing else.

Or, you could subscribe to the theory that satoshi is actually an organization of some sort.

I do make the guess that he is at least from the US, based on the times of his postings.  He would have had to have been awake at very unreasonable hours of the day if he was based in Japan.
2626  Other / Off-topic / Re: Polls of what we think Satoshi likes and dislikes on: December 04, 2012, 07:59:08 PM
With all the experts around here at tracking people's real identities down, I find it interesting no one ever found out who he is or what happened to him.  

If someone knew who he was, do you think they would go around telling everybody?

Why not?  

Only a very non-empathic person would do that like say a lawyer or something. The guy stopped appearing under his alias for a reason. I've outlined the very probably reasons above.

No, I'm not an empath.  You're correct about that.  I am quite empathetic however.  My interest is that maybe he didn't voluntarily choose to disappear, as there is (to my knowledge) no indication that he did.  Perhaps he died is basically what I'm getting at.  

I really didn't mean to come across as callous.  If he chose to disappear, then obviously his privacy and wish should be respected. 
He did choose to disappear.  I believe he worked with theymos on achieving it.  The only one here who I know of who might know his true identity is theymos...  but I wasn't around while he was here either, only a few months after the fact.
2627  Other / Off-topic / Re: 2 year old - Cries himself to sleep every other night on: December 04, 2012, 07:57:05 PM
Sitting with them in their room, either singing or just letting them blabber away and making them think you are paying attention to them helps also.

Initially you will have to put time towards that, and just transition until the bedroom is sleep time.
Forgot about this step!  This was key to the transition out of our room into her room.  My daughter slept in our bedroom until she was just over 1 year old... but getting her to sleep in her own room was a challenge.  She didn't like not having us right there with us.  At first, we tried the "just ignore and let her cry herself to sleep" approach, which would eventually work, but she hated it (obviously), and it made us feel awful too.  Then we went with the "stay in the room until she falls asleep" approach, which worked wonderfully.

One of us would stay in the room with both kids, just doing our own thing (I would either be on my laptop or phone), but just having us there while she fell asleep was enough to comfort her into doing that without too much fuss.  At first, she wanted to be held, but I'd just gently remind her that it was time to sleep, and tell her to lay down, and she would.  I'd keep repeating that each time she would stand up in bed.  She eventually got the idea, and stopped even asking to be held, just understood that it was time to sleep, but that I would be in the room with her.

Once we got that down (took several months), we started leaving the room when she was almost asleep, but not quite there, of course, always coming back in for a minute if she asked to reassure her that we weren't just abandoning her to the bed.  Then, we started leaving earlier and earlier, and now, we can just leave the room as soon as we say goodnight.
2628  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bad news for bASIC - not shipping til mid Jan at best on: December 04, 2012, 07:45:35 PM
Until you got what you paid for in your hands, you just paid for lip service. That's all i have seen so far. All the drama associated with this new hardware has taken a lot of the appeal out of mining. Also the unprofessional outbursts that Tom and Inaba have at times just adds to that. Not sure if i want to be held hostage to those types of companies. I got my money back, and i hope they get there acts together.

good decision. If you buy preorder from one of the 3 companies you have a 33% chance that you will be one of the first ASIC miners . Why risk 100% of your money (in the event of fraud or bankruptcy) for 33% chance to earn a bit more money than the others ? If you wait until one of the companies will be the first and you will buy from them ASIC (existing), you have a 99% chance that you will not be scammed and 66% chance that you will not be  one of last ASIC miner .
Because it's not just a bit more.  It's a HUGE amount more.  The people who gets the first asics and mine at a difficulty of 3M will make as much in one week as the people who get ASICs afterward will make in 2 months.  It's a huge sum of money at stake... one for which many people (myself included) are willing to gamble on.

I doubt any of the three are scammers (at least purposefully).  I think they will all deliver.  So in my opinion, it is a 33% chance that I will be one of the first ASIC miners vs a 100% chance that I will not be.

Assuming that no company goes bankrupt, you're right. But I think the risk of bankruptcy / scam is high. What if the company you have chosen will produce ASIC few months later than the other? If you buy from a company that already has an existing ASIC (assuming that other companies have long delay), you'll be one of the first ASIC miners without risk Wink Even if you good predict the company which will be first, you have no guarantee that this company will increase the difficulty before the rig gets to you. For those who like to risk I recommend satoshidice.com. This is better than ASIC preorder because you yourself can choose the level of risk Wink Personally I do not like gambling;) This is why I did not buy preorder from any of the companies. I'm going to buy ASIC from a company that will be the first (if this will still worthwhile).

Now I'm waiting for a wave of criticism Wink
I definitely don't see BFL going bankrupt.  They have venture capital investment and have not touched the customer's pre-order funds.  Perhaps one or both of the others is a possibility to go bankrupt though, I do not know their financial situations.

If BFL has yet to ship out their product by the time the preorder queue is completed for either of the other two vendors, then I will likely cancel my order and switch to the company who has product ready to ship.  I am not interested in becoming one of the first ASIC miners without risk, because I already believe I have very little risk (of losing my money).  The other risk is that of not receiving the miners prior to one of the other companies shipping out all of their preorders, but in that case, it is the same difference if I just wait to see if that happens, then switch my order if needed.  And yes, I do have a guarantee (from BFL), that they will not be mining on mainnet with these ASICs.

The gamble isn't whether I will receive a product or not.  The gamble is whether I will be one of the FIRST to receive a product or not.  With nothing to lose (in my opinion), there is no reason not to take it.
2629  Other / Off-topic / Re: Inside kills, outside heals on: December 04, 2012, 06:51:44 PM
You won't have to pay ten fold if the system collapses, which it inevitably will, since money represents an I-O-U to the state. It's debt, like most of our economy. You can make something out of nothing, but it'll only exist until people stop believing in it.
That's certainly a viable strategy to take.  I have seriously considered NOT paying down my debts beyond making minimum payments, and instead investing more, banking on some seriously high inflation in the near future.  But I suppose I would rather have the certainty of becoming debt-free instead of the uncertainty of betting on the economy.  When I am done with everything but the lower interest loans (student loans and mortgage), then I may reconsider my course of action...!
2630  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bad news for bASIC - not shipping til mid Jan at best on: December 04, 2012, 06:04:42 PM
Until you got what you paid for in your hands, you just paid for lip service. That's all i have seen so far. All the drama associated with this new hardware has taken a lot of the appeal out of mining. Also the unprofessional outbursts that Tom and Inaba have at times just adds to that. Not sure if i want to be held hostage to those types of companies. I got my money back, and i hope they get there acts together.

good decision. If you buy preorder from one of the 3 companies you have a 33% chance that you will be one of the first ASIC miners . Why risk 100% of your money (in the event of fraud or bankruptcy) for 33% chance to earn a bit more money than the others ? If you wait until one of the companies will be the first and you will buy from them ASIC (existing), you have a 99% chance that you will not be scammed and 66% chance that you will not be  one of last ASIC miner .
Because it's not just a bit more.  It's a HUGE amount more.  The people who gets the first asics and mine at a difficulty of 3M will make as much in one week as the people who get ASICs afterward will make in 2 months.  It's a huge sum of money at stake... one for which many people (myself included) are willing to gamble on.

I doubt any of the three are scammers (at least purposefully).  I think they will all deliver.  So in my opinion, it is a 33% chance that I will be one of the first ASIC miners vs a 100% chance that I will not be.
2631  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Bitcoin Credit Union? on: December 04, 2012, 04:48:28 PM
I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO OPEN A BITCOIN CREDIT UNION

Your OP was unclear on this part and I understood the exact opposite. Given that that isn't true I retract everything I said.
"First, no Tangible Cryptography is not looking to start a Bitcoin Credit Union (well at least not in 2012 Smiley )." is unclear?   Huh
2632  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Is stealing Bitcoins illegal? on: December 04, 2012, 04:45:50 PM
Rudd-O is the nutty one.

Congratulations!  With that gratuitous insult, you've earned yourself a speedy trip to my ignore list.

I recommend everyone else ignore reyals too (ignore link below his nickname).  Men who initiate insults do so because they can't reason.  Men who can't reason aren't worth your time.

Oh no I won't get to hear responses about magic paper, men in blue costumes, and the Byzantine council
However will I go on.  And yet... I'm the one who can't reason???

A) Test answers have value, sure.  But that isn't their normal usage, whereas the normal usage for Bitcoin is as a vehicle of value.  When someone thinks of test answers, they don't think of a way to make monetary transactions with other people.
B) If someone changed the name at the top of my test, and I wasn't able to set the record straight with the professor, I'd sue whoever changed it for everything I could.  I'd sue someone who stole my Bitcoins too.  So, what's your point?
What does normal usage have to do with anything?
A)Paintings normal usage is to be looked at... does that some how negate their value?Huh Baseball cards... ETC
B)Because a lawsuit != being charged with theft.  Which is the point I've been making since the start.

I like your new examples.
A) If someone steals paintings or baseball cards, they most certainly will be charged with theft!  Same with Bitcoins... it is something of value stolen, so they will be charged with theft!  I just think test answers is a bad example.
B) Fair enough, I did not realize this.
2633  Other / Off-topic / Re: 2 year old - Cries himself to sleep every other night on: December 04, 2012, 04:42:53 PM
Random advice.  We have a 2.5-year old.

1) Create a buffer of reduced distractions for an hour or so before bedtime.  That means no TV or other stimulating excitement before bedtime.  You must set the atmosphere.  Quiet time precedes bedtime.

2) I actually avoid sugar, close to naptime/bedtime.  I consider it crack cocaine.  No sugar within 2 hours before bed.

3) That sippy cup should contain milk or water, not juice or soda.

4) Create a familiar routine that slowly, inexorably, heads to bed.  Do the same thing, in the exact same order, every single night.  Bath, jammies, bottle, toothbursh, get into bed, songs/stories.

It may feel like you're being a military drill sergeant at first, but toddlers find comfort in familiar routine.

5) Staged crying responses.  If the fuss starts immediately after you leave the room -- or even before you leave the room.  Give it 30 seconds, then return, comfort and love, explain the routine in simple terms, leave.  If the fuss continues, wait 60 seconds, return, comfort and love, leave.  If the fuss continues, wait 2 minutes, etc.

The basic points you are trying to communicate is (a) mother and father are still there, but (b) you aren't going to give up on putting him to bed.

And sometimes it's just plain hard work.  For a while, we wound up camping out in the room for an hour or more each night, as our daughter got used to the new routine.  We would be in the room, during this time, but would not respond to efforts at play or interaction... being as boring as possible, breathing deeply with our eyes closed, pretending to sleep, ourselves.
This is very good advice.  The routine is especially important.  I have a 2 year old and 2.5 year old... now, sometimes they will complain and cry when we say it is time to go to bed, or during the routine (because they know bedtime is coming), but they don't usually cry when they are in bed anymore.  If my 2 year old daughter cries when we say goodnight and leave the room, then one of us will go in and reassure her that it is time to sleep... I usually make her agree that it is night-night time, and then she's fine.  I suppose that wouldn't work well with a toddler who isn't talking yet though, unless he at least acknowledges your questions with a head-nod or something.
2634  Other / Off-topic / Re: Introduced bitcoin to a developer. on: December 04, 2012, 04:33:55 PM
I've learned to always steer the discussions not towards bringing down the status quo (most people don't want that), but instead towards the technological revolution that Bitcoin represents, with these two points:

- For the first time ever, you can send money to ANYONE ANYWHERE in the world INSTANTLY and for FREE.
- For the first time ever, you can use a digital cash equivalent.  Previously, every transaction had to go through a bank or other central entity, but now, you can send money digitally without a bank or any other entity having to clear or deal with your transaction, or take transaction fees from it.

Those are both points that most people can relate to.  Those showcase why Bitcoin is so much better than the current systems.  Stay out of the anti-government, anarchist viewpoints, because most people (myself included, I'll admit) don't want that to happen.
2635  Other / Off-topic / Re: Already delays in BFL shipment plans? on: December 04, 2012, 04:13:25 PM
I don't really see a difference between what's posted here and what's posted on every other thread on this site. So many people on ignore its amazing.
Lol, I just added a few myself...
2636  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: bad news for bASIC - not shipping til mid Jan at best on: December 04, 2012, 04:10:46 PM
I personally want a quality product, not Tom's product.
why do you think Tom's product is not a quality product?


Probably trying to score brownie points with Josh.
Isn't it caseless or something?
2637  Other / Politics & Society / Re: national minimum wage LAWS. good or bad? on: December 04, 2012, 09:09:09 AM
Minimum wage laws may decrease employment, since companies won't be able to afford as many workers, but at the same time they may reduce the employee pool, since workers who used to work two jobs, or work two shifts, may now be able to quit their second job/shift, since they now have enough money to cover their expenses. This in turn frees up the job for someone else.
So.... complicated  Tongue
To look at it conversely, the worker could have produced twice as much for the same wage, helping to reduce the prices of those services and products he produced, and making things more affordable across the board for people to purchase.
2638  Other / Off-topic / Re: Inside kills, outside heals on: December 04, 2012, 08:14:55 AM

When you can find me a part-time job that pays the mortgage, puts food on the table, and pays for gas and other misc expenses, then I'll listen.  Otherwise... a full time job it is!

I live like no one else today so that I can live like no one else tomorrow.  And that includes working a full time job so that I can retire quickly and comfortably and have the monetary freedom to do whatever I damn well please.  Wink  I could be a bum too, but that would limit the possibilities of what I want to do/explore/see/learn in the future.

Just curious... Do you think you will enjoy your retirement time with "monetary freedom" as much as you would enjoy your current time, when your capabilities, desire and willingness are at the peak? 

Currently, your full time job probably limits your abilities to enjoy life, develop yourself and enrich your understanding as much as you could afford having more free time.

Personally, I think when you reach "monetary freedom", you realize that it isn't so great as you expected...
I suppose I do not really see a way to live joblessly right now even if I wanted to, unless I wanted my family to be homeless.  So it's not really an option.

Regardless, I know that I live much happier when I am not financially stressed.  I also know that if I lived for today instead of tomorrow, I might enjoy it for a little bit, but then have to pay for it tenfold down the road.  Been there, done that already.  Now, I am focused on financial freedom.  Paying off my remaining debts as quickly as possible, saving money into investments, etc.  If I decided to enjoy myself "in my prime", I would very quickly imprison myself to working until whatever age at which social security would kick in.  Instead, I am using my prime to provide for my family and better myself in terms of employability by gaining experience, as well as continuing to set myself up for an early retirement and living stress-free with regards to my finances.

I am very happy with this choice.  I can see that you do not share the same sentiment, which is fine.  Some people like to live for today without regards for tomorrow, and I suppose they will be the ones still working a minimum wage job when they are 70 years old, waiting for the social security to finally kick in.  Wink
2639  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 10 BTC 4 U 2 STEAL - Protected by a weak 5-letter password - crack & it's yours! on: December 04, 2012, 07:57:58 AM
1 BTC for the password
WuKvR
2640  Other / Off-topic / Re: Already delays in BFL shipment plans? on: December 04, 2012, 12:34:47 AM
So BFL cancels one delivery date after the other, because they are supposedly only waiting for parts (mainly the ASICs themselves!) - yet they are still fiddling around with the design of their casing?!?!

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/bfl-forum-miscellaneous/459-new-single-sc-pics.html
BFL_Josh: "I was taking some pics for some promotional stuff tonight, so I thought I'd share some of the pics. This is the new, taller case to accomodate some better airflow, ..."

One could expect that they by now have tons of casings ready just waiting for the PCB to be plugged in - yet they don't even have that!

Man! How on earth would you have kept your initial deadline for October (or even November) shipment?


So if the case is not fabricated yet....
Then it is going to be AT-LEAST another 30 days from when the toolmaker receives the plans and that is the time it takes in Asia got get a mold tool ready.(and that would be a GOOD tool maker, right first time)
Then proofing (1 week)+ final polishing (1-2 weeks) depending on external finish.

Can you get me  side pictures, without me having to log into BFL, so I can see how many sliding cores (if any) the tool may need.

Josh already stated that it takes 2-5 days from design to product-in-hand.  They must have someone local doing it for them.  Stamping sheet metal isn't a difficult or lengthy process.
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 ... 405 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!