Bitcoin Forum
September 23, 2024, 07:09:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 [133] 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 ... 550 »
2641  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Iran has made a huge mistake and the world will pay a price for it. on: January 08, 2020, 03:35:00 AM

Trump spent a fair bit of 'quality time' with Epstein and Maxwell.  He'll do whatever the fuck Netinyahoo tells him to do.  Always has, and there is no reason to believe that the future will be any different.

The U.S. must fall be for the plan to be fulfilled.  Ben-Gurion, first prime minister of Israel, (among many others) outlined it way back in the 1960's

from:  https://www.jta.org/1962/01/04/archive/ben-gurion-foresees-gradual-democratization-of-the-soviet-union

Quote
Gradual democratization of the Soviet Union and the abolition of wars by 1987 is predicted by Israel Premier David Ben-Gurion in a statement published in the current issue of Look magazine which carries a number of interviews on the world outlook 25 years from now. Mr. Ben-Gurion’s statement reads:

“The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The Cold War will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligentsia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and the rising political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy.

“Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, ail other continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars.

In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah. Higher education will be the right of every person in the world. A pill to prevent pregnancy will slow down the explosive natural increase in China and India, And by 1987, the average life-span of man will reach 100 years.”

WW-III results in the end of the U.S., and the stage has been feverishly set for a civil war in that country.  Hopefully just a little bit to feverishly in order to meet the 'time-table' and they left some loose ends.  We'll see.  I predict that the U.S. loses a war with Iran (and company.)  I suggest that that is exactly the idea.  I propose that Trump was installed to be the guy who set's off the charge which implodes the country because he is considered reliable enough to do it.

2642  Other / Politics & Society / Re: WW3 - Are we all gonna die? on: January 08, 2020, 03:17:01 AM

No, we're not 'all' going to die.

Each chosen person gets 2800 non-chosen semi-persons for their own use.  If you are a (semi-) person who will help the 'chosen people' in their goals (e.g., be a 'good noahide'), you've got a chance.

Alternately, if enough people take the time to understand the play-book that is currently being used, there is a very good chance to avoid calamity.  The simple fact of the matter is that this thing ends up working out very well only for a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of humans.  There is no reason for almost anyone to lend support.  They do so only out of ignorance most of the time.

2643  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Democrats pushing increased guns rather than gun control on: January 04, 2020, 05:21:25 AM
Our best friends in the fight against gun control, are anti-gun Democrats.
...

If you make this thing about Dems and Repubs, you'll lose for sure.  (Probably will anyway, but...)

Firstly, there are a ton of pro-2nd amendment folks who are registered Dems and beyond that, are fairly liberal on many issues.

Secondly, it's the so-called 'Republicans' who are even more effective in destroying the 2nd amendment albeit less vocal and more deceitful (on this issue.)  In particular Donald Trump.  Disarming Americans is  a key issue for his entire support base (Zionists.)  Other key issues include fostering destabilizing immigration, getting all Americans tagged and vaccinated, getting 5G rolled out across the country, getting key 'change agents' on a junket to the promised land to get some 'training', etc.

Of course Trump's directors will set the stage that Trump is fighting the good fight against all this stuff.  This is laughably absurd with just a cursory analysis of what programs cease and which accelerate forward.  It doesn't matter, though, because Trump's groupies tend not to be prone to doing their own observations and analysis and will eat up any bullshit served up for them and ask for seconds.

2644  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: January 01, 2020, 05:16:20 AM

Except for all the coincidences of people being normal people until they get vaccinated. All of a sudden, following the vaccination, they become sick or die. Was it the vaccine? Nobody can test things like that to say for sure it was or wasn't the vaccine. All we have to go one is the timing... the coincidences. Better to be safe than sorry.


It would be fairly straightforward to perform studies to discover the damage done by vaccines.  With almost no doubt they are commissioned regularly by the designers of the vaccination programs, but in secret and the results are certainly not made public.  The material which is in the public domain is damning as hell, and is fairly exhaustive in fact.  Few people take the time to even look for it.  (Darwinian evolution in action.)

The people designing the vaccination programs are psychopaths.  That is easily seen by the tiny fraction of their programs which have been looked into (e.g., the Sackler family with their valium/oxycontin/fentanyl franchise) through legal discovery.  The homicidal disdain they have for ordinary people displayed in their corporate memos and board meeting minutes is appalling.  These people are easily capable of poisoning people with vaccines for profit and paying off any authorities to look the other way.  Very easily.

To Big Pharma, causing disease kills two birds with one stone.  It makes them rich pretty much beyond measure, and it helps with what they perceive as the overpopulation problem.   Often enough it's an overpopulation of non-useful goyim or ones which have already been used and worn out (e.g., injured U.S. servicemen who can no longer effectively fight for a greater Israel.)

2645  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: December 29, 2019, 10:16:01 AM
...

You are asking the wrong question. If I told there was a chance your hamburger was poisoned and you refused to eat hamburger, would you consider it a valid retort to claim you refuse to eat and that food is proven to nourish you, or would you just skip the hamburger and eat carrots? People love simplifying this debate into pro and con. The real debate is over the fact that working vaccines are not exclusive of poisonous additives, and no one should be compelled to use them. Framing the whole debate as if people are only denying vaccination is a thing completely is just horse shit.

These 'class' of posters tend to have 'get paid to post' ads associated with their accounts, and they all just parrot a standard set of corp/gov talking points.  I have to wonder if you are not talking to an AI bot thing which has evolved some since we started seeing them some years ago.  You notice that they don't try to make any comment or argument which takes into account any previous thread commentary so it would be hard to call it AI.  Just the A part more or less and certainly not technologically cutting edge.  The prose tends to be just the same old boilerplate that all 'normies' adhere to already.  If it is bot it is getting better with grammar at least.

2646  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Whooping Cough Outbreak Despite A 100 Percent Vaccination Rate on: December 27, 2019, 06:27:40 AM
...

Yep. It just slipped by the scientists and doctors. Guess they just don't know enough to be sure they are doing good. Maybe they are upsetting the whole apple cart of nature's better protection.


Whooping Cough Outbreak Despite A 100 Percent Vaccination Rate Forces School Closure In Texas



The school, St. Theresa Catholic School in Memorial Park, will be closed until January 6th. The outbreak has not only affected the students but also the staff. Some children have also been hospitalized as a result, the Houston Chronicle reports.

It's one of multiple instances that point to the idea that whooping cough, also known as pertussis, is not indicative of a failure to vaccinate, but rather, a failing vaccine. According to Fox, "Officials with the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston said that 100 percent of students who attend St. Theresa Catholic School are vaccinated against the illness."

According to ABC News,

According to a statement from the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, the school notified the community of the first confirmed case on Dec. 4. The case was then reported immediately to the Texas Department of State Health Services to investigate. he archdiocese also said all of St. Theresa's students are vaccinated, and it's working closely with the Houston Health Department.


I can just imagine how that conversation went.  Probably something like:  HHD: "Shut the fuck up about the 100% vaccination rate and help us blame the anti-vaxxers or we'll have the DA bring charges against some of the pedophiles in your archdiocese."

2647  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: December 26, 2019, 10:07:50 PM
"The Pertussis resurgence: putting together the pieces of the puzzle."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883970

The 'puzzle' isn't that hard.  The vaccine doesn't work very well for very long.

People who take the vaccine end up harboring the wild strain bacteria without getting sick, but they do spread it around to others.

If these highly vaccinated walking disease factories among us were JUST making non-vaccinated people sick that would be fine with most pro-vaxxers.  In fact, they've been so indoctrinated that they have turned into such sadistic creeps who would probably take pleasure at the thought of spreading diseases to non-vaccinated people.

The trouble is that since the vaccine doesn't work (a fact which somehow slipped by the 'scientists' when they did the initial 'trials') even vaccinated people are getting infected.

2648  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: December 22, 2019, 04:37:29 AM
They are distrusting of the government, pretty much. And usually they were convinced by some stats, that were probably made up about the government trying to poison people through vaccination.

Pretty much without exception I find the 'stats' which have been flagrantly fabricated come from one (of the many) entities who are focused on getting as many people as possible injected with as much as possible.

It's actually pretty interesting to see how the techniques of deception vary between the pro-vax entities.  Some of them will give themselves a legal out when they lie, and some will just shamelessly make stuff up.

Generally speaking, government agencies in pharma companies will have something like 'we know of no studies have proven harmful effects', but they don't mention that any of the studies which have have been rejected on the basis that vaccines have no harmful effects and thus any study which shows them is automatically rejected as a valid study.  They also don't mention that any studies which can show a negative effect are not funded by any entity but altruistic private ones, and any scientist who participates in such a study can kiss their career goodbye and will have to look for a new line of work.

Mainstream media, on the other hand is totally happy to make utterly absurd claims such as that the measles mortality rate at 50%, or claim that '67 children died from measles in one hospital' when the official number for nation-wide mortality from the DOH isn't even that high.

2649  Other / Politics & Society / Re: why are are allowed to criticize everything except jews or truth on: November 27, 2019, 06:20:06 AM
You don't criticise people if you are guilty of thesame thing you accuse them of.

You certainly do if you are a Talmudist or Kabbahalist.  Like always!  Even when the accusee is completely innocent.  It's amusing to watch.

You have to be perfect If you must criticise others otherwise it becomes hypocrisy.

No, you just don't have to be guilty of what you are accusing the other person of.  Nobody is perfect, but that's no excuse for nobody to ever criticize anyone else.

When we understand how filthy and evil we all are, we would be more humble when talking about other "evil people".

I'm not filthy and evil, and absolutely not in the way that Zionists tend to be.

'Filthy and evil' is somewhat subjective, and although I'm an Atheist, I grew up with 'Christian values.'  Damn glad I did, too, as I read stuff from the Talmud and listen to Talmudic Jews illuminate from their interpretations of it.  Not to mention simply watching the news from the evil that comes out of Zionism.

By the way, there are good jews and the bad, just like you can find in any group of world. Humans can't be all bad right?

No shit.  Even genuine 'antisemites' will say as much, and I've never heard anyone except Talmudic Jews claim that they are, by the mere fact that they are 'chosen', absolved of wickedness.  No other group that I know of has something like the Kol Nidre to back out of any promises and pledges they have made or will make in the coming year.

Seems many want jews destroyed,.. this is probably why they are under this kind of protection

Nobody 'wants Jews destroyed'.  Almost nobody even thinks about it, though it probably does occur to people who've had family killed in furtherance of the 'Greater Israel' project.  This assertion is the kind of extreme paranoia foisted upon Jews by a totally fucked up system of education.  Listen to the freaks coming out of yeshiva and you can spot damaged goods a mile away.  Probably damaged for life in many cases sadly enough.

The psychological trauma (tribalism, fear, victim-hood, etc) dished out to some Jews from an early age probably really does produce some small-ish group of freaks who really are a danger to the non-Jews.  It's just common sense to look out for them just as one would look out for a dog which is staggering around, frothing at the mouth, and biting everything it sees.

2650  Other / Politics & Society / Re: why are are allowed to criticize everything except jews or truth on: November 27, 2019, 03:56:01 AM
Odds are the OP was referring to Epsein that go murdered (?) by powerful Jews that may have been at risk of being exposed.

Don't try to understand, let's enjoy popcorn Smiley

Jews are not allowed to kill other Jews (or loan money at interest) under some interpretations of Talmudic law.  Goyim are fair game though.

Actually, Jews are not really allowed to kill anyone directly(*) under same prior to the coming their their 'Mashiach' and the age in which Jews fully rule over us anamilistic goyim.  That's part of the reason why capital punishment is a thing for lots of Jews.  After the coming, however, everything changes.  At that time one person will be able to sentance any non-Jew to death.  Non-Jews who don't comply with the 'noahide laws' are subject to death by decapitation.  "It is written."

  https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/62221/jewish/The-7-Noahide-Laws-Universal-Morality.htm

Ordinarily such non-sense could be written off, but Jared and Yael Kushner and a lot of other people surrounding the 'leader of the free world' are part of this organization.  They may _say_ that they are not interested in this aspect of their religion, but note that they are not only authorized to lie through their teeth if it benefits their tribe; they are obligated to do so.  "It is written."  It's also widely disimnated in presentations.  Fascenating stuff really!  People should spend more time looking into it.

---

(*) 'directly means like sawing off their head with your own hands.

Pulling a ladder out of a well and thereby inducing the victim starve is OK.  That is 'indirect'.  Similarly, getting the Roman court to crucify someone by paying off a Roman or blackmailing him with footage form your pedo-island is also 'indirect.'  There are reasons why some people question whether the 'God' of the 'people of the sacred serpent' might be Ol' Nick.

2651  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Epstein Murdered According to Pathologist on: November 27, 2019, 01:25:42 AM
well, I agree that Epstein is "Schroedinger's Pedo": no-one in the general public is going to know if he's dead or alive until truly credible evidence appears. That means the box hasn't been opened, so lay off the speculation until you actually know anything that your most recent bottle of Jim Bean didn't tell you

and as well; I fully do not care if he's dead or alive, it would be the least important (or interesting) fact about this story if it was confirmed one way or the other

Lol!


Edit you also didn't even read my first post

The pathologist making this claim (Epstein didn't kill himself) has form for being involved in many high profile autopsies and coroners reports, and making questionable/controverial public judgements on them (i.e. Eric Garner recently, as well as Congressional hearings regarding the JFK autopsy). That's me disbelieving the regular reporting, if that needs any more spelling out.

what does it mean? we can only guess. it might be a bluff, this pathologist's involvement is bound to raise eyebrows everywhere, so he might be telling the truth out of strategy. We're taking it all on trust, we can't get access to the body (even if possible, I'd be more concerned if anyone really cared that much to try it, let them play games, there're more important issues to spend time on from my perspective)

I skimmed it enough to see that you mentioned the controversial pathologist.

Somewhere above is a post I did stating that if I were running a psy-op to cover for a person of Epstein's stature and the potential damage he could do, I'd have all kinds of 'controversial' things crawling out of the woodwork.  This is to create an information overload which make it so people throw up their hands and walk away rather than simplifying and applying some normal logic.

In my engineering, the unifying these 'controversial' issues would be that Epstein is certainly dead.  The only debate would be on how he got that way.  And 'enemies' would fight over this issue to their heart's content since it doesn't matter much.

In my engineering, the peeps would discouraged in multiple ways of stepping off the reservation and entertaining any 'conspiracy theories'.  They are free to argue about whether it was a suicide or homicide until the cows come home, and doing so would be encouraged by various media properties controlled by 'my people.'

Again, if I see anything solid to indicate that Epstein sleeps with the fishes, I'll entertain the notion.  Absent that, which is the current state, I assume he is probably doing fine in 'retirement and is probably just working a different job.

2652  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: November 27, 2019, 12:13:42 AM
They believe in come kind of conspiracy theory I think, as if vaccines were created to exterminate people. Or some just don't believe they really work. Or they are too lazy. With this kind of approach, if the plague appears again, I won't be surprised

The trick is not to 'exterminate' people.  As you say, that is easy.  TPTB usually use wars for that (see Syria, Yemen, etc, etc.)

The trick is to milk people as much as possible before they die.  Making them sick with incurable, painful, and expensive ailments, combine with jacking up the cost of medicine and health care, is just the ticket.

Autoimmune problems and 'affordable health care' fit the bill perfectly.  With socialized medicine you can milk the cows by proxy.  That is to say, plumb all the cows together so that you can keep milking a cow (who has mysteriously developed, say, MS) even after they have become indigent.

2653  Other / Politics & Society / Re: why are are allowed to criticize everything except jews or truth on: November 26, 2019, 11:59:55 AM
ok seems the topic creator has gone from asking to a question to hatred of jews and a haulocaust denier all in under 12 hours

no religion is perfect. an all religions have their leaders and popular folk  and preachers

but individual actions of one/few should not be treated as actions of them all/many

 - snip - more strawmen mostly


Nobody is saying anything about 'every Jew'.  Not even genuine anti-semites.  I'm sure that there are antisemites but they are as rare as hens teeth and I don't think I've ever met one in the flesh.  Questioning the truly clown-show details of the so-called 'holocaust' is certainly not antisemitism no matter what the ADL or whoever says.  It's simply not being a brainwashed simpleton or a shameful coward who would sell the U.S. 1st amendment down the river to appease some of the most abysmal ethnic supremacists who ever walked the face of the earth.

This absolutism is the almost always the first thing Zionist apologists reach for.  Almost every time.  It simply doesn't fit almost any individual, researcher, or commentator.

I know a lot of Jews and am friends with a lot of Jews and I grew up around 1960s 'hippies' who were Jewish as often as not.  Very few of them seem to know anything about the freakish ideas of the Orthodox (and seemingly satanic) Rabbis who surround our current politicians.

True, a lot of 'liberal' Jews do seem to have some cultural baggage which present as 'Utopian' and/or 'Revolutionary', and some of their traits and practices seem influenced by Kabbalah-ish stuff, but I just don't see any way that they are familiar with or would subscribe to the methods of Zionism/Talmudism.  Lots of non-Jews share exactly the same characteristics.  Also, lots of Jews see the clown-show antics and have the balls to call it out...their idiotic label by the ADL crowd is 'self-hating Jew.'

2654  Other / Politics & Society / Re: why are are allowed to criticize everything except jews or truth on: November 26, 2019, 11:08:28 AM
...
The western culture on the other hand has come to be defined by basenss, vanity, over-sexualization and its only natural for the average westerner to feel a sense of loss over this.

About the only thing about 'western culture' which is so is Hollywood and it is run almost completely by Jews.  A fair number of the pedos as well it seems leading me to believe that they are particularly Talmudic, Kabbalistic, and Frankist in a lot of cases.

The theory behind sacrifice is to 'magically' or 'kabbalistically' transfer your sins onto some other entity, then destroy that entity leaving you pure.  It's a childish and evil idea.  Probably won't work either, and certainly if there is a higher-order entity to answer to.  The world 'holocaust' means 'burnt offering' by the way.  You Talmdics can give it a shot on us 'westerners' (aka, 'the nations') if you dare, but don't bitch if it doesn't work out for you like the Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis promise.

2655  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: November 24, 2019, 01:47:44 PM
The problem with vaccination is religion. Shifting from the way of life which you've grown up with in a long time isn't easy. In time, we will all be healed of our ignorance.

I grew up as an Athiest and am one to this day.  Science was and is my religion, though I've recently mixed in history which has given me a lot of respect for the _man_ known as Jesus Christ.

Because I considered myself an Atheist and an enthusiast of science I bought all of the 'science' about vaccines on the basis that 'all the top scientists' worked very hard to develop them, and surely these pure-as-the-driven-snow scientists would be very careful and would never harm anyone.  As recently as mid-way through the life of this forum I basically had no questions about vaccines.

Then I actually dug in and analyzed things for myself and listened to the evidence presented by scientists who didn't subscribe to the mainstream corp/gov medical/industrial complex narrative.  Along with some other socio-political observations I passed right through the 'five stages of vaccine awareness':



2656  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Hoax is a hoax on: November 24, 2019, 12:32:26 PM
I've seen a lot of "Evolution/Vaccination/ISIS/Global warming/XXX is a hoax" threads, so I came to conclution that we need a more generic one.

Dear antivaxxers, feel free to comment this chart:





Ah, so this is where your laughably ignorant 'chart reading' thing came from.  The one which I smacked down hard on another thread specific to vaccines.

(Teaser:  The guy is showing that two basically straight lines look like one another.  Yeah, no shit.  If he had any intellectual curiosity he would muse about the minor squigle, but he doesn't.  Corp/gov tells him how he should think about vaccines so for some reason he wants everyone else to do the same.  Insecurity I suppose.)

Anyway, why do you need to call up phony straw men about things which nobody believes?  If you have a disagreement about vaccines, or instance, state your case about vaccines.  Calling up some 'margarine of 'flat earth' or whatever straw-man shows that you've got nothing.

2657  Other / Politics & Society / Re: PURE CRONYISM: .ORG Registry value pillaged by ICANN ex-CEO on: November 24, 2019, 11:01:18 AM

Anyone remember 'namecoin'?

Anyone heard of 'DNSCurve'?

I'm sure there are a lot of other innovative technologies which could be leveraged for a secure and decentralized service which would allow the world to ditch these greedy and duplicitous fuck-heads and their ancient, overpriced, and compromised systems.

...but I don't know of any since it's not something which I've had to pay any attention to in my retirement years.

2658  Other / Politics & Society / Re: People are burning the banks in Iran right now on: November 24, 2019, 10:44:22 AM

I've heard that around three countries on the planet do NOT have a Rothschild owned central bank at this time:  North Korea, Syria, and Iran.  Interesting matches there with those who find themselves under U.S. [austensibly] military pressure.

I also expect that whatever might (or might not) be going on in Iran would be largely driven by people who consider themselves 'Jews' and inevitably, whether they know it or not, most of their actions tend to be tribal and to the benefit of the current dominant debt-based banking system.

Between these two hypotheses, one would expect the 'rioters' to be focusing on causing problems for Iran's non-aligned banking sector.

2659  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What is in mind of those, who against vaccination? on: November 24, 2019, 02:24:04 AM

The way I do it is pretty simple.  Drink water which is naturally high in silica.  Certain deep wells produce such water.

I actually don't drink it a lot because I don't have much reason to have a lot of aluminum in my system, but for my family who got dosed up (including my daughter who was 'accidentally' given soap (in the vitamin K), and AAHSA nano-particles in the Hep-B shot in when she was taken out of our sight for a brief time) they do drink such water.

Speaking of my daughter, she was lively an alert at birth.  Over the course of the next several weeks she declined until one day she slept almost the entire 24 hours.  About a week after she was scheduled for her 'well baby' shots she started to perk back up.  Needless to say, we skipped all of the vaccines.  At 4 months she is very alert, sleeps all night and plays all day, is 6.7 KG is starting to say a few words, etc.  She got a stuffy nose once and it went away in a few days.  Also a bit of a cough which also went away in a few days.  She's got a sister in public school who brings home everything under the sun which is exactly the way I want it.

I think it a very strong hypothesis that the 'vaccine schedule' is designed specifically so that parents never see their kid in a normal state.  There is no logical risk-based reason associated with the diseases that the vaccines are advertised to protect against for 'the schedule' to be followed with a high degree of rigor, yet that's promoted fanatically by the corp/gov medical system.  There IS a reason for the schedule to be followed rigorously if the goal is to keep kids chronically abnormal (while maiming and killing few enough of them that the damage is not obvious to the highly propagandized public.)

2660  Other / Meta / Re: The Bitcoin Forum is 10 years old! on: November 23, 2019, 02:19:13 PM
...
But we're still operated with much the same moderation philosophy as our first admins Satoshi and Sirius 10 years ago: create a "territory of freedom", and let humanity happen.
...

That's becoming a welcome novelty in the internet of 2019.  I've always appreciated it since the BitCoin.OrgForum days.

Pages: « 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 [133] 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 ... 550 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!