The term 'Judeo-Christian' is a ridiculous invention promulgated to, among other things. get stupid Christians to fight Israeli wars or conquest for them.

Jesus was arch enemies with the Pharisees who were the so-called 'oral tradition' crowd.  He called them the seed of Satan and they got him killed.  They did the killing indirectly which is a technique they take great pride in to this day.  Jacob (who changed is name to Israel) used deceit and treachery to trick his father and steal his brother's birthright.  Kabbalahists seem to love the guy for it.  This goes to show how far away 'Christian ethics' are from Talmudic Judaism and what a crock the term 'Judeo-Christain values' is.

After Jesus's time these 'oral traditions' were written down as the Talmud.  At the present time the Talmud is nearly synonymous with 'Judaism' since the Karaite Jews who's faith is based on the old testament and rejection of 'Oral Torah' are nearly extinct (at the hand of the Khazar Jews mostly.)


It actually makes a lot more sense to talk about Judeo-Islamic.  Islam forked not all that long ago and a result seem to be that the similarities are much closer.  Examples would be the things about animal sacrifice, slavery, decapitation, genital mutilation, pork, etc, etc.

Not with nuclear fusion.

That's not at all what I said.  I said that both 'global warming' and 'vaccines' are programs which are highly important to corp/gov and it is critical that people not question them.  One method to get a fairly large segment of people to not question them is to invent something like 'flat earth', then try to associate questions about these programs with the ridiculous 'flat earth' invention.  Although it is quite an obvious technique, It works and works well on the weak minded.

To answer your question, I happen to be very skeptical of the corp/gov story on both the calamitous nature of 'global climate change', and the safety of mass vaccinations.  The propaganda technique is to try to 'shame' people about having any questions at all about the 'authorized position' on these.  I'm not ashamed of it at all.


Freeman Dyson is famous enough for me.  And there are many many others as anyone who studies this issue will find out.

Again, nobody questions the shape of the earth.  It's an invented canard, but is also a great way to identify people who are almost fer certain working for the corp/gov propagandists.


I've seen very little discernible difference in the temperature or climate in the 40 years that I've been able to assess things.  Actually, about 5 years ago I did start to notice some fairly bizarre atmospheric conditions which are a direct match for the 'solar radiation management' schemes that are not becoming mainstream.

There is no doubt in my mind that if had been told by mainstream media that the scient-priests were seeing global cooling (and we need to give the rich people power to control the solar flux in order to stop it) then you would 'feel' the cooling just as strongly as you 'feel' the warming now.

Do you have any specific reasons why that seems like a good number?

Zerohedge is not on my scheduled rounds, but I'm not remembering very many times when I've seen fabricated or 'fake news' on the site.  Most things I remember seeing have some basis in reality.  Most importantly to me, much of the stuff I've seen is perfectly valid and interesting information which no 'mainstream' outlet will touch with a 10 foot pole.  It's a good place to get leads of general interest to follow up on.

As for basic credibility, I would rate Zerohedge so far above CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc that the latter are not even in sight.  Also the comments are fun and interesting and seem to have a higher 'real-people/bot' percentage than the mainstream rags (which nowadays don't even allow user participation most of the time anyway.)

Some years ago I used to routinely skim stories then head directly for the comments where all the bullshit propaganda from the written piece was dissected.  Not long after than the owners of most of these platforms started highly editing and simply deprecating comments.

Some ice is on land (Greenland, Antarctica, glaciers, etc)

I think the warmunistas argument about sea level rise is that the ocean will become warmer and the water will expand as much as it is about melting ice anyway.

Whatever the argument is, sea level rise is very linear starting before humans started burning fossil fuels.  It will be 100 years before much of anything noticeable happens.  Plenty of time to stop building right on the ocean at sea level.  People who only need a place for 50 years can get a good deal.  This is only a panic because people who have a solution need a problem.

They surprise me too.  I don't think there is a big enough sample size and/or enough honesty.  Based on the content I'm sure that 90% of the forum participants spend more than a little time in front of the zio-con owned idiot box.

You should have made an addition rather than a substitution.  'Entertainment' is at least as mind-shattering as 'news' in mainstream media-land.  It would be interesting to know (or think we know) how many people avoid both.

I became aware of Bitcoin because Paypal interfered with my ability to help fund a journalism platform which was one of the relatively few which I had respect for at the time.  That would be wikileaks.  Paypal telling me what I could and could not support with my own fuckin money pissed me off quite a lot, and I already understood what a scam the debt-based fiat money system was at that time.

The above was 2010.  Unfortunately I didn't immediately get around to compiling the code and CPU mining.  Oh well.  As for mainstream media, I distrusted it before the election of 2000, but the going's on with Bush/Gore really opened my eyes to what a corrupt mess the media was and how phony the 'two-party' charade is.  I've never paid any attention to them since except for things like the weather or earthquake footage and such.

When I do watch or read mainstream media (for the last 20 years now!) it has always been to analyze how they are spinning things in order to understand what is really going on and what the priorities of the ruling classes are.

Forget it.  The people who own the planet have already claimed the millions of square miles of those kinds of places and let plebs go there only in very controlled conditions.  Mostly to work on resource extraction for them.

The plebs home is the 'human habitats'.  That is, a 24 m^2 chunk of floor area usually between 5 and 40 meters above the surface of the earth.  You can rent it.  If you have no money it will be subsidized.  You don't get to own it, or really anything else because...you know...24 m^2 allotment.

Note that as a demonstration of the infinite kindness of our wise earth-saving leaders you will have some greenspace in which to walk with 'doggie reflection pools' for your dog.  You can (for a energy credit deduction) have a small pet of some sort.  Obviously you cannot have a human child.

As a straight guy I can say for certain that the visual sensory perception of female secondary sex characteristics (boob, butt, bush, etc) trigger an instantaneous response of sexual attraction.  I am quite certain that this is fundamentally built in to my brain and was not very much a learned response.  I also have a instinctual response to male characteristics.  It tends to be one of aggression or preparation for such.

My point is that these types of reactions almost certainly stem from physical brain structure.  Such a structure is more likely to develop in a certain way in a normal healthy male (or female) but the structure itself can be manipulated in various ways.  After full adulthood it's probably tricky, but during development that structure probably is quite malleable.

As for evidence, the 'gay frogs' research was quite valid and quite compelling.  That's why they had to present it through some ass-clown like Alex Jones so it could be painted as 'conspiracy theory' and thus most of the peeps would look no further.  Corbett did a piece on this:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2-qdxhC6jc

Sure.  Babies start out as a single cell and develop from there.  At birth they are highly undeveloped and that development proceeds in various ways well past puberty in into early adulthood.  It is well known that there are many techniques which can manipulate this development process.

A basic understanding of endocrinology (hormones) was obtained around the turn of the century, and the 'leading scientists' of the day were ga-ga about the possibilities.  That's reflected in a lot of the science 'fiction' of the day.  The Huxleys were sort of cross-over between 'fiction' and hard science.  Russell was more on the straight-up science end of the spectrum.

Long before that political/religious leaders figured out if the started fucking kids, the kids would be all fucked up psychologically (and often homosexual, sadistic, etc) and would make good political/religious leaders who would repeat the cycle.

In short, human sexuality is highly malleable in the development phases.  That's not to say that there isn't a fair bit of natural variation as well.  Some guys, for instance, will turn out as queer as a three-dollar-bill no matter what their upbrining.  Others could be molested weekly in church and turn out to be perfectly straight.  Most people are in the mushy middle and infant/childhood experiances have a pretty big influence on how they turn out.


You have scientists actively working on techniques.

You have science fiction writers writing books about it.

You have an abundance of prima fascie evidence that social and biological methods are in use.

You have obvious evidence that the techniques are effective in the numbers which you can see at the street level without even needing to do a data dive into the research.

You have people like yourself who are totally cool with the idea of making people gay to solve the 'overpopulation problem'.

In spite of all that it's a 'tinfoil hat conspiracy theory' that anything like that is actually happening.  I would say that 'sexuality' is hardly the only thing being actively manipulated.  Basic logic and analytical ability has also suffered greatly.

Maybe wealthy eugenicists are 'nature's way' of stopping propagation of undesirable genes.  That's actually a justification they use for their activities.

As Bertrand Russell said, 'Diet, Injection, and Injunction will be combined at a very early age to produce the type of individuals that the leaders find desirable.'  As one military whitepaper said, 'promotion of homosexuality can be used to limit population growth.'

Now run along and drink your high fructose corn syrup drink out of the estrogen mimicking plastic bottle, eat your soy based foods, drink your fluoridated water.  Go to public school and learn about Heather's two mommies.  Watch a never ending stream of fagotry on free-to-air mainstream media.  And most importantly, don't forget to get ALL of your government mandated 'vaccinations'.

Very good point!

Also, it is critical to try to gain an understanding of whoever is disseminating information.  It is also critical to realize that every source almost without exception is subject to shift over time.  Often they are bought out directly and the organization changes hands.  Often key elements within an organization is incentivized to introduce a shift or slant into their content.

Currently one of my main sources of information is 'trunews'.  These guys are Christians and they make no bones about wishing people to become Christians or become better Christians as they define it.  That is fine.  It doesn't interest me much but I admire their candor.  They have professional production quality and most of their information is quite solid in evaluating their track record and cross-checking with other sources.

I've constantly switch my 'short list' of information sources.  Sometimes they have been corrupt and gave their hand away (usually on some 'key event' which was important enough to someone to risk their cover.)  Fine.  There are a handful of people who I've followed for a very long time.  Corbett comes to mind.  He's got his shortisightedness and aversion to certain realities, but the information he does put forward tends to be rock solid.  He also is creative enough to find angles I'd not thought of sometimes.

Actually, it is perfectly possible to blame the people who are wary and don't tow the corp/gov party line.  If everyone just shut up and let big pharma and their bought-and-paid-for politicians do whatever they wanted without anyone calling attention to the damage, the 'problem' of people's perceptions of vaccines would be greatly reduced.

So, to a degree it is legitimate the blame the 'problem' on those who study the science and think for themselves.  Maybe the problems wouldn't be such a big issue if they just shut their mouths, protected their own children as best they can, and minded their own business.  Indeed, their own unvaccinated children will be even more competitive when the majority of their peers are vaccine damaged.  The problem is more with people who are educated AND have ethics which won't let them just keep their mouths shut and go with the flow.  Fortunately for corp/gov there are relatively few such people in this Ven diagram.

Most of these 'trade organizations' are dedicated to milking the {insert disease here} franchise and do everything they can to make sure that the money keeps flowing from the vitcims into their coffers.  That means putting a dedicated and well funded effort into NOT finding out what is actually going on with the disease.

The CDC has a long history of corruption, data destruction, big-pharma collusion, etc.

Please give me one valid reason why I should take anything these 'information' sources as anything resembling 'truth'?

I read the crap these outfits put out mostly to find out what the enemy (of humanity) is up to and what strategies they are pursuing.  If a legitimate political entity cleaned house in these organizations I might go back to trusting some of what they say, but I don't see any way we'll (the U.S.) will ever again have a political system which could or would do it.

Finally!  One person doesn't reflexively believe some bullshit story about some basically fictional character of a basically fictional organization just because it was reported on the Tee-Vee.

You would think that after all of the theater and fake news, more people would have wised up and become a little bit descerning, but even people here who one would expect to have a little common sense just buy everything the mainstream media pumps out seemingly without a second thought.  Oh well...what can ya do?

A reasonable number of people around the world recognize what is going on here and have for some time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3g_sKf-mNs

This Arstechnica article makes no efforts to explore other valid ecological questions about the phenomenon.  It presents very questionable conjectures as 'fact'.  This is not science.  It's propaganda.  To their credit they do mention that the mutant viral strain from the vaccines are maiming a lot more people than the wild types but they carefully word things so that an ignorant reader's eyes will glaze over.

As best I can tell, you, and most 'normal people, consider something to be a 'fact' if it was communicated by mainstream media and an 'opinion' if it is not.

I can tell you that I will not trust any 'facts' presented by those who routinely rely on fraud, pay-offs, re-writing history, bogus science, and base scare tactics to get people to believe what they want people to believe.  The fact that they have to employ these tactics tells me that they don't have a case and are hiding some things.

There will always be a contingent who thinks like me.

Knowing that mainstream media is nearly 100% Zionist owned and with the mission to herd the stupid goyim in a direction of their choosing makes it possible to extract useful information by analyzing it.  But I don't own a TV so mostly what I see from the MSM are clips from internet based information outlets.

RIP Simon Elliot.  I mean when you actually die; reports of your demise from the MSM indicate that you are still fine.