...
That is what Muslims should be doing, not going around denying they have a problem, aka practicing Taqiyya. We are all grown-ups here.
...
Misquoting someone's religious text then using that to dog on them is not really very 'grown-up'. In fact it is rather juvenile and desperate. I don't know jack shit about Islam because I've not studied it. I'm absolutely not about to get my information from people who have strategic reasons to make me hate them. As a matter of fact, you asserting that Muslims have violence problems kinda makes me believe that they do not. Or at least question that it's much of a big deal. I'm pretty sure I would be about as violent as possible if I were being treated like a Palestinian, Syrian, etc, etc. I mean if someone attacks me, kills my family, and steals my land I'll certainly be fighting back in any way possible. It would have nothing to do with religion because I'm an Atheist. |
|
|
|
More people on welfare, more power for the state I guess. Or maybe they really want to drive these people out of California to spread the cancer across the whole of America.
That's a hypothesis worth exploring. Really! Pattern match if other 'thought leaders' or entrenched and influncial people from the state find it necessary to re-locate because of policy directives. Haha! I know it's pretty much tinfoil but the greatest changes are those that is barely noticeable. I already see a lot of people online saying that Texas has pretty much become blue from all the people moving from California. Another equally tinfoil I've heard was that they are pushing people out of the state (and turning certain areas into shithole using hobos) is so the land can be bought up cheaply (the market value goes down if the street is covered in shit and used syringes) and resold later. I don't do 'tinfoil hat', and I absolutely don't reject an idea because it is labeled by someone as such. Indeed, just the opposite because the term is cultivated for use in rejecting ideas which need extra kick of illogical rejection because they actually are valid. Another similar tool is to promote a hoax like 'flat earth', then conflate perfectly valid concerns (vaccine concern, climate change skepticism, etc) with the fabricated hoax. These kinds of gimmicks work well on weak minded people who are terrified to be separated from their 'herd'. Unfortunately that is a strong majority of the peeps. It's just how 'normies' are wired. Oh well. What I do are hypothesese. If a hypothesis is nullified and/or does not work, they are valueless and forgotten. If they continue to work (provide explanations for statistical anomalies, are useful for making accurate predictions, etc) they usually remain hypothesese but gain strength. |
|
|
|
Tried to make a self moderated thread before and it seems to not be allowed on here anymore, was that just a fluke or is there a new rule here?
It would be a welcome new rule if it is one. ... I’m curious if you mean in terms of just this sub or btalk as a whole. ... I didn't think about it much. Given your fairly good points, my answer would be just this sub, or if there are any other kinda deliberately off-topic and which people who think they are 'clever' can try to promote a particular brand of propaganda. Maybe on some of the 'announce subs it also makes sense for there to be no self-moderation since the announce thread often becomes a rather valuable source of community feedback on the real-world operation of a particular effort. It would suck for a scammer to get away with scams longer because he moderated out complaints. But then anyone could start and [service ann]-UNMOD thread for the general community to discuss a service I suppose. Maybe it happens. I kinda almost exclusively scan/troll the politics+society one these days for general non-BTC related entertainment since I don't indulge in any other form of social media  |
|
|
|
... What is the reason why they want to kill people who draw a cartoon of a warlord and a pedophile who lived 1400 years ago?  Who agree here? NO one has right to kill anyone even if they insulted anyone. But imagine the same kind of insult was given to Jesus the same kind of threats may be arise to that creator so why particularly targeting Islam? It has to do with getting two of your adversaries fighting with one another while you sit back, enjoy, and profit. Islam and Christianity being the two in this case. This cartoon seems a really good case study in a couple of propaganda techniques. The chief one is ' accuse your adversaries of that which you are guilty of.' We see it all over the place these days. I actually bothered to look up 'Muslim (8.3311)'. You'll be unsurprised to learn that the 'to have sex with her' in parens part seems to be fabricated. Probably the propagandists didn't think anyone would look. Turns out that Talmudic Judiism speaks in some depth about sex with children. The modern day apologists for Judaism are quick to point out that there were arranged marriages so because a 'girl of 3' was stated it didn't mean that the Rabbi was boning her (or him.) While the explanation could apply to the correctly translated Islamic texts, there is trouble in Talmud-land: The Talmudic debate seemed to specify three as the age when a girl's body was 'ready' which wouldn't make much sense unless sex was involved. Dovetailing with the Rabbinical texts we have a seemingly never ending stream of certain behaviors among people of a certain background (Allen, Polanski, Weiner, Weinstein, Dershewitz, Barak, Epstein, etc, etc, etc.) I would take exception to the idea that a 3 year old girl's body is 'ready' for sex, but then I'm just a animilistic goyim who's soul stems from the satanic spheres. The Rabbis have souls which come from by the divine so who am I to argue that it's pretty fucking awful to be dicking 3-year-olds when the Talmidic Rabbis say it's all good? |
|
|
|
...
My hypothesis is that what you eat has an impact on brain function. Basically if you are eating a lot of meat it implies that your group are hunters. For hunting one needs a nimble mind (and body for that matter.) That will naturally develop to help the group operate effectively in their environment. On the other hand, if you eat a lot of fruits and roots and what-not, your group are probably a gatherers or at least that is the most effective food source at the present time. Not much brain is necessary for that, and excess brain wastes energy. If you eat a lot of grain your group are probably farmers. It's much better to be a mindless dolt who is content to work the fields dawn to dust. A well working brain not only wastes energy but interferes with the life's work. Double-negative. I'd say that the 'leadership' understands this. The food pyramid and diet offered by the powers that be favor grains and more recently high fructose corn surup. This is mainly because they plan to avoid any more revolutions going forward and diet is one of the tools that they use to keep the peeps in a state of perpetual dopiness. The ' war on beef' which is a thing among the eco-crowd is another face of the same basic coin. Again, the socialists have a fascination with the concept of getting the kids early and keeping them as much as possible. Mostly is that they understand that this is key to 'revolutionary change', and to enduring rule once revolution is accomplished. |
|
|
|
Yeah I figured as much. Another "master" above having a discussion.
Yeah, pretty much. Words do mean things, so don't attribute words to me I didn't use.
Hey, my use of the word 'evil' made it so that you didn't have to contemplate the corundum, right? I mean you got to use the basic and fairly lame mock-strawman play. Tell dear leader I said hello.
If I remember to do so I will. |
|
|
|
...
You live under a dictator who runs death squads, I am not sure you really should be pointing fingers at the USA or have any right whatsoever to tell us here what we should be doing with our nation when you ran away like a puss and wag your finger from afar. This impeachment is a complete farce, and the only argument you have is forced memes and cartoons. Just be sure you have your mommy change your nappies before you get a rash.
I suggest that you spend some time on the ground before you speak with authority about 'dictators' and 'death squads'. Much of the 'information' about the situation is highly filtered by the very same people who's programs are getting royally fucked up by certain policies of 'the dictator' who 'runs death squads.' If nothing else, ponder just a wee bit about why so many of his countrymen support him and his policies given that he is so evil. Remember that the Philippines is a country where people are fairly free to read what they want so they have access to both sides of the story. As for 'running' you are probably one of the Americans I would rather have around. Unfortunately it implies that you'd be on the short-list of enemies of the neo-state and neutralized early on without making any lasting contribution whatsoever if/when the shit hits the fan. In the mean time you (or anyone else in the country) are also unlikely to be able to do much of anything positive. There is simply no base upon which to gain leverage and I don't see a way that there will be. There will the potential for a base after a proposed 'event', but again, I expect that you'll be no longer. And if by some stroke of luck you are, you'll be glad that there is some support from 'outside'. I never said he was evil. He's a dictator who runs death squads...but he ain't evil though. Whatever. Anyway, words mean things. Even where the 'dictator' has 'marshal law', it is hardly the case that things operate from any person's dictates. Civil courts and judicial protocol are still very much the norm as far as I can see. And relatively high level officials even get into trouble sometimes. The 'dictator' would like to get rid of martial law because it is an expensive hassle but the people want it. That should tell you something...or you could regurgitate what globalist media like CNN and (Oymidar funded) Rappler say because it is easier than thinking. I was simply pointing out the reject above doesn't have any grounds to point fingers. He is of the type neither of us want around and would not be a help to anyone, even himself. I know enough about the Philippines to know it is a low trust nation where everyone is suspicious of everyone else and rule of law is not stable.
The 'rule of law' could well be more healthy in The Philippines than it is in the United States. It really depends what levels and from what angles one looks at things (and very few people bother to try.) To a large degree 'rule of law' is a con(fidence) game in the United States just as is the economy. It's kept polished and shiny on certain surfaces but on many levels it is utterly corrupt. What The Philippines lacks relative to the U.S. is mostly the polished surfaces. I would prefer that not become the standard here, and I find people wagging fingers from afar with plenty of their own domestic problems don't hold much water. If you are done being upset I was critical of your dear leader, do you care to actually comment on the topic or just want to continue tribing up?
This thread, like many others, is not really worth bothering with because all of you n*ggers are fighting in a synthetic-world ring created for you by psychological engineers. WWF level stuff here. IIRC, I already clued you-all in on some things earlier. But you all seem to be having fun, so knock yourselves out. |
|
|
|
...
You live under a dictator who runs death squads, I am not sure you really should be pointing fingers at the USA or have any right whatsoever to tell us here what we should be doing with our nation when you ran away like a puss and wag your finger from afar. This impeachment is a complete farce, and the only argument you have is forced memes and cartoons. Just be sure you have your mommy change your nappies before you get a rash.
I suggest that you spend some time on the ground before you speak with authority about 'dictators' and 'death squads'. Much of the 'information' about the situation is highly filtered by the very same people who's programs are getting royally fucked up by certain policies of 'the dictator' who 'runs death squads.' If nothing else, ponder just a wee bit about why so many of his countrymen support him and his policies given that he is so evil. Remember that the Philippines is a country where people are fairly free to read what they want so they have access to both sides of the story. As for 'running' you are probably one of the Americans I would rather have around. Unfortunately it implies that you'd be on the short-list of enemies of the neo-state and neutralized early on without making any lasting contribution whatsoever if/when the shit hits the fan. In the mean time you (or anyone else in the country) are also unlikely to be able to do much of anything positive. There is simply no base upon which to gain leverage and I don't see a way that there will be. There will the potential for a base after a proposed 'event', but again, I expect that you'll be no longer. And if by some stroke of luck you are, you'll be glad that there is some support from 'outside'. |
|
|
|
|
As a Bitcoin sidechain I'll support anything. You can even market it as 'backed by flatulence' if you like.
|
|
|
|
A few links in: "The World Bank Group’s Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative launched the challenge in November to identify practical and cost-effective ‘privacy by design’ features that can be embedded into digital identification systems to empower users. The effort supports the operationalization of the initiative’s Principles on Identification for Sustainable Development, which aim to ensure that people currently without identification receive ‘Good’ ID." Koire: WHAT IS UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 21?
UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control
all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy,
all education, all information, and all human beings in the world.
INVENTORY AND CONTROL.
Edit: Knowing the existence and parameters of a 'thing' is what gives it a trade-able value on the market. By inventorying and putting everything on earth under control the 'net present value' of the planet increases dramatically. 'Economic growth' on the planet is by no means finished. If anything it is just getting started. This is what is meant to some by the term 'Beast System.' |
|
|
|
... I foresee the same thing that's why our president is working for a Plan B. That's why he try to befriend Russia and also keep befriending China despite of the despute on the reclamation of West Philippine Sea because he knew that they can be a strong allies when new WW began. I can see that he already want to stop our relationship to America, probably he, an me also, thought that we will only suffer more in the end. I thought that all of the help we get coming from.the Americans has something for exchange and that would be human force. We might end up as their "pawns"in case of war. Anyway, do you really think we are rich? I don't think so  . ps: these are just my opinions. It would be quite foolish to rely on the U.S. for any sort of help when the shit hit's the fan. Seems that those who control the U.S. at this time actually take a perverse pleasure in backstabbing their 'friends' and would so it even just for the fun of it for no particular gain. That said, life under the Chinese would probably be 10 times worse than what most people experienced under the U.S.. At least most naive American peeps where indoctrinated with the idea that 'all men are created equal' which imparts some degree of humanity. Not so many other societies. As for rich, I mean that The Philippines as a nation is quite well off with minerals, arable land, water, etc. As I've said before, it would be great to see some real cooperation between Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, The Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia to contain China's expansionist dreams of claiming everyone else's resources. I think that this would be vastly more robust than relying on help form the U.S. if/when any real shooting starts. As a mater of fact, I'm expecting the U.S. to sell their S and SE Asian 'friends' off to China for basically nothing just before themselves are imploded. Those who have been parasitizing the U.S. have already moved their factories to China and are having their kids learn Mandarin. They are one gulfstream jet ride away from switching hosts. |
|
|
|
...
Unlike the previous ones, the Duterte administration shows its claws against crime. Though many humanitarian orgs. and groups are against in his way of ruling, I still like it because you can really see the good results.
The biggest reason I think that Duterte might actually really be 'for real' and not just riding on marketing hype generated from mined social media data is the vicious attacks he gets from globalists (NGO's, United Nations, mainstream media, etc.) My contention is that Duterte really is screwing up some long term globalist programs for The Philippines. Especially their illicit drug operations which are meant to undermine society by corrupting government at all levels. Globalists want country's national governments to be unstable, paralyzed, and focused on internal problems. The more exploitable resources a country has the more important it is to control them, and The Philippines is actually fairly rich. The interesting thing to see is that once people see that there is some possibility for things to get better when it comes to drugs and other such things, and see it happen even just a little bit, they will work vigorously to not regress and their tolerance for future problems goes way down. At least that is what it seems like to me. One decent person making forward progress for a brief time can undue years of hard work on the 'evil' side dragging the country toward collapse and/or revolution. The world is full of such 'asymmetric phenomenon'. Identifying them is key to good strategy. |
|
|
|
|
Does a farmer take his animals for granted?
Politicians play the role of workers on the factory farm and slaughterhouse environments. The so-called 0.001% are the farm owners.
Just like those working the floors, some percentage of politicians take a sadistic pleasure in making the animals lives even less pleasant than they already are. Probably not a high percent. Most of them just do what they are paid to do: follow their bosses directives and keep things working smoothly and efficiently.
|
|
|
|
... The USA is founded on common law >>> local 12-person juries deciding what is law and what is not. The Bundy brothers forcefully took over a wildlife refuge in Oregon. They were arrested and brought to trial. The local Oregon jury released them, twice, on different charges the government brought against them. https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/bundy-oregon-standof/... They were 'sprung' because both Bundy incidents were intel services run (CIA, Navel Intelligence, etc) psy-ops that the Bundy can were frauds. The rancher who's land was stolen by the globalists for continued expansion of the Malhuer 'national wildlife refuge' and his son (the Hammonds) continue to rot in jail last I heard. The 2nd Bundy psy-op was supposed to be associated with the Hammond injustice. Hammond himself wouldn't play ball (with the Bundy creeps or anyone else) so he got the shaft. |
|
|
|
Indeed it is a pity. The concept of the 'light bearer', 'bringer of knowledge', etc, probably does have analogs in most other religions. The basic concepts are ubiquitous to be sure, and various flows of culture (e.g., Hollywood) peddle them in some form constantly. How honor was paid to such an entity as 'the Serpent' in the various socio-religious instances would be good for most inquisitive people to contemplate.
What we seem to have here is a situation where people realize that 'knowledge is power' and are not keen to share it so the 'secrets of the serpent' tend to go un-derground readily. There might be other reasons for the secrecy as well.
Nowadays the information is abundant, but each one connects to what resonates with themselves. The occult literature, forbidden in the past, has been available for a century. Blavatsky, Regardie, Crowley... you can find Kabbalistic groups on youtube or facebook. But most people choose the worst and most distorted things on the web, crazy conspiracy blogs... According to Judaism, there are soul levels, Nefesh, Ruach, Neshama... most people are in the first level - Nefesh, the animal level, the lower materialistic one, so they will look for things at this level of understanding. There are Religious and Atheists at this level. They spend a lot of time discussing and looking for "proofs" of scriptures, both ignoring their metaphoric, symbolic meanings. This knowledge is free, for those who are open to receive. Even if it make me a 'animal' in the eyes of Talmudic Jews I'll happily stay right here at Nefesh level where it ain't cool to pop little kid's kundalini (aka, buttfuck them.) Must take a fair amount of 'enlightenment' to make that the thing to do. No thanks. Speaking of Kabbalists, I do have to wonder when they say that Netanyahu used to "sleep in Jared's bed" when he stayed over at the Kushner residence whether that is code for something. I mean it's kind of hard to believe that the Kushner clan couldn't afford a house with a guest room. |
|
|
|
Again: “ Diet, injections and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the...authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.” – Bertrand Russel – The Impact of Science on Society - 1953 I repeat it on this board and here because this thread really brings all three together ('injunction' meaning truancy laws and legally mandated injections.) Also: https://www.aier.org/article/the-socialists-always-come-for-the-kids-eventually/I didn't yet read the article. I just know enough history that the saying "The Socialists always come for the kids, eventually" resonates. |
|
|
|
More people on welfare, more power for the state I guess. Or maybe they really want to drive these people out of California to spread the cancer across the whole of America.
That's a hypothesis worth exploring. Really! Pattern match if other 'thought leaders' or entrenched and influncial people from the state find it necessary to re-locate because of policy directives. |
|
|
|
Opps. Were we only bashing Muslims on this thread? My bad.
No wonder people are pondering whether some of these 'people of the Sacred Serpent' are genuinely Satanic.
If you expand your knowledge beyond the Abrahamic religions, you will find that the sacred serpent is present worldwide in the most varied cultures. It is a pity that this debate is so limited by ignorance and prejudice. Indeed it is a pity. The concept of the 'light bearer', 'bringer of knowledge', etc, probably does have analogs in most other religions. The basic concepts are ubiquitous to be sure, and various flows of culture (e.g., Hollywood) peddle them in some form constantly. How honor was paid to such an entity as 'the Serpent' in the various socio-religious instances would be good for most inquisitive people to contemplate. What we seem to have here is a situation where people realize that 'knowledge is power' and are not keen to share it so the 'secrets of the serpent' tend to go un-derground readily. There might be other reasons for the secrecy as well. |
|
|
|
From your link on Houris ... Personally I find these descriptions weird and offensive...
Muhammad al-Bukhari (810–870):
...everyone will have two wivesF from the houris, (who will be so beautiful, pure and transparent that) the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through the bones and the flesh.
...
Here's one which strikes me as 'weird and offensive': Reader: I have a question about the statement in Sanhedrin, which troubles me, regarding child sex. It says that homosexual relations with a boy below 9 years is not considered homosexuality, and that there is no punishment and this implies no prohibition. Can you explain why this might be the case?
Mesora: The Talmud cites a dispute between Rav and Shmuel: Rav says that for one who engages in homosexual behavior with a child below 9, there is no punishment of the offender, while Shmuel says that once a boy reaches 3 years, homosexual relations are recognized.
What is their argument?
I believe Rav holds that until 9 years of age, there is no act of homosexuality; as the child cannot initiate a sexual act, he is also not viewed as a partner, so as to contribute to a homosexual relationship. See Rashi who states that although a full adult is not required, i.e., 13 years, some maturity is required to obligate the offender in a homosexual act. The Rabbis deemed a child of 9 as meeting this requirement. But below 9, the boy is no different than an inanimate object, as there lacks any “psychological partner”. Hence, there is no Torah prohibition of homosexuality. Shmuel differs, suggesting that homosexuality is not based on psychological maturity, but on the physical ability of intercourse. Shmuel says that since intercourse is derived from normal (female) intercourse, which commences at three when her body is fit, so too, homosexuality exists with a boy once he is three. Normal sexuality is derived from a man-woman union, and transposed onto males to obligate the violator in homosexuality.
Their argument is what determines sexual readiness: maturity (psychologically) according to Rav, or, according to Shmuel, simple, physical capability.
I would add that although no punishment exists, I would not say there are no violations for pedophiles, for the adult is certainly abusing the child physically and mentally, while also spilling his seed. He also partakes of corrupt emotions similar to recognized homosexual behavior.
Opps. Were we only bashing Muslims on this thread? My bad. No wonder people are pondering whether some of these 'people of the Sacred Serpent' are genuinely Satanic. |
|
|
|
Just being in love with and dedicated to someone doesn't get rid of their herpes.
Why would you choose a woman with herpes anyways? As a man you should know your prospective partner very well before committing to her. As simple as that . And besides it's not so hard to know whether she got herpes or not since it was visible in appearance so you still have of time to back out just in case. Everyone has different ideas about what 'love' and 'commitment' mean I guess. Actually I think almost everyone carries various strains of the herpes virus. It's super common. Only a few strains are the VD type, and not everyone has them thank God. But even those who do rarely have breakouts. Like for a week once every couple of years. Women are advised to have a c-section if they happen to have a breakout when the child is due.* Someone who would ditch an otherwise 'loveable' person because they carried the herpes virus probably is not well educated on the condition, on virology, or on commitment. (*) Similarly, herped out 'moils' (a type of Jewish religious leader) are advised to not use their mouths to suck the blood off the newly mutilated penis of the baby when they put the knife away because they could and sometimes do pass the virus to the infant. Some of them do it anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
