I agree. Gamblers that will choose to get into casinos in Las Vegas will surely die out of stupidity knowing that covid-19 pandemic is still on and having a mass gathering would just create commotion and the spread of the virus will be just a snap of the finger. Although they were thinking to open up the casinos for the sake of their economy, still it is an inappropriate action to do because we are still not safe since there is still no vaccine proven to kill the virus although there is already a vaccine released by Russia that have already done its final stage of trial, it will be still on a process until once proven effective to kill the virus.

It will be okay to open up casinos if they will assure that they will be just operating on 30-50% capacity to further observe social distancing and strictly implement precautionary measures like sanitation to prevent the spread of virus. But still it will be irrelevant to get into casinos at times like this because it is still too dangerous to get outside because of the infectious disease. If a gambler do really want to play gambling, there are online gambling sites to choose with which can provide a lot more convenient gaming experience with the assurance of being safe at home. Let us just set aside the thought of going into casinos for a while until such time that the vaccine is discovered to end this pandemic.

The size of the whole community of crypto casino is already that much big specially at this time that casinos are temporarily closed and people have no choice and if they wanted to play gambling, they will be just dropping by any online crypto casino for a much more convenient gaming experience even players are jus staying at home.

That article is not already surprising because there are lots of cases that lose of money is associated on playing in a crypto casino. That amount stated on the article is not that big if you will compare it into the whole loss being recorded while playing in a crypto casino. That is amount is really massive indeed but just for the individual loss of the player. If you will be better think of it, it is just a part of the big community that crypto casino have. It will just continue to expand as long as there are players that are being encourage playing on this platform so such loss will be stated to be a small part of it.

Indeed, but with the volatility, some still prefer using Bitcoin as their main currency in crypto gambling platforms. Those users whom preferred Bitcoin either often had a lot of holdings in the platform they gamble so they didn't bother any fees at all or either they were simply love gambling and play in it constantly, and insist to let those platform hold their cryptos than to withdraw then deposit again.


What do you mean gambling for fun? And how could you differentiate playing with fun vs playing seriously? lol
Yes, Dogecoin's low fees really are for those whom just want to play now withdraw later or should we rather say those users whom play only for their spare time just to have some fun after their works or stuffs. And I think the serious gambling is when a gambler gambles everyday for money making.. right? If I am, dogecoin can still be an option. TBH, any crypto will do as it would have same amount if exchanged to your local fiat.

Indeed. If it was the case that someone would counter feedback, it would be pretty much mostly based off as a revenge with pure subjective reasons and criticisms. In which is still happening especially if the accusation was based on hate from certain arguments that leads to further investigation of a user's past and finding a little mistake out of it. Meanwhile, IMO, I still don't bother nor judge those who had gain negative trust while having positive trusts as well, because old and veteran users here in the forum often tends to see the validity of the reference of each flags first.

And you're right, CF must only be applied if and only if an inactive only had been active just for a negative feedback on someone. But still, opening a thread in reputation before red tagging a user either a feedback or a counter feedback is the best way to solve a certain issue.

Is it a good option para sa mga newbie? I mean kahit ako hindi masyadong nag-dideep dive sa mga lightning networks and wallets kasi kampante nako sa Coins.ph at iba pang mga segwit and non-custodial/hard wallets. if ever na itry man namin ito, what features does it have na wala ang mga common wallets na ginagamit natin ngayon? (syempre maliban sa Lightning-like speed of transactions nito and UX na sinasabi mong nagproprogress from time to time)

But still, I might check it out and soon kapag nahumaling din ako baka ipromote ko din ang paggamit nito sa iba lalo na dito sa forum! 

Indeed. bitcasino.io already had a bad image here in the forum and a newbie promoting and stating that its support help him with his fault is just ridiculous. If their system would be faulty and had a lot of security flaws, them rewarding the victims and those victims such as the OP is just a pure desperate action by the platform to gain back the forum users trusts. Also, if they were generous like that, I might be always tell them that I'm hacked or what, because that generosity isn't a good thing but rather a foolish move IMO.

Better link your bitcoin address or QR code (if your wallet offers such feature but you also need to indicate on your platform the use of the wallet you're using) on your platform/website yet it is only good for small businesses and one-at-a-time transactions. If you would do that, you might need to have connections with the sender first so that you could validate that they are the one who would send you the payment (which is a lot of work to do especially if you have a lot of payment incoming).

If you like to make it automated and just simply let the users transact and pay you while you didn't need to verify each transaction one by one, better asks or hire programmers in the Services board.

This wouldn't work mate. 50% is a huge deal for traders. Broker are much efficient and cheap as they would only get .25% of your earnings. So basically if we used your "automation" that made us lose, would you give us the 50% rebate of that loss? We'd rather work hard than use a bot that isn't verified nor popular, and give its maker a 50% part of the earnings. And if you really wanted to gain clients (in which you would find a hard time gaining here in the forum), better post this on Services as it fits your idea.

This offer is really funny and ridiculous. I mean, 50 freakin percent for a bot? Hell no! no hard feelings dude...

This was indeed a plagiarism. Paraphrasing is changing the whole context, from the positioning of the parts and figures of speeches to the whole context itself, onto your own vocabulary and your own word styling, AND indicating your idea's source (This is a common issue in academic papers and researches). The text you've accused didn't paraphrased at all, but rather synonymized ^[1] other words yet remains most of the literal words used, the idea, and the parts of speech.

---

[1] synonymize

What I found funny here is that Google Translator translates so off that you couldn't understand it well in your own language. In my case, if someone uses the translator and translates some English context onto Filipino, the proper construction of the sentences would be different and wouldn't be that understandable. And shouldn't be the local community be knowledgeable with the google translated articles?

But if there were really users that do such ridiculous activities, negative trusts isn't a fit for the issue, but rather a report or deletion, and a warning by the moderator. Negative trust should only be implied if and only if the user did not comply with the warnings (for the 3rd time/3rd offense), while if the user is already high ranks (in which they already know such activities is prohibited and never been tolerated in the forum), negative trusts upon 2nd offense would be fine..

Can you indicate here the apk codes that has the line that leads to that file? Knowing that it redirects to a google form then sends to the attacker wouldn't be enough, evidences such as screenshots or the real code will do.. The file you've indicated only is I guess a dummy file form. If they would use google, wouldn't it be that hard and difficult to link due to security measures of google?

Now I see why they only need network access permission, so that they could redirect the user's phrases input in the fake app.

It is the dream of most gamblers here, to somehow have a safe haven for their holdings. With the common volatility of decentralized cryptocurrencies, many find it difficult to have a certain and stable amount of their winnings. They might win a hundred dollars now, but the time they need it, it could be only 90.

Meanwhile, some would still find having stable coins unnecessary and unrealiable, due to the fact that having stable coins could also be risky (even riskier) as you couldn't expect that later it could cost half of its price today depending on the big time holders of that certain coin (with USDT, once the USDs price suddenly go down, then their holdings in USDT would be pretty off as well)

Both have pros and cons. It would only depend on how and when would the holder withdraw his holdings.

Pffrt already mentioned that he had slow internet connection at that time. This wasn't a bug but just a loading error. Try going to a certain bitcointalk page and instantly stop the process while it was loading (depends if you have a fibr optic connection in which you would have a hard time stopping at the right moment). Try it on threads that requires a lot of images to load such as signature campaign threads. You'll see that it wasn't a forum-wide bug, but rather a slow connection leading to slow load of website elements.

I don't really see the essence of taxing na may reason daw na "para sa pandemic" while the government already had trillions of donations from other companies and countries just for the support of the pandemic alone. Kaya sobrang mabubutasan ang gobyerno kapag nilapatan nila ng tax ang mga online businesses dahil sa issue padin ng utang ng bayan.

Meanwhile, agree naman ako na dapat nga may tax kasi business padin siya eh, a source of income na constant (unless malugi), and kaibahan lang is medium ng pag benta. Same idea lang naman ng online gambling vs land-based gambling, both has taxes to pay and dapat ganun din ang lahat ng businesses whether it is small, medium, or big. But what really bothers the FIlipino people is the funds and the reasoning of the BIR na "for pandemic". Dapat gamitin nila yung legitimate reasons nila, na it is really mandatory and para fair sa mga physical businesses na nalulugi din naman dahil sa pandemic.

Those years were already on the long run of success. Meanwhile, there would really be people whom could be scammed because they were fooled by other platform's offers which are often too good to be true. Nowadays, there were projects more specifically trading platforms that were just starting and trying to build an audience. Yes, your list is the far most reliable, yet there were also upcoming exchanges that were faster and better than those on the list but was just taking their first steps.

Also, there are features in some low-key trading platforms that wasn't on the list, while some platforms are better because they accept ICOs as soon as they registered. A inventor of a coin doesn't always afford such registration on famous exchanges.

Can you even try to translate those "evidences" you've posted? LOL it's just ironic that you were more pissed off than the OP, leading you to make accounts just to support your actions, all by yourself. If you wanted to show us proofs that you were right (100% impossible), better indicate valid evidences and not screenshots of your own local language and indicating insults that only says "st***d f***". Dude is eckmar holding the grievances here or you?

BTW, Flag supported. It is a desperate and subjective action trying to make yourself right by making alt accounts with no further proofs of your stand.

FLAG SUPPORTED!

I've also looked at the fake app's permission and it was too suspicious as it only requires full network access permission while most wallets needs almost everything, and the fake wallet app's features contradicts it's permission required. Also, its file size seems to only need its phishing activities to run as crypto wallet.


Good catch op!

How do you define Open-Source on you article? Because all I've read was just wallets that were just transparent and secured (some were not).

Open-source, in technological terms, is being defined as:

In which simply means that their application codes / source code must be free to download, access, and change for either an update, a bug fix, or an enhancement. Meanwhile, indicating that those wallets are open source without indicating it's github or code link is just a pure fraud and a clickbait.

If ever a wallet would be open-source, it can be used by other people to duplicate that wallet and pretend to be an original for their thefts and attacks. It would be ridiculous to have nor trust an open-sourced wallet as you would be vulnerable in many aspects, including your holdings to be exact.

I'm interested! Yet, I still haven't published my portfolio as some of my works have already been used for both commercial and personal purposes. I'll just shoot you a PM once I've done getting all my past designs that I've made. Looking forward to work with you as well!

There are instances that some topics are deleted, either by its maker or by the moderators. Meanwhile, locked topics only stays on what section/board it was posted. And the fact the it was locked, it will only be pushed down by the most recent topics. Though some weren't deleted, moderators often move those topics onto Archival or Off-topic (if the post was indeed off-topic in the section it was posted)


You can still view locked topics yet no one can bump nor reply onto it depending if the thread poster unlocked the topic to provide an update (if and only if he locked it in the first place). Meanwhile, if moderators locked your topic, you cannot do anything at all (but AFAIK you can delete it)