I have done it privately in ccex. On the forum it's not the same. I also have a small pool to work
no. just describe the changes to the code you've made. the fact that you're being hush about it (instead of just forking the original github repo and adding your changes) is a worry. or y'know, just saying what the changes are. |
|
|
|
The dev does not answer and does nothing
I made the change on my pool for a long time and since I'm sync on the official explorer as well as on nova
feel free to share the change, i'm interested to see what it is for sure. |
|
|
|
What do you suggest that we can do about it? It's not bitcoin's protocol fault that the chinese are lucky enough to be in a position where they get tons of cheap ass electricity. So unless you manipulate the protocol and intervene, it is what it is and we can do nothing about it, unless of course you want to start applying interventionist politics and start regulating the marketcap like I said before.
Nothing to do with their cheap electricity. The issue isn't so much the electricity, or the effective monopoly they have over there with the mining equipment, or the laggy GFC.. its the utter dishonesty displayed by the majority of the players over there. Mining each others headers (Antpool, F2pool, BW, BTCC, VIABTC all do it), submitting empty blocks, block withholding (particularly antpool), scavenging to include only the tx's with the best fees. It's actually embarrassing for most, but they don't care, its a living for them.
They don't play by the rules, its dishonest and to be blunt, cheap. |
|
|
|
Was a fork ever chosen? I thought people where getting on the c-cex chain to send coins? is other exchange still on another chain?
actually those checkpoints secure the blockchain (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194078.0) to prevent additional chains with really fast asics now the chain used by ccex and dutch-mining is off of the "official" one, but thats another matter if one wants to sync to the official chain i suggest using the addnodes provided by nova the other way round use those by ccex well aware of the reasons for having checkpoint blocks, just as well as their potential for abuse. trying connection 208.163.158.201 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 00000f8923e2585d5cbd
SetBestChain: new best=00000f8923e2585d5cbd height=1 trust=2097154 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/08/16 17:38:49
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 00000047b8d42ab011bc
SetBestChain: new best=00000047b8d42ab011bc height=2 trust=3145731 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:06:15
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 0000004b8b45189977df
* hyuck, we're gonna need minimum PoW 1e0fffff
SetBestChain: new best=0000004b8b45189977df height=3 trust=4194308 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:08:17
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 000000299fe41f7a5aa0
* hyuck, we're gonna need minimum PoW 1e09a06c
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof-of-work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
Misbehaving: 92.63.57.24:5556 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
disconnecting node 92.63.57.24
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
for the sake of being a team player, rather than a dick; check the 'hyucks' above. some debug code i've thrown in whilst attempting to sync against the 'official' nodes. block 4 needs to be 1e09a06c, but in xenixblockchain.com; it is listed as 1e0340dac-cex has been on the correct chain from the start; not sure what happened with nova. one page back. novaexchange runs a chain that doesnt currently sync with any source. just tried (2 minutes ago, with official dev source https://github.com/xenixcoin/xenixcoin.git):  i've forked the existing repo, fixed it and it syncs to c-cex's chain in minutes ( https://github.com/barrystyle/xenixcoin.git). even dev's own repo will sync to c-cex's chain if sufficient nodes are available. |
|
|
|
Good news will be announced on December, 30, the 3rd anniversary of Mooncoin,
regarding exchanges: of course it's important to have MOON listed on big exchanges, however if you don't want to sell your coins asap, there are more important things to do in the near future, e.g. building real Mooncoin infrastructure - a good task for 2017.
Infrastructure? Switch finally to federatedblockchain.eu.org (read the whitepaper) and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=901605.msg17196473#msg17196473
Greetz Steve so essentially, you're describing ditching mooncoin's own native blockchain and either encapsulating it into your chain/turning it into a token? we've already seen several rocky roads ahead of ethereum (DAO fork, upcoming PoS chain announcements), if this is your chosen method of implementation. what happens if your chain suffers a failure? james |
|
|
|
they're where you sent them. the past few pages in this thread are entirely about the fact c-cex and novaexchange are using different chains (c-cex one is correct). chalk this up to a life lesson and read next time. |
|
|
|
That's the problem with PoW, for sure Satoshi was not thinking about ASICs when he make the coin. And chinese or not, there's a lot of wasted electricity wasted on mining, on the other side some people don't have electricity.
Stealing? lol hope they stay in jail.
Satoshi used FPGAs (arguably less energy efficient) early on to find a large quantity of blocks. The issue isn't so much the electricity, or the effective monopoly they have over there with the mining equipment, or the laggy GFC.. its the utter dishonesty displayed by the majority of the players over there. Mining each others headers (Antpool, F2pool, BW, BTCC, VIABTC all do it), submitting empty blocks, block withholding (particularly antpool), scavenging to include only the tx's with the best fees. It's actually embarrassing for most, but they don't care, its a living for them. |
|
|
|
 haha.. |
|
|
|
Just go to coinmarketcap and go on xenix explorer.
Or on the first page of bitcointalk
And go on the official explorer
All the blocks miner on my pool we were paying
i dont doubt that you are; but you're on an invalid chain. whats an 'official block explorer'?  mine hasnt been deemed as royalty yet, has yours? |
|
|
|
there you go c-cex
Thank you. Synced to block 972 with blockhash 00000000000da716555b0167a05b9cd0fa44c99292db1d747d8a0da5ff9c4333 Wallet is open for deposits and withdrawals. awesome work c-cex; all balances have appeared  what we thought was a swift maneuver was just an exchange being careful. |
|
|
|
The good block is 1843
other than disagree, you've provided no basis for the 'good' block being 1843. i've debugged your code for you, corrected it and put on my github, given good sound reasoning as to why your chain is invalid and i've attempted to help your cause by getting a good known source out to the public. you don't change source code, modify nSubsidy, retarget algo (whatever you did) about 3 blocks into a coin launch; its just dodgy and noone will believe its for the greater good. with all that being said; better run home and tell yo mumma. |
|
|
|
actually those checkpoints secure the blockchain (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194078.0) to prevent additional chains with really fast asics now the chain used by ccex and dutch-mining is off of the "official" one, but thats another matter if one wants to sync to the official chain i suggest using the addnodes provided by nova the other way round use those by ccex well aware of the reasons for having checkpoint blocks, just as well as their potential for abuse. trying connection 208.163.158.201 lastseen=0.0hrs
received block 00000f8923e2585d5cbd
SetBestChain: new best=00000f8923e2585d5cbd height=1 trust=2097154 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/08/16 17:38:49
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 00000047b8d42ab011bc
SetBestChain: new best=00000047b8d42ab011bc height=2 trust=3145731 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:06:15
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 0000004b8b45189977df
* hyuck, we're gonna need minimum PoW 1e0fffff
SetBestChain: new best=0000004b8b45189977df height=3 trust=4194308 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:08:17
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 000000299fe41f7a5aa0
* hyuck, we're gonna need minimum PoW 1e09a06c
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof-of-work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
Misbehaving: 92.63.57.24:5556 (0 -> 100) DISCONNECTING
disconnecting node 92.63.57.24
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
for the sake of being a team player, rather than a dick; check the 'hyucks' above. some debug code i've thrown in whilst attempting to sync against the 'official' nodes. block 4 needs to be 1e09a06c, but in xenixblockchain.com; it is listed as 1e0340dac-cex has been on the correct chain from the start; not sure what happened with nova. |
|
|
|
Synced to what chain / height?
the correct chain (block 961), at this second. i say the correct chain, as the other chain is invalid (block 3 PoW incorrect). Thanks barry. How you been my aussie brother?!?!
good man, still using those antminers to save heating cost over winter good to see you around bud |
|
|
|
So what do the miners want? Wich chain to follow?
Because of the problems syncing to the "official" chain.
I suggest we follow chain with blockheight now ~956.
If not please provide proper source and nodes.
https://github.com/barrystyle/xenixcoinmodified pre-checkpoint with two 'honest' nodes set as seeds. have fun all. |
|
|
|
Yobit is a good trading platform. Why not try to get Moon on there? I trade iCoin on there and think that it is a very reliable platform. T  You never get fast updates there...But if u can handle that, why not? Greetz Steve Yobit is the internets arsehole of cryptocurrency. No quicker way to kill an altcoin. No thanks. |
|
|
|
We just update our wallet to latest from github but it does not sync. It was able to get 3 blocks and then stop. We tried to sync from scratch with fresh wallet.dat - same issue.
Here is what happening in debug.log for freshy launched wallet with empty data dir:
SetBestChain: new best=00000f8923e2585d5cbd height=1 trust=2097154 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/08/16 17:38:49
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 00000047b8d42ab011bc
SetBestChain: new best=00000047b8d42ab011bc height=2 trust=3145731 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:06:15
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 0000004b8b45189977df
SetBestChain: new best=0000004b8b45189977df height=3 trust=4194308 blocktrust=1048577 date=11/21/16 05:08:17
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 000000299fe41f7a5aa0
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof-of-work
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
After that it disconnects from node and does not get any new block. Anybody can suggest a solution?
About all deposits sent to C-CEX wallet. They are all valid and will be registered once we will be able to sync.
git clone https://github.com/xenixcoin/xenixcoin.git
cd xenixcoin
git checkout 4f64992f5d
cd src/leveldb
chmod +x build_detect_platform
make clean
make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
cd ..
make -f makefile.unix -j4
strip xenixd
root@harry:/usr/xenixcoin/src# ./xenixd -server -daemon -rpcuser=barrystyle -rpcpassword= -rpcbind=127.0.0.1 -rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 -datadir=datadir getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 956,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 703.28903794,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00068651,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 8400000,
"netmhashps" : 3843.00689259,
"netstakeweight" : 534.45401973,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
}
there you go c-cex; currently at block 956 with no extra prodding. dev's own nodes are giving out incorrect proof of work at block 3, but this gets ignored quickly as other legitimate hosts step in with the correct block data. ready... go! FYI 'git checkout 4f64992f5d' takes you to the source tree before bad checkpoints added by dev. |
|
|
|
|
from scratch it was only up to 344,000 blocks..
slightly more difficult to download directly to a shell with mega.nz, but got it going.. cheers mate!
|
|
|
|
Eagerly waiting for the new client. Appreciate all your hard work barrysty1e.
Keep waiting.... it takes a few minutes to make the client from the source code...barrystyle is just an other wannabe developer. My wish for the new year....let the original developer take back SUPER and make it SUPER again Jeez mate; for a while there i thought you'd become one of the good guys, shame.. now fuck off. All, Have just found Amazon shut down both my Super/Supercoinplus nodes in the midst of a rental disagreement (not to mention my Bitcoin node, as well as practically everything else). You may have noticed the main reliable node thats been around for the past few months, has disappeared. Not an issue; as Linode are fantastic, however for the Crosschain sends to work (good luck coding something like that proinvestor), I need to stand up a SuperCoin node with -txindex and block explorer which takes literally a week on its own. Does someone have a copy of the blockchain already indexed this way handy? Or is this going to be an extra long week  james |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
