Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 06:33:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
281  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: I am going to build a true random number generator ... on: April 08, 2014, 07:44:26 AM
Have you thought about a lavarand generator?  Wink


http://www.random.org/randomness/
282  Economy / Digital goods / Re: WTB $40 VISA giftcard on: April 05, 2014, 12:38:25 AM
You guys should PM John K, to move this deal forward. Hes well known for escrow.

Double lol!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516308.0

(Don't take advice from newbies!)
283  Other / Meta / Re: Picture of Theymos aka Michael Marquardt ? on: April 04, 2014, 06:18:18 PM
People here may be interested in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8954.0

And this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=512193.0
284  Other / Politics & Society / Re: You think MtGox's lost 850k btc is beyond comprehension? ... watch this. on: April 04, 2014, 06:05:16 PM
Just amazing....but the government lost ANOTHER 6 billion dollars!!


http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/04/04/6-Billion-Goes-Missing-State-Department


When is enough enough!?
285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Futurist talk about money revolution and mention bitcoin on: April 01, 2014, 10:33:11 PM
Futurist talk about the revolution of money and payment systems.  They include bitcoin in the article. 

I think I would hate walking into a store and by facial recognition they know who I am - and they are linked up to my bank/wallet! 


http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/01/a-revolution-in-money/?_php=true&_type=blogs&src=twr&_r=0
286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / IRS changes course declares bitcoin currency on: April 01, 2014, 09:50:17 PM
http://bitcoinmagazine.com/11909/irs-changes-course-declares-bitcoin-currency/

Government never gets things right.....especially on the first go around!  Glad to see they are taking another look at it.
287  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: A small contest to win 0.1 of Bitcoin on: April 01, 2014, 03:37:09 AM
Usually when a newbie posts some type of give-away it is totally bogus.  They either sucker you into giving them something (like your email address) or trick you into doing something.  Rarely do they ever come through on their promise.  Only way i would trust any of these give-always is if the money is held in escrow.   Otherwise I consider them scams.  Be careful on what you provide or what they are trying to have you do.   Remember, they are likely to have an alternative motive.
288  Economy / Economics / Re: Is it good to sell at low prices ? on: April 01, 2014, 01:46:45 AM
"Is it good to sell at a low price?"

It's definitely good.  In fact the lower the better.  You will make someone very happy!
289  Economy / Speculation / Re: BTC may never be this cheap again on: March 30, 2014, 08:18:21 PM
BTC may never be this cheap again... So I think it could rally from here, what you think.

I think a full member should know what belongs in the speculation section.

And how to move posts to proper section.
290  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin lost >50% of hashrate, what happened ? on: March 30, 2014, 05:41:32 PM
I've seen this exact thing before with the market cap graph. It's a glitch from blockchain.info...We will definitely see a decrease in hashrate due to this price drop but not that severe.


Mining rate is still holding strong so far.  It's up almost 20% since last adjustment.

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
291  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Bitcoin lost >50% of hashrate, what happened ? on: March 30, 2014, 04:38:08 PM

I believe it was forked multiple times and its pretty much game over now.  Also dont see how this relates to the BTC hash.
never mind, i were thinking that BTC lost hash rate while AUR received enormous hash rate. But apparently they aren't related.

Aurora is a scrypt coin.....has absolutely nothing to do with bitcoin hash rate.
292  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 06:23:06 AM
Damn foxpup....I just appologized and edited my previous threads to tone them down....then I saw your latest post.  Guess I need to reply....


Quote
Don't you think that any discussion on the subject would be more meaningful if you knew even the slightest thing about it?

The thread title is Quantum Computers isn't it?  Didn't notice cryptography in the title.


Quote
Entanglement is where two particles are known to have complimentary states, to preserve the symmetry, thus if a particle is observed to be in one state, the state of the other particle is immediately known, even if it cannot be observed, and there is no way for information about the first particle's state to be transmitted to the second particle. Spooky. This behaviour exists in classical physics, too: take a coin, slice it in half so that you have a head-half and a tail-half, put the coins in separate envelopes, and mail them to two different people. Whoever opens his envelope and discovers that he has the head-half instantly knows that the other person must have got the tail-half, even if the other person hasn't opened his envelope yet, and even if the envelopes were mailed in opposite directions at the speed of light, so there's no possible way that either party could know about the other envelope. But that's not as spooky.

Appears like you either copied and paste this from another site or you quickly read up on it.  But basically this is correct.  Your envelope example however is wrong.  Einstein used a similar analogy (Left and Right gloves) but was found to be wrong in later experiments with his example.  Here is a good 15 minute video explaining entanglement and proving Einstein was wrong with glove theory.
http://youtu.be/ZNedBrG9E90

If you did type this on your own then I would say you have a fairly decent knowledge.


Quote
There are only 2 states of a qubit. It can exist in a superposition of both states, but when it is observed, it will be found to be in one state or the other, with no way to predict which (though the probability can be known).

Wrong...qubits can be in any unlimited number of states (they spin).  Your back to talking quantum entanglement or the "Observed state."  (Left or right).  Magnets have two states (N & S)


Any way this is getting old....

Night!

293  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 04:58:35 AM
With all due respect singlebyte, foxpup sounds like he knows what he is talking about, and you definitely do not, at least on this topic.  Please stop the foolish arguments and let the people who want to learn (myself) do so from people with knowledge.

All right, I'll jump back in.  What part do you believe that I do not understand about quantum physics?  I may not be versed in cryptography as much but I guarantee I know quantum mechanics fairly good.  I doubt either of you know what quantum entanglement is or why Einstein called it spooky action at a distance?  Do either of you know how quantum entanglement could be used in a quantum computer?  Today's quantum computers are only using 3 states of a qubit.  What if they unlock all states of the qubit spin?  Did either of you even know current quantum computers can only solve the most basic math?  

---removed hostile tone remarks----

As you are right jonald this thread has got of course and we should stop hijacking it.  I will let it die.  On one last note, it does sound like foxpup does know cryptography fairly well.


-Edit-
Replying to jonald thread below (Didn't want to hijack thread with additional posts)

Jonald, you make good points and thanks for replying.  Regarding how the basics of quantum computer work you may find this article below useful.  It is easy to understand and follow.  It tells how "parallelism allows a quantum computer to work on a million computations at once" (depending on how many qubits used) And it discusses Shor's algorithm.   I think you may enjoy it:

http://computer.howstuffworks.com/quantum-computer1.htm


Foxpup...Apology for getting in argument over something so stupid.  I have edited my earlier thread to tone down the discussion.
294  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 03:58:39 AM
When the figure out how to harness quantum's potential then nothing will be safe.  Factoring or cryptography or any other math mathematical equation will be done in minutes.  Quantum physics suggest all solutions are attempted at once whereas a typical computer attempts to process a problem one step at a time until solved.
Quantum physics suggests no such thing. Where'd you get that idea? Quantum computers aren't magical. They are limited by the same laws of physics as any other computer. It is completely impossible for a quantum computer to brute force a private key. The two quantum algorithms of interest to cryptanalysists (Shor's algorithm and Grover's algorithm) are interesting because they are not a brute force approach, instead they are a mathematical shortcut, in the same way that, say, a preimage attack is a shortcut.

Shor's algorithm is only applicable to factorisation, or problems that can be generalised to factorisation. This includes most commonly used public-key cryptosystems, including ECC. However, there are public-key cryptosystems that cannot be broken this way, and Bitcoin could switch to such a system if necessary. Note also that no symmetic cypher or hash function is broken by Shor's algorithm.

Grover's algorithm is more general, but only speeds up the search by the square root of the keyspace, or to put it another way, the effective key size is halved. So a 256 bit key can be found in 2^128 steps instead of 2^256. However, 2^128 is still far too large to brute force, so 256 bit keys are still safe.

There's no such thing as magic.
Quote
Quantum physics suggests no such thing. Where'd you get that idea? Quantum computers aren't magical. They are limited by the same laws of physics as any other computer.

You might have misunderstood my comments in regards to quantum physics.  But let me just say a quantum computer could follow "Quantum Physics" and not the "same laws of physics as any other computer" like you mentioned.  (I would love to see a regular computer use quantum entanglement for data transfers....lol) People who know quantum physics will understand what I just said.

295  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 01:56:11 AM
Funny reading this thread.  Known quantum computers can barely do a basic problem a 1950 calculator could do but everyone still speculates.

15 = 3 x 5 is the most they can calculate at this time in the game.


But if they ever do figure out quantum computing, bitcoin could be hacked in under an hour.  It won't matter that the numbers are so large that typical computers would take longer than the age of the universe. Quantum computing essentially tries every possible solution at once.


http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/quantum-processor-calculates-15-3x5-about-half-time



Factoring numbers is one thing.  Solving a cryptographic hash is another.  What's the connection?


Point is, quantum computing is so early in the stage that they can't even do basic math.  When the figure out how to harness quantum's potential then nothing will be safe.  Factoring or cryptography or any other math mathematical equation will be done in minutes.  Quantum physics suggest all solutions are attempted at once whereas a typical computer attempts to process a problem one step at a time until solved.   

But there is no equation to undo a hash function.

Ok, I see what your getting at.  But there still is a solution (answer) to the problem.  And a theoretical fully working quantum computer could still try every possible solution at once.
296  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 01:39:50 AM
Funny reading this thread.  Known quantum computers can barely do a basic problem a 1950 calculator could do but everyone still speculates.

15 = 3 x 5 is the most they can calculate at this time in the game.


But if they ever do figure out quantum computing, bitcoin could be hacked in under an hour.  It won't matter that the numbers are so large that typical computers would take longer than the age of the universe. Quantum computing essentially tries every possible solution at once.


http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/quantum-processor-calculates-15-3x5-about-half-time



Factoring numbers is one thing.  Solving a cryptographic hash is another.  What's the connection?


Point is, quantum computing is so early in the stage that they can't even do basic math.  When the figure out how to harness quantum's potential then nothing will be safe.  Factoring or cryptography or any other math mathematical equation will be done in minutes.  Quantum physics suggest all solutions are attempted at once whereas a typical computer attempts to process a problem one step at a time until solved.   What was your point? (I think I missed it)
297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 30, 2014, 01:27:03 AM
Funny reading this thread.  Known quantum computers can barely do a basic problem a 1950 calculator could do but everyone still speculates.

15 = 3 x 5 is the most they can calculate at this time in the game.


But if they ever do figure out quantum computing, bitcoin could be hacked in under an hour.  It won't matter that the numbers are so large that typical computers would take longer than the age of the universe. Quantum computing essentially tries every possible solution at once.


http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-08/quantum-processor-calculates-15-3x5-about-half-time

298  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Quantum computer? So what! No worries...(?) on: March 29, 2014, 05:43:37 PM
Today's most advanced quantum computer can only solve:

15 = 3 x 5 (with about 50% accuracy)


We are a ways off from seeing the potential of quantum computers capabilities.
299  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Where is John K? on: March 27, 2014, 09:33:10 PM
looks like he is MIA.  See this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=412061.0

300  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: In 40 Hours already 4% of Iceland's population claimed their Auroracoins on: March 26, 2014, 08:11:47 PM
I call "bullshit" on the thread title.  I agree with BCX....probably less than .01%
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!