The priority will not be enough, it will probably just check the total of the highest paying 1MB worth of transactions and adds a few sats on top, which won't be enough in your case, of course, it will speed up the stuck transaction by a lot, but don't expect to get 1-5 block confirmation. I have not used this wallet but they mention "Full control over fees" on their website, which means if you dig a little you would find "custom" fees or something like that.

With that being said, if that isn't an option, you could either use a different wallet that lets you do so (assuming you have the keys to this wallet) or just use the priority option and wait for a few hours/days. Although since this is a relatively small amount ( compared to the fees you will have to pay) you could just ignore this transaction and send the "new funds" directly to Binance to do whatever you were planning to do with the old transaction.

I see over a 100MB of the transaction with fees above 3 sats/byte, chances are his transaction will eventually drop in two weeks or so.

OP, your only two options are CPFP and paid transaction accelerators such as Viabtc and Poolin, you need to run the math for both and see if any of those options makes economical sense to you, if not which is more likely - patience is king.



The current priority fee is 100 sat/byte, you paid 2.5 sat per byte for a 369-byte transaction so that's a total of 0.00000932 BTC, so you are short of 0.000369 BTC, paying 100 sat/byte for the child transaction won't guarantee your transaction to go through, you need to add that extra missing 0.000369 BTC so that the average fee of both transactions is 100 sats/byte.

Bitcoin is a great hedge against many things" almost everything you can possibly own".  So if you store your wealth in fiat it's almost guaranteed to lose value over the years, the other alternatives are either hard to actually own or can be owned but cost a lot to store, this gives bitcoin a huge advantage over everything else including gold, so in other words, even if you don't view bitcoin as a decentralized "be your own bank" invention, it's very naive to not see it as a great hedge against inflation.

By owning Bitcoin you can be sure to a great extent that in the coming years your wealth is going to be at least the same if not worth a lot more as opposed to owning fiat, and since Bitcoin has a very smaller market cap compared to the other "options" such as gold, it has a lot of room to outperform gold on the scale of probabilities, obviously, it's safer to just own gold but you will, in theory, be rewarded for the extra risk of owning bitcoin against gold or any other more stable/safer hedge.

As for becoming ultra-rich by investing in bitcoin, I am afraid you are a few years late to the party, diminishing returns is a real thing, and the days of investing $1000 to turn it into 1M in a few years are long gone, but that does not mean you can't become richer, it's just that you will need say 20M to get 100M in say 5-10 years, but if you don't already have that much - then there is probably no hope.

Remember BTC isn't a wealth making machine, people are expecting too much from BTC and I believe it's naive at best.

All of this is irrelevant if the voltage is outside of the 200-240v range, you mentioned that it works just fine with a single board plugged in, which also suggests that the PSU isn't capable of running all 3 hash boards, this is either caused by a bad PSU or bad voltage, since you tried different PSUs then it's most likely voltage issue.

Please use the code tag to paste kernel logs, my take on this issue is that you damaged all those 20 PSUs by feeding them improper voltage or any other electrical related issue, the PSU acts differently when plugged elsewhere gives more strength to the theory, to confirm/deny this theory use a PSU which has not been plugged in that "bad" area of the farm on one of the "bad" miners, obviously, the test should be done in a different outlet/area, chances are it will work perfectly fine, if not -- then there is even worse news, which I doubt for now.

I have reasons to believe that this isn't the case, just to stay on topic I rather not mention them here, but I can tell you one thing, it's probably the product ID difference, The 17 pro version has like 3 different product id's, not sure what the reference but it seems like it does reference a certain format in the hex stored on some microchip on each of those hash boards. So if you mix two boards with different product id's the control board will refuse to turn on both of them, you could check the kernel log and you will find the product ID represented in something like so


Or/And hexadecimal values on the PIC fw version:


If the hash boards have any different values, then they need some work done before they can mine using the same control board.

Please post the kernel log (I think it's has a different name on the Baikal Giant) as well as a screenshot of the miner status page, saying they "will not hash" without enough explanation will unlikely yield any proper answers.

The last couple of blocks were mined really fast, and we got a 2.9% adjustment, which isn't bad at all given that bitcoin price managed to get back to the 40k levels, which might also result in a slightly higher adjustment if it was to maintain these levels, current status:


The current pase is at 7% but obviously, we are still very early into this round, let's see how February treats us.

I am afraid you are a little bit too late, Bitmain already has their Antrack , Canaan also have their own, both solutions eliminate the need for air cooling altogether.

The liquid cooling will most likely consume a bit less energy than air cooling, but its initial cost could (most of the time) make it a lot less attractive, it's like solar vs grid, it's cheaper to run solar, but not everyone does so.

This whole mining business is probably going to come to an end in a few years, so unless someone is gambling with investor's money or have no clue about what they are doing - they would want to minimize their cost as much as possible, if I would ROI the liquid cooling investment in say a year or less, it would make sense, but if that takes me 5 or 10 years, I rather not,  so in other words, if I save $100 on energy per month but have to pay $10,000 for the liquid cooling infrastructure, it means I have to wait for 8 years to start receiving the rewards of my investments, do I want something like that? hell, no.

There MUST be other reasons added to the small potential energy-saving to justify the cost, those include but not limited to noise reduction and better cooling, but if I don't care about the noise and I know the chips I have will likely die "economically" faster than "physically" then even the better cooling aspect is worthless, of course, to someone who has a lot of free energy but he must keep the noise level very low, they would want to have a liquid-cooled farm.

LOL, not even sure if this a serious "accusation" or just a "joke" I surely don't have the greatest sense of humor., however, if you carefully read my post and the one which I replied to, you will see that I dropped a bomb of possitvity and optimism and explained "in some detail" how solo mining chances are not all that bad compared to the lotto as opposed to what has been mentioned in the post I quoted.

With that being said, I am sure you are not a newbie just as sure as I am of that fact that I am nowhere near experienced, we all are here to learn (maybe except for the other person you compared me to ).

Do you know what's even more ironic? I have always liked exstasie but I didn't really enjoy reading figmentofmyass's posts, it's "incredible" how one person may seem like a few, he indeed did a better job than "Kevin in the movie Split".

Sounds like a PSU related issue, what is the voltage you feeding the power supply of?

Keep in mind that while the latest firmware might fix it, it will be a lot harder to get rid of it, i heard that someone already found a way to uninstall the stock firmware and there is no confirmation on that yet, the latest firmware would in theory be even more difficult assuming they patched the first one.

You have to extract it from a working hash board, you might be lucky enough to find it online but i would bet against that.

If you don't have a good hash board to use then simply make a new topic and ask if someone can send it to you.

Well, you just did, I explained to you, the other members explained the matter in a different way but you still think that you are correct, it's sad that someone who registered here back in 2014 lacks a basic understanding of mining actually works, but if you feel good about yourself - it all that matters, numbers and law of physics are irrelevant.


Other than the obvious like your miner catching fire and all the stuff that you probably already know, there only risk is the power bill and the cost of the mining gear.


There are solid gears and some low-quality gears, you want to get the ones that can survive, not S9k, S9se, avoid the 17 series of bitmain altogether, just search the forum you'll find a lot of topics that discuss mining gears quality and robustness.

What data did you copy from one hashboard to another?? do you mean the DSPIC32 hex ? Zeusbtc also talk about the possibility that their own tool could result in an incompatible "code" and they have a tool to fix that, I think you can manage the same fix with PICKIT 3 (check the first topic I referenced).

How did you reset it? post a screenshot of the system over, or copy these details


Keep in mind that when you reset the miner your pool info will likely be deleted so make sure you enter them again.

It does not seem like you are accessing the miner, looks like a cashed page to me, can you try a different broswer?

Anyway, the first thing you have to do would be to get rid of the firmware, I am not sure about the uninstallation of HiveOS  but an Sdcard flash should do the trick, please follow this guide https://support.bitmain.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019493654-S9-series-S9-S9i-S9j-S9-Hydro-Control-Board-Program-Recovery.

اعتقد ان الامر متعلق بالقوانين, هده المنصة مرخصة وفيها يتم تداول معظم العملات وليس فقط الكريبتو, لهدا مايتم تداوله في هده المنصة هو مايعرف ب derivative وهوا مثل العقد مشتق من السلعة نفسها, يعني وكأنك تراهن على صعود او هبوط اسعار الكريبتو بدلا من شرائها وبيعها فعليا, وهدا يجعل من الاجراءات القانونية اسهل بكثير من التعامل مع العملة نفسها, تماما مايحدث عند شرائك لذهب من احد المنصات فأنت لايمكنك ان تسحب ارباحك من الذهب وعليك تحويلها الى دولار مثلا وسحبها لحسابك في البنك.



لقد صعد اجمالي الشورت الى حوالي 1.6 مليار دولا وعاد لينخفض الى 1.3 مليار, في المقابل يوجد حوالي 500 مليون لونق يعين ان الفارق حوالي 700 مليار, هده طبعا الارودرز المصنفة على انها تتبع الهيدج فاندز فقط, ويمكن الاطلاع عليها بتفاصيل اكثر هنا https://www.theblockcrypto.com/data/crypto-markets/futures/open-interest-of-cme-bitcoin-futures-by-trader-category-short

This is a good point but based on this theory and regardless of his set-up the worst result that would come out of an IP conflict would be 1 miner going offline, also if the laptop was using the gateway address as its own IP it can't possibly affect the router the way OP describes.

It's most likely this



If it's logged in then it's connected to the network, and thus is using bandwidth, I would refrain from using the word bandwidth to clear a lot of confusion, and let's call it "traffic", there is an on-going connection between the laptop and the router as long as they are connected, even if it was sitting there doing nothing, also, it could be doing something in the background such as windows/antivirus update, unless you closely monitor the router's inbound and outbound traffic you can't tell.

With that being said, if your laptop caused that then it's very likely that either your router or internet speed is pretty must at a critical level, so the slightest extra traffic will again cause the same issue, you might want to get a proper router and perbaps a better internet connection, you can't tell where the problem actualy is unless you troubelshoot it.

You have to post the complete kernel log, and a screenshot of the miner's status page. posts in old topics can be hardly spotted, you should start your own topic and provide all the details needed to troubleshoot it.



This could be a voltage issue, what is the voltage at home and at the farm? S9es PSU's aren't very sensitive to voltage, but if the PSU is bad and not yet dead then voltage drop will affect it, you may troubleshoot this by trying a different PSU in the farm.