.... yes that is very strange to see this kind of transaction, sorry to see this one,  how this hacker was quick in this transaction just delay of 1 minute ? I do not know, it is really strange. I've had much more btc in that wallet in the past. And I only fire up my VM to check my electrum which isn't that often. WHY ME AND why now. This is bullshit!
Have you downloaded something of strange in the past days/weeks? |
|
|
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x? No, he wants: I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts? That wasn't the answer I was looking for! Why does he want to make it when we already have one which isn't even confusing and seems very good! Either You didn't answer OR I didn't get it  He wants to create a page like the Mitch's thread ...not here in the forum but on http://bitsig.website. He does not want to 'run a bot for all the campaigns'. I think I have answered but you cannot understand (or most probable I can't explain better). |
|
|
|
Another one that wants to buy a vps  , if you will be able to provide a valid collateral I will lend you those 0.20 bitcoins. |
|
|
|
This is why I keep saying we need some form of crypto legislation to ensure consumer protection in the crypto world.
No, I do not think it is needed a 'regularisation" ... it will destroy the concept of all the cryptoCurrency world. We only should to know what 'we are doing' that's all!
I know that some people do not have some knowledge, and this is the problem here... however thanks to the OP for the warning. |
|
|
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x? No, he wants: I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts? |
|
|
|
This decision in my honest opinion is really a bad decision, because the bitcoin foundation should never be existed. It is a central organization, and bitcoin does not a central org. if some programmers want to help & contribute he should not be paid (but he can receive 'donation' from all the bitcoiners). I don't really see this is being particularly important. Who cares if they decide to add or remove Satoshi as their "founding member"? Satoshi left the Bitcoin community in early to mid-2011 and the Bitcoin Foundation was created in late 2012. By then, Satoshi had not been seen or heard from for nearly two years. He never asked to become a member nor did he ever have the opportunity to contest his inclusion into the foundation. If his name was to be removed as a founding member, the only real difference would be few less dark pixels on a screen. Maybe you are right, he has never asked to be a member of the bitcoin foundation but I am still thinking that foundation should not exist. |
|
|
|
What do you think? It would be updated much more frequently than the current thread and be easier to sort through.
I think it will be good if we have 2-3 page with all the signature campaigns, maybe you can write and add a form when the 'maintainers' of the signature campaigns can request the addiction of their sig. campaigns (and you will review only the data and confirm). |
|
|
|
Where is the problem if the bitcoin price will go down and down  ? I remember that an user said (here in the forum) : "we are bitcoiners!" I personally think that the problem will present when the bitcoin price will be 0 (zero) dollars, until that moment it is not a problem. |
|
|
|
If he is online and he doesn't actually owe the money then the least he can do is deny the charges against him. A better scenario would be for him to address the allegations and resolve them.
OR maybe he has already replied to him through a personal message, who knows? However I also do not think he has never scammed any users here in this forum (most probable a mistake). |
|
|
|
No reason to get upset.
We're not dealing with legacy trust systems of yesteryear, Vod. No! This paradigm-shifting, game-changing disruptive technology is on the tipping point of turning into a Black Swan. Revolutionary stuff, Vod, not to be rushed.
As soon as our legal team irons out the last few kinks and gives us the go-ahead, it's ON, it's Showtime!
Now then...
Will you be purchasing this Trust for your personal use, or as a gift for A Special Someone?
I'm not upset. I'm just calling you a bullshitter.  And I'm done feeding the troll. Vod, this isn't just any troll. And this is satire worthy of Jonathan Swift. Why am I the only one to see it?! Am I wrong? Exactly. The satire here is quite clever. Personally, I really think that the meaning behind the OP's suggestion ought to be addressed. How is it okay to purchase an account with positive trust but not okay to just directly purchase the trust? What's the principled difference there? I think the difference is when you are buying a forum account you buy all the forum account (so also the positive, negative and neutral trust // with all his history). The problem is the "practice", and it is obviously that is not so intelligent buy directly trust when you can buy a "green forum account". |
|
|
|
|
It is obvious, I also think that maybe the Anarchism is better than the actual 'democracy' (if we can call it in that way). If I can add a thing, the US government is everything that you want but it is not a democracy government (also if you know that people is voting a president).
|
|
|
|
If you will be able to provide a valid collateral I will give you surely the loan , however you should be 'crazy' if you are asking a loan of 5-10 btc without providing a valid collateral. |
|
|
|
Simple, I have voted no. Cloud mining it is not more reliable or better profitable. Why? Because they are only a ponzi schemes and they don't have that 'power hash' of calculation. Cloud mining still better than normal mining They already set miners for their customer & usually has lower electricity & maintenance fee than normal mining, so you can safe your time & money But, it's difficult to got profit from both of them Who is that take profit from cloud mining, only the creator(s) of that 'service". Again, not true, cloud mining can be profitable if you know what to do and devise a smart reinvesting strategy. Reinvesting? not true, the one that will got profit is the operator and also those who are the early depositor, assuming that the cloud mining is still running until the early deposittor reach their ROI, still it is not a guarantee that your reinvesting plan or the early depositor will get profit if the operator run away Voted NO for the poll, better to stay away from cloud mining Even, the operator won't run away Reinvesting is bad idea, since mining bitcoin will become harder & you might not reach ROI next time If you already got profit, keep itIt is obviously that reinvest the cloud profit profit in the cloud mining site. Again : cloud mining is not a profitable thing, also if you know what you are doing . If the "*home mining" is not profitable, how the cloud mining will be profitable (* only if you have free energy and hardware machine). |
|
|
|
bitcoin isn't ready, but it's not so much about the security aspects as about ease of use, ease of understanding and ease of obtaining bitcoins. You need to get people to understand what bitcoin is, and have an easy way to obtain a decent amount of it. Having do to faucets or sign campaigns for dust doesn't help, because people can't get enough to actually use bitcoin to buy anything.
There needs to be a must stronger bitcoin infrastructure and awareness before bitcoin can go mainstream.
So the problem is the value of the bitcoin itself, and the knowledge... am I right? I'm still thinking that bitcoin will never go mainstream because it was not created to 'go mainstream' but to be a good and alternative way (respect all the FIAT currencies and especially the actual economic system). |
|
|
|
Simple, I have voted no. Cloud mining it is not more reliable or better profitable. Why? Because they are only a ponzi schemes and they don't have that 'power hash' of calculation. Cloud mining still better than normal mining They already set miners for their customer & usually has lower electricity & maintenance fee than normal mining, so you can safe your time & money But, it's difficult to got profit from both of them Who is that take profit from cloud mining, only the creator(s) of that 'service". |
|
|
|
under profile information( in your profile), there is "go here" click on thaty
Only Full member and above can add an avatar, so he cannot add one .
OP, you can only wait to be Full member (rank) or you can buy a forum account in the digital section. |
|
|
|
Non è contro il regolamento avere più di un account, ma comunque già che ci siamo scrivilo pure nel titolo... non si sa mai  . Accetti ricarica postepay 'fatta' online?
L'indirizzo bitcoin è tuo, giusto? Allora con un semplice messaggio firmato (utilizzando quell'address) metti a tacere tutti . |
|
|
|
I think you can only attempt to reset one password per 45 second period (based on IP address). So unless you have access to a large number of IP addresses then this would probably not actually work.
I know the SMF forums, you don't need more than 1 ip. And the developers don't think that it is a bug XD. Well considering that you are asking for ~$1.60 worth of Bitcoin, I somewhat doubt that you have put any kind of effort into this. It honestly sounds more like a donation scam to me. If it helps the forums why it is scam? I already knew this bug, that is all. You don't will find this bug in google!, i found it by myself. Have you sent a PM to theymos? if this is a bug I am sure he will send you a 'good bounty', maybe check also this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309785.0 (the rules part). |
|
|
|
I don't agree. Bitcoin's problem is not fiat but the lack of mass adaption. This however results from too few useful real life applications which using Bitcoin. It is too hard to get into all this Bitcoin stuff when you don't have a technical background or interest. tldr version?
Bitcoin's problem is fiat. And people don't care because they want higher fiat prices. The lack of mass adoption is a consequence of the 'lack of knowledge' and we know that some people don't want to learn and don't like the "new technology" so I think this is another problem. The problem I see with bitcoin is what the hell is taking the Willy bot so long to come back. That would surely shut everyone up. You want moon?? There! Good job Willy! Everyone happy. Willy says fuck ya'll.
Then we can say the problem for bitcoin is the willy bot, and that bot used a lot of FIAT currencies... so the problem is the FIAT 'part' . I think we have a problem! Get Willy to pump BTC to over 10,000 USD. These threads and bullshit opinions about the problems of BTC... GONE! Everybody will start counting their benjamins. I think you're right. On the long run this is what 90% of the people in here want.  It is normal, everyone want the equivalent in FIAT currencies (dollar, euro, etcc) no one at the end want really to 'own' or have bitcoin, because bitcoin is nor mainstream. It is a normal 'thought', and don't blame me . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
