A moderator of this board made some software that can create such transactions (Replace-By-Fee transactions). It's available at this link, but it requires some technical skill to use.
I seriously doubt that OP's transaction is an opt-in RBF transaction, and even if it was he can easily do it through Electrum itself and no need for another tool. and also achow101 tool is not only for RBF transactions it works for any kind of transaction. Perhaps I should have written double spend instead of Replace-By-Fee transaction. However I chose to use achow101's terminology because I linked to his software's thread that uses the umbrella term "Replace-By-Fee transaction" to mean both Opt-in RBF and double spend. My point is his software can create double spend transactions to speed up stuck low fee transactions. He specifically includes electrum in his list of wallets that do not allow you to make double spends (which he terms RBF transactions). Attempting a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transactionWhat is an RBF transactionA Replace-By-Fee transaction is a transaction that is nearly identical to your stuck transaction but pays a higher transaction fee. Since the original transaction most likely does not use Opt-in RBF, the RBF transaction that we will be creating will be considered a double spend and marked as such. The transaction uses Full-RBF and thus may still take a little bit longer to confirm as it is technically a double spend. How to make an RBF transactionMaking a RBF transaction depends entirely on the wallet that you are using. Some wallet support the advanced functionality required to make an RBF transaction, others do not. *snip* Wallets that do not allow you to or ones that I don't know how to make RBF transactionsNot all wallets support the creation of RBF transactions. Many wallets do not allow clearing all unconfirmed transactions to allow for making RBF transactions. The following is a list of wallet software which do not support RBF transactions. If a wallet on this list does support RBF transactions, please let me know and provide instructions for that so I can add it above. - Blockchain.info and web wallets in general
- Electrum
- Mycelium
- MultiBit Classic
- Bitcoin Wallet for Android
- Breadwallet
- Copay
achow101 is not the moderator of this board. ThomasV (Developer of Electrum and my above comment) is.
My point was achow101 is trustworthy because he is a moderator. Being pedantic he is a moderator of both the Development & Technical Discussion board, and its Alternative clients child board (sub-board), but not this grandchild board (sub-subboard). This link explains the semantics of simplemachines boards. http://wiki.simplemachines.org/smf/SMF2.0:BoardsCount child's posts in parent's totals - Checking this option will mean that posts and topics in a board's child board (sub-board) will count toward its totals on the Board Index. This does not include grandchild boards (sub-subboards). Using pedantic sematics this board is not a board, it's a grandchild board (sub-subboard). |
|
|
|
The testnet has also channels, but the channel manager doesn't work yet, so you can't do anything interesting with the channels at the moment, unless you copy paste it, so your counterparty can sign it too.
Expect the first state-channel smart contract using our new channel-manager in the next few days. The governance and naming part and lots of other good stuff will come afterwards.
Is the first state-channel smart contract using your new channel-manager available yet? |
|
|
|
Have you tried using the "Rescan Account" option after selecting the account under accounts? Apparently that fixed some similar problems reported on the mycelium github by people upgrading. https://github.com/mycelium-com/wallet/issues/142I had many transactions with labels but now I only have 2 transactions. Mycelium was updated today from some version to v2.1.0 on my Nexus 5. What happened? Can I get my old transaction history back? I found my answer. "Rescan Account" option after selecting the account under accounts. Now I have all of account history back. Thanks for the comment, dmp1ce. I also had to rescan my account after upgrading to 2.1 to get my account history and transaction comments back. Why did this happen? |
|
|
|
Yes, I have enabled signatures. For me it desn't looks annoying. Contrary, I like signatures because it gives some colours to forum  I have them enabled. I thought it helped with ad revenue for the forum. Isn't that what Theymos has written when you go to disable them? And I think you need to be a senior member to be able to turn them off no? Or is it full member?
You are not right. Signatures doesn't helps for the revenue of forum. Forum are getting revenue from ad slots, which is different thing: https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adinfo. And you don't need to be full or senior member to disable signatures. Yes, ads are different to signatures. Theymos auctions off ad space each week, and pays the moderator's wages with the auction revenue. Only Hero/Legendary members, Donators, VIPs, and moderators can disable ads. This is a quote from theymos's latest ad space auction.
Ad blocking
Hero/Legendary members, Donators, VIPs, and moderators have the ability to disable ads. I don't expect many people to use this option. These people don't increase the impression stats for your ads.
This is the setting for disabling ads that Hero/Legendary members, Donators, VIPs, and moderators have. I never disable ads because they don't bother me, and the forum needs the revenue from them.  This is the setting for disabling signatures, although I'm not sure what bitcointalk member ranks have it.  This is what I see with ads enabled. You can see the yobit ad below someone's signature.  This is what I see with ads disabled. You can't see the yobit ad anymore, but the signature's stil there.  |
|
|
|
Good morning Bitcoinland.
I see our little profit-taking/consolidation/beartrap seems to be pretty much finished and we're creeping back up again... currently $1165USD (Bitcoinaverage).
Time to get back over $1200 and set our sights on the old Gox ATH (for those who care) and more importantly, gold ounce parity.
Go Bitcoin go.
It just jumped up to $1182 on stamp. Now the old stamp and finex ATHs are broken again. If we can push above $1200 there's a realistic chance of breaking that gox ATH when the banks open tomorrow. |
|
|
|
petty perhaps..but then again I have no life...what this as a 'gimmie' (I'm on here an't I ......thus rest my case of needing lame stuff like this......life wise)  You have almost 100 Bitcoins. If the price rises by 5x you can buy yourself a life like bender. |
|
|
|
that is not going to work. Electrum is not "re-broadcasting" the transaction. the nodes are. Electrum is just getting the transaction from them. it calls the node that it connects to and asks what transaction belong to my pubkey and then tell it this and that and this is unconfirmed. (*) this means even if you delete,.... restore,... you still get the transaction as unconfirmed in your wallet and still can not spend the funds. a weird way that i can think of would be making a raw transaction with the same outputs with a different tool and then restore your wallets offline to sign the transaction and broadcast it online through somewhere that allows you to double spend. i say offline to eliminate the (*) step above p.s. there may be easier ways such as using the console but i am not familiar with it. A moderator of this board made some software that can create such transactions (Replace-By-Fee transactions). It's available at this link, but it requires some technical skill to use. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1506632.0The software will take the raw hex of a transaction, ask the user for some information, and create an unsigned transaction which can be signed outside of the program. Then the signed transaction can be broadcast from the software.
|
|
|
|
|
It's going back up to the old bitstamp ATH. I doubt the dump won't last long. After the banks open on Monday it will probably break above the gox ATH.
|
|
|
|
https://themerkle.com/r3-admits-defeat-stops-blockchain-development/In a presentation about the R3 Corda, R3CEV engineers, developers and researchers stated “No ‘block chain’ because we don’t need one,” admitting that the utilization and implementation of blockchain doesn’t fit their vision and more importantly, technological compatibility. In terms of the price a bit of correction is happening at the moment. Well that's ok. Let the machine cool off for a while before shifting back to full throttle. Less than a week ago we had yet to break the bitstamp and bitfinex ATHs. Since then we have bounced below and above them a few times, and we might continue bouncing above and below them for another week or two. Eventually we will break the fake Gox ATH, but this time with real trades, not fake willy bot trades on an exchange that won't let you withdraw fiat. Ironically when the Gox ATH breaks on the Chinese exchanges it will be on exchanges that won't let you withdraw Bitcoins, and that should be suppressing the price. |
|
|
|
The meeting is 11 of March right?
That means we have exactly 2 weeks from now. Is this normal for USA to hold such meetings on Suturday? it's working day?? and result will be same day or need also wait?
That's the decision deadline. There's no associated meeting. They might already have made up their minds. Falling on a Saturday is a bit of a weird move indeed. I've read elsewhere that no ETF has ever passed by doing nothing, which is what some people are expecting here, and there's no way something so new and complex would pass like that either. We'll know either way before that Saturday I expect. Absolutely no way ETF goes through. But you think it will have an effect? Why should it makes btc rate drop? Any correct trader knows the chances are low no? I remember there was a crash after one of the US marshals auctions, and most of us expected a crash after another, but there was a rally instead. It's difficult predicting Bitcoin's price movements, and it often does the opposite of what's expected. There could even be a pump after an ETF rejection, although most of us expect rejection to lead to a dump. |
|
|
|
Similar problem.
TxID:
32a5754a7b9064a7f07a6a762dc9c9182579e520f4b5b48f8ce8f939a2cbda94
433e8212f87b65f35486783a4d2b428ea1bc8bcaaa50396a1b65e6e017187e95
Sent 3days ago. Still not confirmed. Any suggestions?
In my mind the best way is to cancel these two transactions. Is it possible?
I submitted them at this page, and it accepted them. Now the viabtc mining pool will include them in the next block it mines if they are still unconfirmed by them. https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/This page shows the most recent blocks viabtc mined, it can give you an idea of how long you will have to wait. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/viabtcHuge thanks! One more thing that both my transaction has a fee of 0.05mBTC, while the accelerator says they only accept transactions with more than 0.1mBTC fee. So why is my transaction accelerated? The accelerator requires a minimum 0.0001BTC/KB fee, which is different to the total fee. The total fee paid is the size of a transaction multiplied by the BTC/KB fee. The viabtc accelerator requires a minimum 0.0001BTC/KB fee. The blocktrail explorer shows one of your transactions has a fee of 0.00026455 BTC/KB which is more than double the accelerator's minimum. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/433e8212f87b65f35486783a4d2b428ea1bc8bcaaa50396a1b65e6e017187e95Blocktrail shows your other transaction has a fee of 0.00022222 BTC/KB, which is also over the accelerator's minimum requirement. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/32a5754a7b9064a7f07a6a762dc9c9182579e520f4b5b48f8ce8f939a2cbda94 |
|
|
|
Similar problem.
TxID:
32a5754a7b9064a7f07a6a762dc9c9182579e520f4b5b48f8ce8f939a2cbda94
433e8212f87b65f35486783a4d2b428ea1bc8bcaaa50396a1b65e6e017187e95
Sent 3days ago. Still not confirmed. Any suggestions?
In my mind the best way is to cancel these two transactions. Is it possible?
I submitted them at this page, and it accepted them. Now the viabtc mining pool will include them in the next block it mines if they are still unconfirmed by them. https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/This page shows the most recent blocks viabtc mined, it can give you an idea of how long you will have to wait. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/viabtc |
|
|
|
If your transaction has a fee below the minimum 0.0001BTC/KB fee the ViaBTC accelerator requires you can send a pm to either kano or macbook-air. Both of them have access to big mining pools. wel i have the same problem i send message to both, this is the message i got from kano " No idea where you read it, but I didn't say that." so i dont know why u say that ? Sorry for my mistake, mocacinno suggested contacting kano together with quickseller or macbook-air, so I assumed kano sometimes helped confirm stuck transactions.
A last option would be to contact quickseller or macbook-air or kano on this forum and offer a reward if one of them includes your tx'es in a block they're currently solving.
You could also try contacting Quickseller. There is a thread stickied at the top of the technical support board that says Quickseller has access to F2Pool's transaction selector which can help confirm stuck transactions.
Ask a miner for helpSome mining pools and miners offer services to allow you to prioritize your transaction in their mempool so that it is chosen sooner for inclusion in a block. You can contact the users Quickseller and macbook-air. These two users have access to F2Pool's transaction selector and they can help you with confirming your stuck transaction. |
|
|
|
I am sending it from my jaxx wallet "which changes some other crypto curruncies into bitcoin" to somw website which still waiting the payment confirmation, So I do not know where the dust come from of what does it means!!
What can I now ?? waiting the load to be decreased or ask someone to add it manually on his pool ?? or if there another solution
You could wait a long time until the network forgets about your transaction, or you could try sending a pm to either Quickseller or macbook-air. Both of them have access to big mining pools, and either of them could include your transaction in the next block their pool mines. However they might charge some money to include it. Another option you might try is creating and broadcasting a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transaction, Not all wallets can create a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transaction, and I don't know if your Jaxx wallet can create them as I am not familiar with it. Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transactions and other options are explained in this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0A tool and instructions for making a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transaction are available at this link. Achow101 made the tool, he's a bitcointalk staff member and one of the moderators of this board, so he's trustworthy. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1506632.0You need to control the sending address's private key to create a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transaction. This quote from the jaxx website says you control its keys, so it might be possible to create a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) double spend transaction using a jaxx wallet. However I'm not familiar with jaxx so I can't be sure. All keys are created on your local device and never sent to any servers. This means you have full control of your wallet and Jaxx neither holds nor has access to |
|
|
|
|
All your transactions were confirmed in a block mined by ViaBTC at 02:15 UTC time. Does either of your wallets show them as confirmed now?
|
|
|
|
creating new wallet using seeds did not work.
Changing server too. Transaction still appears on the list.
My other transaction got canceled too, but did not rebroadcast yet.
Tried transaction accelerator, got accepted, nothing so far, but has only been 1 hour.
You will probably have to wait until viabtc mines a block before your transaction gets confirmed. Sometimes it mines successive blocks very quickly, but sometimes there can be gaps of over 12 hours between the blocks it mines. You can see a list of the latest ones, and the times they were mined at the page linked below. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/viabtc |
|
|
|
If your transaction has a fee below the minimum 0.0001BTC/KB fee the ViaBTC accelerator requires you can send a pm to either kano Quickseller or macbook-air. Both of them have access to big mining pools. |
|
|
|
The bitcointalk image proxy won't show those images, but it shows images uploaded to https://postimage.io/. I tried submitting those transactions to the viabtc mining pool's transaction accelerator, but it's over its hourly limit. Keep trying to submit the transaction IDs below every hour until it accepts them. Afterwards the viabtc mining pool will include your transactions in the next block it mines, and get them confirmed. 62fdcfd0d6e88dc58184561bebaac1c111495615d01ec1a9e0025d81fa6a3f2c 448f06a7b76176bedbe5f91c32959996bd518882cfe6c197f45cac1533ca4b51 cd5a5f8fcca7738f78c120f1d43bafaaa28101df5b179167a1f972277b7652ba https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ The Bitcoin network's very busy today, normally you wouldn't need to use the transaction accelerator. editI tried submitting your transactions to the accelerator again, and it accepted them all. You don't need to do anything now. Viabtc will include your transactions in the next block it mines, and confirm them for you, provided no other pool confirms them first.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
