Bitcoin Forum
June 18, 2024, 03:24:30 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 [156] 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 »
3101  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 18, 2014, 02:19:33 PM
The only thing I ask of is a regular and truthful update, to know where we are standing at. With that, I prefer a pessimistic estimation over an optimistic one.
I shouldn't be impossible to drop to the forum once a week at least and give us a short update, no matter where you are. If there are delays, that's the way it is, but please tell us about it as soon as you know it. If there's good news, please tell us about it. If there is no news at all, which is unlikely, please tell us about it.

Again, I am grateful that someone is building that miner for me, as I'm more the software guy than the hardware one. I appreciate their efforts and I think their miner will be a good one. But they really need to improve on their communication, which lacked from the very beginning.

I hear you. But that't the thing, they need new orders, the need capital.
That's why the will never admit the real condition of their business, in fear that it will scare away the much needed new customers.

It's a vicious cycle with bitmine.ch everywhere I look. How is a customerprotection plan going to help when it WORSENS the situation for everyone next in line?

It's a mess.
3102  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 16, 2014, 04:28:47 PM
EDIT: The information below is wrong, please see updated information here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291141.msg4972393#msg4972393


or TL;DR;

take the first day of your batch week.

You should get an email on that very day, telling you the device has been handed over to a shipment company.

If you do NOT recieve this email, you can start counting the delay days from that first day of the batch week.

As simple as that.


Can someone from bitmine confirm this also here on the forum please?
3103  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 16, 2014, 04:25:32 PM
Was anyone given an exact "agreed shipping date"? I've been trying to get that from them for my order, and it seems they are trying to avoid stating an exact day. This date was supposed to be set at the time the order entered the shipping queue, because the CPP is based on a number of days after the "agreed shipping date". If they are able to fudge that date later, they can avoid giving additional hardware or refunds.

EDIT: The information below is wrong, please see updated information here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291141.msg4972393#msg4972393


The way I understood it and had confirmed by bitmine on the phone is that you have ..

a) the agreed week of your batch. Say february first week.

b) So you go and take the first day of this week.

c) you add 10 days to this first day of that week. (allowed delay for shipment)

d) you get a clear day when the Customer Protection Plan is triggered, should you not have yet recieved your device on first day of week + 10.



Bitmine will absolutely inform you once the device is on the way, meaning it has been handed over to ups or dhl or whatnot for shipping.
Should you not have recieved the device within first day of week PLUS 10 days for shipping, you can apply for additional moduls should there be an overlap.

Should the delay be large enough , two weeks or more, you can expect the additional moduls to be shipped TOGETHER WITH your initial order, and NOT separately.

Now what can happen and what the bitmine guy on the phone was pointing at, was that ... should they recognize that the delivery will get a few days too late to you, because they are at day 9 after the first day of your week, they will simply add the moduls because there is NO WAY in the world the device will get to you in time.

I agree it's a little wishy-washy when it comes to this overlap in the first 10 days. But they clearly state that ONLY 10 days for shipment are allowed. And the FIRST DAY of the week is to be taken as starting point.

So I believe you can do the calculation, should you recieve an email that says: "Order shipped, here is transaction id"...


3104  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 11, 2014, 04:38:47 PM

just simply DONT USE craptsy...

The trade volume there on DVC / LTC is huge.

It has its problems - but it is also the largest cryptocurrency exchange out there.

I agree. That's free market for you.

All the wrongdoings and problems that appear with cryptsy give other developers the opportunity to create a better exchange and grab market share away from cryptsy.

It will sort itself out sooner or later. :-)
3105  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 08, 2014, 06:03:18 PM
1 Coincraft desk 1 TH/s has 50 chips x 190 devices from the backlog = 9500 chips

How did you find out how many devices were ordered and are in backlog? Did they tell you?
Are they so open about their order book? I didn't dare to ask them about that.


http://bitmine.ch/?p=497
http://bitmine.ch/?p=669

both batches could not deliver them due to missing avlonchips
for these non-delivery could bitmine anything!


But those are past devices from half a year ago. But I see your point.
3106  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 08, 2014, 05:30:29 PM
Just thought to let Devcoin owners know that tagcash.com is now live for trading of Devcoin against multiple other coins, as well as 9 fiat currencies. No transaction charges.

hm, this is one of those sites where you just see a login screen with no additional information whatsoever.

Hey, I would have liked to find out what's that all about and how it can help devcoin, but now I am not going to.

3107  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 08, 2014, 05:26:08 PM
1 Coincraft desk 1 TH/s has 50 chips x 190 devices from the backlog = 9500 chips

How did you find out how many devices were ordered and are in backlog? Did they tell you?
Are they so open about their order book? I didn't dare to ask them about that.
3108  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 08, 2014, 04:10:57 PM
Prices are set in USD

You will get refunds in USD... they convert BTC into cash to keep their budget predictable with factory expenses etc. It makes sense...

And think the other way round: if BTC falls back to 200, you will still get what you paid in USD, no loss.

Yes of course. I was asking them because they don't say that on their site. They simply state you will get your money back after 60 days.
They don't say in what form.

But ofcourse it makes sense, since on the order and bill it states dollars and not bitcoins.
3109  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 08, 2014, 03:30:42 PM
i did not understand when the bulk chips delivery starts?
They dont have batches for them.

When i order 500 Chips today, when they will be shipped?
Someone can give me a hint?

I just call them and they always answer if you call inside the allowed time window.

So you could do just that.
3110  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 08, 2014, 03:23:18 PM
Any updated news from bitmine Huh

EDIT: The information below is wrong, please see updated information here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291141.msg4972393#msg4972393


I just called them, and posed a few questions.

So they expect 10k chips to arrive in the middle of january, and another 10k at the end of january.

For my February First week delivery they expect a 50% chance that it will be 2 weeks to late, and
they will update the devices with 10% each.
(they still expect that 50% chance that it will have no delay at all  Roll Eyes )

I asked them how to calculate the delay date, and they told me, if it says february first week, I
have to take the first day of this week, and count 10 days for delivery, and then the customer plan
triggers.

If you have ordered more then one device, each of the devices will recieve the 10% update, and not only
the order as a whole.

I also asked them if people will get their money back the way they payed. Will you get bitcoins back if you payed with bitcoins.
But he declined to answer, and told me that he is just a worker there and can not give an answer at the moment.

When asked about the software and how they will be updating it, he told me that the software will have a setting where you can have it update the firmware/software thru the webinterface.

So far so good, I expect the first guys to recieve their devices at the end of january.
3111  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 11:16:16 PM

I think to a lot of people / companies hereabouts "Open Source" is mostly just a marketing slogan, they release some broken stuff to get some marketing bonus from the use of such terms/slogans but are all about profit thus have no intention of actually enabling competition / competitors by giving out their real working robust production code.


Many companies often jump on the most popular bandwagon, they "go green" (look at bp's logo) or "open source" or "accept bitcoin" (virgin galactic) etc..

it's like free publicity for them.
3112  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 11:03:26 PM

Voting only really works if people have something to lose. If it's arbitrary voting by everyday users, for nothing but a random click, it doesn't create an accurate representation of what people actually want. Valve tried this with their Greenlight system, and have recognized what a horrible failure it was in reducing their workload, or getting better games out. If they had made people pay to vote for greenlight games, they'd have a much more realistic demand plot, because people would only vote for things they actually cared about. If the bounty system you talk about makes people contribute to the bounty as their vote, then that would work fine...but then basically you've got capitalists who are directing open source programmers...

Also, project managers are valuable, and not all programmers would make good ones.

Exactly!

If something doesn't cost anything or has no repercussions at all, we end up with spam mail and anonymous trolls behaving like they never would in real life.

Having exposure is key to empathic socioeconomic behaviour.
3113  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 09:13:39 PM
wow ! so devcoin would only need to go to a dollar and most of you guys on the list would be millionares.


but don't let a market cap value decieve you.

That it might show 1 dollar one day is one thing,
to have would-be-millionaires dump their devcoins all at once to become millionaires and therefore crushin the devcoin price AND their dream is another thing.
3114  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 09:06:24 PM
wow ! so devcoin would only need to go to a dollar and most of you guys on the list would be millionares.


For many a few cent would be enough for that.
3115  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 08:38:37 PM
Look I understand what you want to say, but...

“Understanding is the first step to acceptance...”


― J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

lol, damn I wanted to get in a philosophical debate with you, and you try to disarm me with this harry potter one liner.

 Grin
3116  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 08:24:39 PM

I want to add, that open source does not per definition create cooperation.
Simply making something open source does not imply or guarantee whatsoever that a cooperation will develop.
There is no proof for that.
Cooperation is driven by other factors.
Open Source does merely facilitate access to everybody, but it doesn't handle or influence the motivation of the developers in any form!

If you cannot see a cooperative spirit in releasing code which encourages others to add, modify and use at their will then so be it. Let`s just call it non-competitive or non-capitalistic by definition.

- Nova

Merely releasing code does not encourage others to do anything in particular. You apply a causality that simply doesn't exist.

Furthermore you apply that cooperation can't be competitive?

I can imagine many open source projects where a (friendly) competition between forks emerges, and it makes sense this way.
If one fork has a giant innovation leap, the other fork might just give up their own plans, and not feel like losers, because the innovation is good for everyone. Everyone would realize a paradigm shift and adjust and not feel like a loser.
That's why competition is not a bad thing.

If you take all competition and all capitalism out of the calculation, you create a very artificial environment, because you would have to coercively prevent others from competing and making a buck out of open source if they voluntarily choose to do so.


Look I understand what you want to say, but in my eyes opensource is not married to cooperation, and open source can just as well be competitive and capitalistic, so I just try to understand why you purposely aim to limit the possibilities of the "open source market" ?
3117  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 08:16:28 PM
Why is capitalism bad?

It is not my intention to suggest that capitalism is bad. However if is competition by definition; while Open Source is cooperation by definition. What may be wrong is that the present Bounty System is being shaped by the former instead of the later.

I am just trying to understand. It is important for me to be able to judge how other devcoiners think.

So you suggest that competition is wrong?

Also, I am an (anarcho)capitalist who can program, so your argument is invalid?  Cool

How about "...who can't program, or choose not to...."? You get the idea. Projects that people want are being made Bounties. Either they cannot do it or choose not to. The projects are not coming from the coders but from them unable or not wanting to do it themselves. That just does feel right to my Open Source way of thinking. Only one opinion though, don`t take it personal or anything.

- Nova

I think this is not the case. I am a selfemployed programmer, and many of my customers are programmers themselves.
You somehow seem to apply that the programmers can't be customers themselves?
3118  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 07:45:00 PM
It doesn't have to work the way that I'm describing here; I just believe that if it does, devcoins and http://devtome.com in particular will become much more valuable much more quickly. It's a more capitalist way of doing things.

There can be little argument that Capitalism is competition by definition, while Open Source is cooperation by definition. It is becoming more obvious the Bounty System is being shaped by the Capitalist mindset not the Open Source cooperative one.

The Bounty System, if what is being sold here on this thread is true, needs to me more programmer centric rather than end user centric.

Let's flip things on it's head with an example approach...

Say the programmer codes a program and then posts it to the project/Bounty site to be voted on to see if it should be added to that cycle's shares. Perhaps it could remain on the list to be voted upon until it receives enough votes to take it off the list. If it does not get enough votes it does not receive any shares and if it does get enough votes it does.

It could also be voted as to how many shares it should get. Then it is not capitalist driven but coder driven. The same Open Source will make it to the market regardless of it getting a share split or not. There is no less risk to the programmer than the Bounty System's present form in my opinion.

If Capitalists, that cannot program, want a program then they can dig into their DevCoin Wallets and pay programmers to do it. Of course all such requests would be released to Open Source because that is the whole concept behind DevCoins right?

That would be an example of flipping the Bounty System on it's head and putting it in the hands of Open Source programmers and out of the hands of Capitalists who can't program.

- Nova

[Edit: typos]

In my opinion capitalism is the only thing capable of creating real competition that encourages a fast innovation cycle.

Why is capitalism bad?

Also, I am an (anarcho)capitalist who can program, so your argument is invalid?  Cool


I want to add, that open source does not per definition create cooperation.
Simply making something open source does not imply or guarantee whatsoever that a cooperation will develop.
There is no proof for that.
Cooperation is driven by other factors.
Open Source does merely facilitate access to everybody, but it doesn't handle or influence the motivation of the developers in any form!
3119  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated on: January 06, 2014, 04:30:31 PM
Kissmyweb.com is delighted to offer webdesign services for Devcoin (and Bitcoin)



Kissmyweb.com is not a new business, we have been around for 8 years - we are not a big business, "we" are me and a group of freelance awesome guys who do custom code when I need it - and we are not a complicated business, you deal with the person working on your site directly.

I also write copy if needed, (separate from Kissmyweb.com) and accept devcoins as payment.
Awesome.

I admire every selfemployed freelancer who accepts cryptocoins. I want to do that myself sometime in the future... but I have to prepare a few things before I can.
3120  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Official BITMINE CoinCraft series 28nm ASIC miners thread on: January 06, 2014, 03:22:57 PM
I ordered a Coincraft Desk in the Jan batch #2. Upon my last email communication (12-18-13) with Bitmine rep R Vogel, my "goods are foreseen to be shipped in calendar week 02/2014."

Doesn't "Jan batch #2" mean it was supposed to ship in the 2nd half of Jan?

Bitmine hasn't specified how they are shipping internationally (I'm in the US), what carrier etc. How long does shipment take?

We'll see, but I would not be shocked at all if by April 1 I still hadn't received it. Of course the difficulty will be so high by then, rendering the machine all but useless. I may just dump it straight to eBay to ROI, which I suspect many will be doing.

I really can't see how any of the ASIC companies can stay in business much longer. Smallish machines are becoming a joke in relation to difficulty. Soon you're gonna need a $250k+ server room full of machines to mine anything worthy.

I agree with your assessment.

I believe shipment with bitmine can take up to 10 days, that's what they specify on their website.

Pages: « 1 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 [156] 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!