Lol that is more like 2 bottles.
Alcohol is expensive here. That's the price for a 0.7l bottle of the cheapest Polish vodka. Scandinavian? Yes, Norway. |
|
|
|
Lol that is more like 2 bottles.
Alcohol is expensive here. That's the price of a 0.7l bottle of the cheapest Polish vodka. |
|
|
|
|
What's your address Adam? You need another bottle of vodka.
|
|
|
|
|
$3,000 - No-brainer
$5,000 - Probably
$10,000 - Possible
|
|
|
|
3. Kan man splitte oppgjøret i f.eks 50/50 BTC og NOK?
Vi har ikke lagt inn støtte for dette. Jeg har sett at Bitpay, osv. har dette, men forstår ikke helt hvorfor. Vil det ikke skape store problemer i regnskapet? Si at man selger et produkt hvor man sitter igjen med 30% fortjeneste. Det er sikkert mange som da kunne tenke seg å ha 30% av betalingen i bitcoins da man uansett får dekket inn kostnadene i lokal valuta. Dette skaper ikke problemer i regnskapet. Det blir det samme som å selge i euro eller dollar. |
|
|
|
About 12 hours to new fiat arrives at Stamp. The asks are low. Will the next days be last chance to buy below 450?
Everyday this year so far was "the last chance to buy below 1200"... That's a lie. What do you think about 450 this week? |
|
|
|
|
About 12 hours to new fiat arrives at Stamp. The asks are low. Will the next days be last chance to buy below 450?
|
|
|
|
What happened to the order book at stamp? Only 4k btc until $400
I see ~10k This is what mine looks like, maybe it's a bug?  Of course that's a bug. No bids at all in that flat area? Cmon Which is why I asked wtf just happened Just refresh the page. |
|
|
|
That is actually mega bullish!! ( I dont know why yet, but just insert random retard reasoning) china's government fears bitcoins awesome power. ...and bitcoins will be more scarce in China  |
|
|
|
I'd love to see one more drop to the 430-435 range before we go back up again.
I guess we see that this weekend. |
|
|
|
Someone want to buy @ Stamp Edit: It was a 1400 buy wall at 445, but it was removed and divided into smaller bids. |
|
|
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now. I am referring to the first spike down that occured AFTER the reversal 2013: 66 ->105 -> THE SPIKE=80 ->100 ->100->100->100->100 consolidating at high of spike 2014: 340->540-> THE SPIKE=420 ->440->440->440->440->440 consolidating at low of spike OK. I understand you. But the spike to 80 didn't rebound to 100 immediately. |
|
|
|
No, I don't. By July / August, gox was in hot water already, and it reflected in volume. More specifically, April 2013 was gox volume in full glory, by the middle of the year they had already taken a hit. I guess to do this the right way, we'd have to sum over gox, stamp, btce and btcchina, but I can't bring myself to do it for such little gain. I agree. But Gox was still bigger than Stamp, BTC-e and BTC China combined, so Gox is most important. |
|
|
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now. |
|
|
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume. Me too. Which of those two look more like "Volume is slowly picking up again a month after the bottom" to you?   Possibly the 'reversal' is more stretched out this time, because the entire correction was more stretched out, so I'm not taking the above as proof that we must go down again. I'm just pointing out that, so far, they look pretty dissimilar to me. You need to look at Gox which was the biggest exchange in 2013. http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg360zigWeeklyzczsg2013-01-01zeg2013-12-31ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzl |
|
|
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
