|
It isn't very hard to not to pay here if you win the auction. You can tell that the account won the auctiom isn't responding or something and to make the preveeding bidder a winner. But if this pattern is repeated in two or more auctions, your plan will likely be ruined when there are brainiacs around here.
|
|
|
|
Don't believe that all Muslims are terrorists but 98% of the terrorists are Muslims(excluding America from terrorist group, though they aren't anything less than terrorists).
Excluding US? That is one big mistake. Secondly, how you got 98%? One of the biggest estimation I have ever seen which is lie. There are Christians, Jews and other people who kill and you got 98%?  Also most of the victims are Muslims because we (the non Muslim countries) have somehow been able to defend ourselves a lot from the growth of ideology of radical Islam in our nations and so the Muslims have been confined to their own countries, and so they get divided amongst themselves(sunnis shias) and start killing each other.
Joke? Can you backup this claim? Why exclude US? |
|
|
|
Also it would be nice to have a visible at all times "this post has been edited" icon, if editing has taken place after more posts have been made.
Some people are really irritating with retrospective editing.
You can see it if a post is edited after 10 minutes by checking if there is a dotted line under the time post was made. If there is, hover your mouse above the line and you will see who edited it lastly and what time it was edited. just tryied but not work for me... but this functionality it is avaiable just for posts not yours??? chrome 41.0.2272.118 m here. The post should be edited to see this. It must be edited after 10 minutes to see. Else, you can't see it. You are using conputer, right? In mobile devices, you can't see but there is an exception if you are using Puffin browser. Try again by hovering the mouse to dotted line under the time of post creation. Dotted line is visitible for OP. |
|
|
|
You don't need to know anything, because Google knows everything. You just need to know how to use Google.
That is also knowing.  below the correct link to check for viruses behind link...[ty Lauda] but i repeat i'm searching for something like right click on the link and choos "Scan Link" from drop down menù... if i'm in wrong section suggest me the right one! https://www.virustotal.com/#url[ img]https://i.imgur.com/uYVmbSf.png[/img] Can't you bookmark virustotal and when you want to scan, open it and put the link? You can use userscript and/or bookmarklet. Here is one: https://github.com/aptonic/dropzone-user-scripts/blob/master/VirusTotal.dropzone. I haven't tested this, so I can't comment on this. |
|
|
|
Also it would be nice to have a visible at all times "this post has been edited" icon, if editing has taken place after more posts have been made.
Some people are really irritating with retrospective editing.
You can see it if a post is edited after 10 minutes by checking if there is a dotted line under the time post was made. If there is, hover your mouse above the line and you will see who edited it lastly and what time it was edited. |
|
|
|
Religion is a mental disease.
Unless you know what you are doing. Here is another which tells all muslims aren't terrorists. I suggest you to read this interesting article: After the Charlie Hebdo attack, a Paris imam went to the scene and condemned the murders. "These victims are martyrs, and I shall pray for them with all my heart," said Hassen Chalghoumi (above). He was also quoted as saying that 95% of victims of terrorism are Muslim. How accurate is this statistic? The claim is similar to one in a 2011 report by the US government's National Counter-Terrorism Center (NCTC), which said: "In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years."http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30883058I think your point is invalid, if the most victims of terrorist attack (all) are muslim this is really no sense. A muslim attack another muslim in name o a God (Allah)... this is really no sense. |
|
|
|
muslims tend to be considered more terrosts because of their past and because they are more susceptible to be controlled if there is their religion in play, they are too attached to it
crystian faith on their religion is more on a "normal level", less adulation to their god, less strict ecc....
Wrong. If Islam doesn't teach people to kill others, why should a muslim do it? A terrorist is not identifyed by religion, but by political beliefs.
Sadly most terrorists are muslims.
Okay. Let's come to this matter. Meaning of terrorists: "Persons who use terrorism for gaining of political aims." Meaning of terrorism: "Use of violence and intimidation for gaining of political aims." Here comes the saddest part. Total estimate number of people killed from '80s till now by Muslims: 20,000 to 100,000. US: 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 I pity US more than I pity claimed-to-be-muslim terrorists. 1.7 million Germans killed and telling it was Russians who did it!   He ordered that these Germans did not fall under the Geneva Rules, and were NOT TO BE FED, NOR GIVEN ANY WATER or medical attention. The Swiss Red Cross was NOT to inspect the camps, for under the DEF classification, they had no such authority or jurisdiction.
Months after the war was officially over, Eisenhower’s special German DEF camps were still in operation forcing the men into confinement, but denying that they were prisoners.
“For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW’s on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply … Witnesses and survivors have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald.”
It is known, that the Allies had sufficient stockpiles of food and medicine to care for these German soldiers. This was deliberately and intentionally denied them. Many men died of gangrene from frostbite due to deliberate exposure.
Edit: Nazis were at-least kind enough to give food unlike this US. |
|
|
|
I'm not twisting anything, the phrase "It isn't permitted" implies that permission is not given for something, would you at least agree with that so far?
Agreed. In that you claim that the author of your books says your god did not give permission for the Sun to catch up with the moon, would that not be as asinine as me not giving you permission to float up into the air?
Aha! Now I understand where you are wrong. It is God's words, not a human's. There is no author for Qur'an, what you see is God's words. However, it was earlier orally transmitted from one person to other and when people who learned fully started dying, it was bundled as a book. [quote
]The Prophet asked me at sunset, “Do you know where the Sun goes (at the time of sunset)?” I replied, “Allah and His Apostle know better.” He said, “It goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates Itself underneath the Throne and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted and then (a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go on its course but it will not be permitted, but it will be ordered to return whence it has come and so it will rise in the west. And that is the interpretation of the Statement of Allah: ‘And the Sun runs its fixed course for a term (decreed). That is The Decree of (Allah) The Exalted in Might, The All-Knowing.’” (36.38)
Which part of that quote suggests anything other than ignorance about our Solar System? [/quote] It is regarding Allah and the solar system. This is hard to swallow for you. Qur'an never ignores solar system. If yes, these verses shouldn't even be there. It is poetical verses. You shouldn't understand directly. You, as most theists tend to do, are the one cherry-picking small quotes (bad ones at that) and attributing meaning to them they simply do not possess and, when taken in the wider context of the surrounding text, generally prove that the book is full of much ignorance and woo.
You can't find mistakes. Don't you even know how "poet" looks? There will be metaphors too. I don't know how you will twist this:
36:39 - And the Moon,- We have measured for her mansions (to traverse) till she returns like the old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk.
I don't know how you suggest this is even meaningful. Is this meant to be another 'miracle' or are you still hacking away at the dead horse of the Sun/Moon absurdity? It is a metaphor. Think about it. If you know different shapes of moon and how old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk looks, you will understand.  |
|
|
|
Better thread than those two threads out there. Thank you! It is simple: When you feed bad, you will have tendency to feed more. However, when you feed good, this question will hound you: "Why not feed a bit to bad?". If you answer it yes, you will feed it more and hence, you will be bad. However, one day you will "pity yourself". * By "you", it is not to OP or someone else. In general.
I will give you an example. You got a lion cub and you feed it. When it grow and matures, it will eat you in most cases. Sometimes you will live and sometimes not. Be cautious what you are feeding. It is very hard to resist feeding bad but if you start feeding good, resisting power will increase and as a result, you won't go bad easily.
Don't get yourself eaten by bad.  |
|
|
|
Atop being so dishonest. You know damn well that to claim the Sun is not PERMITTED to do something is to imply that it may otherwise attempt to.
I forbid you to float up into the air! There, you are not permitted to float up into the air. Does that make me somehow the being responsible for you not being able to float up into the air?
There is a slight difference in " Sun tries to catch up moon but it isn't permitted" and " It isn't permitted for Sun to catch up moon". Don't twist verses according to your likes. Qur'an consists of some of the excellent poetry too. Don't pretend to be a fool, I know you are not. I don't know how you will twist this: 36:39 - And the Moon,- We have measured for her mansions (to traverse) till she returns like the old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk. |
|
|
|
I suggest you to read this interesting article: After the Charlie Hebdo attack, a Paris imam went to the scene and condemned the murders. "These victims are martyrs, and I shall pray for them with all my heart," said Hassen Chalghoumi (above). He was also quoted as saying that 95% of victims of terrorism are Muslim. How accurate is this statistic? The claim is similar to one in a 2011 report by the US government's National Counter-Terrorism Center (NCTC), which said: "In cases where the religious affiliation of terrorism casualties could be determined, Muslims suffered between 82 and 97% of terrorism-related fatalities over the past five years."http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30883058I think your point is invalid, if the most victims of terrorist attack (all) are muslim this is really no sense. A muslim attack another muslim in name o a God (Allah)... this is really no sense. According to people above who say "Islam is violence", they are thinking that we muslims are born with guns and bombs directly from stomach of mother. No, it is not only for you but for all who "watching" this thread. They should prove that all the muslim are terrorists and why the most victim of those attacks are muslims. I really can't understand this theory because I have a lot of friends from numerous Religion (jewish, muslim, hinduism,Sikhism and christianity) and none of them is a terrorist.
Me too. They just don't care. I pity US more than I pity claimed-to-be-muslim terrorists. 1.7 million Germans killed and telling it was Russians who did it! He ordered that these Germans did not fall under the Geneva Rules, and were NOT TO BE FED, NOR GIVEN ANY WATER or medical attention. The Swiss Red Cross was NOT to inspect the camps, for under the DEF classification, they had no such authority or jurisdiction.
Months after the war was officially over, Eisenhower’s special German DEF camps were still in operation forcing the men into confinement, but denying that they were prisoners.
“For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW’s on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply … Witnesses and survivors have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald.”
It is known, that the Allies had sufficient stockpiles of food and medicine to care for these German soldiers. This was deliberately and intentionally denied them. Many men died of gangrene from frostbite due to deliberate exposure.
Edit: Nazis were at-least kind enough to give food unlike this US. |
|
|
|
Because I'm the only one presenting objectively reasoned facts to prove your claims towards 'miracles' in your book as being utter tripe. You just keep on repeating the same text as though that somehow qualifies as an answer.
Have you took the time to read what you quoted? What? “It is not permitted to the Sun to catch up the Moon?” The above verse is either ridiculous or wrong, depending on whether we try to understand it from the modern perspective or from the Bedouins’ perspective, respectively.
Wrong understanding. Here is why:
[ img]http://www.foundalis.com/rlg/Sun-Moon.gif[/img]
From the modern perspective, to say that the Sun tries to catch up the Moon (but is not permitted to do so) is laughably naïve.
Tries to catch up? You must be kidding! In Qur'an it is mentioned "not permitted to sun to catch up moon". You are making mistranslation. The orbit of the Moon (gray) around the Earth’s orbit (blue circle) and around the Sun (red, center).
Note: not drawn to scale, and also the Moon completes approximately 13 turns in a year, not exactly 13.
Observation from this diagram: to say that the Sun, in reality, “tries to catch up the Moon”, makes no sense at all.
Right. So, because according to what we know today it is just plain stupid to say that the Sun tries to catch up the Moon, there is only one possibility: that verse 36:40 was said that way for the Bedouins to make some sense of it. But in that case,... it’s wrong again!
Read the verse correctly. It never said sun tries to catch uo the moon. Blatant lie!Seeing as you did the same thing with the first 'miracle' of the mosque, I'm assuming you want to do the same thing with the 'miracle' of the absurd Sun/Moon quote, so I'm saying go for it. Let's have the next one seeing as you have nothing to challenge my take-down of your 'miracles.'
I can't comment on "Mosque" as it looks like photoshopped. However, it may or may not be true. I haven't researched about it. |
|
|
|
Although, to be honest, both of you are choosing to miss out this little clanger I found when looking for a version of the quote with your preferred grammar:
"It is not permitted to the Sun to catch up the Moon, nor can the night outstrip the day, each just swims along in its own orbit."
One word: Eclipse.
Sooooooo, yet another 'miracle' bites the dust.
NEXT!
Read more. Here you go: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EclipseA pic:  ^^^ "A symbolic orbital diagram from the view of the Earth at the center, with the sun and moon projected upon the celestial sphere, showing the Moon's two nodes where eclipses can occur." |
|
|
|
|
36:38 - And the sun runs his course for a period determined for him: that is the decree of (Him), the Exalted in Might, the All-Knowing.
36:39 - And the Moon,- We have measured for her mansions (to traverse) till she returns like the old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk.
36:40 - It is not permitted to the Sun to catch up the Moon, nor can the Night outstrip the Day: Each (just) swims along in (its own) orbit (according to Law).
These tells about day and night and also tells that they are travelling through it's own path.
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my mind after it got negative trust by Grand_Voyageur. It never was my intention to make you an idiot or something.
|
|
|
|
|
There is freedom of speech. However, I suggest you to lock this thread as you can't delete this. You saw how many lies and all wete posted in the thread about "Islamic hate", so I am sure people will do the same here. After sometime you may not be able to control, so lock this and report it to moderator and put "move this to archival" in reason. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
We are being told to read verse's that you post here.
You dont have a valid source that is neutral to show proof from.
You are telling us that we are wrong.. And you are right.
AFAIK except for splitting of moon, we can give scientific proofs but for splitting of moon, only history proofs but you don't believe in old books. |
|
|
|
We should analyze the word 'terrorism'. Everyone who provide terror (a real terror) to a group of person with a weapon, knife etcetera ... By the definition is a terrorist, now the history can speak itself because not all the Muslim are terrorist and not all the terrorist are muslim. I think it's wrong to link the word Islam to the word terrorism, can you explain to us why aren't all the muslim terrorists?
Thanks for your input. Was the last questions to me? I didn't get you correctly. I should prove all muslims aren't terrorist?  A terrorist is not identifyed by religion, but by political beliefs. Sadly most terrorists are muslims. Okay. Let's come to this matter. Meaning of terrorists: "Persons who use terrorism for gaining of political aims." Meaning of terrorism: "Use of violence and intimidation for gaining of political aims." Here comes the saddest part. Total estimate number of people killed from '80s till now by Muslims: 20,000 to 100,000. US: 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
