I ain't an anti-TECSHARE person. I am only telling what I understood/saw. OP
1,2,3,4,5 & 6: Ok. 7: I agree with what he mentioned but a neutral might be better. However, considering he has changed to neutral earlier and it was reverted because you continued, I think negative is ok. There are also a plethora of other instances where he attempted to silence others for speaking out against him by leaving negative ratings that he was later forced to remove under public pressure such as iCEBREAKER and Takagari, each time claiming to have learned his lesson and seeing the error in his ways only to do it again about a month later to some one else.
Takagari's was changed to neutral at the same yours waa changed too. iCEBREAKER's was removed after he understood it wasn't hacked. A neutral was best. In addition to this, he has now unilaterally decided he has to power to negative rate anyone selling microsoft keys because he claims they are all illegal and stolen (some how he knows this for every user as if by magic) . The forum rules state that if a transaction is legal in the country of origin as well as the trading partner's country IT IS ALLOWED ON THE FORUM. If it was illegal THE ADMINS/MOD WOULD HAVE REMOVED THEM THEMSELVES.
If you have followed recent Microsoft threads, you can see almost all of them turned into liars and scammers. I don't think a liar can be trusted. Of course, he left negative feedback on MS key sellers because of his softcorner towards MS but what he said is true. This is just another power grab by Vod, giving himself more self proclaimed authority to dictate to this entire forum to do things his way OR ELSE. Vod is the kind of obsessive compulsive, control hungry, vindictive, egotistical, sociopath that should NEVER be in any position of power, because no matter what authority he has he will abuse it to feed his deficient feelings of self worth, and will lash out at anyone who hurts his feelies.
If he is what you said, he would have been removed from trust list or will be removed soon. IMHO I don't think he is, so I think he will stay. Look how cute you are crafting so many excuses for your pal. We aren't pals. I barely know him in this forum. Whoever agrees with Vod is his pal! Interesting... 7: I agree with what he mentioned but a neutral might be better. However, considering he has changed to neutral earlier and it was reverted because you continued, I think negative is ok. Just because people do not agree with my conclusions does not make me a liar. What a childish way to look at the world. By that standard you are a liar because I don't agree with you calling me a liar and it would be acceptable for me to negative rate you. The statements I made are a matter of debate. Declaring them untrue doesn't magically make them not true or a lie. Uh! I am sorry. Some conclusions can be wrong. You should investigate more before spreading disinformation. I don't even know how could this be a debatable topic where you concluded. I am hearing for first time making a debate on a matter after concluding it. It was changed to a neutral after lots of public pressure. I called him out later on his abusive behavior regarding MSDN key sellers, as a direct result he changed the rating again back to a negative knowing people would not bother to look a second time. Proof is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10890378#msg10890378"Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer." This is the standard for leaving a negative rating. Saying something that upsets Vod is not equivalent to scamming. Are you trying to tell me that I am not allowed to be critical of anyone if they call me a liar and they are on the default trust list? Is that what you mean by "because you continued"? Since when is it acceptable to negative rate people from the position of the default trust list because you don't like what people are saying? It is amazing how much free speech is protected around here... until some one says some thing one of their buddies don't like. No matter how many BS excuses come out of Vod's mouth, he left me a negative rating for pointing out his abusive behavior in an attempt to intimidate me into silence, something other users were removed from the default trust list for for doing ONCE, he however has done it over and over again to many people. The trust system has failed and is nothing more than a way to write off new users as "socks" or "scammers" and extort people who have built up reputations into silence from a centralized position of power. Don't want to copy-paste same thing here, so quoting. 2) Just because people do not agree with my conclusions does not make me a liar. What a childish way to look at the world. By that standard you are a liar because I don't agree with you calling me a liar and it would be acceptable for me to negative rate you. SaltySpitoon is not the god of Bitcointalk. He does not speak for everyone even if he had the ability to know everything. His opinion does not negate my opinion and magically some how make it a lie. Furthermore Saltyspitoon is just a mod, he has very little power to do anything on the forum, so he can hardly speak for higher level staff either. The statements I made are a matter of debate. Declaring them untrue doesn't magically make them not true or a lie. 3) It was changed to a neutral after lots of public pressure. I called him out later on his abusive behavior regarding MSDN key sellers, as a direct result he changed the rating again back to a negative knowing people would not bother to look a second time. Proof is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10890378#msg108903782) You said staff is protecting Vod and even created a thread about staff's selective enforcement conspiracy things. How can we agree with this conclusion? How can theymos benefits from these conspiracies? Don't tell me it's money because he can earned more and there is no money involved in these feedback. Your words are false. Furthermore, how are staffs protecting Vod when he is in trust list of Tomatocage. I am hoping you are joking about SaltySpitoon. He is a Global Moderator. There is no "higher" staff than Global Moderator. He has more than "very little" power. SaltySpitoon is a neutral diplomat. I haven't seen him making a biased statement/opinion. Furthermore, it wasn't an opinion, it was a statement. "Matter of debate"? You said a false things without even discussing. Obviously, the post you made against staff is not in a "discussing" or "debating" style, it is made on your feelings and your conclusion. So whatever you conclude aren't false? You are spreading disinformation but I am wishing it to be a misinformation. Hope this wish can be fulfilled. 3) I looked meaning of "abusive" but it isn't fitting here. According to *your version* of abuse, aren't you being an abuser? You started this anti-Vod war when you were removed from default trust list. Till that day, staffs are ok & DefaultTrust is ok. From that day forth, DefaultTrust is bad. Are you trying to tell me that I am not allowed to be critical of anyone if they call me a liar? Is that what you mean by "you continued what you did earlier"? Since when is it acceptable to negative rate people from the position of the default trust list because you don't like what people are saying?
You can if you aren't telling a lie. Partial yes. It is still not allowed. Edit: TECSHARE has made some changes. So replying. -snip-
Are you trying to tell me that I am not allowed to be critical of anyone if they call me a liar and they are on the default trust list? Is that what you mean by "you continued what you did earlier"? Since when is it acceptable to negative rate people from the position of the default trust list because you don't like what people are saying? It is amazing how much free speech is protected around here... until some one says some thing one of their buddies don't like. No matter how many BS excuses come out of Vod's mouth, he left me a negative rating for pointing out his abusive behavior in an attempt to intimidate me into silence, something other users were removed from the default trust list for for doing ONCE, he however has done it over and over again to many people.
The trust system has failed and is nothing more than a way to write off new users as "socks" or "scammers" and extort people who have built up reputations into silence from a centralized position of power.
BS comes from everyones' mouth. It is clear "users who done once" is about you. Feedback you left and feedback Vod left starts from same end but reach at different place. There is slight difference in them. "people who have built up reputations" is also you. Nobody silenced you for good things you did. You still can. Sadly, you are still going for makeup conspiracy theories. Bitcointalk is centralized and hence, trust system. This centralized power doesn't give Vod special status. "Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer." This is the standard for leaving a negative rating. Saying something that upsets Vod is not equivalent to scamming.
This isn't upsetting Vod, you are telling a lie about whole staffs which is bad for whole forum. Vod | 2015-03-26 | Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. I am not protected by forum staff. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis.
Not trustworthy.
|
|
|
Can you provide an example where 1) someone was suspected of scamming 2) they provided information to show they were legit 3) the negative feedback did not get removed and 4) the person that left the negative feedback is (still) in the Default Trust list?
Yes, I can. 1) I was never suspected of scamming. 2) My over 3 years of honestly trading here demonstrates I am legit. I was accused of "lying" on the basis of a topic which is under debate and neither party can prove the validity of the accusation. (additionally "lying" has never been an acceptable use of giving negatives from someone on the default trust.) 3) The negative feedback did not get removed. 4) The person who left the feedback is still on the default trust list. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0;all1) True. 2.a) You lied saying staffs protect Vod even after SaltySpitoon explained. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10062871#msg100628712.b) Lying is a quality of an untrustworthy person. Trust system is not only for trades and that's why it is trust feedback not trade feedback. 3) It was changed to neutral feedback and you continued what you did earlier and it was reverted. 4) True. TBH, I think this anti-trust_system behaviour of yours came after you were removed from default trust list. You are trustworthy enough for me except your judgements. 2) Just because people do not agree with my conclusions does not make me a liar. What a childish way to look at the world. By that standard you are a liar because I don't agree with you calling me a liar and it would be acceptable for me to negative rate you. SaltySpitoon is not the god of Bitcointalk. He does not speak for everyone even if he had the ability to know everything. His opinion does not negate my opinion and magically some how make it a lie. Furthermore Saltyspitoon is just a mod, he has very little power to do anything on the forum, so he can hardly speak for higher level staff either. The statements I made are a matter of debate. Declaring them untrue doesn't magically make them not true or a lie. 3) It was changed to a neutral after lots of public pressure. I called him out later on his abusive behavior regarding MSDN key sellers, as a direct result he changed the rating again back to a negative knowing people would not bother to look a second time. Proof is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10890378#msg108903782) You said staff is protecting Vod and even created a thread about staff's selective enforcement conspiracy things. How can we agree with this conclusion? How can theymos benefits from these conspiracies? Don't tell me it's money because he can earned more and there is no money involved in these feedback. Your words are false. Furthermore, how are staffs protecting Vod when he is in trust list of Tomatocage. I am hoping you are joking about SaltySpitoon. He is a Global Moderator. There is no "higher" staff than Global Moderator. He has more than "very little" power. SaltySpitoon is a neutral diplomat. I haven't seen him making a biased statement/opinion. Furthermore, it wasn't an opinion, it was a statement. "Matter of debate"? You said a false things without even discussing. Obviously, the post you made against staff is not in a "discussing" or "debating" style, it is made on your feelings and your conclusion. So whatever you conclude aren't false? You are spreading disinformation but I am wishing it to be a misinformation. Hope this wish can be fulfilled. 3) I looked meaning of "abusive" but it isn't fitting here. According to *your version* of abuse, aren't you being an abuser? You started this anti-Vod war when you were removed from default trust list. Till that day, staffs are ok & DefaultTrust is ok. From that day forth, DefaultTrust is bad. Are you trying to tell me that I am not allowed to be critical of anyone if they call me a liar? Is that what you mean by "you continued what you did earlier"? Since when is it acceptable to negative rate people from the position of the default trust list because you don't like what people are saying?
You can if you aren't telling a lie. Partial yes. It is still not allowed. Edit: TECSHARE has made some changes. So replying. -snip-
Are you trying to tell me that I am not allowed to be critical of anyone if they call me a liar and they are on the default trust list? Is that what you mean by "you continued what you did earlier"? Since when is it acceptable to negative rate people from the position of the default trust list because you don't like what people are saying? It is amazing how much free speech is protected around here... until some one says some thing one of their buddies don't like. No matter how many BS excuses come out of Vod's mouth, he left me a negative rating for pointing out his abusive behavior in an attempt to intimidate me into silence, something other users were removed from the default trust list for for doing ONCE, he however has done it over and over again to many people.
The trust system has failed and is nothing more than a way to write off new users as "socks" or "scammers" and extort people who have built up reputations into silence from a centralized position of power.
BS comes from everyones' mouth. It is clear "users who done once" is about you. Feedback you left and feedback Vod left starts from same end but reach at different place. There is slight difference in them. "people who have built up reputations" is also you. Nobody silenced you for good things you did. You still can. Sadly, you are still going for makeup conspiracy theories. Bitcointalk is centralized and hence, trust system. This centralized power doesn't give Vod special status.
|
|
|
Use preev.com to check the value.
Current value: 1,248 Doges for 1BTC.
Edit: This is misinformation. Already solved. Look below.
|
|
|
Loan Amount : .15btc Reason : personal BTC Address : 1BjRTjU5zbgHZhMCAyEFH1wt7442zAUo4w Collateral: bct account
Loan not needed anymore. Thanks for your time mz Due date extended by another 10 days.
Please repay on May 23. Thank you!
Confirmed. Thanks! You are welcome!
|
|
|
I can provide this if you can use your account or a Member account* as collateral.
* Activity of Member account must be >=84 activity.
|
|
|
I think that the easiest way is to use keybase.io , you won't have to have any knowledge about any program,it is really simple. The bad side is that there is a long queue to get an invite,you just have to sign up and wait
Keybase.io's btc address system does not verify the address' ownership, so it is not perfect. Also you have to store private key to do things easily (and they recommend that!) which doesn't seem so good. From what I read about keybase.io they use PGP to link several accounts to a single PGP key. They also offer to verify bitcoin addresses, via said PGP key. Can anyone with an keybase.io account verify the above? I can also check around and see if I can get an invite to dig into this. I do have a keybase.io account, but I don't think adding it to this guide will help. - You put the bitcoin address.
- Wait for keybase.io to save the address, (~10 secs).
- ...
- PROFIT!
Yes, that's all. No signature verification, no check, etc. Just enter the address and that's all. They offer coinbase.com OAuth, but that's different issue here. True. The two things I didn't agree with them are - They recommend storing encrypted PGP private key in their server. - They doesn't verify whether Bitcoin address is owned by the same owner of PGP key, obviously by asking a Bitcoin signed message from submitted address. I have already proposed this but I didn't get any response from them. https://github.com/keybase/keybase-issues/issues/1400
|
|
|
If I send some bitcoins to some address, and I pay the proper fees, how sure am I that it will be included in the next block? Are there any guarantees if I want my payment to be included in the next block that is mined?
Actually just pay recommend fees you can get your transaction sent less than 10minutes. Guaranteed is there no limit to the number of transactions in a block? what if everybody pays recommended fees? so some will still not make it? am i right? there is a limit to that. more transaction means more size, and the block size are limited to 1mb aren't they gonna increase the limit in the near future with an hard fork, i remember 30 mb, i'm right? It is 20 MB hard-fork. Honestly, I am against it unless other devs tell pros are higher and better than the cons of this fork. Difference between soft-fork and hard-fork: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/30817/what-is-a-soft-fork/30821#30821
|
|
|
Their service is good. It is pretty easy to setup. If you ask me before I knew about Blocktrail, I would have said Blockchain.info is my favorite explorer and it's payment service is great but after I knew about Blocktrail, it is better than Blockchain.info and it now offers payment API too. So I will use it. Main reason I go with Blocktrail is because of Blockchain.info's corrupted data. It isn't always corrupted though.
|
|
|
You probably should refund him or replace keys if keys he received aren't working. -snip -snip- I haven't open a PayPal claim but you both talking in English and staff talking in Spanish is weird.
|
|
|
Best of luck. Try to use an offline device or paper wallet generated in a secure/offline device when escrowing. -snip-
Also I don't see why others would use you as they have other more reputable escrows to choose from.
Don't disappoint him. Let him try.
|
|
|
I ain't an anti-TECSHARE person. I am only telling what I understood/saw. -snip-
evershawn -8: -2 / +0(0) 2014-07-25 0.00000000 Reference "Lies constantly, twists words, deletes information, hijacks threads, posts I bought my trust, posts I have multiple accounts. The list just goes on with this guy. In the one week I have know him, he has proven himself to be very dishonest. I recommend not doing any business with this person, as I do not trust him at all."
milkyway -4: -1 / +0(0) 2014-08-25 0.00000000 Reference Spamming
BADecker -8: -2 / +0(0) 2014-10-21 0.00000000 Reference "Mentally unstable - changes stories and views on a whim. Posts that I have the devil inside me (and should not be trusted). For this and his lack or morals makes me believe he would not honour any agreement. I do not trust this person."
jers -4: -1 / +0(0) 2014-10-27 0.00000000 "Threatened me via PM to have my account deleted if I didn't remove negative trust from his scam pump and dump coin."
hilariousandco-rapped -6: -1 / +0(0) 2014-11-05 0.00000000 Reference "Making up stories to get attention. ;("
Decksperiment -4: -1 / +0(0) 2015-03-20 0.00000000 Reference Severe mental issues. Read his past posts and his feedback (sent and received) and be VERY careful.
TECSHARE 92: -0 / +41(41) 2015-03-26 0.00000000 Reference Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. I am not protected by forum staff. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis.
Not trustworthy.
1,2,3,4,5 & 6: Ok. 7: I agree with what he mentioned but a neutral might be better. However, considering he has changed to neutral earlier and it was reverted because you continued, I think negative is ok. There are also a plethora of other instances where he attempted to silence others for speaking out against him by leaving negative ratings that he was later forced to remove under public pressure such as iCEBREAKER and Takagari, each time claiming to have learned his lesson and seeing the error in his ways only to do it again about a month later to some one else.
Takagari's was changed to neutral at the same yours waa changed too. iCEBREAKER's was removed after he understood it wasn't hacked. A neutral was best. In addition to this, he has now unilaterally decided he has to power to negative rate anyone selling microsoft keys because he claims they are all illegal and stolen (some how he knows this for every user as if by magic) . The forum rules state that if a transaction is legal in the country of origin as well as the trading partner's country IT IS ALLOWED ON THE FORUM. If it was illegal THE ADMINS/MOD WOULD HAVE REMOVED THEM THEMSELVES.
If you have followed recent Microsoft threads, you can see almost all of them turned into liars and scammers. I don't think a liar can be trusted. Of course, he left negative feedback on MS key sellers because of his softcorner towards MS but what he said is true. This is just another power grab by Vod, giving himself more self proclaimed authority to dictate to this entire forum to do things his way OR ELSE. Vod is the kind of obsessive compulsive, control hungry, vindictive, egotistical, sociopath that should NEVER be in any position of power, because no matter what authority he has he will abuse it to feed his deficient feelings of self worth, and will lash out at anyone who hurts his feelies.
If he is what you said, he would have been removed from trust list or will be removed soon. IMHO I don't think he is, so I think he will stay.
|
|
|
theymos did say earlier this week or last week that the site was on the end of ddos attacks so this may be the problem, what does he use? cloudflare?
Not couldfare.
|
|
|
Can you provide an example where 1) someone was suspected of scamming 2) they provided information to show they were legit 3) the negative feedback did not get removed and 4) the person that left the negative feedback is (still) in the Default Trust list?
Yes, I can. 1) I was never suspected of scamming. 2) My over 3 years of honestly trading here demonstrates I am legit. I was accused of "lying" on the basis of a topic which is under debate and neither party can prove the validity of the accusation. (additionally "lying" has never been an acceptable use of giving negatives from someone on the default trust.) 3) The negative feedback did not get removed. 4) The person who left the feedback is still on the default trust list. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.0;all1) True. 2.a) You lied saying staffs protect Vod even after SaltySpitoon explained. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=915823.msg10062871#msg100628712.b) Lying is a quality of an untrustworthy person. Trust system is not only for trades and that's why it is trust feedback not trade feedback. 3) It was changed to neutral feedback and you continued what you did earlier and it was reverted. 4) True. TBH, I think this anti-trust_system behaviour of yours came after you were removed from default trust list. You are trustworthy enough for me except your judgements.
|
|
|
Great escrow and I'll make sure gonna use you again for a escrow next time. Fast reply and smooth
smooth cooperation with 0.05 btc translate work.
Again a very smooth deal went very well with out any problem with this guy
thanks MZ
Thank you for the positive feedback! Looking forward to work with more people!
|
|
|
You can use Gyazo if you want instant upload. It will upload as soon as you take a pic. Just add ".jpg" to the end.
|
|
|
If that's the problem I can do this trade for you. PM me if you want and also leave your skype. I will be online for next 7-8 hours If you can send 0.2 BTC after he send CANN to my address(you must check it), it will be helpful. I will send you 0.2 BTC when I come online.
|
|
|
Click lower left "lock topic" to lock this thread.
|
|
|
All of them are spam. Mods may not have noticed it.
It's something new to me. Can't one ask a person to join as his/her referral and pay for the same? I thought as it is considered a job, it's allowed. See BadBear's post I quoted above. It isn't allowed. It is solely for advertising and what they are paying is what they get from referral earning. If there is any additional payment other than from referral earning, it maybe allowed. Some referrals are allowed in tasks like these. For example, to track new registrations/traffic from forum, site owners may use referral.
|
|
|
The keylogger will only get your password if you type it in. It won't know it immediately when infected. If you are using the passphrase to create a password, you would definitely need a random password that is seriously random. You can try to recite it to yourself three times per day or write it down on somewhere safe. If you are encrypting wallet keys, password will only protect you in the event of someone gaining control of your PC.
Can the keylogger get my password if I copy-and-paste it (no typing)? yes, you need to use the keyboard of your pc(virtual keyboard) or typing it in a way to camouflage it(for example, your password is "my name is", instead you write my.name.is, then you delete those two dot, using the mouse) use zemna antikeylogger free, it help a lot You know there are mouse loggers, right? so even if i generate a password with a pass generator it can still be seen by keyloggers? what if you disconnect your pc from the net while setting a password? is that better?
It depends on how your keylogger does the job. Some keyloggers try to upload/share instantly which can be prevented if you are offline but some save the log and upload/share as soon as you connect to internet which can't be resolved without removing them. Most of the keyloggers are infected in pirated OS copies.
|
|
|
|