- is not staking any more due to not having enough daily transactions to support the blockchain
Nonsense, PoS staking does not require any daily transactions to work. It needs just mature coins and unlocked wallet. Anyone having problems getting the wallet to sync?I am stuck on block 118285 even though have plenty of connections.Debug has some stuff on it ........WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block ...........ERROR: ProcessBlock() : block with too little proof-of-stake....connection timeoutERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
Works fine for me. Try running it with -reindex and then -rescan those two should fix almost all issues. Thanks subSTRATA..I am trying to launch -rescan to find any missing transactions using cmd on windows but the command is not recognised.What is the correct prompt for xbc? Create a shortcut for bitcoinplus-qt.exe file, add -rescan to shortcut's Target field and then use shortcut to run wallet. |
|
|
|
Anyone having problems getting the wallet to sync?I am stuck on block 118285 even though have plenty of connections.Debug has some stuff on it ........WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block ...........ERROR: ProcessBlock() : block with too little proof-of-stake....connection timeoutERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
Works fine for me. Try running it with -reindex and then -rescan those two should fix almost all issues. |
|
|
|
Pool owners and users who compile from source; the latest commit allows you to block 0.9.1 nodes which should clean up the network somewhat. I'll be testing this approach this evening and if it works I'll release a new binary tomorrow.
All nodes except 0.9.2.1 should be filtered out, there are actualy still many of them using 0.9.0 and 0.8.9 versions. There are zero good reasons to tolerate nodes which use old ruleset, just let them stay on their own blockchains isolated from healthy network. Also, syncing to only healthy nodes goes much faster if our nodes wasted minimum time on those outdated nodes. For a perfect outcome, peers.dat file should be filtered as well so IPs of outdated nodes are not sent to other healthy nodes. |
|
|
|
100,000+ nodes will do quite a lot of InstantDEX, Teleport, Privatebet, Tradebots, etc.
Went through .pdf file and some other places, starting post here and then noticed the number above. Out of all craps by now from jl777 mouths that one is the biggest one. jl777 is a pirate40 (nefario) in the making, watch out. Hey, I know your FUD from some months ago, I see you're still on that path of darkness  Given that majority of people are just like you - on a path of light - and the state of The World today, that is a compliment, thanks. Number of nodes on majority of cryptocoin networks is few hundreds at best (Bitcoin is at 8,000 reachable nodes) yet SuperNET will reach 100,000+ nodes, complete bullshit but that does not really matter to you - just like none of other craps by jl777 and his buddies, it is all fine (until you finaly realise what the fuck have you participated in and done)! |
|
|
|
|
Just 3 connections possibly all to wrong nodes. For mining, it is the best to wait until you have at least 8 connections and wallet is fully synced (current block height is 525,089).
|
|
|
|
Current maxcoin source has fatal error, can be fork anytime like what darkcoin suffered few months ago. There's no test time. It's disaster. Fix it now.
To Dev. Don't debug now. Just revert. This is what Darkcoin team had done on blockchain forking. checkpoint resync is not a easy problem to debug.
If the dev is going to have to rollback anyway why are people wasting resources mining it right now? And blocks are being found much faster than what was stated. Something is definitely not right with block rate (quick analysis shows it is around 2 or 3 blocks per minute - it should be around 1) or difficulty calculation is wrong somewhere. |
|
|
|
OK, to sum up and react to what I read: - Fixing the misleading OP: replace "40%+" with "up to 40%" (even though technically it is up to around 41.25%).
- Emergency hard fork broke the interest rate. To have it back, a second hard fork is necessary - but not sure the problem we had before won't come back. Extensive testing on a testnet is required. Who steps in? Read the comprehensive (quotes included)
Interest rate went "broke" because too many matured coins started staking at around the same time which caused PoS difficulty to rise in order to compensate for a flood of new blocks and that caused PoS reward to decrease. Nothing to fix there. If you want more PoS reward do not stake your matured coins while PoS difficulty is high, as simple as that. |
|
|
|
You guys gave 2,500+ BTC to someone who refuses to idenficate themselves to a third-party? Jesus, this community never learns... Sorry to say... before I can invest I need to make sure this isn't a scam. And there is a big red sign on this. Bytheway the "this goes up X and X per minute" is another one. "Hurry up, don't miss the train!" Ugh. I get a feeling market gonna lose more BTC after this  jl777 has been in the NXT community since very early on, and is a key contributor to the MGW(Multigateway) and other various projects. I've been here since the early beginning of NXT (December 2013 under Wakasaki808 before account was stolen) and have witnessed this firsthand. The guy is not a nobody to anyone in the NXT community. jl777 and his buddies are very capable scammers, that is true. |
|
|
|
Further, one of our ICO requirements is identity verification ( https://www.poloniex.com/icoRequirements); this requirement exists to protect investors and to lend credibility to the ICO. Despite several attempts to convince James the importance of revealing his identity, we were ultimately unable to reach an agreement that satisfied both parties. Member of or at least in some way connected to Russian (crypto) mafia, that should be obvious by now. And now you gave them money to own 10% of BBR and few other coins, such a great idea! What could possibly go wrong? |
|
|
|
There have been more than a few folks with Hero reps suddenly showing up to proclaim what nonsense the supernet is, how hastily it has been conceived, etc. The following is directed at them:
If you do not understand the interrelationship between teleporting & the exponential increase in mathematical anon that is achieved by being able to move payments through one or more entirely different blockchains - then you do not understand one of the key ideas underlying the supernetwork.
If you do not understand that there will be a clear network advantage to coins joining the network, you have - again - not researched the concept sufficiently.
If you do not understand the corresponding increase in valuation of said coins, and how this ico is designed to reap the benefits of it, then again, you have not done you research.
Coming in here with potty mouth sentences full of "shit shit shit" makes your Hero reps a joke.
If you have criticisms, articulate them about the underpinnings of the supernetwork - instead of engaging in shotgun character assasination of jl777 . Be intelligent. Live up to your post count.
Jmho
You're the one who doesn't understand shit about this scheme bro... You only fool yourself by thinking ... "heh, look at me, I'm smart, I understand things...I jumped into a panic buy because I don't freaking want to be left aside..." This is the sheep inside you talking... So cut the crap... There is not real tech or useful thing behind the scheme...just some group buying their own scheme to create panic BUYS... "we MUST own 10% from every coin who join us, so help us do so by giving us your money so we can buy 10% from every coin...." One individual owning 10% means freaking disaster for that coin you don't need 10% you greedy monkey, you need max 1% from each "great" market... Well said. |
|
|
|
Yes subSTRATA. Everyone here is very stupid. The creator and those (including me) investing a few bucks over here.
Creator is a very smart guy (one gotta know the job very well to pack craps into seemingly valuable deal and also promote it as such), it is most of you others who are stupid. If you really want to try and prove a point about something, then providing more information beyond "it's shit and you are stupid for investing in it" is required. Your argument is that of a child who can't formulate an actual argument, so they resort to insults instead. I'd honestly be interested in some sort of actual, rational debate as to why this whole thing is a bad idea other than "it's a crap asset of bundled crap", because that does not actually make any sense to me. You first must know what exactly you have bought into. http://www.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/5/6/38564127/supernet.pdfThere is nothing rational in the crypto world. What should make sense doesn't, what should fail succeeds, what should succeed fails. One has to just toss logic to the wind and go with your gut.
That is true only if you look at the things (very) short term. |
|
|
|
Yes subSTRATA. Everyone here is very stupid. The creator and those (including me) investing a few bucks over here.
Creator is a very smart guy (one gotta know the job very well to pack craps into seemingly valuable deal and also promote it as such), it is most of you others who are stupid. |
|
|
|
Hmm, I wonder if buying at 127 on the AE was a dumb idea. How low will this thing go?
Depends. If NXT goes to da moon buying in a couple of days would be wiser. If it stays or falls buying now is better. But doesn't SuperNET contain NXT within it? If NXT rises wouldn't the value of the SuperNET basket of currencies also rise? Hahahaha you guys haven't even informed yourself about what you are buying but you burned 2,000+ BTC into it, hillarious! Really thanks, I needed a good laugh.  TBH the whole thing is pretty convoluted which is why I only bought 100 TOKEN. I read everything there is to read but still found it to be rather confusing. The SuperNET itself sounds like a good idea which is why I bought some. Not saying I regret my decision. I think everything could be made a bit more clear though, really. The truth is you people gave 2,000+ BTC to guy who invented yet another stupid shit asset value of which is related to other stupid shit assets and some other stupid shits. |
|
|
|
Hmm, I wonder if buying at 127 on the AE was a dumb idea. How low will this thing go?
Depends. If NXT goes to da moon buying in a couple of days would be wiser. If it stays or falls buying now is better. But doesn't SuperNET contain NXT within it? If NXT rises wouldn't the value of the SuperNET basket of currencies also rise? Hahahaha you guys haven't even informed yourself about what you are buying but you burned 2,000+ BTC into it, hillarious! Really thanks, I needed a good laugh. |
|
|
|
Actually checkpoint is not needed for hardfork. Hardfork don't need to be holding 51% major hash.
Not even major hashrate is needed for successful hardfork - what new nodes must do is ignore any node which does not comply to the new ruleset, it is as easy as that. Even some coins laughed at by most people did it right (see Flappycoin, if node is not at least v3.1 it will end up ignored immidiately, you will never ever see it connect even for a split second) but instead of just using what worked - which is what they did in the first place by cloning Bitcoin - so called developers opted for some untested techniques and stuff that realy make no sense. Unfortunately the wallet version was not updated with the client so we cannot do this until the majority of users has updated to the most recent fix. Once this happens we will ban previous versions. Instructions for updating to the most recent version can be found at http://maxcoinnews.net/maxcoin-0-9-2-1-release/Well coins don't determine to disconnect by the version information since it will behave abnormally when connected to malicious peer. Validating block's reward amount and block hash is already implemented to check peer to peer and it disconnects automatically from the hardfork. Client version doesn't do anything. You can implement to force disconnect from reading the version info but don't need to do that. It's implemented already on all altcoins. If node reports old version ignore it else connect to it (or accept connection) and proceed with additional checks (block hash and so on). That is the way only few altcoins work. |
|
|
|
100,000+ nodes will do quite a lot of InstantDEX, Teleport, Privatebet, Tradebots, etc.
Went through .pdf file and some other places, starting post here and then noticed the number above. Out of all craps by now from jl777 mouths that one is the biggest one. jl777 is a pirate40 (nefario) in the making, watch out. Hey, idiots! Are you looking at anything except price? Do you have any clue what exactly are you buying? Why are you investing money into crap created by a guy who lies to extremes (see red bolded number above)? Stop it!Did someone say 'bring out the gimp?', back in your box subSTRATA, you don't see what's going on, but many other do! As in majority of cases, it is exactly the opposite. |
|
|
|
100,000+ nodes will do quite a lot of InstantDEX, Teleport, Privatebet, Tradebots, etc.
Went through .pdf file and some other places, starting post here and then noticed the number above. Out of all craps by now from jl777 mouths that one is the biggest one. jl777 is a pirate40 (nefario) in the making, watch out. Hey, idiots! Are you looking at anything except price? Do you have any clue what exactly are you buying? Why are you investing money into crap created by a guy who lies to extremes (see red bolded number above)? Stop it! |
|
|
|
Actually checkpoint is not needed for hardfork. Hardfork don't need to be holding 51% major hash.
Not even major hashrate is needed for successful hardfork - what new nodes must do is ignore any node which does not comply to the new ruleset, it is as easy as that. Even some coins laughed at by most people did it right (see Flappycoin, if node is not at least v3.1 it will end up ignored immidiately, you will never ever see it connect even for a split second) but instead of just using what worked - which is what they did in the first place by cloning Bitcoin - so called developers opted for some untested techniques and stuff that realy make no sense. |
|
|
|
100,000+ nodes will do quite a lot of InstantDEX, Teleport, Privatebet, Tradebots, etc.
Went through .pdf file and some other places, starting post here and then noticed the number above. Out of all craps by now from jl777 mouths that one is the biggest one. jl777 is a pirate40 (nefario) in the making, watch out. |
|
|
|
|
1GH might be running 0.9.2 but if it is so then 0.9.2 is completely fucked up on multiple levels:
1. Nodes 0.9.1 successfully sync to 1GH block height (blockchain) - dozens of 0.9.1 nodes connected to my 0.9.2 node report the same height as 1GH and blockchain explorer.
2. Rate of block generation is few blocks (up to 5) per minute instead of 1 per minute on average.
3. Difficulty is not reacting fast enough or is just wrong somewhere.
There should be a complete rollback to pre-hardfork point. No blockchain is correct right now and developers should not respect anyone's work done on a wrong data. If they do it
that would mean this whole mess was (yet another) deliberate scam.
New MAX logo sucks balls, please continue using original one.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
