It's good to be high on the rich list. Gives you goals to shoot for in your accumulation!

@Z get into the seventies, buy moar! 

@sirsmokes As always, good points. I did not realise that it was a voting scheme, which could be manipulated / require significant effort. I simply thought we paid a token to get listed. Thought, another exchange? Why not?

I, too, am very pleased with the MM. I think that not only does it help protect from the 51% attack, but that it adds sophistication and credibility to $UNO with such a high hash rate.

Some people always ask why has $UNO not taken off yet. I always remind them that it is not a PND scheme, but a paced endeavour - like running a marathon.  There are forces in the world right now such as NIRP and outright calls for bans on cash that will cause the broader market to seek out alternatives to the fiat world.  It's obvious that the NIRP is designed to steal more wealth from the people and outlawing cash will not allow individuals to be outside the system...

Presented without comment is an interesting article about those matters:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-25/goodbye-100-bill-ex-central-banker-demands-all-high-denomination-banknotes-should-be

I would like to be on more of the "high-powered" exchanges as well.  However, I believe that more exposure is better. This seems like a cheap price.

I'm starting a pledge list of donors for this 30 $UNO project:

-BitcoinCharlie 5$UNO

Assuming we move forward, Nat, since you've already been in contact with this group, will you head up getting them paid so that we get listed?

Looks like someone drained a little more from the mega wallet. It changed addresses again! 

Not again, always. Bittrex posts this message often. If you look at the photo above, it is evident why the volume is low. No one wants to buy high and no one wants to sell low.

The volume yesterday was > 3.5 BTC, so $UNO is still safe...

They always leave the warning up even though the burden has been met.

Aggressive market or not, a fee structure change of that magnitude without notice = #amateurhour

Nor am I, would simply like to see the giant wallet destroyed so that if there is a bankruptcy / hack, we are not again victim to a flood of stolen coins foisted onto a market...

Storing at any exchange is simply unsafe and unadvisable...

EDIT: BTW, there seems to be a lot of action on the big wallet today. Reviewing the block explorer, the beast changed addresses at block 664842 and then again at block 664869. Got 'em on the run!  

Also, hash is down to around 650k, did somebody big go offline?

Does Cryptsy have anyone in charge of PR or Marketing?

I mean really, what a sham! No notice whatsoever certainly should give pause to anyone with balances over there. Similar to a brokerage house that would entirely change its fee structure without any notice.

Vote with your feet and DRAIN THAT WALLET!

Welcome Hashmaster1!

And you have found the future of storing value / savings is Unobtanium!

Are you trying to buy with BTC or fiat?

I'm guessing that fiat will always require identity papers.

Welcome wence!

There are many places to buy, you can check them out all out on the opening page. However, Bittrex, Bleutrade and Cryptopia are some of my favorites.

Blazr2 has been very active as of late. Simply under his new moniker HagbardCeline

Welcome Coryvmcs1!

We hope that you add some $UNO to your portfolio!

Welcome Starblocks!

Step 1: Buy at Cryptsy

Step 2: Withdraw from Cryptsy

Step 3: Repeat regularly

Destroy the megawallet!

I will be glad to participate with the community for the marketing push...

I was wondering the same thing. What's not to like? Huge hash, protection from attacks, more street cred, etc...

 

@siameze As always, thanks for the detailed information. I had no idea about the security issue.  Seems to me that the .conf issue is a non-issue then if it's that easy. The community has proved that it is certainly more than willing to assist any newcomer with issue resolution.

@FK Excellent analysis! Keep backing the truck up to collect the dumps!

@siameze For the minority of people having this .conf issue, is there anyway to create an .exe install file that contains only the .conf file; for placing it where it needs to be?