Do not be afraid to lose money trying to find your own method as well, that is the most important thing. I mean there are tons of people who end up making their own strategy and that means we are talking about people who lost tons of money until they found the best strategy, it is not really that easy to get it done that way and you have to handle that a bit better before you do anything crazy.

I personally believe that you could use demo and all that to find the most optimum for you, but you need to do real trading to make sure. The reason why everyone needs their own is the fact that we are all different and we all have different styles, one thing that works for me may not work for you.

I would guess that pre-sale is still considered ICO in some sort of way. Doesn't mean that it would be considered ICO just because it is named that way is a very old school approach and we should be approaching every pre-sale type of situation like ICO, and there are tons of them out there.

I believe that we are getting a lot, we have 17k+ projects just on CMC and I have seen plenty of projects that have been out of CMC and not get listed, which means there must be something like 30k+ at the very least projects. That must be like at least 5k+ projects every year, and that means we are talking about 10+ project every single day, and most of them have pre-sale.

Assuming at least 10 per day, that is seriously insanely good and I would be very proud to say that I do not lose money on most of them because I avoid investing into rug pulls but it shows you how much we need to be careful.

USA could be a question mark, but Europe is very very important. Why? Because they are getting a decent amount of gas from Russia and Russia needs to sell some of that gas to Europe to make money. They could keep selling it to others but suddenly zero to Europe would mean a lot of money lost as well. Plus, Russians buy a lot of stuff from Europe, but Europe also gets a lot of "cheap" stuff from Russia as well, that would be a problem.

On top of that there are tons of super wealthy Russians that made their money illegally, and then used that money in other European nations and even in the USA, so freezing those assets would be horrible for them as well since those super wealthy criminals are the ones that pay for these big politicians. All in all when you combine the USA and Europe, you end up with getting something huge in number and that matters a lot for Russian big names.

How do you not see it relevant? I mean we are talking about a big war coming up, or maybe it is already over since Russia already took whatever they wanted and nobody is doing anything about it. I can imagine why Ukraine is not doing anything because A) It was mainly Russians living there and it wasn't really fully connected anyway and B) Ukraine can't match Russia in anything military related.

So all in all, Ukraine just got scared and didn't see it worth it. Other nations? Well other nations didn't care about Ukraine enough to intervene and just "stern warning" and "sanctions" and that's it. However, it is still a war and the markets got ready for it, so I wouldn't say totally irrelevant.

Oh, there will be for sure. I mean we are talking about something that would replace the USDT and USDC and BUSD of the world. We are talking about something that is both digital dollar but also being able to exchange with the crypto at the same time. If places like Coinbase and Binance and all of that end up accepting the level of it then we are going to end up with something a lot better in the long run compared to USDT type of stuff.

I would definitely prefer that for sure, why? Because if we end up with something like Tether company stealing all of our money, how could we even stop them? We can't and that is why I prefer governments to do it. This is stablecoin anyway, not the real cryptocurrency, so I would be fine with it.

There are tons of people who keep forgetting this fact. Bitcoin is decentralized, maybe the last project that is left that we could be considering truly decentralized as well. Sure there are some changes with segwit and all that, it is not the legacy blockchain that all things started with, but it is not really that bad and can be considered decentralized. ETH has vitalik, LTC has charlie, USDT has tether/bitfinex, Tron has Justin, SOL has team that freezes the blockchain, ADA has team that fails to deliver smart contract, I can go on forever, ALL projects have a team at the top and the moment they leave, the project becomes horrible.

Bitcoin is not like that, leave it be like this forever without touching anything and it will survive no matter what. This is why it is 100% succeeding at what it wants to do and have not failed at it at all.

That is one of the biggest things that people end up doing and that causes a lot of people to lose out. Back in the day that made a bit of sense if it was like a big big big increase. Like you opened a long when it was 10k and it became 20k+ and then you are still holding then it makes sense but right now?

It doesn't make sense since we are not in a huge bull run that makes it go up like that. At the end of the day, we are talking about something that is a bit more common and you should take your profit and run away with it. Just do it like most people do, have 1k in that turned into 10k?

Just take out 5k and then with the other 5k do it again, keep doing that if you keep winning, and if you lose then go back to 1k each, that means 9 more tries until you run out of money and go back to your initial 1k investment. How hard that could be?

I am sure that Auby will be feeling a lot better about himself after scoring three goals in a single game. I do not know how Xavi knew that he would be a perfect striker for his team because dude was doing nothing in Arsenal before he came here and he was seen as a player that didn't get too many minutes and they literally got him for free. Don't get me wrong Auby of a few years back would be able to get himself to any club and would worth a lot, he was a 75+ million pounds worth player only like 3-4 seasons ago, so we know he is a good player.

However, he was seen as washed and old and bad already but dude is 32 years old only and Barcelona really capitalized the situation very well.

Personally, I think that the first thing that you will have to do is to look for a reliable platform where ICOs are being listed, and when you have gotten a good platform where the best airdrops are more likely to be listed, you can then get started from there, but that doesn’t mean that you are safe, you still have to be very selective.

The good thing about getting the right platform is that you will be getting the best and as well most of the ICOs you will find would be legit. After that you have to start properly going through any ICO you see, making sure that every thing about it is good before you sign up for it.

I basically did this way back in the day. I was a content writer in my own language for a company as a junior marketing analyst, I should have been titled content writer but they just gave me an analyst title while making me write. Sadly enough, I am not great at my native language and kept making silly grammar mistakes.

During that period I met with my current boss who was in crypto and he was looking for a content writer, looked like not a greatly difficult job, and offered me 2 times more than what I was making if I worked really hard. I couldn't reach that level because I couldn't write that much content, but instead of wearing a suit and going to work 1.5 hours going and 1.5 hours coming back, I stayed at home with my pyjamas and made enough money. Ever since that day, I have been full time crypto marketing person and loving every single day of it.

That depends a bit on the transfers they are aiming at, isn't it? We are forgetting but this was the club that made some fake deals to get themselves to financial fair play and that means they didn't just fake it, the owners literally lost money on those deals from their own pockets (or networks pockets basically) to make themselves look richer (the club) and that means they would be willing to do everything they can to get the biggest names.

City is doing awesome right now but believe me, they could do a lot better. They have so much money that, they could offer 200 million dollars to Mbappe, not that he would leave, he is going to Madrid if you ask me, but at the end of the day they have that kind of money and that matters a lot. If they get a star like that, then Sterling could be gone.

This was something I talked with my friend, I mean yes there is less defence but he made some shots that were insane. First of all he was defended whenever he was around the three point line, not like he wasn't defended, and the ones that he didn't get too much defence were like a foot in the half court line, he shot from 40 feet multiple times. I just wish he scored that half court shot as well because that would be stupidly great.

Defence or no defence, that 16 made threes is something that is insane, hell even 27 threes taken is something that is unheard of, that alone is great and shows confidence. It was obvious that Curry would be out there dominating if you give him that flying zone availability.

It is still a loss but not as big as you assume it is. I do not know the numbers and there is not an exact number for some of them but they did made some profit thanks to him as well. First of all you have to consider the jersey sales, Mbappe jerseys got sold this year, and that means they made some profit from having him this year, because those jersey sales are expensive and does bring in some money for the team.

Secondly they are going to end up being first in the league and win a lot of games and we can't exactly say how much of that was thanks to Mbappe, maybe all, maybe none, maybe somewhere in between and that means they made some profit from that.

We had fans going to stadium to watch him as well and we do not know that neither, they played in French cup and that is some extra as well and we do not know how many he won, and they are in UCL and who knows maybe win it? Maybe they won't but he helped there as well. So, we know that it wasn't zero, which makes it less than 200+ million lost.

Roma getting a tie should be a danger bells ringing for Mourinho type of deal. I am not goign to hide or say anything but the reality is that I dislike Mourinho to begin with so I am a bit biased about this topic but I still believe that if you took Roma that was 7th and ended up as a team who is 7th again and getting a draw against Verona on a game this important than you should probably not be managing Roma and managing a much smaller team.

He is a great coach if you give him the exact roster type he wants. He doesn't even need super quality players, he just need players who are good enough on the roles he will give them, but if you give him players who are MUCH better but do not play the way he wants, then he is going to end up losing more games and that's his problem. Like a player who is 70/100 but amazing at "that" role, would play better for Mourinho than a player who is 90/100 but plays differently and not many teams could get those transfers.

I know that the price will be 68k+ one day, I am not guessing, I know it will be from the bottom of my heart and if it doesn't then I would be super shocked. It means that buying at these prices and waiting however long I have to wait is a fine deal and it is not a big problem for me at all. Doesn't mean that I will get super rich right away, but I know that at the very least I will be able to profit from this a bit when I wait long enough.

To know that you will profit, if you wait, is good enough for me and I feel like anything that doesn't have a loss risk is a great deal and I do not feel like there could be a loss as long as you can wait long enough. Maybe I am wrong but I like to believe that I am right.

That's the thing about current Juventus, they are playing like they are not a big team and playing like a mid level team. A mid level team would get ahead and then try to stay back and not get scored, a big team ends up trying to score even more. You do not see City players go back on defense and try to keep a 1-0 score that way, you see them trying to score the second, even the third goal and never really back down.

You do not see this even from Inter or Milan from this league neither. So, it is really not a cool move by Juventus to give up that easily and try to keep the score at 1-0 for the remainder of the game. Shows a lack of confidence in the team and in the manager as well, if manager didn't give that order the players wouldn't have done that. Dybala is a greatly important player but by the looks of it him playing doesn't really change much for Juventus any more. Not because he is not great, but because they do not even utilize him enough.

That champions league ticket will be one of the most expensive ones as well. It required teams to make some decisions, and based on those decisions some transfers as well. I feel like we are going to see one of them at the fourth spot and then the rest of them will have some changes for sure, anyone of those four that did not became fourth will end up getting either the manager fired, or a big amount of changes in the roster as well.

This is EPL and if you are close enough then there must be a problem that made you lose out on that position and that's how people think at all times. Being 11th is ok, but being 5th means you could have been 4th and something was wrong.

That is sort of true. I mean it was definitely de facto legal, but in a world of governmental laws de facto legal means nothing for most big business', you can't just say "well let's start an exchange here and spend 10+ million dollars on it because it is de facto legal" and that would mean that you would spend money on a thing that is not illegal, but not really legal neither.

This is why it was de facto legal as in it wasn't a big deal for the regular citizen, but go ahead and try to make a business that earns a million dollars a month from crypto profits, that would have been hard to explain. So I could say it was "de facto legal to small investors" and wasn't great for big whales. Now it is great for everyone and that is the difference from what was and what is right now.

Sixers versus Nets finals, Suns vs Warriors finals, and then whoever out of the two of those four teams end up winning they go to NBA finals and face each other. That would be the ideal scenario for me. Suns vs Warriors because they are the two best teams from the west, but from the east I rather see nets vs Sixers (which is unlikely by the looks of it) because I think it would be a lot more fun to watch all the drama.

I know it is not going to be the best, I know people are expecting something like Bulls vs Heat because those are at the top but there is no drama there, it would be boring game that doesn't have any narrative to talk about in that case at all.

Nobody expected them to be that great, they could have been something lower but at the same time I was expecting them to be at least good. There is a huge difference between "not going to win the league" to "they are going to be 10th in the league". I would have expected them to be second with a big point difference, like PSG is 13 points head of Marseille, and put Lille there instead of Marseille and you would have what I expected, or even be third or fourth and that would still be fine.

However, they ended up with basically 10th place for now and that is showing us that they are not good at all. Winning the league is a big stretch but being better than 10th would have been what is expected from them.