If it's not yet implemented then we cannot say for sure.
There are those who are still using cash for their privacy while when they start changing that to CBDCs you will be known wherever you pay. Even just for a pack of cigarette or just a candy bar. They can trace who did the payment and where it was done.
It will be long before this could become a norm to society. The availability for merchants to accept it just like cryptocurrencies should also be worked out.
And, I doubt it will be a peaceful walk because if the high number of people that are against it.

Bitcoin finally stays at 24k today , this is the first increase in this level for several months now and maybe in the next coming hours Bitcoin will cross that 26-26k and i voted for YES.
It has been long that price stays lowering and just this August that we can see light again.
I am longing for at least 30k this August before the BER months starts the wave.
and finally in December at least 50k will be best for me and all of us.

Diversification is not really a strategy to increase profits, diversifying your assets is done as a way to protect yourself form losing too much money in the case one of your assets went down hard.

If your goal is to make money then you need to do the opposite, which is to concentrate your capital in just a few assets and in that way increase your profits when those assets go up in value, however as you may guess this strategy entails a bigger risk and it is not appropriate for everyone.

Good resources above. However, when it comes to anything regarding legal advice, I'd recommend either speaking to a professional or going directly to your governments website which will document that legalities of cryptocurrencies in your country. Simply because there's a varying level of laws depending on the country you're from. Obviously, being in the US simplifies that a little bit as they have extensive coverage of cryptocurrencies, but also because they dominate the news, so almost every search you do on Google will apply to you.

However, still states also differ I believe, and you should probably consider taking a look at your state government website also.

If you're concerned about looking at the chart everytime then you can go for dual monitor setup, no need to buy expensive monitor you can even use a cheap 18 inch monitor or use your TV as monitor with VGA or HDMI port so you will have no difficulties.

Binance can be trusted, but it’s not good to hold your majority assets in other exchanges.
Coming back to the OP, it’s really great to know that you have took the basics more seriously and hence earned a great profits by carefully trading the coins.
I don’t prefer trading frequently by changing the alts, as these increases the risk of getting more losses. But yes with great risks comes great profits, so if you can handle the risks then yes you are on a right path.

but for governments who are not pro with bitcoin, this will be a threat. The adoption of bitcoin will change all the systems they regulate and control completely. With the adoption of bitcoin they (the government) cannot exercise full control, this is the reason some governments are reluctant to adopt and only provide standard regulation for bitcoin.

The adoption of bitcoin will indeed have a positive impact, namely increasing the interest of crypto investors, but behind it will be a lot of work.
Currently bitcoin is only used as a commodity tool and is still side by side with Fiat.

only the country of el-salvador is able to fully adopt bitcoin and even continue to develop it to the point of wanting to build a Bitcoin City.

Despite the volatility in the bitcoin market now, bitcoin is a good hedge against inflation, and now most of the traditional investments are broken, and people want to build wealth by owning something of value.

Now that price has tested $25K (ish) a few times already, I think it's due to break if tested again. Especially when price is forming higher lows and horizontal resistance, even if it's far from a guarantee. I guess the trend-line you are referring to is from the two previous lower highs, which currently puts it at $22.5K, though personally I think there is immediate support below this around $22K so I wouldn't consider it fatal if broken, as also only two points of contact for that trend-line so not convinced it's confirmed as support anyway. The fact that price continues to find support from $23K and the 200 WMA is a positive sign though.

Yesterday the price was looking a bit unreliable, but already today it's back above the 20 Day MA and looks comfortable consolidating between $23K and $23.5K which is good to see.

I don't really agree here with your statements that charts don't lie. If you follow crypto analysts or just financial analysts in general at social media then you will have everyday a new trend analysis in your feed which tells you that, "a breakup will happen in the next days" or "if the resistance at xx $ holds then it will only go up from that point on" or other statements. Sometimes those predictions become true but i would say that in most of the cases they turn out to be incorrect.
The problem with chart analysis is, that it has the requirement that in the future things are developing the same way like in the past and that is just not true in the real world in many cases.

Web 3.0 will be my guess, even though we are not going to achieve the complete decentralized internet still it will plays the role and I feel metaverse still needs more time so among the listed 3.0 can be the one.

But I don't think this is not really going to help or push the cryptocurrency market towards the bullish trend, again bitcoin will outperform all these shit coins at the end of the hype.

Why even bother to post, what do you think you're sharing with the Bitcoin community that we don't already know? Maybe such "wisdom" might be reserved for the newbie section but you can already find dozens of similar recitations over the last few pages of threads in here. Maybe if you gave a few examples of recently failed crypto exchanges then it might emphasize the fact to people but frankly the average user of Bitcoin just wants simplicity and a reasonable level of security. Not everyone is technically literate and if we want Bitcoin to have the widest adoption possible we need to embrace the fact that many people want an easy to access online service similar to existing platforms like Paypal.

It is already a supplier as far as I know, the problem with US oil is that is not going to be as cheap as other sources that are more readily available and can be extracted at a cheaper cost. The fracking process requires continuous CAPEX investments that are much larger than those required for conventional oil. Despite the major "easy" fields have been used up, there is still much better quality and price outside US.

America and any country are always threatened with inflation and recession, Fiat who has no basis or guarantee becomes a problem when the central bank cannot control its value, and this is what makes many experts find the best solution, namely with a decentralized system that locks stock so that inflation can be eliminated .

I think the supply of bitcoins on the exchanges now exceeds 21,000,000, especially when you consider the number of different surrogates in the form of wrapped bitcoins in other blockchains. It is the same situation with gold, which is very much only on paper, but absent in reality. When the bankers get involved, the situation is the same with any asset.

Rushing things up is never a good idea especially when we consider the nature of cryptocurrencies, a single mistake can be more than enough for hackers to take advantage of the situation and steal millions of dollars, and we have examples of this almost every week, so without a doubt it is better for the developers of new coins to take their time when developing their coins and even more importantly to not impose themselves milestones they will not be able to achieve, because when they fail to follow their roadmap and fall behind it their investors will begin to lose confidence in them.

When something happen all of a sudden which the market could be affected by the geopolitics conflict or FED announcement, they wouldn't also be ready since what they use in trading is basically just the trailing stop. Its not so bad though, ofc everyone wants to make money.

Trailing stops limits your profit actually compare to just waiting for the right time to sell when you see the market is is already in the ATH.  But then anyway, its up to them.

Blockchain fraud is a very known issue for Blockchain applications like hacks, fraud and even criminal Darknet activities.
I want to ask for solutions how it  can be solved to catch more Blockchain fraudsters and prevent fraud.
People will be hacked less when we can catch more Blockchain fraudsters.

Yeah, funny, isn't it? All these corporate types suits and ties, beating their chest about how they're paving the way for the future of money, decentralised finance, freedom and crypto, et cetera, when all they're really doing is adding new products to their old way of doing things. Under-collateralised gambles and networked guarantees, just piling on the dominoes atop the same old house of cards.

But as pointed out also, not everyone is guilty of bad risk management, it seems to be the newcomers (relative to being in business for decades) making those mistakes.